Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

$...



 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> NEW! - Political Forum - Scripture and Christianity in Politics
Author Message
theseldomscene
Banned



Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Posts: 7817


PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:16 pm    Post subject: $... Reply with quote

http://portal.tds.net/news.php?story=23171
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 8326

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder what will get more cars off the road, a gas tax or tolls?
_________________
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction."
-Blaise Pascal
"...with or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil -that takes religion..."
-Steven Weinberg
"I would bless my children with your destruction instead."
-Someone who shall remain anonymous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6365

Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you trying to cheer me up tss?

It's not only in CA. it's happening in a lot of places.
We're going to have to turn in the truck if this keeps up.
We already pay fuel taxes at the pump and quarterly's.
About $400 a year. That's not including the fuel.
If the tolls actually paid for repairs of the roads, well then I might not complain..
But have you ever gone northbound over the George Washington Bridge in NY in an 18 wheeler?
Talk about shake rattle and roll..man..
All of the northeast is terrible. I tell Mark, we should get some of these people that recieve the tolls and put them in a truck and let them go boppin down the road. I worry about the front end. It takes a beating, not to mention your kidneys. Sometimes the roads are so bad the load is at risk..that's not good.

anywhooo..
Like I say, IF they used the money to keep up the roads then I wouldn't squack at all. But most times it goes to lining other projects pockets, and the roads get neglected bad.
Last time we went nb on the gwbridge it cost $4. for cars and $35. for trucks. And cars don't have to pay a road toll tax on top of their fuel tax. We stay out of the northeast as much as possible...
Now who does that hurt the most in the end?
the consumer.
If we have to pay tolls then the cost of the load has to go up to compensate. If the revenue goes up, the products go up, and the people that buy the commodoties get charged more to compensate for the shipping charges.
It's a vicious cycle...

There's a lot of truck drivers hurting right now with the cost of fuel, freight is slow, weathers bad. Lot's of them go out of business..the little guys like us.
That means less trucks to move the commodoties, all goes back to supply and demand.
And then you have these wonderful hours of service rules that apply. You can't sleep when your tired without taking out of your drive time. Less drive time means longer delays getting to the P/U and REC. So you can drive for 11 consecutive hours straight and sleep for 10. The other 3 hours is for loading and unloading, eating, repairs, traffic jams,bookkeeping.
Get real..we sit sometimes to get L-UL for up to 5-6 hours or more alone.
And if your tired..too bad. have to get to the destination on time. If not who starts crying? The consumer because the items they want aren't available when they want them...NOW..

more road tolls... Rolling Eyes

It's getting tough out there..for sure.

sorry I went on a tirade..it's tax time.
Mark is in Indiana. Having some rough weather up there and I'm just...well you know me...worry wort.. Rolling Eyes

Quote:
Local and state transportation officials have begun a number of road projects and many in the state government say that creating tolls may be the only way to bankroll the transportation projects without implementing an unpopular gas tax, The Los Angeles Times reported Tuesday.


You know what will happen though? Most trucks will end up using the local roads instead of the toll roads, and then you have the local people screaming because we're downtown instead of on the highway...

What's going to be more unpopular, a gas tax or truckers refusing to go into CA because they can't afford the tolls?

Long Beach to the Inland Empire..what's that all of I-5 up to Sanfransico? 350 miles of toll road... Shocked
San Diego to the Mexican borders only 16...
Basically all of I-5.

maybe I'm just biased because we have a truck.. Confused or disgusted

ok ductape time
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 8326

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

lone-traveler wrote:

Like I say, IF they used the money to keep up the roads then I wouldn't squack at all. But most times it goes to lining other projects pockets, and the roads get neglected bad.


I can think of one 'project' in particular, where if you'd taken the money wasted on it and put it into roads, you'd be able to repave ever road in the entire country!
_________________
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction."
-Blaise Pascal
"...with or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil -that takes religion..."
-Steven Weinberg
"I would bless my children with your destruction instead."
-Someone who shall remain anonymous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7005

Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The sad part is that our state legislature doesn't look at the whole problem and the whole solution.

