 |
Bible-Discussion.com Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby |
|
|
| Which law were those whom Jesus was speaking to NOT keeping? |
| The ceremonial laws only |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| The moral laws only |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| The civil laws only |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| The civil and ceremonial laws, but they kept the moral laws |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| The 10 commandments. They weren't keeping the Big 10! They probably did keep the ceremonial & civil laws though |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Zathrus King Kong

Joined: 28 Aug 2002 Posts: 2270 Location: WI USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:21 am Post subject: Which law were the Jews not keeping in John 7? |
|
|
I read something that caught my interest a couple of days ago.
From John 7: | Quote: | 11Then the Jews sought him at the feast, and said, Where is he?
12And there was much murmuring among the people concerning him: for some said, He is a good man: others said, Nay; but he deceiveth the people.
13Howbeit no man spake openly of him for fear of the Jews.
14Now about the midst of the feast Jesus went up into the temple, and taught.
15And the Jews marvelled, saying, How knoweth this man letters, having never learned?
16Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.
17If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.
18He that speaketh of himself seeketh his own glory: but he that seeketh his glory that sent him, the same is true, and no unrighteousness is in him.
19Did not Moses give you the law, and yet none of you keepeth the law? Why go ye about to kill me?
| Sorry about all the choices in the poll. I've heard the law divided up so many ways it's silly. And sorry for not including a choice for all of them, but since we know to break one is to break them all, everyone would have to choose that one, and we'd have no idea which specific ones anyone thought those Jesus was talking to were not keeping. _________________ Establishing the law by receiving the righteousness which is by faith, without the deeds of the law!
2 Cor 3 "11For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious."
Certified Chalcedon Compliant
Officially approved in 451 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lone-traveler Emperor of the Universe

Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 6365 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mat 23:23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier [matters] of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
They were paying their tithes, they were keeping the sacrifices, they were teaching the "works" of the law. But what they left out was the Spirit of the Law. The good judgment, the mercy, and faith in God that He would save them and not themselves.
They took the role of authority and lorded over the people with ceremony and pomp and unmercifulness.
Looking at the scene with the woman caught in adultery, they are supposed to listen to both sides, have two or more witnesses and the man who is caught is to be stoned also.
They didn't even bother going to court. They were just going to sentence her to death without even hearing the case.
They left of humanity to just be able to kill. (murder), however you put it.
Lev 19:15 Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: [but] in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.
Deu 1:16 And I charged your judges at that time, saying, Hear [the causes] between your brethren, and judge righteously between [every] man and his brother, and the stranger [that is] with him.
Deu 16:18 Judges and officers shalt thou make thee in all thy gates, which the LORD thy God giveth thee, throughout thy tribes: and they shall judge the people with just judgment.
They didn't Hear the causes, they just condemned.
Question is...where is the man?
Jhn 8:3 And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,
Jhn 8:4 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
Jhn 8:5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
Lev 20:10 And the man that committeth adultery with [another] man's wife, [even he] that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.
Jhn 8:7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Jhn 8:9 And they which heard [it], being convicted by [their own] conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, [even] unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.
It would be interesting to learn what Jesus had written on the ground...
If their own conscience bothered them, and they hoped for mercy and forgiveness of their sins, shouldn't they have been willing to at least
1.Listen to the case
and
2. Abide by the whole law and not just the part they wanted to hear.
Eye for Eye, tooth for tooth....you want mercy...show mercy, you want forgiveness..give forgiveness....
This they ommitted and left off the weightier matters of the law.
Judgment, Mercy, and Faith.
| Quote: | | Sorry about all the choices in the poll. I've heard the law divided up so many ways it's silly. And sorry for not including a choice for all of them, but since we know to break one is to break them all, everyone would have to choose that one, and we'd have no idea which specific ones anyone thought those Jesus was talking to were not keeping. |
so apparently, they weren't really keeping any of the laws, because none of them were being kept with faith or mercy or judgment.
