Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

THE TRINITY IS BALONEY !!!


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion.
Author Message
metothezero
Tiger Cub



Joined: 13 Aug 2003
Posts: 791

Location: east texas

PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you discredit New Testament as Scriptural?

Regardless, for what reason would you like Old Testament reference?

I pointed out the two New Testament reference that show that Jesus is the creator. What reason do you want the Old Testament one, the same?

If so, I confess I haven't any. No Old Testament reference that say Jesus is the creator. I have one that says the Holy Spirit is so (Job 33:4).
_________________
The very idea of freedom presupposes some objective moral law which overarches rulers and ruled alike.
C. S. Lewis

Atheism is a ferocious system, that leaves nothing above us to excite awe, nor around us to awaken tenderness. --R. Hall.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
M Paul
Tadpole



Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 18


PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2005 4:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I think you'd be surprised at how much history there is concerning the Christian faith. The church can't prove it's existance before the 4th century but there are many writings related to that period.




No Trinity before the fourth century?? There's a lot of early Christian History??? How about early writings??

There is not much early Christian literature. What exists addresses issues raised during its time.

The Epistle of Clement, cerca 96 A.C., addresses the issue of obedience to bishops, and in response to Gnosticism, he emphasized the historic humanity of Christ.

Against Heresies by Iranian, 180/190 B.C., also set out the authority of apostolic tradition as represented by bishops in a line of succession, and in response to Gnosticism, the necessity of the atonement of the blood of Christ.

Justin Martyr in the second century in the First and Second Apologies and in Dialogue with Trypho addresses allegations made against Christian religious practices, and represents Plato's teachings as having similarities to Christianity, having borrowed some ideas from Moses, and comparing Christ as the whole word to Plato's concept of Logos.

Tertullian was the first prolific on church doctrine in Latin, 197-220 B.C. and he originated the terms Trinity and Sacrament.

Cyprian wrote in the mid third century addressing the issue of the unity of the church to bishops.

Note Tertullian is before the fourth century and coins the term Trinity. But, what Christian writings have I missed that should be addressing the concept of the Trinity, or where is this great body of early Christian historical evidence??

Bridgett, what do you consider is the best peice of evidence from early writings to establish that the Christian concept of the Trinity comes from paganism?? Or, what two or three early writings. Note, I'm not asking what review of history establishes the Trinity with paganism, -- but, what actual early writings are the evidence from early church history??

Quote:
I will not accept the man made doctrine that Jesus is part of a trinity, and the Catholic teaching that Jesus is God. John 1:1 has been given over and over again, it proves nothing.


The point is, that without the concept of the Trinity, the image of Christ is always changed into something less than what Scripture represents is required for our redemption. Thus, those who wish to attack Christianity, always attack the Trinity, in order to reduce the concept of Christ to not being God. However, the logic of establishing the Trinity from Scripture is not what is deficient--but the arguments saying it isn't there are what are forced and contrived.

In my outline, I review Old Testament Scriptures on the Trinity, like the one from Zechariah in my above post, and I conclude with - "Actually, the Trinity is found in the very first verses of the Bible. Genesis 1:1-3: In the beginning God created . . . And the Spirit of God moved . . . And God said, Let there be . . . . Note, the New Testament describes Christ as God's word. John 1:1,3: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God . . . All things were made by him . . . , cf. Job 26:13, Proverbs 30:4." Now, just because you say you don't like the John 1:1-3 parallel with Genesis 1:1-3, doesn't mean it isn't there, but it may mean that you just don't want to accept the divinity of Christ and understand attacking the Trinity is part of accomplishing your objective.

http://www.loveofchrist.info/theology/trinity.html

Regards,

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
M Paul
Tadpole



Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 18


PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2005 4:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's a quote from the Didache

"Chapter 7. Concerning Baptism. And concerning baptism, baptize this way: Having first said all these things, baptize into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living water. But if you have no living water, baptize into other water; and if you cannot do so in cold water, do so in warm. But if you have neither, pour out water three times upon the head into the name of Father and Son and Holy Spirit. But before the baptism let the baptizer fast, and the baptized, and whoever else can; but you shall order the baptized to fast one or two days before."

