Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

The Heresy of Johovah's Winesses


Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Jehovah's Witness
Author Message
habeshaw
Growing Guppy



Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Posts: 41


PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:50 am    Post subject: The Heresy of Johovah's Winesses Reply with quote

Some thing About Jehovah's Witnesses and their belife.
I got this info from the Coptic Orthodox patriarch.H.Pope Shenoda 3.

1st. From where it comes from, who establises it, and how it is established Historical Background

Jehovah’s Witnesses are a group which appeared in the
second half of the nineteenth century. Their founder,
Charles Russell, was born in 1854 in Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Russell was a Christian, but was influenced in his youth by
Arian and Seventh-Day Adventist teaching, as well as the ideas of some atheists. From amongst all this mixture, he formed his doctrine around the year 1872 and published it in the United States of America. He was able to collect a fortune worth approximately five million dollars, which he used for industrial and commercial projects.

His wife sued him on the grounds of marital betrayal at the Hamilton court which ruled in her favour, making him pay a fine and approving her divorce application. Some farmers also commenced proceedings against him on the grounds of fraud and swindling because he sold to them wheat which he called, ‘miracle wheat’ at a very high price, claiming that it was from the holy land and that it was many times more abundant than the normal harvest. {Of course non of this was true, the wheat was
normal American wheat.}

In 1878 he renounced all Christian doctrine and in 1879 he published the ‘Watch Tower’ magazine, and thus this name distinguished the publications and societies of Jehovah’s Witnesses. In the year 1884 he incorporated the “Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society”.

Russell died in 1916 and was succeeded by Judge Joseph
Rutherford.

Their False Prophecies

One of the most amazing doctrines preached by Jehovah’s Witnesses is that dealing with the Second Coming. Russell said that the world would end in 1914 with the Second Coming of Christ and that the Jews would be assembled together and govern the earth. However, the prophecy was not fulfilled and he died shortly afterwards in 1916. Jehovah’s Witnesses {then} changed their thoughts to the following:

They said that the Lord Jesus Christ did not actually physically come in 1874, but did so spiritually, and that He commenced ‘harvesting’ in 1878, gathering the ‘chosen’. In the year 1914 the Father (Jehovah) enthroned Him and Judgement began.

Hence, many wrote their wills and left their riches to Jehovah’s Witnesses in preparation for Judgement and the end of the world.

As for Russell’s successor, Rutherford, he said that
Abraham, the father of the prophets, would come to the
world with a group of prophets in 1925 and he prepared a palace in California to receive them which cost $75 000. He dwelt with his wife in this palace awaiting their visitors, the prophets who, of course, have not come till now.

that is it for now, What a tragedy!!!
After a while i will try to show some of thier belife and how contradict with the bible
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ChristianWoman1
Fierce Poodle



Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 290


PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

a tragedy indeed Crying or Very sad I have a very dear frien who is a JW...we often discuss the diferences in our faith and it saddens me deeply...she has no hope of heaven and does not believe in hell Crying or Very sad JW's are even forbidden to to step one foot inside a church...it's quite a religion to follow Crying or Very sad
_________________
____________________

Don't copy the behavior and customs of this world, but let God transform you into a new person by changing the way you think.
ROMANS 12:2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TBax
King of the Jungle



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 1965


PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

habeshaw,


I saw the web site you pulled that information from. That site is not an accurate source of information. That information you gave contains half truths, and misrepresentations. Personally, I know "Miracle Wheat" is misrepresented here. It wasn't claimed to have come from "the holy land", or sold by Bro. Russell, but was termed "Miracle Wheat" by the original grower of this unusual strain of wheat. Brother Russell didn't sell it but simply reported on it. Here are the actual facts as these lies have been circulating for some time:

Watchtower wrote:
The facts about “Miracle Wheat” are equally perverted. Brother Russell was interested in anything related to the Scriptural prediction that the desert would blossom as a rose and the earth yield her increase. So, when the public press reported a new and unusual strain of wheat, called “Miracle Wheat” by its original grower, Brother Russell reported this in The Watchtower, along with a government report on it. Some Watchtower readers contacted the grower, who was in no way connected with the Watchtower Society, and purchased some of the wheat. When theirs produced seed they offered it as a contribution to the Society. The original grower sold the seed at $1.25 a pound, so they suggested their contribution be priced at $1.00, and all the money received be given to the Society. The Society made no claim for the wheat on its own knowledge, though it won several State Fair grand prizes before it wore itself out. Brother Russell neither named it nor profited from it; the money went as a donation into Christian missionary work. When others criticized this sale, all who had contributed were told that if they were dissatisfied their money would be returned, and the money was held for a year for this purpose. Not a single person requested it back. The only critics were those who had no real knowledge of the matter, which was purely a donation sale for the benefit of the Society—as open and aboveboard as a church cake sale.