They ommitted the Spirit of the Law. Jesus came to fulfill the law by putting the spirit back in it....
God Bless
Lone _________________ Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yehushuan King Kong

Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 2848 Location: Charismatic
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would think the answer to John 7:19 could be found in the following text, especially in verses 23 and 24.
(John 7:23) If a man on the Sabbath day receive circumcision, that the law of Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the Sabbath day? (24) Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.
I would say it was the Law of Love that Jesus accused them of not keeping, in that God gave the Law (all of them) to try and help men implement righteousness (Love). While keeping to the entire letter of the entire Law, they did not seem to fathom the underlying desire of God that we should seek the benefit of our neighbor even to the detriment of our self (true righteousness). This was lost in their obsession to achieve personal obedience - an appearance of righteousness.
But Righteousness is not achieved within one’s self. It is established only in relationship to someone else.
The Law can only look at the behaviour of the individual. What did *I* do; what should *I* do; what does God say should happen about what *I* did? (And the “warcry” of the Law? “*I* didn’t do anything wrong!”) The Law is totally wrapped up in the ego - within oneself - to check one’s behaviour in accordance with some measure, to measure oneself against this measure, to improve the individual’s ability to keep these measures, or to meet out punishment to the individual, based upon what that “ego” did or did not do.
Yet the Law of Love isn’t really a “law” at all in this sense, because it has nothing to do with oneself. The focus of Love isn’t at all on what you did or did not do (your obedience), but upon how well the other person was helped.
The Law is solely concerned with you – the individual.
Faith (the Royal Law; the Law of Love) is solely concerned with the other person.
An eye for an eye was meant to discourage evil from fear of retribution to oneself. All this law did was foster revenge. The Law was meant to guide the individual. All it did was create judgment (judgmentalism).
Do unto others was meant to teach that we should be proactive in helping someone else (not ourselves).
The Law of Moses (and even the Law of God – cf. Exodus 20:5) said do this and YOU will receive a blessing. Do that and YOU will receive a curse. It is all dependent upon the self – upon YOU.
But the righteousness of God apart from the law does not focus upon the self, but upon the other (person). How can I be of help to you? What do you need? Have we actually been of benefit to you?
Obedience is an obsession with the self; measuring the self continuously to some list of objective commands. Righteousness in the Holy Ghost is an outpouring of rivers of life in concern for the well being of someone else - everyone else. That is why Jesus broke the Sabbath to heal another.
Jesus broke the Law, but did so to Love.
Yehu
PS: As my choice was not on the list, I have not submitted a vote. _________________ There must be a God; Natural Selection would have gotten rid of you a long time ago. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
soleprobe1 Fierce Puppy
Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 227 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yehushuan wrote: |
Jesus broke the Law, but did so to Love.
|
Now I know I'm not a "Christian." But never in my 28 years of belief would I have ever thought that a "Christian" could believe such a thing. For if Jesus broke the law, for any reason, He would have disqualified Himself from being the perfect atonement for our sins and we would all stand condemned.
This is an absolute horrendously false teaching. If this idea and teaching would have been presented to any of the early apostles, by someone who claimed to be among them, they would have prayed to God, without ceasing, that you would share the same fate as Ananias, who fell down at their feet and “breathed his last.” _________________ VALUE: If it can't withstand the heat of a trillion suns then it is worthless!
Threadender |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cballard Grizzly Bear
Joined: 16 Jun 2005 Posts: 731 Location: WV
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Probably with totally different reasoning, I can say that I agree with Yehushuan in that Jesus broke the law. The LAW without LOVE is meaningless. Love means the betterment of others not something self-serving. The Jews accused Him of breaking the sabath by working. He showed doing good works is always acceptable. Yehu, What other laws did He break? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
soleprobe1 Fierce Puppy
Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 227 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cballard wrote: | | ...I agree with Yehushuan in that Jesus broke the law. ...The Jews accused Him of breaking the sabath by working. Yehu, What other laws did He break? |
Well I am quite sure that you, along with Mr. Huan and the Jews could compile quite a lengthy list of laws that Jesus broke.
