Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Godhead


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion.
Author Message
jdwtx2005
Tadpole



Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 28


PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thunder, Very Happy
Whereas there are numerous scriptures and passages within the Bible that make it crystal clear that salvation is based on the GOSPEL (i.e., the death, burial, and resurrection of CHRIST), plus nothing, minus nothing (See - Jn 3:14,16,17,36 & 5:24 & 6:40,47 & Acts 16:31 & Rom 10:9-13), there are only seven verses in the N.T. that “appear” to indicate that salvation is dependent upon baptism. A simple examination of these verses, however, will prove that baptism has nothing to do with the GOSPEL that saves:

1) Mark 16:16 - It should be noted that in the second half of this verse the only basis for condemnation is a refusal to believe (See - Jn 3:18). Therefore the only basis for salvation is belief, not baptism plus belief. Take for example a man that desires to travel to Chicago by train.

“He that gets on the train (i.e., believeth) and sits down (i.e., is baptized) gets to Chicago (i.e., is saved), but he that does not get on the train (i.e., believeth not) does not get to his desired destination called Chicago (i.e., is damned).”
Belief in the Gospel of CHRIST ( Rom 1:16 & Eph 1:13 & I Cor 15:1-4), not baptism, is the matter that settles salvation. The Gospel is not CHRIST’S death, burial, and resurrection plus good works, or plus church membership, or plus baptism. Paul said in I Corinthians 1:17, “For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the Gospel:” It’s not JESUS plus - its JESUS only!

2) Acts 2:38 - "Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ FOR the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the HOLY GHOST."

The Greek word translated “for” is the indefinite preposition “eis.” It means “pointing to,” not “in order that.” The people in Acts 2:38 were baptized “pointing to” the fact that they had already been saved, not “in order that” they might be saved (i.e., have remission of sins).
Take for example a man that is in jail “for” murder. Is the man in jail “in order that” he might murder or is he in jail “pointing to” the fact that he had already murdered? The question answers itself! While we should preach that all men are commanded to repent and be baptized, adding any other requirement to salvation by grace becomes “works” in disguise.

3) I Peter 3:20,21 - "20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the 21days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein 22few, that is, eight souls were saved by water..."

Interestingly enough, Noah and his family were not saved by getting into the water but by staying out of the water. The ark (i.e., a picture of CHRIST) is what saved Noah and his family, not the water.

4) Mark 1:4 - According to Acts 19:3,4, the “baptism of repentance” is the proclaiming of the Gospel, not the performance of a rite (See - Acts 10:37 & 13:23,24).

5) Acts 22:11-16 -
According to Acts 22:13, Saul (i.e., Paul) was already saved and considered a brother in CHRIST long before he was ever baptized. Acts 9:17,18 confirms this truth. Calling on the name of the LORD JESUS is what washes away sin and saves a person (See - Acts 10:43 & Rom 10:13 & I Cor 6:11), not baptism. Ananias exhorted Paul to be baptized “in token of” the washing away of his sins, not “in order to” wash away his sins. Again, baptism has no saving merit whatsoever. Only the blood (See - Lev 17:11) of CHRIST washes away sin and saves a person (See - Acts 20:28 & Rom 3:25 & Eph 1:7 & Heb 10:19,20 & Rev 1:5)!

22:16: "And now why tarriest thou? ARISE, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the LORD. "
The word "arise" here in the original Greek is the past participle of the word and should be translated as young Literal transaltion does as "HAVING ARISEN". This means salvation (RISING) happens before baptism.


6) John 3:1-6 - There are some religions that would have you to believe that the water in verse 5 is speaking of baptism and therefore baptism is a part of salvation. However, there are four irrefutable reasons why the phrase “born of water” in John 3:5 cannot mean baptism. The water in verse 5 refers to the washing of the water of God’s Word (See - Eph 5:26).

7) Titus 3:5 - According to John 15:3 and Ephesians 5:26, the washing of regeneration here in verse 5 refers to the Word of God, not baptism (See - I Pet 1:23). According to the Bible, it takes a combination of the HOLY SPIRIT (i.e., the Wind) and the Word of God to produce the new birth in a person (See - Ezk 37:1-10 & Jn 1:13 & II Thess 2:13 & Titus 3:5 & Jms 1:18 & I Pet 1:22).


