 |
Bible-Discussion.com Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
darrencorpe Newbie Alert
Joined: 23 Apr 2007 Posts: 4 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:48 pm Post subject: Is communism Biblical? |
|
|
| Some early Franciscans wanted to use a system of communism, such as the one used by the early apostles. Pope John at the time excommunicated them and reaffirmed that communism was heresy. Historically Communism is rejected, but Reformed Christians often deny many historically verified points. What do you think? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
theseldomscene Banned

Joined: 17 Mar 2005 Posts: 7817
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| define how you define communism please... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pondering King of the Jungle

Joined: 15 Sep 2005 Posts: 1512
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if you mean a utopian state of equality and sharing...sure. If you mean the form of government espoused by Marx and Lenin and as practiced by Stalin and Mao....not so much  _________________ Links of note:"Review for Doubting Christians"
Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs
“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong...You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” - Ronald Reagan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
darrencorpe Newbie Alert
Joined: 23 Apr 2007 Posts: 4 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Acts 2
The Fellowship of the Believers
42They devoted themselves to the apostles' teaching and to the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer. 43Everyone was filled with awe, and many wonders and miraculous signs were done by the apostles. 44All the believers were together and had everything in common. 45Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need. 46Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts, 47praising God and enjoying the favor of all the people. And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved.
Acts 5
7About three hours later his wife came in, not knowing what had happened. 8Peter asked her, "Tell me, is this the price you and Ananias got for the land?"
"Yes," she said, "that is the price."
9Peter said to her, "How could you agree to test the Spirit of the Lord? Look! The feet of the men who buried your husband are at the door, and they will carry you out also."
10At that moment she fell down at his feet and died. Then the young men came in and, finding her dead, carried her out and buried her beside her husband. 11Great fear seized the whole church and all who heard about these events.
As I said before, I am referring to the communism of the early Apostles.
Commune: a small group of persons living together, sharing possessions, work, income, etc., and often pursuing unconventional lifestyles.
It is written about in the Bible, some monks, Franciscans in the case I know of, argued that a system of communism (based on the Biblical example) should come to be. Some Christians argue for economic communism, others for a church commune...(basically take your pick on the type or severity of the system)... however my general point in posting this was to spur some opinions, questions, reasoning, debate... I just want thoughts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SealedEternal Labrador

Joined: 28 Dec 2006 Posts: 312 Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pondering wrote: | if you mean a utopian state of equality and sharing...sure. If you mean the form of government espoused by Marx and Lenin and as practiced by Stalin and Mao....not so much  |
I totally agree. The difference is choice. The early Church shared everything with one another and helped those in need because they wanted to. Communism as a form of government however robs people of their personal property, and throws them in gulags and murders them if they don't go along with the program. Jesus would advocate the former, but not so much the latter.
SealedEternal _________________ 1 John 3:7-8 Little children, make sure no one deceives you; the one who practices righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous; the one who practices sin is of the devil; for the devil has sinned from the beginning. The Son of God appeared for this purpose, to destroy the works of the devil. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
apocatastasis King of the Jungle
Joined: 15 Feb 2004 Posts: 1827
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good ideas, people!
| toxicshocksyndrome wrote: | | define how you define communism please... |
define how you define superfluous please...  _________________ "Overcome anger by love. Overcome evil by good. Overcome the miser by giving. Overcome the liar by truth." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
apocatastasis King of the Jungle
Joined: 15 Feb 2004 Posts: 1827
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Darren, you ask a good question.
I think that communism/socialism is certainly an ideal in line with the Spirit of Jesus' fundamental moral teachings. What do you think? _________________ "Overcome anger by love. Overcome evil by good. Overcome the miser by giving. Overcome the liar by truth." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
darrencorpe Newbie Alert
Joined: 23 Apr 2007 Posts: 4 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A form of communism should be instituted in the church setting. That is what the church is, a communal fund, for the brotherhood of believers. The church is run by elders and learned teachers, and those people say where the money goes. Economic Communism on the other hand, I believe is evil, although some Christians tend to think it should be so. Since prophesy says that the lamb will eat grass with the wolf - or the gazelle with the lion. Basically prophetically speaking a utopia will exist. Some think that people have to bring the world to utopia. I believe that Jesus will bring the world to utopia. As it is written, this world will be destroyed and a new will be created in which Jesus will rule. So basically there were two ideas I was getting at with this post: 1 that economic Communism is not Biblical, and 2 to what degree does a church practice communal qualities. Idea 2 is one which I wanted to expand upon, with the question, have Catholics been more communal (let's not argue about the pope & bishops here), or are Protestants more communal? It seems to me that in the past Catholics used communal funds to run schools and welfare (among other things) and also they presently run their own schools, whereas the Protestant style of faith turned itself to more of a self serving type of brotherhood, in that they stay out of modern day stereotypically political concerns. The point I am further making is that; should these "political concerns" be accepted as out of church control, or should the church be concerned with how much the brotherhood is under state control? _________________ Vanity of vanities, saith the preacher; all is vanity.
Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OrdinaryRadical Tadpole
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
To be true I think we should be worried about how much the church is under state control.
In Romans, Paul says that we should be subject to our authorities, but in 2 Corinthians Paul also tells us that Satan is the God of this world and according to Luke 4 Satan has the authority to give the Kingdoms of this world. They are his.
Whether or not you believe in the personality of Satan. Obviously there is something up.
I'm not sure how to reconcile all of this, but I think we should be keeping an eye on how much our churches get involved in state politics or control. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lone-traveler Emperor of the Universe

Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 6365 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not sure if communism is something that is in a particular "place".
It's scattered around the world. It's not something that should be overseen by one man but by all mankind in common. There should only be one leader and that leader is our faith in love for one another. Taking care of eachother. Not to build up a treasury filled with money..
But a treasury filled with compassion and kindness.
The money thing would just be a way to distribute the physical needs...but what we need more is a way to distribute spiritual needs.
It's really not about the money...If all the markets were to fall tomorrow we would still be here..and we would find other means of trade to help one another.
So to me, communism isn't something that comes from the pocket. It's something that comes from the heart.
It's not an establishment that is built in a certain country or nation...rather an establishment that is built in each individual around the world.
just ramblin..
lone _________________ Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
atoz Emperor of the Solar System
Joined: 28 Jun 2007 Posts: 4189
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| OrdinaryRadical wrote: | To be true I think we should be worried about how much the church is under state control.
.....
I'm not sure how to reconcile all of this, but I think we should be keeping an eye on how much our churches get involved in state politics or control. |
Hi OR,
It was the church that originally caused the state to be so full of Hate---since most members of Govt were brought up in some religion or other---which is why Tom Jefferson made his famous comments on Church and State.
Then C & S simply each re-influenced each other.
So we first need to be concerned about how much the church is under Hate-control.
"Across the ages, clergy have been interested [according to Jefferson]not in truth but only in wealth and power; when rational people have had difficulty swallowing "their impious heresies," then the clergy have, with the help of the state, forced "them down their throats."
Five years later, he [Jefferson]wrote of "this loathsome combination of church and state" that for so many centuries reduced human beings to "dupes and drudges."
[Edwin S. Gaustad, Faith of Our Fathers: Religion and the New Nation, San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987, p. 47. According to Gaustad, the first quotes are from a letter from Jefferson to William Baldwin, January 19, 1810; the second source is a letter from Jefferson to Charles Clay, January 29, 1815.]
"In every country and every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own. It is easier to acquire wealth and power by this combination than by deserving them, and to effect this, they have perverted the purest religion ever preached to man into mystery and jargon, unintelligible to all mankind, and therefore the safer for their purposes.
(Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to Horatio Spofford, 1814; from George Seldes, ed., The Great Quotations, Secaucus, New Jersey: Citadel Press, 1983, p. 371)
"...difference of opinion is advantageous in religion. The several sects perform the office of a common censor over each other. Is uniformity attainable? [/b]Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned; yet we have not advanced an inch towards uniformity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one half the world fools, and the other half hypocrites. To support roguery and error all over the earth.[/b]"
Thomas Jeffersion, "Notes on the State of Virginia [1781-1785] also George Seldes, ed., The Great Quotations, Secaucus, New Jersey: Citadel Press, 1983, p. 363.
"Let us, then, fellow citizens, unite with one heart and one mind. Let us restore to social intercourse that harmony and affection without which liberty and even life itself are but dreary things. And let us reflect that having banished from our land that religious intolerance under which mankind so long bled, we have yet gained little if we countenance a political intolerance as despotic, as wicked, and capable of a bitter and bloody persecutions."
... error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.
... I deem the essential principles of our government . ..[:] Equal and exact justice to all men, of whatever state or persuasion, religious or political; ... freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and freedom of person under the protection of the habeas corpus, and trial by juries impartially selected.
Thomas Jefferson, "First Inaugural Address," March 4, 1801. From Mortimer Adler, ed., The Annals of America: 1797-1820, Domestic Expansion and Foreign Entanglements, Vol.4; Chicago: Encyclopedia Brittanica, 1968, pp. 144
with all Love and respect,
atoz |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|