The Satanic Bible - What it is and isn't

golfjack · Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 11:39 am Post subject: reply

As far as I know, the Bible consists of 66 books, with about 40 authors. The reason why other Books were rejected is primarily is because there was no mention of Jesus Christ. For example Maccobes, Catholics get the idea that we pray to or for the dead. I once talked to a Priest, annd he said that the Pauline epistles were mere Philosphy. this is one of the reasons I left the Catholic Church. There are many things in their thelogy that to me are unbilical.

May God bless, golfjack

trettep · Lion Joined: 24 Nov 2005 Posts: 910

stfuyssb · Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:12 am Post subject:

stfuyssb · Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:25 am Post subject:

[quote="ekspiulo"]Its true that the Satanic Bible was written by human beings and is no more true than all other books dreamed and written by men and women.

The Bibles we have today are simply all that remains after Satan published a sequal to the original that God made; however, God works in mysterious ways so instead of fixing this he simply riddled Satan's version of the Bible with errors and contradictions so rational people would know it to be false instantly. King James, after becoming king through a pact with Satan tried to edit this unholy work and make it less crazy, sadly for Satan, he failed. It is still crazy, but much like reality TV shows.
Bad writing doesn't seem to repel viewers.

This post is true because I wrote it and you read it; think about it :roll:[/quote]

[/quote] Its true that the Satanic Bible was written by human beings and is no more true than all other books dreamed and written by men and women.[quote]
Dont forget your beloved Bible was written by "Man" not your so called "god"[/quote]

atoz

Mista_Jim · Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:21 am Post subject:

eleven · Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 4:04 pm Post subject:

The only thing that really bothers me about the satanic bible or satanic worship is more and more it is geared toward young children. Check out some of the websites.
One that I went to gave this flowery speech about how satan loves his children, while Jesus was barbaric. Jesus was all about blood and sacrifice, while satan was all about surrounding his children with love all they desired. There is a separate forum for teenages 12- 17.

Sorry, but this does scare me. #evil

atoz · Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 6:32 am Post subject:

RevJP · Moderator Joined: 18 Apr 2003 Posts: 6840 Location: USA

atoz, I don't think you are on the right track. It is those of the faith that have the bigger battle for we are teaching our children and peers things which are contrary to human nature. Satan has the inside track here because he is offering what the kids think they want, while the faithful offer hope for an eternal life with God and a love that is not truly manifested in carnal terms.

God doesn't offer bling...

jsbradtech · Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:47 pm Post subject:

I, too, have read the Satanic Bible. It is my understanding that, instead of regarding a literal Satan/Lucifer, it is based on strict nihilism and focusing on material life, without regard for consequences in the hereafter. It strictly forbids sacrifice and the like. The "calls" as they appear are merely an adaptation of John Dee's "Enochian Calls" which were, according to Dee and Kelly, divinely inspired. The rest is a modified form of classic "sympathetic magick", very similar to that found in Voodoo, shamanism, and Wicca. The main difference from these other systems is that it does so without regard for karma or consequence. The so-called Satanic aesthetic it uses is merely a lure to those who are pre-disposed to rebellion. After this, the similarities largely end.

The Gnostics feel that the vengeful, bloody, Old Testament God was, in fact, the Demiurge. The supreme fallen angel, who posited that it be "better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven." Reading "Paradise Lost", "Gargantua and Pantagruel" by Rabelais, and the various scriptures of the Nag Hammadi can be at least somewhat enlightening in this regard. I also recommend reading some of the various Rosicrucian documents with an open mind. YMMV.

I feel that both Christ and Lucifer are not literal beings, but aspects of our own personalities that we have to come to terms with. In order to ascend, we must become Christ-like. If we submit to our pride, our egos, we become like Lucifer, and will remain here, in the material universe. These things in the Bible are given to us as personal spiritual guides, not rote history lessons to be spouted off to justify this or that.

We all have our personal demons. These usually get suppressed, because we are afraid of them and what they might do. But, they are part of us, and there's no getting rid of them. Life gives us these experiences, and it's up to us to integrate them into our psyches, not shove them into the oubliette of the subconscious. Left there, they gain power over us. Dealt with and reconciled through Will, they fall in line and we become healthier and stronger for it.

Humans are rebellious by nature. Our pride wants us to be individual, separate in some way... better than "them". This is our Lucifer nature. Most of us, thankfully, try to keep it in check. However, make something forbidden, and people clamor to it. Rules and laws create self-fulfilling problems with the very activities they try to restrict (just take a look at Prohibition... more people drank than ever, or the so-called "War on Drugs"). By taking away a taboo status, it suddenly becomes no big deal. When things such as sexual morality and what-not get rules applied, we end up with rapists and child-molesters. Suppression creates problems. Rules, commandments, laws... these are merely about control, and making sure that we each have this enormous repressive guilt complex to keep us barely above sane daily function. We should simply try to follow the Golden Rule, and worry less about all the labeling, division, classification of who's right and who's wrong in this world, take away the concept of "us and them".

Pride and Dogma divide. That's just what Machiavelli taught.

Dust · Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:35 am Post subject:

Those who would rebel against truth, have a fairly easy and wide path to follow. There is only one book of truth, whereas there are countless alternate books, paths, and views.

When lack of truth in these alternates becomes apparent, I don't think it wise to throw out the baby with the bath water, so to speak.....which is what I see this thread suggesting.