Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Water Baptism is ESSENTIAL to salvation!


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Bible Doctrine
Author Message
rjustice7
Growing Guppy



Joined: 28 Jun 2007

Posts: 41

Location: Johnson City, TX

PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:38 am    Post subject: ragman13... Reply with quote

ragman 13

If you read some of the posts I have left FoC, you will find my stand on things like dying before baptism. I agree fully with Steven3 so if you read his post, you'll understand my beliefs as well on the matter. Also no God did not send Paul to baptize, as I said before he sent Him to preach the word and bring people to a point of salvation. However baptism is part of this, or Christ most likely would have not commanded His disciples to baptize in Matthew 28:19. If baptism is not essential, why do it in the first place? Doesn't it seem kind of unnecessary? Also I didn't prove your point in Acts 10 unless you agree with me. The point was that if Cornelius and his house were saved after receiving the Holy Ghost, then why did Peter baptize them at all? Apparantly Peter saw a need to do this, and frequently there was a need to do this all throughout the time of the early church. Just look at a few examples...

Acts 2:38 (where it was first preached by Peter)
Acts 8:16-17
Acts 10:46-48
Acts 19:3-5
Acts 22:16

Either before they received the Holy Ghost, or in some cases after, they were always baptized. I also explained the situation Peter was in at Cornelius's house, and about the 6 Jewish bretheren. And that all checks out because when good old Pete comes home you bet the council approaches him about baptizing the gentiles. Peter tells them that the Holy Ghost also fell upon the gentiles. Then they rejoice together. Now what if the gentiles had not received the Holy Ghost before being baptized? It would have been a bad situation for our friend Peter.

I know that we have different beliefs on the matter, so I'm just describing mine to you. What I post will show you what I believe and why scripturally. Your opinions and beliefs will always be respected in my eyes even if we don't see eye-to-eye. Very Happy
Back to top
Steven3
Lion King



Joined: 10 Jul 2007

Posts: 1205

Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi SealedEternal
SealedEternal wrote:
Steven3 wrote:
Additionally John 3:5 is explained, if explanation were needed, in Titus 3:5, which makes it evident that both water and spirit were and are required.
Titus 3:5 has nothing whatsoever to do with the ceremonial water baptism.
Nothing whatsoever? Shocked Well, with respect that's quite a claim, not just in that Paul's other mentions of "washing" (see below) are connected with "water", but also generally in any language "wash" and "water" go together, well, like "wash" and "water" Rolling Eyes .

1 Corinthians 6:11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

Ephesians 5:26 that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word,


Note the binary qualities of water and spirit in the above too.

All I said is that John 3:5 is "explained" by Titus 3:5, my point was Titus 3:5 shows John 3:5 is more than the purely ceremonial aspect of baptism. So actually I was actually saying something you'd agree with, just not agreeing to the extreme to deny any relation between "wash" and "water". As illustrated by:

Hebrews 10:22 let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water.
God bless
S


Rjustice
rjustice7 wrote:
I agree fully with Steven3 so if you read his post, you'll understand my beliefs as well on the matter.
Very Happy delighted Very Happy
Back to top
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003

Posts: 6816

Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been thinking about baptism just recently and started thinking about the physical and spiritual ramifications of it.

Consider the ceremonial applications of washing before entering the temple and other ideas of ceremonial cleansing. Water was the mode and the result was a ceremonial cleanliness before approaching worship of God.

Baptism is very much like this is it not? The use of water in the act of cleansing? Let us look then to 'water':

Isa 8:7 Now therefore, behold, the Lord brings upon them the waters of the River [Euphrates], strong and many--even the king of Assyria and all the glory [of his gorgeous retinue]; and it will rise over all its channels, brooks, valleys, and canals and extend far beyond its banks; [Isa. 7:17.]

Isa 12:3 Therefore with joy will you draw water from the wells of salvation.

