Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Trinitarians wake up!


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion.
Author Message
Rocket
House Cat



Joined: 10 Dec 2006

Posts: 153


PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aramaic, Greek and Latin may have been spoken in Jerusalem in Jesus' day, because it was a large city and many came to buy and sell, but I thought we were taking about the man Jesus and His Apostles. Jesus never lived in Jerusalem, He came from a very small Jewish village named Nazareth. So, those around Him would have spoken Aramaic since that was the language of all Semetic tribes in the area. If you wish to discuss Pagen countries and their language, I could see your point, but we are talking about a Jew not a Pagen.
Back to top
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003

Posts: 6845

Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rocket, I thought the question was which language were the scriptures written in?
Back to top
mag_dala55
Tadpole



Joined: 02 Jul 2006

Posts: 26


PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JP's Mind - my blog

Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

JP, what a timely quotation of Psa. 118:8 in discussing the Trinity doctrine.

Psa 118:8 It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man.

If only we follow this God's advice, then His IDENTITY would not have elluded us. As it is, "many" people just ignore our Lord's very sharp rebuke:

Joh 8:19 Then said they unto him, Where is thy Father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also.

How many people profess to know Jesus, and at the same time declaring Father God is a mystery?
Back to top
mag_dala55
Tadpole



Joined: 02 Jul 2006

Posts: 26


PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:20 pm    Post subject: the "taboos" Reply with quote

RevJP,

Are we not "touching" the following taboo's?

Jer 17:5 Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.

Prov 3:5 Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.

Jer 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?

No wonder there are many things remaining unanswered regarding the word of God, foremost, His identity.
Back to top
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003

Posts: 6845

Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm sorry mag, I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Can you be bit less cryptic perhaps?
Back to top
TBax
King of the Jungle



Joined: 24 Oct 2005

Posts: 1942


PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rocket wrote:
If you wish to discuss Pagen countries and their language, I could see your point, but we are talking about a Jew not a Pagen.


The scriptures I provided show the JEWS spoke Hebrew and Greek. The Christians, whether Jewish or Gentile, were to live among the people of the nations and preach to them as well. Jesus, who spoke mainly to the Jews, probably spoke Aramaic, but he probably also spoke Hebrew to the Hebrew speaking Jews, and Greek to the Greek speaking Jews. Why does this matter? Very Happy You seem hung up on this. Smile


Later. Very Happy
Back to top
mag_dala55
Tadpole



Joined: 02 Jul 2006

Posts: 26


PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:54 pm    Post subject: To avoid rebuke Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
I'm sorry mag, I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Can you be bit less cryptic perhaps?


RevJP, since this thread refers to the identity of God through the Trinity, I am only pointing some flaws in the doctrine because, while professing to know Jesus, the following rebuke of our Lord cannot be avoided:

Joh 8:19 Then said they unto him, Where is thy Father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also.
Back to top
Rocket
House Cat



Joined: 10 Dec 2006

Posts: 153


PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I brought up the subject of there being an original Aramaic Bible in Syria , given to them by the Apostles and kept by the Catholic church of the East. There were those who disagreed and claimed Jesus spoke Greek? I don't think so. The original version of the Bible was written in Aramaic the language of Jesus and His Apostles. It was later copied into severial other languages.
Back to top
mag_dala55
Tadpole



Joined: 02 Jul 2006

Posts: 26


PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:21 pm    Post subject: Bible translations Reply with quote

Rocket,

The way I see it, the Bible may be written in any language and translated in different dialects. As long as there are not material deductions and additions, God will not allow His chosen to be distracted by these aberrations. Example:

In MANY Bible versions we read the following. Note the question mark (?) at the end of the verse, perhaps the translators are thinking it is impossible for God to make these possible to literal children “weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts.”

Isa 28:9 "Who is it he is trying to teach? To whom is he explaining his message? TO CHILDREN WEANED FROM THEIR MILK, TO THOSE JUST TAKEN FROM THE BREAST?

In ALL Bible versions we read the following:

Mat 11:25 At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and HAST REVEALED THEM UNTO BABES.