To solve a multitude of problems they have to implement a multitude of corrections:

1) start reorganzing their budget to eliminate certain spending and redirecting the funds to transportation (I think they should cut thier salaries first and divert those funds)

2) improve mass transit to make it workable and affordable

3) gas tax the regular gas and leave the truckers alone

4) actually start making roadway improvements before the roads are so bad they have to be completely redone.

5) make the developers actually pay the infrastructure fees they are supposed to when planning huge development projects.

That would be a start. Heck I would right public transit if I could get to my work from home and get their timely.

BTW:
Quote:
I can think of one 'project' in particular, where if you'd taken the money wasted on it and put it into roads, you'd be able to repave ever road in the entire country!
Don't even go there. Not in THIS thread...
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Ana
King of the Jungle



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1566

Location: BC

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:

1) start reorganzing their budget to eliminate certain spending and redirecting the funds to transportation (I think they should cut thier salaries first and divert those funds)

2) improve mass transit to make it workable and affordable

3) gas tax the regular gas and leave the truckers alone

4) actually start making roadway improvements before the roads are so bad they have to be completely redone.

5) make the developers actually pay the infrastructure fees they are supposed to when planning huge development projects.


I agree with #1-#4, although I highly doubt #1 will ever happen - more money for this would have to come from #3 (which I've suggested before, so of course I agree with it!).

#2 is a terrific one, but it's sort of a catch-22, at least in my city, but I can see the same thing happening in other cities too. Here, our city is rather spread out, so the fringe areas get some busses, but not enough to make it convenient (we're talking 7 busses a day in some parts, and none of them are very early, very late, or in the middle of the day), so of course hardly anyone actually takes the bus, but it isn't feasible for the busses to run any more often than that because the demand is so low (in those fringe areas, there wouldn't be enough riders even if there were busses every 5 minutes).

#5 I don't really understand (I mean, I understand it, but not really how it contributes to this problem or how it would be a big help once solved)- maybe you have an illustrative example?
_________________
Truth doesn't care about theology, and theology doesn't care about truth.
Ana's Bananas
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6365

Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Both I-80/90 and I-76 coming from MA and NJ going into Indiana is all toll road. There are no truckstops on the toll roads, there are service areas. These service areas do not provide enough parking spaces for trucks to stop and have their 10 hour breaks. Some of them only allow you to park for 2 hours. And there is no idling which when it's very hot out or very cold out can cause one to get very sick and even die. So we have to put generators on the trucks so we don't melt and freeze. And then they say the generators make too much noise.. Rolling Eyes
But these service areas don't provide any where to sleep other than in the truck. If you want to stay at a motel you have to exit the toll road and pay more money to get back on. The cost of diesel fuel costs more on toll roads as well as the things you purchase in the service plaza.
They know they got you by the ..hmm..so that's how they make their extra money. The roads are kept up fairly well, but they are always under construction. And most of the time they are repairing the same stretch of highway they worked on the previous year...can't figure that one out.. Confused or disgusted

And they're talking about making I-75 into a toll road. there's lots of them.
And then you have a choice of Mcdonalds, BK, all fastfood restaurants which are greasy and fatnening and put a lot of stress on the drivers. It's not like we can get out and go for a 30 minute jog on the highway. So we put a refrigerator in the truck and a microwave...but you have to run the truck or have a generator or an inverter to run them. So now your back at idling. which burns fuel which costs money...which make noise which creates fines if you run them.

And they say the tolls are to pay for the roads that their building, but long after they have been paid for they are still in effect. Who's going to shut down a cash cow?

So we take the back roads and the side roads as often as we can. We sleep in truckstops on off ramps and on ramps and rest areas, but still parking is limited.
I love being with Mark but I don't like being on the road. He gets frustrated because for every dollar you make someones trying to take two out of your wallet.

