Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Academic Freedom and Political Correctness at Christian Univ



 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Bible Doctrine
Author Message
Da Blonde Bombshell
Cobra



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 461

Location: Brooklyn NY (formerly TX)

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:23 pm    Post subject: Academic Freedom and Political Correctness at Christian Univ Reply with quote

In response to the concept at some of these faculty and staff may be required to sign a statement that they believe the Bible is literally true and some may be perjuring themselves by doing so, one wag had this response: " guess if someone actually believes that the bible is literally true, and asked you to affirm the same; it would be somewhat ironic that the requirement would take place in a university setting with modern office equipment, mixed sex classrooms, women who come out in public while menstruating, etc… Somehow I see literal believers of the bible more akin to the Taliban or the Amish. If those asking of you to believe literally can delude themselves that they are following the “literal” interpretation of the bible, you shouldn’t place too much internal ethical debate on going along with the 'game'. "

All Comments welcomed.
_________________
"Count it all joy, my brethren, when you meet various trials." (James 1:2)

"The tendency to claim God as an ally for our partisan values and ends is the source of all religious fanaticism." -Reinhold Niebuhr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
golfjack
Lion King



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 1136

Location: arizona

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:22 pm    Post subject: reply Reply with quote

That is a ridiculous statement. Are you trying to start an argument?


May God bless, golfjack
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FFT
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 6287

Location: Memphis

PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let's see. What is this thread under ...

"Bible Doctrine."

And what is that under ...

"Public Debate Forums."

Oops.

Anyway, yeah, it's likely she's trying to start a debate. A literal reading of the bible gives outdated legislation.
_________________
When Science was in its crib, Religion tried to strangle it. When Science was in its infancy, Religion tried to abuse it. Now that Science is grown up, Religion wants to be in its good graces.

Theology is philosophy/ethics for people who already know what conclusion they want to come to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7003

Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 5:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suppose one would have to provide semantic definitions for 'literal' as used for the purposes of this discussion and for the alleged statement referred to in the opening of this thread.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
FFT
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 6287

Location: Memphis

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Following the bible to the letter would lead you to organize stoning parties. No civilized society is going to allow that to happen.

Therefore, outdated legislation. Without even covering the reasons for the stonings.
_________________
When Science was in its crib, Religion tried to strangle it. When Science was in its infancy, Religion tried to abuse it. Now that Science is grown up, Religion wants to be in its good graces.

Theology is philosophy/ethics for people who already know what conclusion they want to come to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Da Blonde Bombshell
Cobra



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 461

Location: Brooklyn NY (formerly TX)

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
I suppose one would have to provide semantic definitions for 'literal' as used for the purposes of this discussion and for the alleged statement referred to in the opening of this thread.


Sorry. This is kind of like a Baylor joke, except there the big joke is the administration and regents.

They, and other colleges and universities tied to conservative denominations, have begun policies of asking faculty and staff to sign statements upon being hired that they believe the Bible is literally true. Dr. John Killinger said he felt people who perjure themselves in such a manner to maintain their livelihood are committing what is essentially an ethical act.

As to whether or not the statements define it further (I imagine many do) I have no idea.

Someone who says, for instance, homosexuality is wrong per the oft-cited texts of terror but sees no problem with playing football which is prohibited by Leviticus 11, is certainly perjuring themselves no less than someone who has no problem with either.
_________________
"Count it all joy, my brethren, when you meet various trials." (James 1:2)

"The tendency to claim God as an ally for our partisan values and ends is the source of all religious fanaticism." -Reinhold Niebuhr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7003

Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was thinking more along the lines of accepting obvious observational and metaphorical language as literally true. For instance does one accept that 'sunrise' actually means the sun rises and that the bible professes such or does one understand the use of observational language in such an instance and accept that the bible is referring to morning...
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Da Blonde Bombshell
Cobra



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 461

Location: Brooklyn NY (formerly TX)

PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 12:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
I was thinking more along the lines of accepting obvious observational and metaphorical language as literally true. For instance does one accept that 'sunrise' actually means the sun rises and that the bible professes such or does one understand the use of observational language in such an instance and accept that the bible is referring to morning...


Interesting. And there's the whole Is Genesis 1-2 referring to actual events just as written or it is poetry?

I would suppose the Unis that are not completely stupid have some elaboration to the statement that has been reviewed by theologians and so forth.
_________________
"Count it all joy, my brethren, when you meet various trials." (James 1:2)

"The tendency to claim God as an ally for our partisan values and ends is the source of all religious fanaticism." -Reinhold Niebuhr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7003

Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm sure they would. I simply asked for more information in order to give your post and questions the proper consideration.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Da Blonde Bombshell
Cobra



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 461

Location: Brooklyn NY (formerly TX)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JP what do you think of the "principle" of Christian colleges and Universities doing this?

In my view it's inappropriate political correctness and harms the unis doing it because it makes all their academinc writing and research suspect.

As far as denominations which claim to take the bible literally, it is hypocritical since they really don't except selectively.

If that is the alleged doctrine though it makes a kind of sense to require it in theology schools and so forth, but, for teachers of computer science, English, etc., it is merely bullying. And then you have the matter of biology teachers. Creationism is not an academic position but a dogma.
_________________
"Count it all joy, my brethren, when you meet various trials." (James 1:2)

"The tendency to claim God as an ally for our partisan values and ends is the source of all religious fanaticism." -Reinhold Niebuhr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Bible Doctrine All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

© 2001-2007