Scripture does not and cannot contradict scripture.

In the love of Christ,
jdwtx2005 Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thunder
Lion King



Joined: 13 Sep 2003
Posts: 1222


PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:02 am    Post subject: Again ... Reply with quote

Again ... you are arguing to be arguing.

The bible says," He that believes and is baptised shall be saved." Mark 16:16

Why argue a written text supported by water baptism throughout the NT?

Why defy simple instructions requiring obedience?

Oh, that's it, obedience! That's the problem.

Some people, even some who say they are christian and say they are born again refuse to submit to simple instructions as an act of human rebellion.

" Just because the bible says it, Jesus did it, Apostles preached it, those are not good enough reasons for me to obey it." signed, an obedient believer and follower of Jesus Christ ... WRONG!!!

thunder
_________________
Submit to God in Christ
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7003

Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 11:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think jdwtx2005 made an extremely valid point, scripturally supported as well.

Thunder, you are preaching a Gospel +, plain and simple, which is contrary to the Gospel of Christ, the Good news of salvation by Grace through faith, by no work of our own.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
jdwtx2005
Tadpole



Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 28


PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thunder,
If I may be a little picky about the verse Mark 16:16.
It does not mention WATER baptism here specifically. I could easily mean baptized of the spirit. Which is what I believe.

Remember scripture cannot contradict scripture. If one's interpretation causes a contradiction in the scriptures, one should rethink their position on that interpretation.

Be always and forever willing to do this. Seek only truth, even if it is different than current beliefs. This is what I attempt to do. Hopefully I am not deceiving myself.


Laughing Surprised Confused or disgusted Wink emoticons are cool!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RND
Grizzly Bear



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 725

Location: Victorville, California, USA Corporate

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:59 pm    Post subject: Re: Why do you believe ... Reply with quote

thunder wrote:
Why do you believe ... that the Prophet of God John the Baptist ( John got his nickname from performing as many as several thousand water submursion baptisms, including the water baptism that Christ Himself REQUIRED (( not submitted to or asked John to do )) him to perform on Him ), the Apostles and Timothy and Titus and, and, and generations of Christian ministers performed and perform water baptisms?

" He that believes and is baptised shall be saved." Mark 16:16

Not,' he that believes shall be saved.' Not,' he that is baptised shall be saved.' Not,' he that is baptised and believes shall be saved.'

The result of belief ( faith ) leads directly to and precedes baptism.

It is not my personal belief, it is the word of God and I believe that Mark had a personal instructor who required him to introduce this mandate of Christ to disciples of Christ and disciples of God.

It's bible baby! Any argument contrary to this mandate will answer to God in Christ and will answer to all who follow them and were led astray from the law of Christ. It is likely that they will each spend eternity together so that each will be forever reminded of the error.

Why would any minister risk defying simple holy instructions written in clear and concise text?

thunder


What would your position be on "the thief on the cross" then?
_________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860

www.heavenlysanctuary.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TBax
King Kong



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 2072


PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RND,


Hi, Very Happy

RND wrote:
What would your position be on "the thief on the cross" then?


Acts 24:14 But I do admit this to you, that, according to the way that they call a ‘sect,’ in this manner I am rendering sacred service to the God of my forefathers, as I believe all the things set forth in the Law and written in the Prophets; 15 and I have hope toward God, which hope these [men] themselves also entertain, that there is going to be a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous.

That man who died next to Jesus will be resurrected and given the opportunity to excercise faith in Jesus. But as for those who NOW have the opportunity to accept Jesus yet reject him may not have that same second chance.


Take care. Very Happy
_________________
Agape,
TBax
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pete
Big Lion



Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 991

Location: Arlington Hts., Il. USA

PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
I think jdwtx2005 made an extremely valid point, scripturally supported as well.