Note the use of the Trinity.

Here's a web site establishing a first or second century date to the Didache

http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/didache.html

Regards,

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bridget
Rattlesnake



Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Posts: 443


PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 12:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From www.auburn.edu

Foreword
References for all statements obtained from research are listed at the end of this thesis and are marked throughout the text with corresponding superscript numbers.
Unless otherwise noted, all scripture is quoted from the Revised Standard Version (RSV) of the Bible.

Readers are encouraged to verify everything to their own satisfaction.

"...for they received the word with all eagerness, examining the scriptures daily to see if these things were so." (Acts 17:11)

"...test everything; hold fast what is good, abstain from every form of evil." (1 Thessalonians 5:21-22)

I. Introduction
Most Christians in the world today believe in the Trinity which is the union of the three divine persons -- Father, Son, and Holy Spirit -- into one Godhead.(1)
The Dictionary states that doctrine is something taught as the principles of a religion and that dogma is a doctrine formally and authoritatively affirmed(2) but not necessarily proven. The Trinity, therefore, is a principle that can be considered dogmatic.

Sincere Christians, however, are more interested in obtaining accurate knowledge from Biblical research than in twisting and manipulating the scriptures to fit some preconceived man-made doctrine or dogma. To these people, truth is more important than tradition.

Is the dogma of the Trinity fact or not? Let us examine the evidence.

II. How the Trinity Became Doctrine
During the days when Christ's apostles lived, the Gospel was taught with accuracy, but after their death, it did not take very long for the truth to become eroded with falsehoods.
This erosion of Biblical truth grew like a cancer -- slow, but sure. Little by little, inacuracy crept in as the Gospel message of Jesus Christ became more and more popular.

In an effort to increase the church membership, many Pagans were brought in and with the Pagans came Pagan ideas. Rituals began to replace serious Bible study and differences in opinion soon became the basis for growth of various creeds and sects. Over the span of many years, man-made rites became time honored tradition.

Christian leaders then became powerful forces in the church as well as in politics; religious beliefs, many times, were dictated by the state. These facts, however, are not surpirsing considering the Biblical warning:

"First of all you must understand this, that no prophecy ever came by the impulse of man, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God."

"But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them.... And many will follow their licentiousness, and because of them the way of truth will be reviled. And in their greed they will exploit you with false words...." (2 Peter 1:20-21; 2:1-3)
Trinity Is Not A Christian Idea
One idea that became popular among Christians around the fourth century was that of a trinity of gods. It was not, however, a new idea conceived by Christians, for there is much evidence of widespread belief in similar ideas throughout earlier recorded history.
Many scholars believe that the Trinity, as taught by Christians, comes from Plato as suggested in the Timaeus, but the Platonic trinity is itself merely a rearrangement of older trinities dating back to earlier peoples.(3)

In Indian religion there is the Trinitarian group of Brahma, Vishna, and Shiva; in Egyptian religion there is the group of Kneph, Phthas, and Osiris. In Phoenicia the trinity of gods were Ulomus, Ulosuros, and Eliun. In Greece they were Zeus, Poseidon, and Aidoneus.

In Rome they were Jupiter, Neptune, and Pluto. In Babylonia and Assyria they were Anos, lllinos, and Aos. Among Celtic nations they were called Kriosan, Biosena, and Siva, and in Germanic nations they were called Thor, Wodan, and Fricco.(4)

Trinities of gods existed in other cultures as well, including, but not limited to, those of Siberia, Persia, Japan, Scandinavia, and Mexico.

We can see, therefore, that although the Trinity is characteristic of the Christian religion, it is by no means peculiar to it.

