Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Bethlehem's Position on Homosexuality


Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Homosexuality and the Bible
Author Message
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 6999

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 5:21 am    Post subject: Bethlehem's Position on Homosexuality Reply with quote

This was produced by Pastor John Piper regarding the Bethlehem congregation's position. I agree with it.


Beliefs about Homosexual Behavior and Ministering to Homosexual Persons

Our affirmation that the Bible is the infallible Word of God with "supreme authority in all matters of faith and conduct," and our affirmation that "a Christian should live for the glory of God" include the following six beliefs about heterosexuality and homosexuality:

1. We believe that heterosexuality is God's revealed will for humankind and that, since God is loving, a chaste and faithful expression of this orientation (whether in singleness or in marriage) is the ideal to which God calls all people.

2. We believe that a homosexual orientation is a result of the fall of humanity into a sinful condition that pervades every person. Whatever biological or familial roots of homosexuality may be discovered, we do not believe that these would sanction or excuse homosexual behavior, though they would deepen our compassion and patience for those who are struggling to be free from sexual temptations.

3. We believe there is hope for the person with a homosexual orientation and that Jesus Christ offers a healing alternative in which the power of sin is broken and the person is freed to know and experience his or her true identity in Christ and in the fellowship of his Church.

4. We believe that this freedom is attained through a process which includes recognizing homosexual behavior as sin, renouncing the practice of homosexual behavior, rediscovering healthy, non-erotic friendships with people of the same sex, embracing a moral sexual lifestyle, and in the age to come, rising from the dead with a new body free from every sinful impulse. This process parallels the similar process of sanctification needed in dealing with heterosexual temptations as well. We believe that this freedom comes through faith in Jesus Christ, by the power of his Spirit.

5. We believe that all persons have been created in the image of God and should be accorded human dignity. We believe therefore that hateful, fearful, unconcerned harassment of persons with a homosexual orientation should be repudiated. We believe that respect for persons with a homosexual orientation involves honest, reasoned, nonviolent sharing of facts concerning the immorality and liability of homosexual behavior. On the other hand, endorsing behavior which the Bible disapproves endangers persons and dishonors God.

6. We believe that Christian churches should reach out in love and truth to minister to people touched by homosexuality, and that those who contend Biblically against their own sexual temptation should be patiently assisted in their battle, not ostracized or disdained. However, the more prominent a leadership role or modeling role a person holds in a church or institution of the Conference, the higher will be the expectations for God's ideal of sexual obedience and wholeness. We affirm that both heterosexual and homosexual persons should find help in the church to engage in the Biblical battle against all improper sexual thoughts and behaviors.

Pastor John

By John Piper. ©Desiring God.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
FFT
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 6266

Location: Memphis

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I heartily agree, at least with #5. Except the end bit, if you're going to back off of endorsing things the bible outlaws, you'd better not be eating them shellfish.
_________________
When Science was in its crib, Religion tried to strangle it. When Science was in its infancy, Religion tried to abuse it. Now that Science is grown up, Religion wants to be in its good graces.

Theology is philosophy/ethics for people who already know what conclusion they want to come to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Reverend Swaggart
Tadpole



Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 16


PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agree with above. Living in sin is common to all of us. The problem is that the homo's sin is visible to all, unllike most sins which are not easily observed by others.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Truth101
Kitten



Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 146

Location: B.C

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reverend Swaggart wrote:
Agree with above. Living in sin is common to all of us. The problem is that the homo's sin is visible to all, unllike most sins which are not easily observed by others.


So are you saying that they should have just stayed in the closet? The bible teaches us that everything will be revealed that is hidden so how do you reconcile your idea that because their sin is in view, it is worse than other sins such as heterosexual immorality?

Sin is sin whether hidden or exposed. The fact that their sin is exposed puts them in a perfect position to recieve compassion from others where the Lord can do His healing work.

If it was still hidden, most would not want to approach out of fear of offending

Just wondering about you thoughts on this.