Thunder, you are preaching a Gospel +, plain and simple, which is contrary to the Gospel of Christ, the Good news of salvation by Grace through faith, by no work of our own.


Trinitarians ought to practice what they preach.

Athanaisian Creed: "WHOSOEVER WILL BE SAVED, BEFORE ALL THINGS IT IS NECESSARY THAT HE HOLD THE CATHOLIC FAITH. WHICH FAITH EXCEPT EVERYONE DO KEEP WHOLE AND UNDEFILED, WITHOUT DOUBT HE SHALL PERISH EVERLASTINGLY."

The creeds represent the primary teaching of Trinitarian churches. When they say "We are saved by grace alone," they are speaking out of both sides of their mouths at the same time. If anyone preaches Gospel plus, it is Trinitarians, plain and simple, who are contrary to the Gospel of Christ.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RND
Grizzly Bear



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 725

Location: Victorville, California, USA Corporate

PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 5:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TBax wrote:
That man who died next to Jesus will be resurrected and given the opportunity to excercise faith in Jesus.


You mean he didn't? I thought when the thief acknowledged Jesus' kingdom he was displaying 'faith' that Jesus was indeed the Son of God.

Quote:
But as for those who NOW have the opportunity to accept Jesus yet reject him may not have that same second chance.


And yet, God still loves them, even when they were still sinners!

Some just don't hear Him when He calls. Some don't open the door when He knocks.

This from EG White in
Desire of Ages:

"When condemned for his crime, the thief had become hopeless and despairing; but strange, tender thoughts now spring up. He calls to mind all he has heard of Jesus, how He has healed the sick and pardoned sin. He has heard the words of those who believed in Jesus and followed Him weeping.

He has seen and read the title above the Saviour's head. He has heard the passers-by repeat it, some with grieved, quivering lips, others with jesting and mockery. The Holy Spirit illuminates his mind, and little by little the chain of evidence is joined together. In Jesus, bruised, mocked, and hanging upon the cross, he sees the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world. Hope is mingled with anguish in his voice as the helpless, dying soul casts himself upon a dying Saviour. "Lord, remember me," he cries, "when Thou comest into Thy kingdom."

Quickly the answer came. Soft and melodious the tone, full of love, compassion, and power the words: Verily I say unto thee today, Thou shalt be with Me in paradise.

For long hours of agony, reviling and mockery have fallen upon the ears of Jesus. As He hangs upon the cross, there floats up to Him still the sound of jeers and curses. With longing heart He has listened for some expression of faith from His disciples. He has heard only the mournful words, "We trusted that it had been He which should have redeemed Israel."

How grateful then to the Saviour was the utterance of faith and love from the dying thief! While the leading Jews deny Him, and even the disciples doubt His divinity, the poor thief, upon the brink of eternity, calls Jesus Lord. Many were ready to call Him Lord when He wrought miracles, and after He had risen from the grave; but none acknowledged Him as He hung dying upon the cross save the penitent thief who was saved at the eleventh hour."

Many were ready to call Him Lord when He was doing something for them, healing them, teaching them. But the thief acknowledged Him as Lord when Jesus hung on the cross, when it wouls appear He was displaying the least of His divinity.
_________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860

www.heavenlysanctuary.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TBax
King Kong



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 2072


PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RND,

Hi, Very Happy

RND wrote:
TBax wrote:
That man who died next to Jesus will be resurrected and given the opportunity to excercise faith in Jesus.


You mean he didn't? I thought when the thief acknowledged Jesus' kingdom he was displaying 'faith' that Jesus was indeed the Son of God.


That man gave an expression of faith. But how we live our lives is how we demonstrate we have faith and prove it is genuine. Did you ever hear that saying "there are no athiests in a foxhole" ? People cling to anything when they are desperate, but when this man is resurrected he will be able learn who exactly who Jesus is, and be able to prove his faith.


Take care. Very Happy
_________________
Agape,
TBax
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RND
Grizzly Bear



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 725

Location: Victorville, California, USA Corporate

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="TBax"]RND,

Hi, Very Happy

RND wrote:
TBax wrote:
That man who died next to Jesus will be resurrected and given the opportunity to excercise faith in Jesus.


