 |
Bible-Discussion.com Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
the_highlander Little Guppy
Joined: 09 Nov 2003
    Posts: 30
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2003 12:47 pm Post subject: The Da Vinci Code |
|
|
Anyone read this book or watch the special that was on television last week?
I read it and it was quite the novel. The author certainly did put a lot of time in researching factual material concerning the underlining topic.
One thing that was interesting is the theory that the Bible was written (one of many reasons) to write out women. Before the Bible Earth and many of its 'gods' were feminine. Subsequent to the Bible, anything feminine was akin to sin and the devil while all things masculine were righteous and godly.
Hmmm...any thoughts? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
shepreach Cobra
Joined: 08 Nov 2003
    Posts: 487 Location: ga
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2003 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Highlander,
I haven’t read the book and only saw the last part of the special. I can see Mary Magdalene being one of the apostles. I can also see Susannah and Johanna in that same category. Of course the women provided for Jesus and the others. Women still do that today. It doesn’t prevent them from being on a par with the men of the group. Mary and Martha of Bethany can also be included in that group, though I don’t think they traveled with Jesus.
If the Bible was written to write out women, the writers didn’t do a very good job. They keep popping up in unexpected places. And the women who are prominent in the Bible are as varied in nature as the men who are there. As far as feminine goes, the Aramaic word for breath or spirit, or wind, “ruach” is feminine in gender. This is the word used for the breath of God which gave Adam life. Imo, the men in a male dominated society made feminine things sinful because of their own impure thoughts about women.
Sheila |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the_highlander Little Guppy
Joined: 09 Nov 2003
    Posts: 30
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2003 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm....
Well, let's see.
Only a select few woman of notability were meantioned in the Bible, which of course, does not extend to all women in the real world. Because of the Bible (i.e., religion, Allah, God, etc.) women have been seen as less than dirt and treated as such.
If this weren't true, then women in Africa and Middle Eastern countries wouldn't have to go through the heinous oppressive acts that they have. This being just one example among many.
When one thinks about the 'Witch Trials,' do you know just how many women have been hunted, captured and burned at the stake [i[because of[/i] religious fear!?!
What the author wrote about where the oppression of women and the feminine (on a grander scale) is concerned makes more sense than what the Bible, Allah, God, et al has given men the excuse to treat women so poorly.
I mean really, I can recount a huge investigative report done by Time magazine a few years back that quoted a woman saying her Christian Pastor told her it was God's will that she stay in her abusive marriage and the next time her husband went to hit her to merely duck. That's the kind of attitude towards women by men that has permeated humanity that the author is indirectly talking about. Which is really sad you know, history being so replete with example after example of the pain and suffering women have had to endure for centuries 'in His name.' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
metothezero Tiger Cub
Joined: 13 Aug 2003
    Posts: 791 Location: east texas
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2003 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
oooh, I sense some underlined hatred towards men...just kidding.
While many henious things have been committed 'in His name' this does not mean that it is his wishes. I do not think that the author has truly read the Bible or is completely ignoring evidences given by the Bible that say the complete opposite of what God is like. He is not a chauvenist, who doesn't like women. I mean think of the four gospel accounts, who was the first to see Jesus alive? Was it not women? Think of Deborah the judge, and personally I think, one of the coolest. Consider the story of the person who saved the Israelite peoples from death, who was it, oh yes Esther, a woman. Consider the story of Ruth and her faith in God. I do not believe that you can count the Christian Bible on the same level as that of Islamic beliefs who do belittle women completely. I understand that women have been mistreated by mean, in the name of God, and under other names including stupidity and arrogance. But this does not mean that God promotes this type of behavior.