Then all that’s left to do after you have all put together a comprehensive list of allegations, is decide whether to have Him stoned or to petition the Romans to have Him crucified. _________________ VALUE: If it can't withstand the heat of a trillion suns then it is worthless!
Threadender
Last edited by soleprobe1 on Wed Oct 11, 2006 6:32 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lone-traveler Emperor of the Universe

Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 6365 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Yehu,
you wrote:
| Quote: | The Law is solely concerned with you – the individual.
Faith (the Royal Law; the Law of Love) is solely concerned with the other person. |
Let me show you the law....
does this sound like selfishness?
Lev 19:9 ¶ And when ye reap the harvest of your land, thou shalt not wholly reap the corners of thy field, neither shalt thou gather the gleanings of thy harvest.
Lev 19:10 And thou shalt not glean thy vineyard, neither shalt thou gather [every] grape of thy vineyard; thou shalt leave them for the poor and stranger: I [am] the LORD your God.
Lev 19:11 ¶ Ye shall not steal, neither deal falsely, neither lie one to another.
Lev 19:12 And ye shall not swear by my name falsely, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I [am] the LORD.
Lev 19:13 ¶ Thou shalt not defraud thy neighbour, neither rob [him]: the wages of him that is hired shall not abide with thee all night until the morning.
Lev 19:14 Thou shalt not curse the deaf, nor put a stumblingblock before the blind, but shalt fear thy God: I [am] the LORD.
Lev 19:15 ¶ Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: [but] in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.
Lev 19:16 Thou shalt not go up and down [as] a talebearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbour: I [am] the LORD.
Lev 19:17 ¶ Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him.
Lev 19:18 Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I [am] the LORD.
sounds kind of like what Jesus said...no?
Peace
Lone _________________ Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
soleprobe1 Fierce Puppy
Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 227 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lone-traveler wrote: |
sounds kind of like what Jesus said...no? |
AMEN Lone.
That was Jesus who said that. The Lord God of Israel and Jesus are the same God:
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. _________________ VALUE: If it can't withstand the heat of a trillion suns then it is worthless!
Threadender |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yehushuan King Kong

Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 2848 Location: Charismatic
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lone-traveler wrote: | | does this sound like selfishness? |
It is (selfish) when one's human concern is about whether one obeyed it or not; whether one will or will not receive the blessings because one obeyed it, or whether one fears to disobey it because of the curses one is to receive. Do I love my neighbor because I love my neighbor or because God told me to? Do I love my neighbor because it is in my nature to love my neighbor, or because I obey out of fear of retribution or desire for personal gain? If I obey the Law for the sake of obeying the Law, then it is selfish, no matter what objective the Law desires to achieve.
If the Holy Spirit changes and transforms your nature so that BY your nature you Love your neighbor, then that is righteousness by faith via Christ. If, instead, you Love your neighbor because of the command to do so, then you attempt to implement righteousness by Law via human willpower. Such is not of faith.
Why would God need to command me to do something which by my nature I automatically do? This is why obedience is irrelevant. If one finds that obedience is necessary, then one must realize that the transformation promised by the Holy Ghost just hasn’t taken place yet, and one’s righteousness is not by faith, but by works and Law which depend upon obedience. That is what the entire process of Law is about. What sayeth Moses of the Law? That the man who does such will live by them. It doesn’t matter what object the Law attempt to achieve, what matters is whether the Law is obeyed or not (whatever that Law may be). When understood this way, the focus of the Law is not upon it’s end objective (or else the end does justify the means?) but upon whether the individual person has or has not obeyed the letter.