Also His wife's suing him for marital betrayal is a lie as well.
Quote:
No immoral action was ever proved against the Watchtower Society’s first president, Charles Taze Russell. In a suit for separate maintenance Mrs. Russell’s attorney said, “We make no charge of adultery”


That site also made the claim:Jehovah's Witnesses are not Christians. They are not
attributed to Christ and they do not call themselves
Christians.



Totally untrue. We are who we are because we follow Christ, and we call ourselves Christians. Jesus was "the faithful and true witness" of his Father Jehovah. We follow his example. Smile




That site appearently gathered a bunch of misinformation and presented it as truth. Be careful where you get your information. Confused or disgusted

Smile
_________________
Agape,
TBax
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TBax
King of the Jungle



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 1965


PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ChristianWoman1,

We believe in "Hell", but not that humans are "forever tortured" there, or are even consciously aware of anything. Hell is mankinds common grave. We sleep there until Jehovah resurrects us from there. Very Happy
The Bible talks about the time when hell is emptied and then destroyed. Would you like to see that scripture?

Smile
_________________
Agape,
TBax
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Daystar
House Cat



Joined: 10 May 2008
Posts: 163

Location: Midwest US

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TBax wrote:
habeshaw,


I saw the web site you pulled that information from. That site is not an accurate source of information. That information you gave contains half truths, and misrepresentations. Personally, I know "Miracle Wheat" is misrepresented here. It wasn't claimed to have come from "the holy land", or sold by Bro. Russell, but was termed "Miracle Wheat" by the original grower of this unusual strain of wheat. Brother Russell didn't sell it but simply reported on it. Here are the actual facts as these lies have been circulating for some time:

Watchtower wrote:
The facts about “Miracle Wheat” are equally perverted. Brother Russell was interested in anything related to the Scriptural prediction that the desert would blossom as a rose and the earth yield her increase. So, when the public press reported a new and unusual strain of wheat, called “Miracle Wheat” by its original grower, Brother Russell reported this in The Watchtower, along with a government report on it. Some Watchtower readers contacted the grower, who was in no way connected with the Watchtower Society, and purchased some of the wheat. When theirs produced seed they offered it as a contribution to the Society. The original grower sold the seed at $1.25 a pound, so they suggested their contribution be priced at $1.00, and all the money received be given to the Society. The Society made no claim for the wheat on its own knowledge, though it won several State Fair grand prizes before it wore itself out. Brother Russell neither named it nor profited from it; the money went as a donation into Christian missionary work. When others criticized this sale, all who had contributed were told that if they were dissatisfied their money would be returned, and the money was held for a year for this purpose. Not a single person requested it back. The only critics were those who had no real knowledge of the matter, which was purely a donation sale for the benefit of the Society—as open and aboveboard as a church cake sale.


Also His wife's suing him for marital betrayal is a lie as well.
Quote:
No immoral action was ever proved against the Watchtower Society’s first president, Charles Taze Russell. In a suit for separate maintenance Mrs. Russell’s attorney said, “We make no charge of adultery”


That site also made the claim:Jehovah's Witnesses are not Christians. They are not
attributed to Christ and they do not call themselves
Christians.



Totally untrue. We are who we are because we follow Christ, and we call ourselves Christians. Jesus was "the faithful and true witness" of his Father Jehovah. We follow his example. :)




That site appearently gathered a bunch of misinformation and presented it as truth. Be careful where you get your information. :?

:)


This is true, what TBax wrote. I have some problems with the Watchtower, but a great deal of what is published by Christian as well as apostate ex JWs on the internet are dishonest attempts to slander them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wolvo
Ferret



Joined: 06 Jul 2008
Posts: 113


PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TBax wrote:
I saw the web site you pulled that information from. That site is not an accurate source of information. That information you gave contains half truths, and misrepresentations.


You could also say the same about the Watchtower site that you pull your information from.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Daystar
House Cat



Joined: 10 May 2008
Posts: 163

Location: Midwest US

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wolvo wrote:
TBax wrote:
I saw the web site you pulled that information from. That site is not an accurate source of information. That information you gave contains half truths, and misrepresentations.