God bless,

Dave
_________________
If the many are said to find only death (whether annihilation or eternal torments) than what of the boast of God, 1Co 15:55 Where, O death, is thy sting? where, O death, thy victory? For the many will be the returned boast of death.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Da Blonde Bombshell
Cobra



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 461

Location: Brooklyn NY (formerly TX)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Much of this manifesto is a de facto endorsement of antigay repairative therapy, which is considered fraudulent and unethical by most in the helping professions. The statement about positive nonsexual same sex relationships brought to mind the only movie yet about the subject, "But I'm a Cheerleader" which featured Cathy Moriarity and RuPaul Charles as the authoritarian therapists operating a homo-no-more camp. I think they started out with eight kids in the program but only three graduated and it was obvious those were closet cases. Richard Moll ("Bull" from Night Court) was hilarious as one of the "Ex-ex Gays" who took in two of the kids put out of the program. Part of the program was exactly that, though-developing positive same sex friendships, which led to two of the kids, Meagan and Graham (Natasha Lyonne and Clea DuVall) falling in love. The final scene was very sweet. Meagan's parents (Bud Cort and Mink Stole) were evangelical Christians who viewed her homosexuality as a negative like drugs and crime and put her in this program. At one point they told her she could never come home if she didn't change. but in the final scene they were attending a meeting of Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (see www.pflag.org ). Nervously the Dad introduced himself, "My name is Peter and my daughter is a homosexual," he stuttered while the Mom hid her face. Baby steps.

There's also the aspect of not "endorsing" as they say, which has resulted in cruel public policies such as sodomy laws and institutionalized discrimination. The zeal to do such makes this in the final analysis a very UnChristian response.
_________________
"Count it all joy, my brethren, when you meet various trials." (James 1:2)

"The tendency to claim God as an ally for our partisan values and ends is the source of all religious fanaticism." -Reinhold Niebuhr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 6999

Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

blah blah blah...

You continue to mischaracterize one's position and talk about things which are plainly not the case. The position posted here has nothing to do with therapy, repairative or otherwise.

Get a new song, one that actually pertains to the information posted.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Da Blonde Bombshell
Cobra



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 461

Location: Brooklyn NY (formerly TX)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
blah blah blah...

You continue to mischaracterize one's position and talk about things which are plainly not the case. The position posted here has nothing to do with therapy, repairative or otherwise.

Get a new song, one that actually pertains to the information posted.


IOW, you have no argument.
_________________
"Count it all joy, my brethren, when you meet various trials." (James 1:2)

"The tendency to claim God as an ally for our partisan values and ends is the source of all religious fanaticism." -Reinhold Niebuhr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 6999

Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I made my case:

Quote:
You continue to mischaracterize one's position and talk about things which are plainly not the case. The position posted here has nothing to do with therapy, repairative or otherwise.


Would you kindly point out where the position of Bethleham Church discusses therapy?

You argue something that you imagine, THAT is the case I made.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Da Blonde Bombshell
Cobra



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 461

Location: Brooklyn NY (formerly TX)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
I made my case:

Quote:
You continue to mischaracterize one's position and talk about things which are plainly not the case. The position posted here has nothing to do with therapy, repairative or otherwise.


Would you kindly point out where the position of Bethleham Church discusses therapy?


It does not. I said it made a de facto endorsement of the basis for homo-no-more programs. De facto and de jure are two Latin terms meaning respectively 'by fact' and 'by law'. Their most prominent use in recent history was in the civil rights era when de facto segregation, consisting of denial of service at restaurants, hotels, etc., among other things, was even more pervasive and much more damaging than de jure segregation (pass laws, laws limiting access to things by race, etc.). In the same token the position of this "Bethlehem" organization (any relation to "General Bethlehem" of the Holnist Army?) does not specifically address therapeutic (or legal) applications of its cruel position, but in effect ("de facto") it does much more harm than things that do, as it denigrates others' capacities to love as not as good as their own.
_________________
"Count it all joy, my brethren, when you meet various trials." (James 1:2)

"The tendency to claim God as an ally for our partisan values and ends is the source of all religious fanaticism." -Reinhold Niebuhr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 6999

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In other words, you cannot find fault with what was posted so you invented something to argue about. Not only that but you have made false accusations about a congregation which you know absolutely nothing and have condemned their position of accepting homosexual Christians into their fold.

You are amazingly confounding. I seriously worry for your mental well-being.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 6999

Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm wondering if this conversation has come to an end?

