Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

When "Creation Science" develops the cure for canc


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Creation vs. Evolution Debate
Author Message
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6772

Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
Quote:
Find me just one example of scientists making true predictions based on ID being true...
P123...

How does the idea that life was intelligently designed negate the evidence that certain species are similar?

Evolution says that all life evolved from the same source, pretty much. Intelligent design says that life was designed, part of the intelligence in that design was the use of a master blueprint for life. Certain species are similar? Of course they are, they were designed to be.


It sounds to me like you are making the argument that God created similar 'kinds' of animals, and that this is essentially the same thing as evolutionists saying that certain animals are closely related.

This may be true in a broad sense, but the Biblical account is not precise enough for performing scientific experiments. For example, if you go by the 'God created different kinds of animals' argument, it is totally unclear whether we are more closely related to pigs or to monkies; after all, we are built more like monkies, but pigs have skin that looks like ours. In fact, if you go by the Bible, you might even think that we aren't related to either of them, because God made us separately!

By contrast, ToE tells us EXACTLY which creatures are most closely related to us, and therefore tells us exactly which animals to test our drugs on so that we don't have to test them on humans.
Back to top
FFT
Emperor of the Galaxy



Joined: 26 Mar 2005

Posts: 5847

Location: Memphis

PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
Evolution says that all life evolved from the same source, pretty much. Intelligent design says that life was designed, part of the intelligence in that design was the use of a master blueprint for life. Certain species are similar? Of course they are, they were designed to be.
Except that the theory of evolution explains why bats have solid bones but birds have hollow ones.

How does intelligent design do that? Surely one or the other must be superior for flight?
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6772

Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FFT wrote:
RevJP wrote:
Evolution says that all life evolved from the same source, pretty much. Intelligent design says that life was designed, part of the intelligence in that design was the use of a master blueprint for life. Certain species are similar? Of course they are, they were designed to be.
Except that the theory of evolution explains why bats have solid bones but birds have hollow ones.

How does intelligent design do that? Surely one or the other must be superior for flight?


Not to mention whales having hind legs... ToE tells us EXACTLY why whales are sometimes born with hind legs. ID doesn't even come close...

Or why horses are sometimes born with toes, or why humans are sometimes born with tails, etc., etc.
Back to top
Pete
Tiger



Joined: 31 May 2006

Posts: 806

Location: Arlington Hts., Il. USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The theory of evolution is just that - a theory, that has not proven anything scientifically. It still takes a designer to produce cures for medical problems. Bats only produce bats, crocs only produce crocs, horses produce more horses, apes can only produce more apes and humans produce more humans.

Evolution is a fraud and an unscientific fairy tale that has nothing to back it up. Evolution is the last bastion of atheism and the only reason it gets any press.
Back to top
Trinity1
Emperor of the World



Joined: 02 Apr 2006

Posts: 3111


PostPosted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete wrote:
The theory of evolution is just that - a theory, that has not proven anything scientifically. It still takes a designer to produce cures for medical problems. Bats only produce bats, crocs only produce crocs, horses produce more horses, apes can only produce more apes and humans produce more humans.


Pete, please don't take this the wrong way... but this really is not a good way to argue this subject. A theory is nothing more than a "well-substantiated explanation of data." Other theories include the Theory of Relativity, Atomic Theory, etc... and they are well substantiated theories.

Now, I would agree that perhaps the theory is not as 'well-substantiated' as asserted by scientists, but it is a theory predicated on evidence they believe to be valid.

Not that I agree completely with THIS list from AiG, they do present some good tips.

Quote:
Evolution is the last bastion of atheism and the only reason it gets any press.


Now, that is a statement that I can agree with. Wink
Back to top
admin
Beloved Admin



Joined: 28 Sep 2000

Posts: 1686

Location: Macau, China

PostPosted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agree, I think the "evolution is just a theory" is actually on the Answers In Genesis list of arguments NOT to use anymore. (They have a list of previously used, but now deprecated, arguments against evolution).
Back to top
Trinity1
Emperor of the World



Joined: 02 Apr 2006

Posts: 3111


PostPosted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

admin wrote:
Agree, I think the "evolution is just a theory" is actually on the Answers In Genesis list of arguments NOT to use anymore. (They have a list of previously used, but now deprecated, arguments against evolution).


You would be correct... I linked to it in my previous post. It is towards the very bottom of the page...
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6772

Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete wrote:
The theory of evolution is just that - a theory, that has not proven anything scientifically. It still takes a designer to produce cures for medical problems. Bats only produce bats, crocs only produce crocs, horses produce more horses, apes can only produce more apes and humans produce more humans.


Are you an exact clone of your parents? No! Except for a couple of strange cases, reproduction always creates creatures which are slightly different.

Enough of these slight differences over time can add up to create creatures which are VERY different.

Just look at whales. Their ancestors had hind legs. I would say that losing limbs qualifies as a big difference, wouldn't you?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Creation vs. Evolution Debate All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 

© 2001-2007