It's not easy being a truckdriver...that's for sure.
and I tell you, the money isn't that good for all the crap you have to go through to make it.
And there is no mercy out there. Every one always trying to cut you off. slam their breaks right in front of you..they don't realize 80,000 pounds is a lot of weight to try to stop on a dime. It just doesn't happen.
Everyone should have to learn how to drive a truck, then they might understand how to behave around them.
Get out from under my tires..get out there where I can see you, don't ride beside me pass on by, if I have to come over and I don't see you that could be a problem. Don't hang behind my bumper I may have to stop quick or something may fall off and break your windshield or get under your tires, or I may get a flat tire and it could blow up in your face...I don't want to be responsible for your death, so please please..give me some room to maneuver.

thankyou
I'm on the soapbox today.. Rolling Eyes
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7005

Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
#5 I don't really understand (I mean, I understand it, but not really how it contributes to this problem or how it would be a big help once solved)- maybe you have an illustrative example?

My city has grown in size by more than 1/3 in the past 5 years, it is expected to have doubled in size by 2010. The majority of that growth is housing and the light industry that goes along with housing (retail, restaurants, etc). A portion of it is industrial/commercial.

The standard practice seems to be the waiving of development fees for large developers. A major retail outlet comes in (ie WalMart) and asks for a waiver to build a 100,000 sq ft outlet. Since the store will provide jobs for about 150-200 people the city and county usually waives the fees (those fees are implemented to offset the costs of improving the infrastructure of the ares - road improvements, stop lights, sewer and water, etc) Then, the city and county has to either make the improvements out fo the general fund or let the community suffer.

The big housing developers are worse. They build 2000-3000 new homes and recieve waivers for the building of parks, schools, roads, etc. The cost of which all comes back to the property owners in one way or another.

So, the solution? Make the developers pay what the established laws dictate they are supposed to pay. THEN use those funds to make the improvements they were intended to make.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Ana
King of the Jungle



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1566

Location: BC

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:

The standard practice seems to be the waiving of development fees for large developers. A major retail outlet comes in (ie WalMart) and asks for a waiver to build a 100,000 sq ft outlet. Since the store will provide jobs for about 150-200 people the city and county usually waives the fees (those fees are implemented to offset the costs of improving the infrastructure of the ares - road improvements, stop lights, sewer and water, etc) Then, the city and county has to either make the improvements out fo the general fund or let the community suffer.


Gotta love the corporate fatcats, eh?

RevJP wrote:

The big housing developers are worse. They build 2000-3000 new homes and recieve waivers for the building of parks, schools, roads, etc. The cost of which all comes back to the property owners in one way or another.


It is my feeling that the costs would land on the property owners regardless.

It's like in the industry I work in, where if we have to pay for a permit, we pass that cost on to the customer, who then passes it on to its customers. The money for the permit ultimately goes to maintaining the roads we were permitted to travel on (at least, in theory Rolling Eyes ). Spread this over all the other transportation companies, and the permit fund goes towards maintaining the roads, and the customers are paying into that fund, so that over all, we have everybody (ie. the tax payers - again, in theory) paying for those roads. Now say we waive those fees here and there (or even altogether). The deficit of money in the 'maintaining the road' fund gets made up in taxes (paid by the tax payers of course), or else it doesn't get made up, in which case, the roads deteriorate a little extra. Either way, the taxpayers are the ones who pay.


RevJP wrote:

So, the solution? Make the developers pay what the established laws dictate they are supposed to pay. THEN use those funds to make the improvements they were intended to make.


This sounds like you either have a corrupted government, since they break laws, or there are laws which allow them to waive these fees, in which case, either the laws themselves are the result of corruption, or they were implemented for good reasons.
_________________
Truth doesn't care about theology, and theology doesn't care about truth.
Ana's Bananas
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6365

Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 1:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

President’s Budget Recommends $1.4 Billion for Major Transit Projects

www.dot.gov/affairs/fta0107.htm

President Bush today recommended to Congress $1.4 billion in funding for major transit projects that are aimed at increasing mobility and easing congestion in urban areas such as New York and Seattle, as well as smaller metropolitan areas like Springfield, Ore., and Kansas City, Mo., U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary E. Peters said.