Perhaps I was too forceful in calling a spade a spade? It was not my intent to drive someone away, but to force a consideration of the truth of the matter at hand...
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
golfjack
Lion King



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 1136

Location: arizona

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:56 am    Post subject: reply Reply with quote

Rev. J.P. How do you interpret 1 Cor. 5:5? I believe when one is not willing to repent after 2 or 3 have ministered to the ones who practice open sin, and starts to infiltrate a Church, they must be told to leave so they can repent.

May God bless, golfjack
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Da Blonde Bombshell
Cobra



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 461

Location: Brooklyn NY (formerly TX)

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
In other words, you cannot find fault with what was posted so you invented something to argue about. Not only that but you have made false accusations about a congregation which you know absolutely nothing and have condemned their position of accepting homosexual Christians into their fold.

You are amazingly confounding. I seriously worry for your mental well-being.


I don't think so. I do not believe anyone can seriously call their position "accepting homosexual Christians" based on the information provided; it appears exactly the opposite is what is being done. Perhaps they can say that if they change their position and support civil rights for all and perform same gender Holy Union ceremonies.
_________________
"Count it all joy, my brethren, when you meet various trials." (James 1:2)

"The tendency to claim God as an ally for our partisan values and ends is the source of all religious fanaticism." -Reinhold Niebuhr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Da Blonde Bombshell
Cobra



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 461

Location: Brooklyn NY (formerly TX)

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
I'm wondering if this conversation has come to an end?

Perhaps I was too forceful in calling a spade a spade? It was not my intent to drive someone away, but to force a consideration of the truth of the matter at hand...


Yo, I use this board as my stress reducer at work and consequently avoid it over 3 day weekends. Plus I had to take all 13 kids plus 2 staff to dinner last night at Peter Luger www.peterluger.com with a funder.
_________________
"Count it all joy, my brethren, when you meet various trials." (James 1:2)

"The tendency to claim God as an ally for our partisan values and ends is the source of all religious fanaticism." -Reinhold Niebuhr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 6999

Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Rev. J.P. How do you interpret 1 Cor. 5:5? I believe when one is not willing to repent after 2 or 3 have ministered to the ones who practice open sin, and starts to infiltrate a Church, they must be told to leave so they can repent.


1Co 5:1-5 IT IS actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, impurity of a sort that is condemned and does not occur even among the heathen; for a man has [his own] father's wife. [Deut. 22:30; 27:20.] And you are proud and arrogant! And you ought rather to mourn (bow in sorrow and in shame) until the person who has done this [shameful] thing is removed from your fellowship and your midst! As for my attitude, though I am absent [from you] in body, I am present in spirit, and I have already decided and passed judgment, as if actually present, In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, on the man who has committed such a deed. When you and my own spirit are met together with the power of our Lord Jesus, You are to deliver this man over to Satan for physical discipline [to destroy carnal lusts which prompted him to incest], that [his] spirit may [yet] be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.

I agree completely. Practicing known and open sin after being 'confronted' is grounds for removal from the congregation. I will point out though, once again, that being homosexual is not the sin, it is the engagement in homosexual activity which is the sin described by scripture - sex between two men or two women.

Where the congregations have err'd is in the consideration of one's orientation as sin rather than one's actions.

I think Bethlehem's position clearly addresses this in point #6.

John Piper also addresses the issue in his sermon "The Other Dark Exchange"
In which he states:

Quote:
I would like us to be a church like that - justified sinners battling together to walk in purity, with all of our differing genetic, hormonal, environmental disorders that incline everyone of us, in varying ways, to do sinful things. We will talk more about that next week. It's a very important issue. But the point for now is simply this: we want to be a church where homosexual people can either overcome their sexual disorder, or find the faith and courage and help and love and power to live a triumphant, joyful, celibate life with the disorder.


Some here have advocated that in order to be "accepting" of homosexual Christians one must necessarily accept same sex marriages, condone homosexual sexual activity and the like. While that may sound loving and caring, it does not take into account that the Church is under no obligation, in fact it is commanded not to, accept the continuous commission of known sin in their body. We would not be required, nor expected to accept pedphiles, adulterors, liars, theives, cheats, etc. if they continued to openly and knowingly engage in their sin, nor should we be expected to accept those who openly and knowing engage in homosexual sex.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Homosexuality and the Bible All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 

© 2001-2007