Trinity Not Mentioned In Bible
The truth is that the Trinity isn't even mentioned in God's word, the Holy Bible.(5) A check of any concordance will prove this fact. Not only is it not mentioned, but the doctrine is neither found in the New Testament,(6) nor the Old Testament.(7)
Concerning Old Testament scriptures, "theologians today are in agreement that the Hebrew Bible does not contain a doctrine of the Trinity, even though it was customary in past dogmatic tracts .... to cite texts like Genesis 1:26 .... as proof of plurality in God."(8) And "... in the New Testament the doctrine of the Trinity is not enunciated ..." but only "deduced from a collocation of passages ...."(9)

The Trinity, therefore, did not " ... reflect accurately early Christian teaching regarding the nature of God, it was, on the contrary, a divination from this teaching."(10)

"The formulation 'one God in three Persons' was not solidly established ... into Christian life ... prior to the 4th century.... Among the Apostolic Fathers, there has been nothing even remotely approaching such a mentality or perspective."(11)

If the Trinity doctrine isn't Biblical in nature, how did it become a part of Christian dogma?

Idea of Trinity Evolved
"It is generally acknowledged that the church father Tertullian (ca. A.D. 145-220) either coined the term or was the first to use it with reference to God. The explicit doctrine was thus formulated in the post-biblical period...."(12)
The book World Religions From Ancient History to the Present indicates that today's belief in the Trinity evolved over many years of heated political argument. The book states:

The great Arian controversy of the fourth century, which split the Church in two, stemmed from the preaching .... that the Son was a created being who did not eternally exist and, therefore, was a sort of demi-god, subordinate to the Father.
The Emperor Constantine summoned the first General Council of the Church of Niceae, in 325, to settle this dispute and so reunify the Church. It condemned the teaching of Arius and produced a creed which declared that the Son is of one substance with and co-eternal with the Father.

Theodosius I convened the second General Council at Constantinople, in 381, which endorsed his definition of Catholicism, finally condemned Arianism .... and reaffirmed the Nicene Creed.

A further dispute arose between the monk Nestorius, patriarch of Constantinople in 428, and Cyril, patriarch of Alexandria about the two natures in Christ ....

There was ferocious argument ... in which Rome joined on the side of Alexandria against the pretentious claims of the upstart see of Constantinople. Thus politics entered into the dispute.

Once again the state intervened. The third general council of the Church at Ephesus, in 431, was called by the two emperors, Theodosius II of the East and Valentinian III of the West. It condemned Nestorianism, and Nestorius was exhiled to the Egyptian desert in 435 ....

[At] the final session .... the Catholic Church in East and West accepted what is known as the .... doctrine on the Trinity.

This statement of belief, together with other doctrinal definitions ... [has] ever since been accepted by Eastern and Western Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant Christians.(13)

It is interesting to note that the first General Council of the Church at Niceae stated that the basic question contained in the New Testament was: Is Christ God or not? They stated that it could only be answered with a "yes" or "no." It was either true or not.(14)

The search for basic truth deteriorated into a widely accepted doctrine which was influenced, not by logic and biblical research, but by politics and human egotism.

Trinity Is Man-Made Concept
The facts, therefore, prove that the doctrine of the Trinity does not appear in the Bible(15) "nor did Jesus and his followers intend to contradict the Shema in the Old testament: 'Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord' (Deut. 6:4).... The doctrine developed gradually over several centuries and through many controversies.... By the end of the 4th century the doctrine of the Trinity took substantially the form it has maintained ever since."(16)
The controversy, indeed, was settled by man, not God. But, if God and Jesus and the Holy Spirit are not one and the same, who, or what, are they?

I have at least three saved explanations such as this on my bookmarks. I have so much information but you asked the source I would have to say the Bible itself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M Paul
Tadpole



Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 18


PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I asked for better support of the pagan source theory on the Trinity as follows--

Quote:
Bridgett, what do you consider is the best peice of evidence from early writings to establish that the Christian concept of the Trinity comes from paganism?? Or, what two or three early writings. Note, I'm not asking what review of history establishes the Trinity with paganism, -- but, what actual early writings are the evidence from early church history??


You responded 1) quoting Scripture that we should examine our beliefs carefully and dismiss what is evil; 2) noting an unspecified dictionary definition of doctrine; 3) quoting Scripture that the apostle Peter predicted false teachers.

