Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Why Christianity today is divided


Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion.
Author Message
mag_dala55
Tadpole



Joined: 02 Jul 2006
Posts: 26


PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:58 pm    Post subject: Why Christianity today is divided Reply with quote

Perhaps we are thinking why Christianity is divided into sects and denominations when religious leaders have a common basis for their doctrines -- the Holy Bible.

The reason is, because "spiritual WOMEN" are speaking in the churches! A typical example is, religious leaders interpret WOMEN literally, thinking that they are the "men" alluded to in the following:

• 1 Tim 2:11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.

• 1 Tim 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

If only we abide by what "is written," this chaos in Christianity should not have happened.

This is what “is written.” God speaks parables:

• Eze 20:49 Then said I, Ah Lord GOD! they say of me, Doth he not speak PARABLES?

Jesus Christ was prophesied to speak dark sayings of old or in parables:

• Psa 78:2 I will open my mouth in a PARABLE: I will utter DARK SAYINGS OF OLD.

The prophecy is fulfilled as confirmed by Mark in:

• Mar 4:34 BUT WITHOUT A PARABLE SPAKE HE NOT UNTO THEM: and when they were alone, he expounded all things to his disciples.

Were Peter, John, James, Paul, or any the Apostles authorized to expound on the words of our Lord?

• Mar 4:34 But without a parable spake he not unto them: and WHEN THEY WERE ALONE, HE EXPOUNDED ALL THINGS TO HIS DISCIPLES.

Can we trust people expounding on the words of God?

• Jer 17:5 Thus saith the LORD; CURSED BE THE MAN THAT TRUSTETH IN MAN, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.

Can we use our own understanding in perceiving the meaning of the word of God?

• Prov 3:5 Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and LEAN NOT UNTO THINE OWN UNDERSTANDING.

Did Jesus demonstrate the foregoing truth? He told His listeners:

• Joh 2:19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.

Look when Jer 17:5 and Prov 3:5 are violated!

• Joh 2:20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?

• Mat 27:40 And saying, Thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in three days, save thyself. If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross.

Proof that only God has the authority to expound on His words:

• Joh 2:21 But he spake of the temple of his body.
• Joh 2:22 When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said.

Therefore, who are the "women" in 1 Tim. 2:11-12?

Let alone God expound on His words.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TBax
King Kong



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 2131


PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 12:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Therefore, who are the "women" in 1 Tim. 2:11-12?


I believe the "women" are women, the gender who are not to excercise authority over a man within the congregation.

1 Cor 11:3 But I want YOU to know that the head of every man is the Christ; in turn the head of a woman is the man; in turn the head of the Christ is God.

Later. Very Happy
_________________
Agape,
TBax
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mag_dala55
Tadpole



Joined: 02 Jul 2006
Posts: 26


PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TBax wrote:
Quote:
Therefore, who are the "women" in 1 Tim. 2:11-12?


I believe the "women" are women, the gender who are not to excercise authority over a man within the congregation.

1 Cor 11:3 But I want YOU to know that the head of every man is the Christ; in turn the head of a woman is the man; in turn the head of the Christ is God.

Later. :D


How every regrettable indeed is for man to “lean unto his own understanding”?

Prov 3:5 Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.

Why don’t we just “wait and listen” to God instead of “trusting people explain the word of God to us?”

Jer 17:5 Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.

Here is God “speaking” through Paul in his letter to the Christians of Galatia:

Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

Clearly therefore, God does not recognize PHYSICAL gender. Why don’t we “ask” Him through His “letter to us” – the Holy Bible?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TBax
King Kong



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 2131


PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
How every regrettable indeed is for man to “lean unto his own understanding”?


What exactly do you think you are doing? 1 Cor 11:3 and 1 Tim. 2:11-12 are "scripture" and shows us that according to God men are to take the lead in the congregation. The scriptures also show the first century congregation applied this.

Quote:
Clearly therefore, God does not recognize PHYSICAL gender.


That is true regarding people being acceptable to God, however being acceptable requires listening to God's headship principles.

Later. Very Happy
_________________
Agape,
TBax
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6365

Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Curiosity here...

I'm a stickler for some things and I've been looking for this for a while and I can't seem to find it. I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this for me..

1Cr 14:34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but [they are commanded] to be under obedience, as also saith the law.

Maybe someone can show me where it says in the law that women are not permitted to speak and they are commanded to be under obedience?

I can justify the obedience part with the conversation God had with Eve, but I can't find a law that doesn't allow women to speak.

hoping someone can help me out here..
thanks
Lone
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6365

Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HA,

I found this I thought it was cool...