A major OT theme is that God doesn’t care about the Law. The Law says to pay such and such homage with this and that sacrifice, yet the prophets declare that God isn’t interested in the sacrifice, but in the heart. Is the Love of God found in one’s heart? Or does one love to condemn others and relishes with glee that another might go to hell? What I am saying is that one who is obsessed with obedience to the Law cares whether the mint and cumin is tithed, they will scry your fields to see if the gleaning is left. But God’s heart is on how the poor are helped, that one does love his neighbor because he loves his neighbor, not because he tries to obey a law whose objective is such love.
When did I ever say that God was selfish? God’s objective is the foundation for Law, but man turns the process of Law around and is concerned not with the other person, but with how well he himself implements these laws. That is why no one can be justified by the Law. The process of Law is selfish because it can only deal with what one does or does not do. (Perhaps I should coin the word self-i-fied.) The objective of the Law, however, was to establish love between one another. Does the process of Law achieve Love? No. It only achieves the appearance of Love (John 7:24). One can boast, “Hey I love my neighbor because - *I* obeyed such and such command.” Pick whatever command you want - the gleaning *I* left in my field, the money *I* could have stolen but didn’t, the anger *I* could have left fly in my words etc. The point is that under Law one is concerned with one’s self – the *I* - what one does or does not do. Under Faith (or Love), one is Not concerned with self, but with the other person. I do things because the Love within me dies to self, but lives to Love (God is Love) in that my focus is Not upon what *I* do or do not do, but my focus is upon my neighbor and what can be done to help them benefit (love).
If one breaks (disobeys) the letter of the Law to fulfill the intent of the Law, wasn't the Law still broken? Of course it was (to all intents and purposes). And this is what it seems Mr. Probe does not understand. Jesus broke the Sabbath Law (the letter) to fulfill the higher Law of Love (the objective).
The end objective of God is Love (righteousness). It cannot be achieved by obedience to Law (any Law), but can only be achieved (established - manifest) by the tranforming power of the Holy Ghost so that we become Love. If we ARE Love then we don't need to obey anything, because Love is not found in obedience - it is found within us. We know that God is Love. Can we actually say that God "obeys" Himself?
Yehu
PS: I hope this helps explain my point. It’s the first time I’ve tried to write this in English, and I’m not completely sure all the edges are smooth. Usually I’d take a year or so to work through such an essay, and bounce the results off my grad students. Alas that opportunity is no longer present, so I’m using Zathrus as a guinea pig.  _________________ There must be a God; Natural Selection would have gotten rid of you a long time ago. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yehushuan King Kong

Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 2848 Location: Charismatic
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cballard wrote: | | Yehu, What other laws did He break? |
Your question is most insightful, Mrs. Ballard. But to be honest, I am not an Old Testament scholar to be able to present any exhaustive exegesis on this topic. But the three of which I am aware are:
(Mark 2:23) And it came to pass, that he went through the corn fields on the sabbath day; and his disciples began, as they went, to pluck the ears of corn. (24) And the Pharisees said unto him, Behold, why do they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful?
While technically it never states that Jesus Himself plucked the ears of corn, He did defend His disciples’ behaviour, saying the objective of the Sabbath Law was to benefit man, and that man was not created for Sabbath Law obedience. Today we would call Jesus an accessory. This is one example where Jesus preached that the objective of the Law was more important than obedience to the letter of the Law.
(John 8:10) When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee? (11) She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.
The Law called for her condemnation. Jesus never asked where the guy was, nor did he dispute whether “due process” was followed, and He certainly believed she did commit adultery because He charged her to sin no more. Jesus (as a Jewish male) did not obey the Law by ensuring that the woman was stoned as the Law demanded of Him.
The third example can be found here:
Douay-Rheims: (Matthew 17:24) And when they were come to Capharnaum, they that received the didrachmas, came to Peter, and said to him: Doth not your master pay the didrachma? (25) He said: Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying: What is thy opinion, Simon? The kings of the earth, of whom do they receive tribute or custom, of their own children, or of strangers?