Isa 49:10 They will not hunger or thirst, neither will mirage [mislead] or scorching wind or sun smite them; for He Who has mercy on them will lead them, and by springs of water will He guide them. [Rev. 7:16, 17.]

Eze 36:25 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and you shall be clean from all your uncleanness; and from all your idols will I cleanse you.

Pro 5:15 Drink waters out of your own cistern [of a pure marriage relationship], and fresh running waters out of your own well.

We see the idea of cleansing with water and a foreshadowing of this cleansing.

Then, with John the Baptist, we see a transition, a cleansing baptism which he more concretely identified as a shadow of that to come:

Mat 3:11 I indeed baptize you in (with) water because of repentance [that is, because of your changing your minds for the better, heartily amending your ways, with abhorrence of your past sins]. But He Who is coming after me is mightier than I, Whose sandals I am not worthy or fit to take off or carry; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire.

And Paul confirming that John's baptism was transitional:

Acts 19:3-4 And he asked, Into what [baptism] then were you baptized? They said, Into John's baptism. (4) And Paul said, John baptized with the baptism of repentance, continually telling the people that they should believe in the One Who was to come after him, that is, in Jesus [having a conviction full of joyful trust that He is Christ, the Messiah, and being obedient to Him].


Now we see Jesus paralleling Himself with cleansing water:


Joh 4:10 Jesus answered her, If you had only known and had recognized God's gift and Who this is that is saying to you, Give Me a drink, you would have asked Him [instead] and He would have given you living water.

Joh 4:14 But whoever takes a drink of the water that I will give him shall never, no never, be thirsty any more. But the water that I will give him shall become a spring of water welling up (flowing, bubbling) [continually] within him unto (into, for) eternal life.

John 7:37-39 Now on the final and most important day of the Feast, Jesus stood, and He cried in a loud voice, If any man is thirsty, let him come to Me and drink! (38) He who believes in Me [who cleaves to and trusts in and relies on Me] as the Scripture has said, From his innermost being shall flow [continuously] springs and rivers of living water. (39) But He was speaking here of the Spirit, Whom those who believed (trusted, had faith) in Him were afterward to receive. For the [Holy] Spirit had not yet been given, because Jesus was not yet glorified (raised to honor).

Rev 21:6 And He [further] said to me, It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. To the thirsty I [Myself] will give water without price from the fountain (springs) of the water of Life. [Isa. 55:1.]

Rev 22:17 The [Holy] Spirit and the bride (the church, the true Christians) say, Come! And let him who is listening say, Come! And let everyone come who is thirsty [who is painfully conscious of his need of those things by which the soul is refreshed, supported, and strengthened]; and whoever [earnestly] desires to do it, let him come, take, appropriate, and drink the water of Life without cost. [Isa. 55:1.]


Now we see that John's baptism, for the remission of sins, no longer serves that purpose as that function is replaced by the Name of Christ:

Act 22:16 And now, why do you delay? Rise and be baptized, and by calling upon His name, wash away your sins.

Romans 6:3-11 Are you ignorant of the fact that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death? (4) We were buried therefore with Him by the baptism into death, so that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glorious [power] of the Father, so we too might [habitually] live and behave in newness of life. (5) For if we have become one with Him by sharing a death like His, we shall also be [one with Him in sharing] His resurrection [by a new life lived for God]. (6) We know that our old (unrenewed) self was nailed to the cross with Him in order that [our] body [which is the instrument] of sin might be made ineffective and inactive for evil, that we might no longer be the slaves of sin. (7) For when a man dies, he is freed (loosed, delivered) from [the power of] sin [among men]. (8) Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with Him, (9) Because we know that Christ (the Anointed One), being once raised from the dead, will never die again; death no longer has power over Him. (10) For by the death He died, He died to sin [ending His relation to it] once for all; and the life that He lives, He is living to God [in unbroken fellowship with Him]. (11) Even so consider yourselves also dead to sin and your relation to it broken, but alive to God [living in unbroken fellowship with Him] in Christ Jesus.


and we also see that 'baptism' is now a thing of the spirit, not of water:

1Co 12:13 For by [means of the personal agency of] one [Holy] Spirit we were all, whether Jews or Greeks, slaves or free, baptized [and by baptism united together] into one body, and all made to drink of one [Holy] Spirit.