You could also say the same about the Watchtower site that you pull your information from.


That is a pretty empty claim if you can't give an example of that being the case.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
habeshaw
Growing Guppy



Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Posts: 41


PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:54 am    Post subject: SOME OF THEIR HERESIES REGARDING CHRIST Reply with quote

SOME OF THEIR HERESIES REGARDING CHRIST

Despite their belief that the Lord Jesus Christ is a god, and that He is a mighty god (Isaiah 9:6), they do not consider that He is the Almighty God, {hence implying that they believe in polytheism.}

Jehovah’s Witnesses say that the bowing of the Magi before our Lord Jesus Christ proves that they were led by Satan.

They say that Christ was created and pre-existed in heaven. The purpose for His coming down from heaven is to be a witness to the kingdom of Jehovah. In this way they fall into the heresy of Arius which was anathematised by the Nicene Ecumenical Council in 325 A.D. Saint Athanasius was the hero who defended the Divinity of Christ there.

They say that the Lord Jesus Christ took the Divine Nature in Baptism. This, of course, is against Christ’s ability to create: “All things were made through Him” and “He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him” (John 1); how could He then create the world if He is not God?

Jehovah’s Witnesses say that the Lord Jesus Christ does not have an immortal soul, but that He gained immortality as a reward for His success in examination and His loyalty to His Father until death. They say that Christ was not immortal at the beginning of His creation, thus meaning that eternal life is dependent upon eternal obedience. However, the time came when Jehovah (God) granted his son immortality, after a test of
obedience. This is impossible, because how can Christ be
without an immortal soul, when He is the One who created everything, “All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made” (John 1:3).

They also say that Christ did not rise in flesh, and did not
ascend to heaven in flesh, but that His crucified Body was taken out from the tomb and hidden by the angel with the penetrating power of God and that He arose in spirit only. Naturally, this is against the saying of the Lord Jesus Christ to His disciples after the Resurrection, “Handle Me and see, for a spirit does not
have flesh and bones as you see I have ... And He took it (fish) and ate in their presence” (Luke 24:39-43). {Furthermore}, He let Thomas touch the place of His wounds (John 20:27-29).

But, The actual meaning of resurrection is that it is a resurrection of the body because the spirit does not die; it is the body which is resurrected after the spirit’s reunion with it. Therefore, if the body does not rise, then there is no resurrection at all.

EThey {say} that Christ did not ascend to heaven with a
disfigured body, because if He did then He would be less than the angels. We do not see Christ’s wounds as a disfigurement of His Body, but as a sign of His love for and Redemption of us; we say with Isaiah the prophet, “... and by His stripes we are healed” (Isaiah 53:5).

The Book of Revelations states that He was seen in heaven in the appearance of “a Lamb as though it had been slain” (Revelations 5:6), and that the Priests worshipped Him, saying “...You are worthy to take the scroll (the Bible) and to open its seals; for You were slain, and have redeemed us to God by Your blood” (Revelations 5:9).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TBax
King of the Jungle



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 1965


PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

habeshaw,

Do you want to have a discussion, or copy and paste the lies and half truths from a web site?

habeshaw wrote:
Despite their belief that the Lord Jesus Christ is a god, and that He is a mighty god (Isaiah 9:6),


True.

habeshaw wrote:
they do not consider that He is the Almighty God, {hence implying that they believe in polytheism.}


False. We do not consider him God almighty, but that is not polythiesm. We worship one God, Jehovah. The Jews were monothiestic, yet they understood that others were properly called gods, even by God himself. And rightly so as: Deut 10:17 For Jehovah YOUR God is the God of gods and the Lord of lords, If Jehovah is a God of gods, then Jesus being termed a god is not out of harmony with that.

Did Jesus consider himself as God Almighty?

John 14:28 YOU heard that I said to YOU, I am going away and I am coming [back] to YOU. If YOU loved me, YOU would rejoice that I am going my way to the Father, because the Father is greater than I am.

John 17:3 This means everlasting life, their taking in knowledge of you, the only true God, and of the one whom you sent forth, Jesus Christ.



habeshaw wrote:
Jehovah’s Witnesses say that the bowing of the Magi before our Lord Jesus Christ proves that they were led by Satan.