I have seen the Da'Vinci Code book, and have wondered what it was about, please tell me more, I might be interested in buying it, was it good??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the_highlander Little Guppy
Joined: 09 Nov 2003
    Posts: 30
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| metothezero wrote: | | oooh, I sense some underlined hatred towards men...just kidding. |
| Quote: | | While many henious things have been committed 'in His name' this does not mean that it is his wishes. |
Are you sure!?!
| Quote: | | I do not think that the author has truly read the Bible or is completely ignoring evidences given by the Bible that say the complete opposite of what God is like. |
Actually, he is quite the scholar. What turned me onto his book was an interview I heard on NPR (National Public Radio). Once his book hit the consumer market (well, even before that) it was a National #1 Bestseller! He was complimented time and time again for his devoted research (over a year + his personal and vicarious experiences) that went into the book.
| Quote: | | He is not a chauvenist, who doesn't like women. I mean think of the four gospel accounts, who was the first to see Jesus alive? Was it not women? Think of Deborah the judge, and personally I think, one of the coolest. Consider the story of the person who saved the Israelite peoples from death, who was it, oh yes Esther, a woman. Consider the story of Ruth and her faith in God. |
I know, but as I already mentioned a few mentions of a few women in the Bible don't account for the centuries of oppression at the hands of men (who considered themselves only secondary to God - as it is written in the Bible - which, in my opinion was written by men for men), regardless of religion, in 'His' name.
| Quote: | | I do not believe that you can count the Christian Bible on the same level as that of Islamic beliefs who do belittle women completely. |
Did you not read my anecdote regarding the Christian Pastor and his advice to the battered wife? That is only one among countless examples in the Christian faith (among other faiths) of women being belittled.
| Quote: | | I understand that women have been mistreated by men, in the name of God, and under other names including stupidity and arrogance. But this does not mean that God promotes this type of behavior. |
Again I must ask, are you sure?
| Quote: | | I have seen the Da'Vinci Code book, and have wondered what it was about, please tell me more, I might be interested in buying it, was it good??? |
It was absolutely fantastic! One book that was definately hard to put down. I'm usually a slow reader but I read this at warp speed! It's so good that Hollywood is already in the works of making a movie out it and likely some of his other books.
He's a great author and I highly recommend it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
metothezero Tiger Cub
Joined: 13 Aug 2003
    Posts: 791 Location: east texas
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| My question is this. Does everyone who professes the name of Christianity necessarily have to be considered as a spokesperson for my Faith? IF this is the logic, that just because some pastor who professed christianity, is completely stupid and decides that a woman should continue in her abusive realtionship, if this pastor does something bad this does not make the christian faith bad. IF this is the correct logic, then aren't all men by that logic bad. Likewise all women bad. I can name dozens of men who did henious crimes in their lives, hitler, dahmer, gaycey, bin laden, hussein, these men were men, does that make all men bad. This isn't exactly the same with christians, becuase you are not born a christian, it is a choice. But still you are labeled as a christian, and your actions do reflect that of christians. But that does not mean we can consider a religion to be what it's abuser make it out to appear to be. Christianity does not teach the supression of women. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the_highlander Little Guppy
Joined: 09 Nov 2003
    Posts: 30
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| metothezero wrote: | | My question is this. |
Quid Pro Quo (Q&A)
You're not entitled to ask a question until you answer mine first! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nobby Board - Admin
Joined: 16 Sep 2002
     Posts: 4900 Location: Missouri
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shepreach Cobra
Joined: 08 Nov 2003
    Posts: 487 Location: ga
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nobby,
this is the special highlander was referring to. isn't it funny how people make a big deal out of stuff. "the DaVinci Code" is a novel. novel = fiction. the tv special was just a forum for certain persons opinions and ideas. the problem is that some people will think it's the gospel truth.
sheila |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the_highlander Little Guppy
Joined: 09 Nov 2003
    Posts: 30
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| shepreach wrote: | nobby,
this is the special highlander was referring to. isn't it funny how people make a big deal out of stuff. "the DaVinci Code" is a novel. novel = fiction. the tv special was just a forum for certain persons opinions and ideas. the problem is that some people will think it's the gospel truth.
sheila |
Talk about confirmat bias!
