Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Separation between church & state is good for churches!


Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Separation of Church and State
Author Message
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6791

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Sun May 28, 2006 9:05 pm    Post subject: Separation between church & state is good for churches! Reply with quote

Religious people often aren't too fond of the separation between church and state. For example, when the issue of teaching intelligent design in public high schools comes up, the people against it inevitably cite that that would be violating the separation of church and state.

Naturally, the people who want ID taught don't like this, and consequently they aren't too fond of the separation between church and state.

However, something that they're not taking into account is that the separation between church and state is a double-edged sword in the sense that it doesn't just keep the church from meddling in government, but it also keeps the government from meddling with the church.

Religious people everywhere should be celebrating the fact that the government can't mess with their religion, because if there were no separation, you can be absolutely sure that the government would be messing around with religion ALL THE TIME. It's bad enough that politicians falsely invoke the name of Jesus Christ during elections, but if there were no separation, the state would be actively be meddling in church doctrine.

Just look at countries where there is no separation. Iran is a good example. In Iran, the state meddles meddles with church affairs quite regularly. For example, there is nothing in the Koran about destroying Israel, but the Iranian government for political reasons is opposed to Israel, and therefore makes sure that anti-Semitism is promoted in church.

With a proper separation, the religious leaders wouldn't be getting their marching orders from politicians.

In short, the point I'm trying to make is that the separation between church and state is good for EVERYONE!
Back to top
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 3:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

so your saying...

render unto Ceasar what is Ceasar's, and unto God what is God's.

peace
lone
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6791

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 8:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess a further argument to be made is that Jesus certainly was not political at all. He was a purely spiritual man, and never got involved in petty political issues. He never tried to grab political power or start a war or anything like that.

By Jesus' own example, it should be clear that religion and politics should not be mixed. Bringing politics into religion perverts it, and therefore has no place in it.
Back to top
theseldomscene
Banned



Joined: 17 Mar 2005

Posts: 7817


PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i agree p38....and i think one of the worst things for the church is the idea of federally funded faith based initiatives...

any church will be the gov.'s puppet the minute they start taking their money....i think the gov should not fund churches...in anyway...churches and their programs must be self supporting...in order to be free...if they cannot function on their own...they should fold...

also,
i can't stand the idea of bush or clinton signing a bill that contains a prayer written by kennedy and lott...for my children to have to recite in schools...

children should be taught to pray at home...by their fathers and mothers...if they want them to pray...

and one more thing,
my son is forced to say the pledge at school...i really don't like that at all...it is nothing more than a prayer written by the state to the state...that has no place in schools....
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6791

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

theseldomscene wrote:
i agree p38....and i think one of the worst things for the church is the idea of federally funded faith based initiatives...

any church will be the gov.'s puppet the minute they start taking their money....


Yes, exactly.


theseldomscene wrote:

also,
i can't stand the idea of bush or clinton signing a bill that contains a prayer written by kennedy and lott...for my children to have to recite in schools...


No kidding! It's bad enough that our kids get a sub-standard education. Including religion in the classroom does nothing except guarantee that they'll get sub-standard faith as well!

theseldomscene wrote:

children should be taught to pray at home...by their fathers and mothers...if they want them to pray...


Yes, once again, you hit the nail on the head! I'm willing to be a little more lenient, though; I also think it should be ok for people to teach their kids to pray in church. Wink

theseldomscene wrote:

and one more thing,
my son is forced to say the pledge at school...i really don't like that at all...it is nothing more than a prayer written by the state to the state...that has no place in schools....


Seldomscene, you're on fire! I totally agree with everything you said in this post. I can see that you fully appreciate the dangers that the state poses to churches, and that the separation between church and state is not just something to protect Darwinists.
Back to top
FFT
Emperor of the Galaxy



Joined: 26 Mar 2005

Posts: 5901

Location: Memphis

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 12:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

theseldomscene wrote:
and one more thing,
my son is forced to say the pledge at school...i really don't like that at all...it is nothing more than a prayer written by the state to the state...that has no place in schools....
It wasn't always. It may stop being so in the near future should the "under God" bit get taken out.

I've mostly had a problem with it being recited over and over every day.

It's a pledge of allegiance—why should one have to say it every day? Their allegiance is already pledged.
Back to top
Ana
King of the Jungle



Joined: 10 Mar 2006

Posts: 1549

Location: BC

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 7:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FFT wrote:

It's a pledge of allegiance—why should one have to say it every day? Their allegiance is already pledged.


From an outsider's perspective, I can say that Americans are very patriotic, very proud of their country. Saying the pledge of allegiance every day reinforces that.
Back to top
Fake
Tiger



Joined: 03 May 2003

Posts: 862


PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 7:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

From another outsider's position.

Nationalism is never good, it is one of the most prolific brewing grounds for war, mix in fevrent religious messages, and you soon will have a war.

Unfortunatley, this seem to be true all to often.


Fake
Back to top
theseldomscene
Banned



Joined: 17 Mar 2005

Posts: 7817


PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i can't see me as a CHRISTian saying the pledge with or without the "under GOD" line in it...it is a prayer to the state...swearing an oath to it...my life is already pledge...i cannot swear it to another...how is it different than bowing to an idol of gold at the appointed time?...."ok class...let's stand and say the pledge...put your hand over your heart"...
training them from the first grade to die for the state...

p38
i like what you said about a substandard education and faith...that was good stuff and full of wisdom...
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6791

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ana wrote:
FFT wrote:

It's a pledge of allegiance—why should one have to say it every day? Their allegiance is already pledged.