Ephesians 4:4-5 [There is] one body and one Spirit--just as there is also one hope [that belongs] to the calling you received-- (5) [There is] one Lord, one faith, one baptism,

Eph 5:26 So that He might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the Word,

1Pe 3:21 And baptism, which is a figure [of their deliverance], does now also save you [from inward questionings and fears], not by the removing of outward body filth [bathing], but by [providing you with] the answer of a good and clear conscience (inward cleanness and peace) before God [because you are demonstrating what you believe to be yours] through the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Back to top
SealedEternal
Labrador



Joined: 28 Dec 2006

Posts: 312

Location: Milwaukee, WI

PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steven3 wrote:
Hi SealedEternal
SealedEternal wrote:
Steven3 wrote:
Additionally John 3:5 is explained, if explanation were needed, in Titus 3:5, which makes it evident that both water and spirit were and are required.
Titus 3:5 has nothing whatsoever to do with the ceremonial water baptism.
Nothing whatsoever? Shocked Well, with respect that's quite a claim, not just in that Paul's other mentions of "washing" (see below) are connected with "water", but also generally in any language "wash" and "water" go together, well, like "wash" and "water" Rolling Eyes .

1 Corinthians 6:11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

Ephesians 5:26 that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word,


Note the binary qualities of water and spirit in the above too.

All I said is that John 3:5 is "explained" by Titus 3:5, my point was Titus 3:5 shows John 3:5 is more than the purely ceremonial aspect of baptism. So actually I was actually saying something you'd agree with, just not agreeing to the extreme to deny any relation between "wash" and "water". As illustrated by:

Hebrews 10:22 let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water.
God bless
S


The verses you post are about being washed with God's Word and sanctified by His Spirit. This is the means by which He saves us "by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit." God's Spirit regenerates our hearts and sanctifies us so that we become a new creation in Him.

Water plays no role in this process whatsoever. Water was the forshadowing of the true baptism to come. Just as circumcision symbolized the circumcision of the heart by God's Spirit, water baptism symbolized the washing of our hearts by His Spirit. If you focus on the symbol rather than what it symbolized you have missed the entire point.

God saves us by washing away our filthy hearts through His Spirit. Water only washes away the filth from our flesh, but it is useless spiritually except as a symbol. To become a child of God you must be washed internally by His Spirit which is what water baptism was meant to symbolize.

Titus 3:5 is about the washing of God's regenertion, and not the regeneration of our washing. Read the verse more carefully for yourself. You're turning it backwards.

SealedEternal
Back to top
Steven3
Lion King



Joined: 10 Jul 2007

Posts: 1205

Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello SealedEternal
SealedEternal wrote:
Titus 3:5 is about the washing of God's regeneration, and not the regeneration of our washing. Read the verse more carefully for yourself. You're turning it backwards.
I can read. If it said "regeneration of our washing" then, no, it wouldn't be an explanation or comment on the process that begins with baptism, it would be a statement "water is magic, that's all you need". But it doesn't say that, as you point out (but my original post already had) "washing of regeneration" is clearly a process not a single event.

What I don't understand is the vehemence with which you object to "washing" having anything whatsoever to do with water. It sounds like overkill.
S
Back to top
SealedEternal
Labrador



Joined: 28 Dec 2006

Posts: 312

Location: Milwaukee, WI

PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steven3 wrote:


What I don't understand is the vehemence with which you object to "washing" having anything whatsoever to do with water. It sounds like overkill.
S


Hello Steven,

I object vehemently to anyone claiming that water washing has anything to do with salvation, because scripture specifically says throughout that it is heart washing by God's Spirit that is the entire point of the gospel, and how God creates us anew and makes us His eternal children. Water is irrelevant in this process other than as a symbol. If people get hung up on the symbol itself they end up completely missing what it symbolized and the symbol entirely loses its value.