You mean he didn't? I thought when the thief acknowledged Jesus' kingdom he was displaying 'faith' that Jesus was indeed the Son of God.


Quote:
That man gave an expression of faith.


No doubt. He 'expressed' His faith. He told Jesus he believed in Jesus as the Son of God by calling Him Lord. Likewise, we can express our faith by living a life that expresses that faith.

Quote:
But how we live our lives is how we demonstrate we have faith and prove it is genuine. Did you ever hear that saying "there are no athiests in a foxhole" ? People cling to anything when they are desperate, but when this man is resurrected he will be able learn who exactly who Jesus is, and be able to prove his faith.


Indeed! And I can't wait to meet him!
_________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860

www.heavenlysanctuary.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
daviddale3
Kitten



Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 146

Location: georgia

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jdwtx2005;

Quote:
1) Mark 16:16 - It should be noted that in the second half of this verse the only basis for condemnation is a refusal to believe (See - Jn 3:18). Therefore the only basis for salvation is belief, not baptism plus belief. Take for example a man that desires to travel to Chicago by train.

“He that gets on the train (i.e., believeth) and sits down (i.e., is baptized) gets to Chicago (i.e., is saved), but he that does not get on the train (i.e., believeth not) does not get to his desired destination called Chicago (i.e., is damned).”
Belief in the Gospel of CHRIST ( Rom 1:16 & Eph 1:13 & I Cor 15:1-4), not baptism, is the matter that settles salvation. The Gospel is not CHRIST’S death, burial, and resurrection plus good works, or plus church membership, or plus baptism. Paul said in I Corinthians 1:17, “For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the Gospel:” It’s not JESUS plus - its JESUS only!


Let's consider what you have written here.

The text begins, "He that believeth..." Of this believer, our Lord concludes, "shall be saved." The essential nature of belief for salvation is obvious in the closing words of the verse, "but he that believeth not shall be damned" (Mark 16:16). One of the conditions upon which salvation depends, according to this verse, is faith (belief).

This is a point upon which all are agreed throughout the religious world. The New Testement makes it clear that God requires faith, on the part of the sinner, for his salvation. (Heb. 11:6).

The entire 11th chapter of the Hebrew letter shows the importance of faith in the lives of those pleasing to God, even in the days of the Old Testement. But, the faith described in that chapter is not faith alone; it is faith that responds in obedience to God. Even in verse 6, we have action inferred by the reference to coming to God and seeking Him. It is that kind of faith (active, obedient) that justifies (Rom. 5:1). Bear in mind that this faith comes from hearing God's Word (Rom. 10:17).

James' words are emphatic on the connection between faith and action.

"Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only" (James 2:24)

This, by the way, in the only Biblical reference to faith only. It is significant that James tells us that justification (another word for salvation) is not by faith only in spite of the very popular teaching to the contrary. James then concludes his discussion of faith and works with these words, :For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also" (2:26). It could not be clearer! The faith that saves involves more than mental assent; faith must act to save.

There are even New Testement examples of some who believed, but were not saved. The chief rulers (John 12:42-43), the devils (James 2:19), Felix (Acts 24:25), King Agrippa (Acts 26:27). It is, therefore, clear that man is not and cannot be saved by faith alone; nevertheless, faith is absolutely essential to salvation.

Obedience is also necessaty for salvation. Referring to Jesus, the Hebrew writer notes,

"And having been made perfect, he became unto all them that obey him the author of eternal salvation" (Heb. 5:9).

According to this, Jesus is the "author of eternal salvation" to "all them that obey him." Add to this the statement of Peter,

"Seeing ye have purified your souls in your obedience to the truth unto unfreigned love of the brethern, love one another from the heart fervently" (I Peter 1:22).

Souls are purified by "obedience to the truth."

Returning to Mark 16:16, our Lord states, "He that believeth and..." According to English grammar, the coordinate conjunction "and" connects things of equal rank and value. Therefore, it should be carefully noted that "believeth" and "is baptized" are of equal rank and value. One is not more important than the other. A person can no more be saved by being baptized only, then he can be saved by believing only. The Lord did not say, "He that believeth shall be saved, and then be baptized if he wants to." Niether did he say, "He that is baptized shall be saved whether he believes or not." He said, "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved."