2 Tim 3:15 And that FROM A CHILD thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.

To a discerning reader, there is a big contradiction! Therefore, it is necessary to “verify with other versions.” Thus we find in the following:

The Bishops Bible and KJV:

Isa 28:9 Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine? THEM THAT ARE WEANED FROM THE MILK, AND DRAWN FROM THE BREASTS.

Mat 11:25 At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and HAST REVEALED THEM UNTO BABES.

2 Tim 3:15 And that FROM A CHILD thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.

Very clearly MANY versions do not take Isa 28:9 correctly and therefore they are to be disregard on this particular point, and instead follow the Bishops Bible and KJV.
Back to top
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003

Posts: 6845

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry mag, I don't see the point, nor do I see where you've poked holes in anything. I suppose one could post any verse they wanted to and state that it denounces some doctrine, that simply would fly for most scripturally literate people though...

"Jesus wept." There, that pokes holes in any doctrine that asserts we should be joyful....
Back to top
TBax
King of the Jungle



Joined: 24 Oct 2005

Posts: 1942


PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I brought up the subject of there being an original Aramaic Bible in Syria , given to them by the Apostles and kept by the Catholic church of the East. There were those who disagreed and claimed Jesus spoke Greek? I don't think so. The original version of the Bible was written in Aramaic the language of Jesus and His Apostles. It was later copied into severial other languages.


Interesting assumption. How do you know the "Aramaic Bible in Syria" wasn't a copy?
Back to top
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002

Posts: 1025


PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 10:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rocket wrote:
I brought up the subject of there being an original Aramaic Bible in Syria , given to them by the Apostles and kept by the Catholic church of the East. There were those who disagreed and claimed Jesus spoke Greek? I don't think so. The original version of the Bible was written in Aramaic the language of Jesus and His Apostles. It was later copied into severial other languages.


Don't you mean the Syriac Bible otherwise known as the Peshitta?
Back to top
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 11:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ryck wrote:
Rocket wrote:
I brought up the subject of there being an original Aramaic Bible in Syria , given to them by the Apostles and kept by the Catholic church of the East. There were those who disagreed and claimed Jesus spoke Greek? I don't think so. The original version of the Bible was written in Aramaic the language of Jesus and His Apostles. It was later copied into severial other languages.


Don't you mean the Syriac Bible otherwise known as the Peshitta?


Hi Ryck,

I don't know if the Syriac and the Peshitta are the same..

http://www.aramaicpeshitta.com/WastheNewTestamentReallyWritteninGreek1c.pdf

if you click on pages and go to page 193 there is a discussion concerning both Syriac and the Peshitta. So I'm not sure..
just thought I'd toss it out there anyways..

Lone
Back to top
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002

Posts: 1025


PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lone-traveler wrote:
Ryck wrote:
Rocket wrote:
I brought up the subject of there being an original Aramaic Bible in Syria , given to them by the Apostles and kept by the Catholic church of the East. There were those who disagreed and claimed Jesus spoke Greek? I don't think so. The original version of the Bible was written in Aramaic the language of Jesus and His Apostles. It was later copied into severial other languages.


Don't you mean the Syriac Bible otherwise known as the Peshitta?


Hi Ryck,

I don't know if the Syriac and the Peshitta are the same..

http://www.aramaicpeshitta.com/WastheNewTestamentReallyWritteninGreek1c.pdf

if you click on pages and go to page 193 there is a discussion concerning both Syriac and the Peshitta. So I'm not sure..
just thought I'd toss it out there anyways..

Lone


Thanks Lone. We learn from each other. Smile

I found something in Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peshitta
Back to top
Rocket
House Cat



Joined: 10 Dec 2006

Posts: 153


PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aramaic pershitta is in Syria. Thank you for your Url, I have two sites for this Bible that I enjoy. Both have it in aramaic with English on top of the Aramaic script. There are many version or translations on line, I have read most of them. www.Pershitta.org
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion. All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14
Page 14 of 14

 

© 2001-2007