The fundamental basis of the novel is fiction but that doesn't mean that the contents of the historical and religious accounts are!
Face it! The author did over a years worth of maticulous research to validate the core of his story. Hence, it is more of a documentary than a fictional tale.
Your ignorance (i.e., arbitrary dismissal of history) won't erase that fact. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shepreach Cobra
Joined: 08 Nov 2003
    Posts: 487 Location: ga
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
over a year, huh? and you say it was meticulous research. i'm impressed. it's still the opinions of a group of people. and you prove my point about people seeing it as the gospel truth.
sheila |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the_highlander Little Guppy
Joined: 09 Nov 2003
    Posts: 30
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| shepreach wrote: | | over a year, huh? |
Over a year for the 'specifics' for that particular novel. That doesn't mean he hasn't done other research along the same lines of theology before. Which, btw, he has.
| Quote: | | it's still the opinions of a group of people. |
Only one person wrote the book, hence, it's the opinion of one man. An opinion, however, that is shared by others.
| Quote: | and you prove my point about people seeing it as the gospel truth.
sheila |
I've proven no such point. On the other hand, you've proven the lengths at which you'd go in order to fallaciously make your point. I never said nor did I hint at 'The Da Vinci Code' as being 'gospel truth.' Try dispensing with the straw men arguments, it might make your 'reactions' a little less emotional than what they obviously are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RevJP Moderator
Joined: 18 Apr 2003
     Posts: 6661 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | He was complimented time and time again for his devoted research (over a year + his personal and vicarious experiences) that went into the book.
Over a year for the 'specifics' for that particular novel. That doesn't mean he hasn't done other research along the same lines of theology before. Which, btw, he has
Only one person wrote the book, hence, it's the opinion of one man. An opinion, however, that is shared by others |
I am impressed. One man did over a year's worth of meticulous research in efforts to prove his theory and sell his book which spells out that theory.
If I were to balance that impressive feat against the countless scholars and theologians, thousands of whom hold advanced degrees in all fields of study, who over the course of hundreds of years have either not came to the same conclusions or whose own studies have provided more than adequate controvertable evidence, who would I side with? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Da Blonde Bombshell Cobra
Joined: 31 Jan 2003
     Posts: 461 Location: Brooklyn NY (formerly TX)
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2003 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'll have to check out that book. The premise you state does have significant evidence to support it.
Prior to development of mass scale agriculture matriarchical culture was the norm. Matriarchical culture of course had a female concept of God. BTW there is a Tom Robbins novel also that addresses this; sorry I can't remember the name. He refers to the Biblical tale of Jezebel at various points in the narrative and indicates she was right and the priests who opposed her were wrong.
I don't agree but I can see the point made by an Erisian (Eris, the Goddess of Discord of the Greeks, is one of the Mother god figures, just like Jehovah and Zeus and Odin are versions of God the Father, Christ and Thor and Siddharta [Buddha] as Son Gods, etc.) who described our present state of affairs as one that resulted because "Jehovah and Eris had a messy divorce." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Da Blonde Bombshell Cobra
Joined: 31 Jan 2003
     Posts: 461 Location: Brooklyn NY (formerly TX)
|
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
I got it and started reading it. Apparently Opus Dei, the Catholic lodge with extremist practices, are the bad guys. It's a suspense novel, maybe one grade up in sophistication over the Left Behind potboilers, but entertaining as such.
I'll be interested to see if it winds up being mostly anti-Catholic dreck. Once in an interview the ultra-fundamentalist and virulently anti-Catholic cartoonist Jack Chick commented on Billy Graham's alleged softness on homosexual issues (i.e., the Graham organization refers homosexuals who contact them to gay Christian groups, not antigay groups) by saying "there are a lot of Jesuits at Wheaton College" (Graham's alma mater).
Even so, he's on the money that Opus Dei is both weird and powerful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|