From an outsider's perspective, I can say that Americans are very patriotic, very proud of their country. Saying the pledge of allegiance every day reinforces that.


Yes patriotism in the U.S. is a very interesting phenomenon. We don't have anything like the pledge of allegiance in Canada. And whenever I visit the U.S., I'm always really surprised at how many flags I see flying all over the place.

I'm not saying that you guys shouldn't be proud of your great country; you have a lot to be proud of. But it is interesting to note the subtle cultural differences between our two countries.
Back to top
bwokg
Tadpole



Joined: 04 Mar 2005

Posts: 21


PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 8:08 pm    Post subject: church and state Reply with quote

There is nothing wrong with patriotism. Between these borders lives the freedom the rest of the world covets. We have freedom and stability because our constitution is a fixed contract between the governed and those who are allowed to govern. Pride in our national adhearance to the rules of this contract is laudable and desireable and is why we are the most prosperous country in the entire world. Pledging alegence to the simbol of our country reminds us that we must remain on guard against those who desire to erode our freedom by narrowing our freedom of speach, by frouning on our references to almighty God. LIberty for all, justice for all, states joined indivisably, one nation, under God! The drafters of the constitution were, at least scocially, Christians. How can it be said that these people (with, if nothing else, a Christian bent) would be against reffering to God in public, on public occasions? Satan is ever ready to attack the people of God every time his people raise their heads to acknowledge His exsistance, and the more this is tolorated the bolder he becomes.
Back to top
Ana
King of the Jungle



Joined: 10 Mar 2006

Posts: 1549

Location: BC

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

P1234567890 wrote:

Yes patriotism in the U.S. is a very interesting phenomenon. We don't have anything like the pledge of allegiance in Canada. And whenever I visit the U.S., I'm always really surprised at how many flags I see flying all over the place.


Here's something interesting: a friend of mine from Canada has a father who lives in the States. He recently visited his father, and exclaimed at one point how many flags he was seeing everywhere he went. His father mentioned that when he was in Canada, he noticed little maple leaf symbols on all our stuff. The really interesting part is that when prompted, he mostly listed things that were Canadian branches of American companies (his major example was the leaf in the McDonald's logo). To me, this represents the American patriotic attude manifested 'abroad'.

Canadians are patriotic in our own way: Hockey Night in Canada, whining and complaining that we can't enter Survivor while snidely remarking that it's because we'd win and the Americans want to keep their money in-house, the little Canada flags we proudly wear all over the world on our travel gear, and so on. We're just not blatant aboot it, that's all Wink
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6791

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 9:14 pm    Post subject: Re: church and state Reply with quote

bwokg wrote:
There is nothing wrong with patriotism. Between these borders lives the freedom the rest of the world covets. We have freedom and stability because our constitution is a fixed contract between the governed and those who are allowed to govern. Pride in our national adhearance to the rules of this contract is laudable and desireable and is why we are the most prosperous country in the entire world. Pledging alegence to the simbol of our country reminds us that we must remain on guard against those who desire to erode our freedom by narrowing our freedom of speach, by frouning on our references to almighty God. LIberty for all, justice for all, states joined indivisably, one nation, under God! The drafters of the constitution were, at least scocially, Christians. How can it be said that these people (with, if nothing else, a Christian bent) would be against reffering to God in public, on public occasions? Satan is ever ready to attack the people of God every time his people raise their heads to acknowledge His exsistance, and the more this is tolorated the bolder he becomes.


There's more to it than that... I agree that Americans should be proud of their country; it really IS a great country. But patriotism is an extremely dangerous thing. It can be corrupted and perverted VERY easily.

One bad aspect of American patriotism is the isolationism and xenophobia associated with it. Canada is pretty much in the same geographic location as the U.S., isolated by a massive ocean on either side, yet if you look at where Canadians and Americans take their vacations, you'll see that Canadians are much more likely to go abroad, whereas Americans are much more likely to go somewhere in the U.S.

This is partly due to patriotism. American culture and patriotism dictates that America is the greatest country on Earth (a sentiment more or less echoed by you above). So why bother learning about other countries or visiting them if your own country is so great and has everything you could possibly want?

A side-effect of all of this is that Americans tend to be somewhat ignorant of other countries and cultures, and this lack of interest and respect translates into all sorts of foreign-policy problems.

Again, I'm not saying you shouldn't be proud of your country; you should. I'm just pointing out some of the dangers associated with patriotism.
Back to top
bwokg
Tadpole



Joined: 04 Mar 2005

Posts: 21


PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 9:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who is talking aboot blinking canucks anyway? What do they have to be proud of? They live in the cold and travel alot mostly to warm up. Their scocialist system gives them more free time to travel. We Americans have been here for as long as you have and we are the superpower, Canada is just the girl next door that we look after. Without the U.S. to rely on Canada would have to triple it's military budget, increase it's foriegn aid and grow up into our world where being nice gets you killed.
This forum is about the church and the U.S. constitution, not the wimpy hosers north of us who continually give us a hard time while sneaking down here to work and warm up. If you are from canada try to keep to the subject and not on how much better canadians are than us in the U. S. Keep your views on our patriotism up your great white north.
Back to top
golfjack
Lion King



Joined: 24 Aug 2005

Posts: 1123

Location: arizona

PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 9:40 am    Post subject: reply Reply with quote

Amen Brother Bwokg.




May God bless, golfjack
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Separation of Church and State All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 

© 2001-2007