You also made many generalized statements with no supporting evidence. For example --
Quote:
In an effort to increase the church membership, many Pagans were brought in and with the Pagans came Pagan ideas. Rituals began to replace serious Bible study and differences in opinion soon became the basis for growth of various creeds and sects. Over the span of many years, man-made rites became time honored tradition.


The Christian doctrine of a Trinity is established by Scripture alone, as has been set out for you previously in this thread. You do not cite any document which establishes an equivalent doctrine of a tri-unity of God from paganism. Thus, also you do not demonstrate the parallels between the Christian doctrine and pagan doctrine, which for now in your position is just unexplained and mysterious. You do not demonstrate the use of such a pagan document in the writings of any Christians.

You do note that pagan gods can be grouped in threes.

Quote:
In Indian religion there is the Trinitarian group of Brahma, Vishna, and Shiva; in Egyptian religion there is the group of Kneph, Phthas, and Osiris. In Phoenicia the trinity of gods were Ulomus, Ulosuros, and Eliun. In Greece they were Zeus, Poseidon, and Aidoneus.
In Rome they were Jupiter, Neptune, and Pluto. In Babylonia and Assyria they were Anos, lllinos, and Aos. Among Celtic nations they were called Kriosan, Biosena, and Siva, and in Germanic nations they were called Thor, Wodan, and Fricco.(4)


However, this is not a parallel to the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. As has been cited previously, the Christian concept of the Trinity is essential to understanding how redemption occurs for humankind. In what way do the lists of three in the examples you cited form a theology that is central to the basic doctrine represented by these gods, and how does that relate to the Christian concept of redemption?? A list of three is not the doctrine of the Trinity.

You also set out a special interpretation of historical events that supports your position. It's true that in history at times the church reviewed the doctrine of the Trinity, but it is not true that these reviews involved anything more than an interpretation of Scripture. You have not given any evidence on how these church events mis-interpreted Scripture to establish the Trinity, or how they depended on non-Scriptural sources.

Your position in essence says that because Scripture had to be interpreted to understand the concept of the Trinity, it had to be made up, and it is not true. On that basis, one would have to say the majority of theology is made up, even borrowed from paganism, because it uses terms of language that came into existence after the 15th century B.C. to the 1st century A.D. to describe scriptural concepts. In other words, according to Bridget's rules of how theological concepts must be understood, the Trinity does not qualify as being legitimate. But, do Bridget's rules have special objectives??

Essentially you have no real evidence for your position. Basically, you are saying the Trinity does not come from Scripture, because you don't like to interpret Scripture that way, and because it can be assumed it comes from paganism. In fact, it does appear from the evidence you've presented, that disbelief in the Trinity must be by faith alone.

Regards,

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bridget
Rattlesnake



Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Posts: 443


PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 6:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The books of I and II Corinthians were originally written by Paul to the church he formed among pagans. He formed these churchs out of extreme trepidations because of the city's extreme moral depravity and its pagan cult, which included the practice of religious prostitution. (Introduction to Corinthians NAB Catholic version)

If you have studied anything about the ancient world you would know that most of the surrounding countries at the time of Jesus were Pagan. Greece, Rome, Babaloyn were not Jewish, they were Pagan.

I do not understand what sources you wish me to give you unless you want me to post the history of the ancient world during the time of Jesus???? Don't you think it would be easier for you to check it out on your own.?

You and your church believe that because the Bible speaks of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit this is the trinity. This is where the pagan believers get the trinity but it is not how Jesus and the Apostles originally ta


The following are references from the thesis that I previously posted.
Concerning the Christian Trinity concept, J. L. Mckenzie, in his book, Dictionary of the Bible, states: "The Trinity of persons within the unity of nature is defined in terms of 'person' and 'nature' which are G[ree]k philosophical terms; actually the terms do not appear in the Bible."(23)
Research, therefore, proves that even the concept of the Trinity, as taught by Christian religions, did not exist, and could not have existed, during all of Biblical history.

The deduction, by factual research and logical reasoning, is that there is absolutely no evidence or proof that there is a Trinity. The evidence, in fact, proves the opposite -- there is definitely not a Trinity.

