|
|
| Author |
Message |
FFT Emperor of the Galaxy
Joined: 26 Mar 2005
   Posts: 5847 Location: Memphis
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:37 am Post subject: Intelligent Design |
|
|
LuckyStrike has expressed a willingness to participate in a debate over Intelligent Design. I agree, on one condition:
You have to show how Intelligent Design is anything but an argument from ignorance, one of those violations of logical empiricism. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
SDMD Show Poodle
Joined: 12 Oct 2005
  Posts: 253
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| But that is not possible to being with, as there is no evidence for ID, thus making it not even a science |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FFT Emperor of the Galaxy
Joined: 26 Mar 2005
   Posts: 5847 Location: Memphis
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd like to see LS respond, actually. What with all his descent into logical empiricism when it suits him, I'd like to see if he follows through when it doesn't. However, from LS's posts, I gather that he does not actually support ID, as he has stated that evolution stands on its own without God, that any addition would be merely a God of the Gaps argument (those gaps get slimmer every day, too).
So I'm curious as to where this will go. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|