Num 27:1 ¶ Then came the daughters of Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of Manasseh the son of Joseph: and these [are] the names of his daughters; Mahlah, Noah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Tirzah.
Num 27:2 And they stood before Moses, and before Eleazar the priest, and before the princes and all the congregation, [by] the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, saying,
Num 27:3 Our father died in the wilderness, and he was not in the company of them that gathered themselves together against the LORD in the company of Korah; but died in his own sin, and had no sons.
Num 27:4 Why should the name of our father be done away from among his family, because he hath no son? Give unto us [therefore] a possession among the brethren of our father.
Num 27:5 And Moses brought their cause before the LORD.
Num 27:6 ¶ And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
Num 27:7 The daughters of Zelophehad speak right: thou shalt surely give them a possession of an inheritance among their father's brethren; and thou shalt cause the inheritance of their father to pass unto them.

least we get some credit for something .. Laughing Laughing
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
mag_dala55
Tadpole



Joined: 02 Jul 2006
Posts: 26


PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:07 pm    Post subject: Who are these "daughters?" Reply with quote

lone-traveler wrote:
HA,

I found this I thought it was cool...

Num 27:1 ¶ Then came the daughters of Zelophehad, ...
Num 27:5 And Moses brought their cause before the LORD.
Num 27:6 ¶ And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
Num 27:7 The daughters of Zelophehad speak right: thou shalt surely give them a possession of an inheritance among their father's brethren; and thou shalt cause the inheritance of their father to pass unto them.

least we get some credit for something .. Laughing Laughing


lone-traveler, who do you think are these "daughters of Zelophedad" who are entitled to the INHERITANCE? With God's revelation, this indeed is a great message to the "chosen" of God.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6365

Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

well,
so far 5 daughters from the tribe of Manasseh Son of Joseph, who was born to Him while he was in Egypt but Jacob claimed as his own.
So also under the covenant of Abraham, which are the ten tribes of Israel scattered around the world.

Some say Ephraim and Manasseh are Britain and US. But even these people have scattered cross the globe to live in other countries too.

5 daughters...

Zelophehad
first-born, of the tribe of Manasseh, and of the family of Gilead; died in the wilderness. Having left no sons, his daughters, concerned lest their father's name should be "done away from among his family," made an appeal to Moses, who, by divine direction, appointed it as "a statute of judgment" in Israel that daughters should inherit their father's portion when no sons were left ( Num 27:1-11). But that the possession of Zelophehad might not pass away in the year of jubilee from the tribe to which he belonged, it was ordained by Moses that his daughters should not marry any one out of their father's tribe; and this afterwards became a general law ( Num 36).

Num 36:6 This [is] the thing which the LORD doth command concerning the daughters of Zelophehad, saying, Let them marry to whom they think best; only to the family of the tribe of their father shall they marry.

Num 36:11 For Mahlah, Tirzah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Noah, the daughters of Zelophehad, were married unto their father's brothers' sons:
Num 36:12 [And] they were married into the families of the sons of Manasseh the son of Joseph, and their inheritance remained in the tribe of the family of their father.

You know I see this same scenerio taking place between Joseph and Mary...odd... Confused or disgusted

Mary was going to be put out of the inheritance because Joseph thought she was impure. But the Angel intervened for her and She inherited the portion of the Lord.

Having left no sons, his daughters, concerned lest their father's name should be "done away from among his family," made an appeal to Moses, who, by divine direction, appointed it as "a statute of judgment" in Israel that daughters should inherit their father's portion when no sons were left ( Num 27:1-11).

don't know why, I just see it like this for now... Confused or disgusted

God Bless
Lone
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Pete
Lion King



Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 1019

Location: Arlington Hts., Il. USA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

lone-traveler wrote:
Curiosity here...

I'm a stickler for some things and I've been looking for this for a while and I can't seem to find it. I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this for me..

1Cr 14:34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but [they are commanded] to be under obedience, as also saith the law.

Maybe someone can show me where it says in the law that women are not permitted to speak and they are commanded to be under obedience?

I can justify the obedience part with the conversation God had with Eve, but I can't find a law that doesn't allow women to speak.

hoping someone can help me out here..
thanks
Lone


Hey Lone, I believe in this instance, what Paul was referring to, was that women were not permitted to "preach" (speak) in the church, or exercise authority over men in terms of "church authority." In short, men are supposed to be the leaders when it come to group instruction within the church.

I had another thought, and I seem to remember that The early churches (home churches), and synagogues were not quite as formal as they are today. So there may have been quite a bit more back-and -forth banter, more like what you might see in an informal group Bible study class today.

It may have been that women were not to lead these gatherings, and possibly not even voice their opinions, but would do so later with their husbands, other women, and within their families.


Last edited by Pete on Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:44 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6365

Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like when Eve gave Adam something to eat that God told him not to?

Wink
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 1094


PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete wrote:


It may have been that women were not to lead these gatherings, and possibly not even voice their opinions, but would do so later with their husbands, other women, and within their families.


Hmm, could one guess why? LOL

Not true for all women, of course. But many women do have a penchant for arguing points without the need of logic - which tends to be a little disruptive or heated in meetings and gatherings. Men are a little more cooler and reasonable - just a little more than women. I think Paul may have seen these disruptions too often and so may have had this in mind as a remedy to keep disruptions in these gatherings at a minimum.