False. That is not the proof at all. Rolling Eyes

This could go on and on.

habeshaw, you can continue to reprint lies from a web site that teaches falsehoods, or actually ask about these things to get the truth. Smile

I showed you some of the lies, but you wish to continue to trust that site? To each his own. Cool
_________________
Agape,
TBax
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 1072


PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:46 am    Post subject: Re: The Heresy of Johovah's Winesses Reply with quote

habeshaw wrote:


Some thing About Jehovah's Witnesses and their belife.
I got this info from the Coptic Orthodox patriarch.H.Pope Shenoda 3.

...



Pardon my saying this but don't we all do weird and funny things? What does the Coptic Orthodox church got against the JWs? Are you a member of the Coptic Orthodox church?

Are we supposed to be perfect examples of our religions or our religions supposed to be perfect examples of us?


Last edited by Ryck on Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:26 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 1072


PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ChristianWoman1 wrote:
a tragedy indeed Crying or Very sad I have a very dear frien who is a JW...we often discuss the diferences in our faith and it saddens me deeply...she has no hope of heaven and does not believe in hell Crying or Very sad JW's are even forbidden to to step one foot inside a church...it's quite a religion to follow Crying or Very sad


For what it's worth, I find Hell inconsistant with a "God of Love". If the JWs don't believe in Hell, I think they have a better understanding of God in this regard.

In an effort to somehow bridge Hell with a God of Love, I've seen preachers water-down Hell ( pardon the pun ) to say some sort of alienation or darkness from the presence of God or absence from the love of God. But sooner or later they'll come back to the fire and brimestone preaching. So I think it is all some marketting ploy to keep selling people the idea of Hell to keep them worried about their spirituality.

I think we should love God instead of being afraid of what He (supposedly) can do to us to make us eternally miserable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 1072


PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:33 am    Post subject: Re: SOME OF THEIR HERESIES REGARDING CHRIST Reply with quote

habeshaw wrote:
SOME OF THEIR HERESIES REGARDING CHRIST

...

The Book of Revelations states that He was seen in heaven in the appearance of “a Lamb as though it had been slain” (Revelations 5:6), and that the Priests worshipped Him, saying “...You are worthy to take the scroll (the Bible) and to open its seals; for You were slain, and have redeemed us to God by Your blood” (Revelations 5:9).


The full quote is:

NIV Re 5:9 And they sang a new song: "You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals, because you were slain, and with your blood you purchased men for God from every tribe and language and people and nation. 10 You have made them to be a kingdom and priests to serve our God, and they will reign on the earth."

I don't see them worshiping the one that was slain but, instead, commending the one that was slain for his "purchasing men for God" to the service of their God.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wolvo
Ferret



Joined: 06 Jul 2008
Posts: 113


PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Daystar wrote:
Wolvo wrote:

Tbax wrote:

I saw the web site you pulled that information from. That site is not an accurate source of information. That information you gave contains half truths, and misrepresentations.


You could also say the same about the Watchtower site that you pull your information from.



That is a pretty empty claim if you can't give an example of that being the case.


Daystar,

I can give many examples of half truths and misrepresentations from the Watchtower. I will not hijack the thread with alot of examples as if you go through the JW section here you will see many.

The first one i will highlight is their 1914 prophecy which i have discussed at length here.

First of all they calculate Christ was present from 1914 by means of Jerusalem being destroyed in 607BCE. I do not know how familiar you are with JW doctrine i can provide a detailed calulation of how they come to this date if you wish.

The fact of the matter is Jerusalem was not destroyed in 607BCE but 587/6BCE. JW's calculate this date by counting the 70 year prophecy backwards from 537BCE a date that they make up as the year Cyrus announced his decree to release the Jews from captivity. Nobody else supports either 537BCE or in turn 607BCE apart from Jehovah's Witnesses. If JW's were to accept 587/6BCE as the true date of Jerusalem's destruction, 1914 would have to be thrown out, their central doctrine.

Apart from all of this Jehovah's Witnesses were looking for Armaggedon in 1914, when this failed to occur, they then interpretated it as a heavenly presence.

No acknowledgment of this previous teaching in modern day books, just that they 'prophesied' the happenings of 1914, when in fact they didn't.

Moving on they said the generation that saw 1914 would also see the end. This doctrine has also now changed. Do they now acknowledge their previous doctrine? No.

When 2nd, 3rd and 4th copies of their literature are rewritten, certain passages are changed. For example the inside cover of years of Awake magasines that mentions this generation doctrine has now been changed in subsequent bound volumes of the exact 'copy' of the original piece of work. There are many examples of subsequent editions of the same piece of work being changed to fit in with current thinking.