It is God's Spirit that washes and regenerates, and our hearts that are washed and regenerated. Water can only wash the flesh so it serves no purpose in this process.

SealedEternal
Back to top
FoC
Goldfish



Joined: 03 May 2007

Posts: 62


PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Water Baptism...just do it
By Wm Tipton

Instead of discussing whether water baptism 'saves' a person...an issue we personally believe is conditional seeing that some folks repent of their sins yet are unable for whatever reason to be baptised...Id like to discuss whether water baptism was practiced AFTER Jesus had ascended and after Pentecost and the coming of the Holy Spirit.

Some seem to think that after a time that water baptism was removed from our faith or something, but I personally do not believe that is the case.

The day of Pentecost and the coming of the Holy Spirit is recorded in Acts 2, as we well know, so do we see any water baptisms going on after this baptism of 'fire' spoken of in Gods word?

6 entire chapters later we have a very clear baptism in water being practiced still. If Spirit baptism is all that is *required* or expected at this point, then why is this even occurring? (of course we expect some to come up with illogical reasoning's and excuses, but read it for yourself and take no ones word for anything. Does it make sense to YOU that this water baptism is taking place *IF* it is no longer of any issue? )
Quote:

Act 8:36-39
And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? (37) And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. (38) And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him
And when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way rejoicing.
.


This next passage is quite clear. These HAD already recieved the Holy Spirit and yet WERE going to be baptized in WATER as well.


Act 10:44-48 While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word. (45) And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost. (46)
For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God.
Then answered Peter, (47) Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we? (48) And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.


Now, dear reader, is there any doubt in your mind about what is clearly shown there?
These who HAD already received the Holy Spirit were commanded to be baptized in water. we know its water since they had ALREADY received the Holy Spirit.

These who argue against water baptism do so with their own personal agendas.
Do not let these who teach falsely rob you of the blessing of water baptism...
Back to top
FoC
Goldfish



Joined: 03 May 2007

Posts: 62


PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SealedEternal wrote:


I object vehemently...

Which you seem to do often even where you are proven erroneous.
Back to top
SealedEternal
Labrador



Joined: 28 Dec 2006

Posts: 312

Location: Milwaukee, WI

PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FoC wrote:
SealedEternal wrote:


I object vehemently...

Which you seem to do often even where you are proven erroneous.


What exactly did I say there that was "erroneous"?

SealedEternal
Back to top
FoC
Goldfish



Joined: 03 May 2007

Posts: 62


PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SealedEternal wrote:
FoC wrote:
SealedEternal wrote:


I object vehemently...

Which you seem to do often even where you are proven erroneous.


What exactly did I say there that was "erroneous"?

SealedEternal

Well, now that you mentioned it, your halfhearted approach to water baptism seems somewhat 'anti' Christ to me seeing that even our perfect Lord was baptized...and HE surely didnt need to be.

I think this is just another one of those areas of doctrine that you see a bit of truth, grab onto and and lose sight of so much other truth that eventually you squeeze the life out of any truth that you had in your hand.
Kind of like the MDR thing...kwim ? Wink
Back to top
SealedEternal
Labrador



Joined: 28 Dec 2006

Posts: 312

Location: Milwaukee, WI

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's odd because I thought you agreed that water had nothing to do with regeneration, but now you say it is antichrist to say so. Make up your mind.

SealedEternal
Back to top
FoC
Goldfish



Joined: 03 May 2007

Posts: 62


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SealedEternal wrote:
That's odd because I thought you agreed that water had nothing to do with regeneration, but now you say it is antichrist to say so. Make up your mind.

SealedEternal

I agree that it is not *required* for salvation.....learn to read what a person says, otherwise those who are UNable to be baptized could never be saved....absurd to say the least.