The Father is Jehovah, the Creator of the Universe. The Son is Jesus Christ, begotten by the Father. And the Holy Spirit is God's power -- his active force -- not a person or being.

This booklet contains just a sampling of some of the truths taught in the Holy Bible. All people who desire an accurate knowledge of our Creator and His divine plan for mankind are encouraged to carefully examine the great book of truths, the Holy Bible, and learn how harmonious and comprehensible His plan is.

VII. Bible Verses Prove Trinity False
Listed below are over a hundred individual Bible verses which prove conclusively that Jesus Christ was not God, but God's Son. We urge all sincere Christians to examine their own Bibles as to the accuracy of this information.
Matthew 3:16-17; 8:29; 11:27; 12:18; 14:33; 16:16-17; 17:5; 27:54
Mark 5:7; 15:39
Luke 1:32; 1:35; 8:28; 9:35; 10:22
John 1:13; 1:18; 1:34; 1:49; 3:16; 5:19-23; 5:37; 6:40; 6:69; 8:18; 8:42; 10:15; 10:36; 11:4; 12:49-50; 14:13; 14:23; 14:28; 16:17; 17:1-16; 20:17; 20:31
Acts 2:22-24; 3:13; 3:26; 9:20
Romans 1:4; 5:10; 8:29
1 Corinthians 11:3; 15:28
2 Corinthians 1:19
Galatians 4:4
Philippians 2:9
Colossians 1:13
1 Thessalonians 1:10
1 Timothy 2:5
Hebrews 1:2; 2:9; 4:14; 5:7-8
1 Peter 1:3
2 Peter 1:17
1 John 1:3; 2:22; 3:23; 4:10; 4:14-15; 5:11-12
2 John 1:9
Revelation 2:18
VIII. The Son of God Became the Son of Man So that We, the Sons of Man, May Become the Sons of God
Here are 60 Bible texts which prove conclusively that Jesus was NOT GOD, but RATHER the SON of God. [If in fact He WAS God, (as trinitarians would want us to believe), He could not have really died; and the act of paying the Ransom would merely have been a hoax!]
Matthew 3:16-17; 8:29; 11:27; 12:18; 14:33; 16:16; 17:5; 27:54
Mark 5:7; 15:39
Luke 1:32; 8:28; 9:35; 10:22
John 1:18; 1:34; 1:49; 3:16; 5:19-23; 6:40; 6:69; 8:42; 10:15; 11:4; 12:49-50; 14:13; 14:23; 14:28; 16:17; 17:1-26
Acts 2:22-24; 3:13; 3:26; 9:20
Romans 1:4; 5:10; 8:13; 8:29-32
1 Corinthians 11:3; 15:28
2 Corinthians 1:19
Galatians 4:4
Colossians 1:13
1 Thessalonians 1:10
Hebrews 1:2; 4:14; 5:8; 7:3; 11:17
2 Peter 1:17
1 John 1:3; 1:22; 3:23; 4:10; 4:14-15; 5:6; 5:11-12
2 John 1:9
Revelation 2:8
Since these texts exist in God's Word, the Gospel story has been told over and over again. However, it could NOT be told if Jesus had really been God and the ransom had not actually been paid! GOD CAN"T DIE!

IX. Bible Versions and References Used
This booklet was originally published by: Christian Millennial Fellowship, Hartford, CT

(KJV) The Holy Bible, Authorized King James Version

(TLB) The Living Bible, c.1971, Tyndale House Publishers

(NIV) The Holy Bible, New International Version, c.1984, International Bible Society

(RSV) The Holy Bible, Revised Standard Version, c.1973, Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Chruches of Christ in the United States of America

(NAS) New American Standard Bible, c.1972, The Lockman Foundation

(GND) Good News New Testament, c. 1976, American Bible Society

(MEB) The New Testament in Modern English, c.1958, by J. B. Phillips

(NEB) The New English Bible, c.1961, Oxford University Press

(DGT) The Emphatic Diaglott Containing the Original Greek Text of What Is Commonly Styled the New Testament, by Benjamin Wilson
1. Webster's New World Dictionary, Third College Edition, ed. V. Neufeldt, c.1988, Simon & Schuster, New York