This is just one example of Watchtower lies and misrepresentation. There are many more, with a bit of research. I would suggest this section of the site would be a start.[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
habeshaw
Growing Guppy



Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Posts: 41


PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 2:32 am    Post subject: IS JESUS CHRIST THE ARCHANGEL MICHAEL ? Reply with quote

IS JESUS CHRIST THE ARCHANGEL MICHAEL ?

Jehovah’s Witnesses say that Jesus Christ is the archangel Michael, and this belief is expressed in their book, This Means Everlasting Life, which is their commentary on Revelations 12:13-19:5. The Harp of God is their commentary on Daniel 12:1 and Salvation is their commentary on Revelations 12:7-9.

In Reply to this:

Saint Paul the Apostle clarified that the Divinity of Christ is much higher than that of angels. In Hebrews 1:3-14, he presented proof of this in the following points:

(1) The sitting of Christ on the right hand of God on high
(Hebrews 1:3). This fact is also mentioned in Mark 16:19 and Acts 7:56. The Father said to the Son, “Sit at My right hand, till I make Your enemies Your footstool” (Hebrews 1:13 and Psalm 110:1).

(2) The angels worshipping the Lord Jesus Christ in
Hebrews 1:6. This worshipping was also mentioned in
Philippians 2:10.

(3) There is witness in the book of Psalms to Christ when it says, “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever; A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom” (Psalm 45:6), whereas it is said about the angels, “Who makes His angels spirits, His ministers a flame of fire” (Psalm 104:4).

(4) Christ is ‘the Creator’ in Psalm 102:25-27. This is also mentioned in John 1:3, “All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made” and “He was in the world, and the world was made through Him” (John 1:10). As long as He created all things, then this includes the angels, amongst whom is the Archangel Michael.

(5) It was said about the Lord Jesus Christ, “You have put all things under His feet” (Psalm 8:6 and Hebrews 2:8), whereas, “He has not put the world....insubjection to angels” (Hebrews 2:5). However, the Lord Jesus Christ said about Himself, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth” (Matthew 28:18). This authority, of course, includes authority over angels.

We wish to add the following points to all of this:

(1) It was said about the Archangel Michael in his contention with the devil that he “dared not bring against him a reviling accusation, but said, ‘The Lord rebukeYou!’” (Jude 9), whereas, the Lord Jesus Christ rebuked the devil many times (Mark 1:25, 27). He also cast out demons from many people and He gave His disciples authority to cast out demons (Matthew 10: 1, 8 and Luke 10:17).

(2) It was said about the Lord Jesus Christ that, “(He) made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a servant” (Philippians 2:7) whereas the angel is a servant to God by his nature (Revelations 19:10).

(3) It was said about the angels that they are sons of God (Job 1:6 and 38:7). As for Christ, He is the Only Son (John 3:16 & 18; 1:18 and 1 John 4:9) which means that He is the only One of His Nature and Essence.

(4) The Lord Jesus Christ said that He and the Father are one (John 10:30), a statement which neither angel nor archangel could dare make.

(5) Neither the Archangel Michael nor any of the other
archangels were described with the characteristics which are unique to God alone, such as His omnipresence, immortality, ability to create and reading thoughts.

(6) It was said about the Lord Jesus Christ that the angels are “His angels” (Matthew 13:41; 16:27 and 24:31). This means that they all conform to Him, including the Archangel Michael.

Another point which we can add is that Jehovah’s Witnesses mix between the Lord being an angel and His
appearance in the form of an angel. The Lord’s occasional appearance in the Old Testament in the
form of an angel does not mean that He is an angel, for He also appeared in the form of a man, as in Genesis 32: 24-30... does this mean that God is a man?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Luvnlife
Lion King



Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 1194

Location: US

PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Despite their belief that the Lord Jesus Christ is a god, and that He is a mighty god (Isaiah 9:6), they do not consider that He is the Almighty God, {hence implying that they believe in polytheism.}


I'm not sure how believing in and worshipping or paying homage to two Gods can be considered anything but polytheism.

There is but one God. Jesus is Lord. There is a difference yet JW's, by TBax's own admission believe Jesus to be a God also. That is polytheistic.

Luv
_________________
Matthew 6:21
For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.
Biblegateway Christian Viewpoints
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Jehovah's Witness All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 

© 2001-2007