The term "comdemned" has no more reference to the eternal state than the term "saved" in the preceding clause. They both have primary reference to the present state, and the former is the exact counterpart of the latter. Condemnation already rests on those who believe not (John 3:18), but the apostles are here told that is shall especially rest on those who hear the gospel and believe it not. It rests on them now, and it must, of course, rest on them forever unless, at some subsequent period in life, they shall become believers. In this way the state of condemnation which now exists will reach forward into eternity, unless its cause be removed, in like manner as the state of salvation enjoyed by the baptized believer will reach into eternity, unless it be forfeited by subsequent apostasy. It has been frequently observed that though Jesus says: "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved," he does not, in stating the ground of condemnation, mention the failure to be baptized as part of it, but simply says: "He that believeth not shall be condened." From this is is again inferred that baptism is not one of the conditions of pardon. BUT THE CONCLUSION DOES NOT FOLLOW FOR THE FACT THAT BAPTISM IS NOT MENTIONED IN STATING WHO SHALL BE COMDEMNED CAN NEVER REMOVE IT FROM THE PLACE IT OCCUPIES IN STATING WHO SHALL BE SAVED.

Suppose a governor of a state should say to the convicted thieves in the penitentiary, "He that pledges himself to be honest and will restore what he has stollen shall be pardoned, but he that will not make this pledge shall serve out his time in prison," none but a crazy thief could think that because restitution is not nention in the latter instance he would be pardoned without making restitution. Equally unreasonable is the conclusion in question. Equally true that there is not a man in the penitentiary who would expect pardon without restitution required.

The leading thought in the commision is to state the ground on which men would be saved, and not that on which they would be condemned. The apostles were to be concerned with saving men, not with condemning them; consequently, Jesus tells them in detail on what ground they are promised salvation; but as condemnationis his own work, not theirs, he specks of that comprehensively by naming the one sin of unbelif which renders all acceptable obedience impossible, and is the chief cause of all condemnation. He that believeth not is already judged or condemned. (John 3:18) One does not have to refuse to be baptized to be condemned-unbelief damns him before his refusal to be baptized. Unbelief will *Holy Censor, Batman* the world. A man should come to the commission, then, not to learn how he may be damned, but how he may be saved; and this it teaches him right plainly.

We can deal with the others at a latter time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RND
Grizzly Bear



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 725

Location: Victorville, California, USA Corporate

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

daviddale3 very good post.

I have oftened thought, and as a result, firmly believe that water baptisim by immersion is an essential part in 'signifying' our willingness to be obedient to Jesus Christ, and that the baptism of Jesus Christ by John the Baptist was performed for those, who for one reason or another, could could be baptized.

I expect to see the 'thief on the cross' in Heaven after the resurrection. I look forward to meeting him, speaking with him, and getting to know this brother in Christ.

He was never baptized, yet I firmly believe he will be resurrected.

I am quite comfortable with the notion that just as the very blood of Jesus Christ cleanses and heals people from all unrighteousness, so too does His baptism work for those who were never, nor ever could, be baptized.
_________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860

www.heavenlysanctuary.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
daviddale3
Kitten



Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 146

Location: georgia

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jdwtx2005

Quote:
2) Acts 2:38 - "Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ FOR the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the HOLY GHOST."

The Greek word translated “for” is the indefinite preposition “eis.” It means “pointing to,” not “in order that.” The people in Acts 2:38 were baptized “pointing to” the fact that they had already been saved, not “in order that” they might be saved (i.e., have remission of sins).
Take for example a man that is in jail “for” murder. Is the man in jail “in order that” he might murder or is he in jail “pointing to” the fact that he had already murdered? The question answers itself! While we should preach that all men are commanded to repent and be baptized, adding any other requirement to salvation by grace becomes “works” in disguise.


You make this to easy. This is the old "because of" theology.

