Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Those who will 'NOT' Take the "Mark"


Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Revelation and End of Times
Author Message
The Revealer
Not So Newbie



Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 5

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2004 9:12 pm    Post subject: The Mark Reply with quote

Silver Surfer wrote:
revmattchoo.com wrote:
and dont tell me that its collectively worshipping God on sunday because i dont see how anyone could put that on their forehead or hand.
Study the wording in Revelation 14:9.
The Bible says that the 'Mark' is 'IN' the forehead....and 'IN'...the hand.
The Bible does not say 'On' the forehead., but in the forehead.....meaning the mind is envolved.

Now, does Sunday seem more reasonable ?
Quote:




Read Deuteronomy 6:1-9 pay attention to verse 8
This is talking about God's mark. God's mark is NOT a physical mark and the beast's mark may not be either. You may be right about picking up on IN and not ON!
Shalome
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 6908

Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lexicon Results for epi (Strong's 1909)
Greek for 1909

Pronunciation Guide
epi {ep-ee'}

TDNT Reference Root Word
Not Available a root
Part of Speech
prep
Outline of Biblical Usage
1) upon, on, at, by, before

2) of position, on, at, by, over, against

3) to, over, on, at, across, against


The above is the Strong's definition for epi, the word for 'on' in Rev 14:9. It is interesting to note that out of 14 different translations, the KJV is the only version that uses 'in' the forehead as opposed to 'on' the forehead. From the original text we can pretty well see that 'on' is a correct translation.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
The Revealer
Not So Newbie



Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 5

Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 8:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
Lexicon Results for epi (Strong's 1909)
Greek for 1909

Pronunciation Guide
epi {ep-ee'}

TDNT Reference Root Word
Not Available a root
Part of Speech
prep
Outline of Biblical Usage
1) upon, on, at, by, before

2) of position, on, at, by, over, against

3) to, over, on, at, across, against


The above is the Strong's definition for epi, the word for 'on' in Rev 14:9. It is interesting to note that out of 14 different translations, the KJV is the only version that uses 'in' the forehead as opposed to 'on' the forehead. From the original text we can pretty well see that 'on' is a correct translation.


So, you believe that the MARK will be an actual mark and you do NOT think that Deut. 6:8 is a clue in any way leading us to the meaning of the other MARK spoke of in Rev.? Satan is sometimes a copy cat when it comes to God's kingdom. He tries to imitate God. However, it may very well be both a physical mark to show man that you have accepted the counterfit religion of the beast. Then again, whether you have a physical mark or not, if you have accepted anything other than God's religion in your mind, you do not have God.

God Bless
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 6908

Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
So, you believe that the MARK will be an actual mark and you do NOT think that Deut. 6:8 is a clue in any way leading us to the meaning of the other MARK spoke of in Rev.?

No. I did not say this is what I believe.

I simply pointed out that 'on' was the more accurate translation. A mark on the forehead can very well mean a condition of the mind as well as a physical mark. Do we not use the phrase "I have a lot on my mind"?

I was just pursuing clarity of scripture, not making a statement of belief.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
The Revealer
Not So Newbie



Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 5

Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
Quote:
So, you believe that the MARK will be an actual mark and you do NOT think that Deut. 6:8 is a clue in any way leading us to the meaning of the other MARK spoke of in Rev.?

No. I did not say this is what I believe.

I simply pointed out that 'on' was the more accurate translation. A mark on the forehead can very well mean a condition of the mind as well as a physical mark. Do we not use the phrase "I have a lot on my mind"?

I was just pursuing clarity of scripture, not making a statement of belief.

I understand. We are on the same page now. You are right about the phrase!

God Bless
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ron
Grizzly Bear



Joined: 27 Aug 2002
Posts: 750

Location: home, wa, usa

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 7:20 am    Post subject: Re: Those who will 'NOT' Take the "Mark" Reply with quote

Silver Surfer wrote:
These people are keeping all 10 commandments of God...as found in Exodus 20:3-17.....and this puts them in opposition of the "Mark of the Beast".

These Christians are upholding the word of God...and are witnessing for the truth founded upon Jesus Christ Himself.


In fact, Jesus was the only person on the face of the earth who ever was able to keep the Covenant of Sinai fully and thus be declared righteous in his own right before God. Jesus fulfilled the requirements of the Law of Moses in his own life before He superceded the Law of Moses on the Cross.
_________________
"He that hath ears to hear, let him hear." Matthew 11:15

Yours in Christ with much love,
Ron

http://www.arkwebshost.com/theology/ron
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
kris007
Sea Monkey



Joined: 09 Feb 2004
Posts: 12


PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

the beast will be a government , not the catholic church , but the chatholic church might be the religion that comes with the beast
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Javan
Fierce Puppy



Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 235

Location: Canada

PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How would a physical government do battle with spiritual forces? The beast(s) are spiritual (already here, already exist, already "marking" people), not physical, and definitely not political.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Smilin' Jacks
Pit Bull



Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 354


PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kris007 wrote:
the beast will be a government , not the catholic church , but the chatholic church might be the religion that comes with the beast


Just a note for clarification on this point - the Protestant Christian churches have grown out of the Roman Catholic Church. You did mean the RCC, didn't you and not the small 'c' catholic meaning "comprehensive"? That creates an interesting quandary for those who prefer not to adhere to Mosaic Law...

And, while I think of it - the New Testament is identified by the "Book of Mormon" as having been 'polluted' by Satan and propagated by the church of Rome...

And, Wink, the Coptic Gospels of Nag Hammadi say essentially the same thing...
_________________
All things are good that lead to God
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
James1-26
Bear Cub



Joined: 17 Feb 2004
Posts: 603

Location: Virginia

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2004 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Smilin' Jacks wrote:
kris007 wrote:
the beast will be a government , not the catholic church , but the chatholic church might be the religion that comes with the beast


Just a note for clarification on this point - the Protestant Christian churches have grown out of the Roman Catholic Church. You did mean the RCC, didn't you and not the small 'c' catholic meaning "comprehensive"? That creates an interesting quandary for those who prefer not to adhere to Mosaic Law...

And, while I think of it - the New Testament is identified by the "Book of Mormon" as having been 'polluted' by Satan and propagated by the church of Rome...

And, Wink, the Coptic Gospels of Nag Hammadi say essentially the same thing...


Yeah, well everyone else's "Bible" is always better.
_________________
"Life is tough. Life is tougher if you're stupid." --John Wayne
"Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me:..." --the LORD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
eljofa
Newbie Alert



Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Posts: 4


PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i like this idea of a rapture

YEAH RIGHT

there is no rapture, but believe it if you may
the rapture you will get is that you will be put in a flying saucer
and thrown into space,

just like the germans were taking the jews for a shower
and giving them poisonus gas as shower

there is no rapture my friend,

JESUS who is God was not taken away when the hour got hot
but you and me who are a sinners, we will be taken away
so we dont have to go through tribulation

you want scripture I GIVE YOU SCRIPTURE
Quote:

this is john 17 15

"I do not pray that You should take them out of the world, but that You should keep them from the evil one.


that pretty much states that no one is getting out of this world
SORRY TO DISSAPOINT BUT THAT IS WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS

about meeting the lord in the air, that is after the whole shebang
has occured, not before baby Smile

so get ready to die for Jesus if you want to meet him in the air

of prepare to freak out when u find out that you were not
one of those that were thrown in space hehehe

hope it helps

eljofa
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Revelation and End of Times All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 

© 2001-2007