2. Webster's New World Dictionary, (see previous reference)

3. Nouveau Dictionnaire Universel, Vol. 2, by M. Lachatre, c.1865, Paris

4. God, by Paul Johnson, c. 1938, pub. By P.S.L. Johnson, Philadelphia, Pa.

5. Harper's Bible Dictionary, by P. Achtemeier, c. 1985, Harper & Row, San Francisco, Ca.

6. Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, Vol. 12, ed. S. Jackson, reprint of early 1900's edition republished by Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, Mich.

7. Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, Vol. 10, by J. M'Clintock and J. Strong, reprint of 1881 workd published by Baker Book House, Grands Rapids, Mich.

8. The Encyclopedia of Religion, Vol. 15, ed. M. Eliade, c. 1987, Macmillan Pub. Co., New York

9. The New Schaffe-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, Vol. 12, ed. S. Jackson, reprint of early 1900's edition republished by Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, Mich.

10. Encyclopedia Americana, Vol. 27, c.1956, Americana Corp., New York

11. New Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 14, p.299, by editorial staff at the Catholic University of America, c.1967, McGraw-Hill, New York

12. Harper's Bible Dictionary (see previous reference)

13. World Religions From Ancient History to the Present, ed. G. Parrinder, c.1971, Facts On File Publications, New York

14. The Three-Personed God, by W. Hill, c.1982, The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C.

15. Dictionary of the Bible, by J. McKenzie, c.1965, Bruce Pub. Co., Milwaukee

16. The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. 10, Micropedia Ready Reference, c.1976, Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., Chicago

17. Aid to Bible Understanding, c. 1971, pub. I.B.S.A., New York

18. Harper's Bible Dictionary, (see previous reference)

19. Harper's Bible Dictionary, (see previous reference)

20. Aid to Bible Understanding, (see previous reference)

21. New Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 14, by editorial staff at the Catholic University of America, c.1967, pub. McGraw-Hill, New York

22. Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, Vol. 15, (see previous reference)

23. Dictionary of the Bible, (see previous reference)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7005

Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 6:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matthew 3:16-17 Mat 3:16 And Jesus when he was baptized, went up straightway from the water: and lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove, and coming upon him;
Mat 3:17 and lo, a voice out of the heavens, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.;

8:29 Mat 8:29 And behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, thou Son of God? art thou come hither to torment us before the time?;

11:27 Mat 11:27 All things have been delivered unto me of my Father: and no one knoweth the Son, save the Father; neither doth any know the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son willeth to reveal him.; 12:18; 14:33; 16:16-17; 17:5; 27:54

I could go on, but for what purpose? Bridget, you reference said: Listed below are over a hundred individual Bible verses which prove conclusively that Jesus Christ was not God, but God's Son
What these verses PROVE is that Jesus is the Son of God. What they do not prove is that Jesus Christ IS NOT GOD. An accurate understanding of the trinity would be necessary to understand this.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
James1-26
Bear Cub



Joined: 17 Feb 2004
Posts: 603

Location: Virginia

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 6:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Question I do not understand the Trinity. Nevertheless, I question the necessity in believing in a Trinity. How will I benefit from believing in a Trinity?
_________________
"Life is tough. Life is tougher if you're stupid." --John Wayne
"Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me:..." --the LORD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
metothezero
Tiger Cub



Joined: 13 Aug 2003
Posts: 791

Location: east texas

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 6:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I do not understand the Trinity. Nevertheless, I question the necessity in believing in a Trinity. How will I benefit from believing in a Trinity?


Let us then see...the Trinity teaches that Jesus is God, the Father is God, and the Holy Spirit is God. So IF the Scriptures teach (as the Trinitarians maintain) that Jesus is God, then basically they are claiming that God is God. The Trinitarian doctrine attempts to state biblically the deity of the Christian God (His deity being complex and trinitarian).