How shall we define a word? The best place to start is always the Bible. It is it's best dictionary and commentary. Sometimes the word in question is defined in the very passage where it is found. For instance, the word Psalms in Eph. 5:19; "Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your hearts to the Lord;" The verse in and of itself defines the word for us, the melody is to come from the heart and not a mechanical instrument of music. Sometimes we can go to different passages and obtain the meaning of the word. For instance, the word baptized as in found in Acts 2:38, The verse in and of itself does not define the word for us, yet we can go to places such as Acts 8:26-40, in which we see both the eunch and Phillip going into the water, so we can see that it has something to do with water. Also we can refere to Romans 6:1-6, in which we find that it is a burial and ressurection, the old man of sin is buried and a new creature is brought forth. I hope you can see my point.

As for the word "for" as found in Acts 2:38; how does the Bible define the word. We are unable to clearly get a definate definition from this verse alone. So we must locate the same word in an easy to understand verse or account to aid us in the definition. There does exsist a verse that does define the word "for" or "eis". It is found in Matthew 26:28. "For this is my blood of the new testement, which is shed for (eis) the remission of sins."

According to the definition you place on the word "eis" Jesus shed his blood "because of" the remission of sins, indicating that remission has already happened. The word used in Matthew does not define that way. The blood that our Lord shed was for the remission of sins. The exact same word is used in Acts 2:38 and has the same meaning as the one in Matthew 26:28. You are wrong in your definition.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6364

Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I see baptism as both a physical demonstration of that which is taking place on the inside.

Eph 5:25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
Eph 5:26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,
Eph 5:27 That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.

I believe that the washing and being baptised in the water refers to the living water which Jesus himself proclaimed to be the possesor of.

Jhn 4:10 Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water.

Jhn 7:38 He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.

So by preaching the gospel and spreading the word of faith which comes from Jesus himself, we are baptised into this living water of the word and it also rushes out of us baptising those around us with the living water which is the word of God.

John himself says:

Luk 3:16 John answered, saying unto [them] all, I indeed baptize you with water; but one mightier than I cometh, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire:
Luk 3:17 Whose fan [is] in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and will gather the wheat into his garner; but the chaff he will burn with fire unquenchable.

Act 11:15 And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning.
Act 11:16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost.
Act 11:17 Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift as [he did] unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could withstand God?
Act 11:18 When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.

Maybe John's baptism of water was a prelude to what was coming. That those who believe are baptised by the Holy Spirit which is the word of God shed on us. And that we become emersed in Him and in His word as though we were being emersed in the river Jordan.

In acts 11:15 it is the Holy Ghost which falls on them, as if being flooded or poured on by water.
Could be why there are so many different ways of being baptised. Some are dunked, some are sprinkled...
And I believe these are signs that we use to witness to others what is happening inside where they can't see.

I don't know if actual water baptism saves, I lean more towards the baptism of the Holy Spirit and the Word of God that baptises us.

I'm not condemning or condoning either way. God gives signs for everything. Most of the time signs are given for those things which are not yet manifest but will be at some later time. Maybe when everyone is baptised into the Word of God then water baptism won't be needed anymore. The same way animal sacrifices aren't needed anymore, because the truth of the sacrifices for sin was manifested in Jesus himself. And the truth of baptism is still yet to be manifested in us...

It's an interesting topic, that's for sure.

God Bless
Lone
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
daviddale3
Kitten



Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 146

Location: georgia

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lone-traveler;

I understand what you are saying, yet do not agree. As we examine the examples of conversion in the book of Acts, especially in Acts 8, your view is not what we see. We see a group of people that were baptized in the name of Jesus Christ who had not recieved the Holy Ghost. It was only untill the apostles came to them and laid their hands upon them that they recieved such. Also, with the eunch, Phillip preached unto him Jesus. It is obvious that at some point in preaching Jesus that Phillip mentioned to him water baptism since he asked, here is water what doth hinder me to be baptized. Phillip and the eunch both went into the water and he was baptized.

These two acounts do not square with your explanation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion. All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 

© 2001-2007