It is my understanding that the Law required every man above twenty years to pay the sum of half a shekel as atonement for his soul, and to meet the expenses connected with the synagogue. Jesus, as a Jew, was under just as much obligation to comply with this particular law as with any other. The fact that those who collected the “temple tax” had to come after Him (via Peter) showed that Jesus had not paid. He stood against such tax, and only paid it because of Peter’s lie (and His identification with those who suffered under this Law). Even today, if you attend a synagogue you must pay these membership dues. The Churches, however, rely upon offerings, not “tribute” or “dues.”
There are probably others, but I should point out again that Jesus broke the letter of the Law inorder to fulfill the intent of the Law.
Yehu BarYahwho _________________ There must be a God; Natural Selection would have gotten rid of you a long time ago. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grace Goldfish

Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 57 Location: writing and writing and writing!!!
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jesus never broke any of Gods laws, He only broke the oral tradition. There was no way He could have been the Messiah and broken a law.
The Talmud and other writings is the oral law, but the first five books are Gods first law.
Grace _________________ British diplomat, orator and writer Edmond Burke said, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
hear hear.
view my testimoney and poetry at
http://www.lotrfanfiction.com/viewuser.php?uid=1611 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mtimber Lion King
Joined: 01 Sep 2006 Posts: 1216
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jesus broke Jewish tradition.
Do you realise you are saying Jesus was a sinner Yehushuan?
Last edited by mtimber on Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:24 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lone-traveler Emperor of the Universe

Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 6365 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hello Yehu,
Good post..
What does the law say about "doing" on the sabbath day?
Isa 56:2 Blessed [is] the man [that] doeth this, and the son of man [that] layeth hold on it; that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and keepeth his hand from doing any evil.
Isa 58:13 ¶ If thou turn away thy foot from the sabbath, [from] doing thy pleasure on my holy day; and call the sabbath a delight, the holy of the LORD, honourable; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking [thine own] words:
Isa 58:14 Then shalt thou delight thyself in the LORD; and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken [it].
Did Jesus come to do His own will or the Father's will?
Did Jesus speak His own words, or the words God told him to speak?
Did Jesus do things his own way, or the way he had seen his Father do them?
Did Jesus seek His own pleasure, or did He come to give health and hope to others?
Jesus was "doing" his father's will on the sabbath days. How then could he have broken them?
Were those with Him in the field hungry, God fed them by the gleanings left in the field.
They were rewarded, because someone had left corn in the field to begin with.
(Mark 2:23) And it came to pass, that he went through the corn fields on the sabbath day; and his disciples began, as they went, to pluck the ears of corn. (24) And the Pharisees said unto him, Behold, why do they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful?
They didn't HEAR the law....They wanted to do their own thing...
| Quote: | | (John 8:10) When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee? (11) She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more. |
Lev 19:17 Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him.
Also the law required both the man and the woman to be stoned. Where's the man?
Lev 20:10 And the man that committeth adultery with [another] man's wife, [even he] that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.
They were being partial...
So if they let one go free, they aught to have let them both go free. If they were going to condemn one, they aught to have condemned both.
Douay-Rheims: (Matthew 17:24) And when they were come to Capharnaum, they that received the didrachmas, came to Peter, and said to him: Doth not your master pay the didrachma? (25) He said: Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying: What is thy opinion, Simon? The kings of the earth, of whom do they receive tribute or custom, of their own children, or of strangers?
Exd 30:11 ¶ And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
Exd 30:12 When thou takest the sum of the children of Israel after their number, then shall they give every man a ransom for his soul unto the LORD, when thou numberest them; that there be no plague among them, when [thou] numberest them.
Exd 30:13 This they shall give, every one that passeth among them that are numbered, half a shekel after the shekel of the sanctuary: (a shekel [is] twenty gerahs:) an half shekel [shall be] the offering of the LORD.