The New Starts Annual Report includes $864 million in annual funding for projects to which the federal government has already made long-term funding commitments, known as Full Funding Grant Agreements (FFGAs). Another $330 million will be available to fund four projects recommended for an FFGA. Finally, six projects will compete for $72 million based on their progress within the New Starts program and four smaller projects will receive a total of $52 million.

“We believe the projects recommended in this report provide American citizens the greatest possible return on the investment of their tax dollars,” said FTA Administrator James Simpson.

I could think of better things to do with 1.4 billion dollars.
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Posts: 2673

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lone I agree with this sentiment:

Quote:
Everyone should have to learn how to drive a truck, then they might understand how to behave around them.


But it probably wont change anyone's way of driving.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7005

Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It is my feeling that the costs would land on the property owners regardless.


Here's the thing though: The laws as established should cause things to work this way:

A housing developer on the other side of the city is building 3000 new homes, this development would require the improvement of roads in that area, sewer, water, power, and the building of a new elementary school. The initial costs are to be provided by the developer which they in turn pass on to the new home owners in the purchases of the homes and 'Melo Roos' fees.

The city waives the costs, and then a bond measure shows up on the ballot for the bonds to fund the building of a new school in that neighborhood. My property tax now goes up to pay for infrastructure and schools that I do not benefit from and the people who by law are supposed to foot the bill get off the hook, and in fact make a profit while I go in debt.

This has happened over and over again unfortunately.
Quote:

This sounds like you either have a corrupted government, since they break laws, or there are laws which allow them to waive these fees, in which case, either the laws themselves are the result of corruption,
They are within their rights to waive the fees, I am not asserting that any laws have been broken, simply that it is not the right thing to do, and our community suffers for it in the long run as the impact of traffic and population are never immediate, but develop gradually until one day you wake up and wonder where all the people and cars came from.

Then the city jumps up and says they need to make major revisions to the road system, which of course needs to be funded by the taxpayers... Although by this time the City counsel members who had waived the initial development fees have moved on to bigger and better things....

Quote:
or they were implemented for good reasons.
Usually one overriding reason, and not a particularly 'good' one: The developer tells them that they want to build in the city, raising their tax revenue, but if they cannot get a break on the developers fees they will go to another city and get it - giving them the tax revenue. The city bites at that bait almost every time.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Ana
King of the Jungle



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 1566

Location: BC

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:

Quote:
or they were implemented for good reasons.
Usually one overriding reason, and not a particularly 'good' one: The developer tells them that they want to build in the city, raising their tax revenue, but if they cannot get a break on the developers fees they will go to another city and get it - giving them the tax revenue. The city bites at that bait almost every time.


That's something I was thinking about yesterday... this tax revenue, if it's coming from retail, does that mean there is more consuming going on, really? Or is it just reallocated spending? The way I see it is, unless you're attracting a lot of people from out of town to come shopping at this new development, then you're not really gaining tax revenue, unless you're attracting a lot of residents too, (and where would you put them?) So really, those big developments are worth it to you, if your whole city sees improvements because of it. The schools thing, in particular, is a good thing, because the more educated a populace is, generally the better quality of life everyone in it enjoys. The roads, electricity, et cetera that go into this is generally a good thing for you, even if you don't benefit from it directly.
_________________
Truth doesn't care about theology, and theology doesn't care about truth.
Ana's Bananas
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7005

Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
he schools thing, in particular, is a good thing, because the more educated a populace is, generally the better quality of life everyone in it enjoys. The roads, electricity, et cetera that go into this is generally a good thing for you, even if you don't benefit from it directly.
Yeah, and all the while my kids attend a school that was built before I was born with leaky roofs and 5 year old text books, and we drive on roads cracking and full of pot holes, and I get my property taxes increased to put some kids across town into a state of the art school with computers in every classroom, and they get to drive on brand new streets...

I think I would rather the developers pay what they are supposed to pay and the people buying the houses in the new neighborhoods pay for thier own schools...
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> NEW! - Political Forum - Scripture and Christianity in Politics All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

© 2001-2007