But for you and me who CAN be baptized, yes, it is anti-Christ(ian) to find excuses to not do what Jesus Himself set the example in doing when He had no reason to be baptized seeing that it was for the remission of sin.

it is anti-Christ(ian) to teach in a manner that demeans water baptism that our own Lord partook of and commanded that we do so ourselves.

And before you start with your speach about how water baptism fell to the wayside once the Spirit had come....

These were baptized in WATER AFTER having received the Spirit, showing conclusively that WATER baptism IS still very much a part of our faith.
Quote:

Act 10:44-48 While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word. (45) And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost. (46)

For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God.

Then answered Peter, (47) Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we? (48) And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.
Back to top
SealedEternal
Labrador



Joined: 28 Dec 2006

Posts: 312

Location: Milwaukee, WI

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FoC wrote:


I agree that it is not *required* for salvation.....learn to read what a person says, otherwise those who are UNable to be baptized could never be saved....absurd to say the least.


It is you that needs to "learn to read what a person says" :

SealedEternal wrote:


Hello Steven,

I object vehemently to anyone claiming that water washing has anything to do with salvation, because scripture specifically says throughout that it is heart washing by God's Spirit that is the entire point of the gospel, and how God creates us anew and makes us His eternal children. Water is irrelevant in this process other than as a symbol. If people get hung up on the symbol itself they end up completely missing what it symbolized and the symbol entirely loses its value.

It is God's Spirit that washes and regenerates, and our hearts that are washed and regenerated. Water can only wash the flesh so it serves no purpose in this process.

SealedEternal


I made no judgment regarding the symbolic washing of water except to say that it does not save anyone. Scripture says that it is the washing of our hearts which sanctifies our lives through the regeneration of God's Spirit that saves, and never says that dunking someone in water saves. The problem is that you don't understand what the untranslated Greek word "baptizo" really means. It never means the water ceremony when speaking of salvation. Washing of water only symbolizes the "baptizo" that saves.

1 Peter 3:21 Corresponding to that, baptism now saves you--not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience

Most of us "baptizo" ourselves every day in water to try to keep our flesh clean, but that isn't going to save any of us. It is the washing of God's Spirit of our inner selves that saves, and water plays no role in this process.

SealedEternal
Back to top
FoC
Goldfish



Joined: 03 May 2007

Posts: 62


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="SealedEternal"]
FoC wrote:


It is you that needs to "learn to read what a person says"

Ive seen enough of your anti-baptism material all over the web, david. You present yourself as one who almost seems to condemn water baptism.
Of course, the the spirit that you exude, its no wonder that you wouldnt cherish water baptism like most christians do and would be so determined to tear it down here and elsewhere.


Quote:

The problem is that you don't understand what the untranslated Greek word "baptizo" really means.

Apparently I do since I understand that water baptism does not save a man.

it is your overall attitude towards water baptism that is surprising. Ive seen enough of your posts about and you almost seem to judge anyone who does cherish following in their Lords footsteps on the matter, regardless of what is said here in this thread.
Back to top
tonytony
Tadpole



Joined: 27 Mar 2007

Posts: 20


PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 12:12 pm    Post subject: The Water Baptism talk Reply with quote

Water is not symbolic of receiving his Spirit as a converter that received Christ for their life. Water is taught about with literal application not symbolically of the Spirit being in Christ. No water baptism your not born again. John 3:5. "And" is a conjunction word referring to 2 or more things. Any English grammar teacher will tell us that. Except a man be born of the water and of the spirit he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
"And" no tricky word. Water is water and spirit is spirit only. John 3:5 didn't say water baptism is optional. No thief on a cross being cruficied shortly can water baptize their self so this is the only exception with making it to heaven without water baptism given. Jesus stated the thief will be in paradise with him. Only exception but no exception outside of that. We now shut the mouth of the gainsayers.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Bible Doctrine All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
Page 11 of 13

 

© 2001-2007