Perhaps at Corinth the women there were particularly disruptive in the church requiring him to write to them special about it. Whether it was to be policy for all Christian gatherings or it was policy just for them at Corinth is a matter of debate. I believe Paul mentions it again in another unrelated epistle. I believe one of the Timothy epistles.

Anyway.

Just my theory based on observation. Smile

For the women reading this, please don't stone me on this point. No offense. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6365

Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ryck wrote:
Pete wrote:


It may have been that women were not to lead these gatherings, and possibly not even voice their opinions, but would do so later with their husbands, other women, and within their families.


Hmm, could one guess why? LOL

Not true for all women, of course. But many women do have a penchant for arguing points without the need of logic - which tends to be a little disruptive or heated in meetings and gatherings. Men are a little more cooler and reasonable - just a little more than women. I think Paul may have seen these disruptions too often and so may have had this in mind as a remedy to keep disruptions in these gatherings at a minimum.

Perhaps at Corinth the women there were particularly disruptive in the church requiring him to write to them special about it. Whether it was to be policy for all Christian gatherings or it was policy just for them at Corinth is a matter of debate. I believe Paul mentions it again in another unrelated epistle. I believe one of the Timothy epistles.

Anyway.

Just my theory based on observation. Smile

For the women reading this, please don't stone me on this point. No offense. Smile



HA Ryck,

LOL..

have you wandered round the forum lately? this could be debatable..LOL... Laughing Laughing Laughing
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
MoJo
Moderator



Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 3399

Location: Canada

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ryck wrote:
Not true for all women, of course. But many women do have a penchant for arguing points without the need of logic - which tends to be a little disruptive or heated in meetings and gatherings. Men are a little more cooler and reasonable - just a little more than women. I think Paul may have seen these disruptions too often and so may have had this in mind as a remedy to keep disruptions in these gatherings at a minimum.


#Rofl
_________________
matt 6: 34 "Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
knuckle
Young Wolf



Joined: 18 Sep 2006
Posts: 501


PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi All-----------
Paul starts by speaking to the men about prophesying
1Co 14:31 For ye may all prophesy one by one, that all may learn, and all may be comforted.
1Co 14:32 And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets.
1Co 14:33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.

He is saying guys take your turn and be silent when your fellows are speaking---this is church not a debate

1Co 14:34 Let your women(whos women?the women(wives)of the ones prophesying) keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
1Co 14:35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

he is saying ladies this is church,not a football game your husbands don't need a cheering section

Paul was telling them in general---sit down and shut up so the message could be heard


much love------------knuckle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
saibe
Ferret



Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 120

Location: houston tx

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Hmm, could one guess why? LOL

Not true for all women, of course. But many women do have a penchant for arguing points without the need of logic - which tends to be a little disruptive or heated in meetings and gatherings. Men are a little more cooler and reasonable - just a little more than women. I think Paul may have seen these disruptions too often and so may have had this in mind as a remedy to keep disruptions in these gatherings at a minimum.


Quote:
For the women reading this, please don't stone me on this point. No offense. Smile


How good of you to put in a disclaimer, but Im not letting you off the hook!

11A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. 12I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent. 13For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner. 15But women[a] will be saved[b] through childbearing—if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety.

When Paul wrote this could it have been that men, were not teaching, possibly arguing with one anther, and not being the spiritual covering God holds them responsible for.

When Jesus was cruxified, it is true that only the women stayed, most if not all the men vanished.

Judges 4:1
1 After Ehud died, the Israelites once again did evil in the eyes of the LORD. 2 So the LORD sold them into the hands of Jabin, a king of Canaan, who reigned in Hazor. The commander of his army was Sisera, who lived in Harosheth Haggoyim. 3 Because he had nine hundred iron chariots and had cruelly oppressed the Israelites for twenty years, they cried to the LORD for help.


4 Deborah, a prophetess, the wife of Lappidoth, was leading [a] Israel at that time. 5 She held court under the Palm of Deborah between Ramah and Bethel in the hill country of Ephraim, and the Israelites came to her to have their disputes decided. 6 She sent for Barak son of Abinoam from Kedesh in Naphtali and said to him, "The LORD, the God of Israel, commands you: 'Go, take with you ten thousand men of Naphtali and Zebulun and lead the way to Mount Tabor. 7 I will lure Sisera, the commander of Jabin's army, with his chariots and his troops to the Kishon River and give him into your hands.' "

8 Barak said to her, "If you go with me, I will go; but if you don't go with me, I won't go."

9 "Very well," Deborah said, "I will go with you. But because of the way you are going about this, [b] the honor will not be yours, for the LORD will hand Sisera over to a woman." So Deborah went with Barak to Kedesh, 10 where he summoned Zebulun and Naphtali. Ten thousand men followed him, and Deborah also went with him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion. All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 

© 2001-2007