Exd 30:14 Every one that passeth among them that are numbered, from twenty years old and above, shall give an offering unto the LORD.
Trying to determine who is taking and who is giving here....
When thou takest the sum of the children of Israel, they shall give everyone that passeth among them that are numbered an offering.
And the tribute money is to atone for "who's" souls?
Exd 30:16 And thou shalt take the atonement money of the children of Israel, and shalt appoint it for the service of the tabernacle of the congregation; that it may be a memorial unto the children of Israel before the LORD, to make an atonement for your souls.
Who pays for atonement..the people or the priests?
The people bring things to the temple and the priests are to distribute it among the people.
Those that are numbered.
In Mat 22:17, Mar 12:14, Luk 20:22, the word may be interpreted as denoting the capitation tax which the Romans imposed on the Jewish people. It may, however, be legitimately regarded as denoting any tax whatever imposed by a foreign power on the people of Israel. The "tribute money" shown to our Lord ( Mat 22:19) was the denarius, bearing Caesar's superscription. It was the tax paid by every Jew to the Romans. ( See PENNY T0002891.)
So was the tax imposed by the Jews or by the Romans?
Render unto Ceasar what is Ceasars and unto God what is Gods'.
Gen 49:14 Issachar [is] a strong ass couching down between two burdens:
Gen 49:15 And he saw that rest [was] good, and the land that [it was] pleasant; and bowed his shoulder to bear, and became a servant unto tribute.
| Quote: | | It is (selfish) when one's human concern is about whether one obeyed it or not; whether one will or will not receive the blessings because one obeyed it, or whether one fears to disobey it because of the curses one is to receive. |
I agree Yehu,
And this is why and how they broke the law. Because they did it for selfish reasons. They did not obey God because they loved Him and wanted to obey him from thier heart. They wanted the rewards that came from it.
But because they desired the carnal gain of riches, they lost out on the spiritual gain of righteous riches...those of the heart.
| Quote: | | If I obey the Law for the sake of obeying the Law, then it is selfish, no matter what objective the Law desires to achieve. |
Yet if you obey the law out of love for God and wanting to do what he says, then the objective is to please God and not oneself.
| Quote: | | Why would God need to command me to do something which by my nature I automatically do? |
Because it is not in our nature to look out for the next guy, it is in our nature to be self preserving and to get gain for ourselves.
Rom 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
Rom 8:7 Because the carnal mind [is] enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
1Cr 3:3 For ye are yet carnal: for whereas [there is] among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?
Until we put aside our differences and come together looking out for the best interest of our neighbours, we will remain carnal.
Not respecting people for who or what they are, or how they look or where their social standing is, whether they are rich or poor, young or old, black or white...
Or even if they agree with us or not. You are not in control of another persons thoughts and deeds, but your own. So if you are doing God's will, you have nothing to worry about. Let God worry about the other persons thoughts and deeds.
You do what's right regardless....
God Bless
Lone _________________ Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zathrus King Kong

Joined: 28 Aug 2002 Posts: 2270 Location: WI USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mtimber wrote: | Jesus broke Jewish tradition.
Do you realise you are saying Jesus was a sinner Yehushuan? | Why mtimber, I thought you'd stopped speaking to Yehu. This is "calling someone out". _________________ Establishing the law by receiving the righteousness which is by faith, without the deeds of the law!
2 Cor 3 "11For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious."
Certified Chalcedon Compliant
Officially approved in 451 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mtimber Lion King
Joined: 01 Sep 2006 Posts: 1216
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Zathrus wrote: | | mtimber wrote: | Jesus broke Jewish tradition.
Do you realise you are saying Jesus was a sinner Yehushuan? | This is "calling someone out". |
No this is standing up against error and false teaching...
Others on this board may not know the bible too well and this sort of error will corrupt them if left unchallenged. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|