Therefore, if the Trinity is true, then the necessity is that of believing in the deity of your deity...

If it is false, then it teaches the deity of something not divine.

It is of utmost importance to know whether it is true or not. If it is true, then you must know it as it is a teaching of the very nature of God. If it is false, then it is a lie teaching against the very nature of God.

You cannot pass it onto one of the non-essential doctrines that can be believed or not be believed. It is of the utmost necessity. How can you question the necessity of knowing whether Jesus is God or not? That is ridiculous idiocy.
_________________
The very idea of freedom presupposes some objective moral law which overarches rulers and ruled alike.
C. S. Lewis

Atheism is a ferocious system, that leaves nothing above us to excite awe, nor around us to awaken tenderness. --R. Hall.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
M Paul
Tadpole



Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 18


PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bridget wrote:
I do not understand what sources you wish me to give you unless you want me to post the history of the ancient world during the time of Jesus???? Don't you think it would be easier for you to check it out on your own.?


I see--you have no sources of evidence to support your postion, but you want to assert that it is just something a person has to know, because it is well known that paganism existed the same time as Christianity, and because it easier for other people to get the evidence for your position.

Quote:
Concerning the Christian Trinity concept, J. L. Mckenzie, in his book, Dictionary of the Bible, states: "The Trinity of persons within the unity of nature is defined in terms of 'person' and 'nature' which are G[ree]k philosophical terms; actually the terms do not appear in the Bible."(23)


Would you say there are people in the Bible, and do they have a nature?? Or would you say there can't be any people in the Bible, because the term "person" is Greek?? And, would you say none of the people in the Bible, if there are any, can be thought of in terms of having a nature either, because that is Greek??

Quote:
Research, therefore, proves that even the concept of the Trinity, as taught by Christian religions, did not exist, and could not have existed, during all of Biblical history.


Gee, that's really neat to know. Is this the evidence you want me to find on my own??

Then you give the numbers on a lot of Bible verses, and I guess you want me to read those verses and figure out on my own why they prove there is no Trinity. Is it because they don't have the word "Trinity"???

And, you don't respond to why the verses I cite as making a reference to a Trinity, such as the one in the post above on Zecheriah 12:10. I guess that's my job too.

Ok, Bridgett, I understand exactly where you are coming from now, and I thank you for sharing your knowledge with me.

Regards,

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
M Paul
Tadpole



Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 18


PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I do not understand the Trinity. Nevertheless, I question the necessity in believing in a Trinity. How will I benefit from believing in a Trinity?


I review this in my article on the Trinity on my web site. Note the link at the top to section "IV. The Concept of the Trinity Is Essential to Christianity"

http://www.loveofchrist.info/theology/trinity.html

Regards,

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bridget
Rattlesnake



Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Posts: 443


PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My claiming that Jesus is not God, in no way discredits either the New Testament or Yeshua. What the Bible teaches is very simple, God sent His Only begotten Son so that we can receive His forgiveness.
First of all let me explain my love for the Old Testament. These are the words that Yeshua Himself would have read in the first century, only He knew them as the Sacred Scriptures and this is why you find so many verses from the Old Testament quoted in the New. The Apostles were Jews. Jew originated from God and were to be His people. How can you look at the Old Testament and see anything having to do with Yeshua being the creator or that there is a trinity is beyond me. It proves that you have never studied the Old Testament and you have no idea of who Yeshua really was and what He believed, and I doubt very much if you care. You only care about your pagan church and it's teachings. So Be It!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
christina
Cobra



Joined: 01 Nov 2004
Posts: 456


PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with bridget.
_________________
Christina
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7005

Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Let US make man in our image..."

Who the heck is Us?
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Nobby
Board - Admin



Joined: 16 Sep 2002
Posts: 5303

Location: Missouri

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:21 pm    Post subject: THE TRINITY IS BALONEY !!! Reply with quote

JP wrote:
Who the heck is Us?

Who the heck is Our? Wink
_________________
Much Love Nobby
CVP Smilies
dictionary Bible
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion. All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 

© 2001-2007