Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

John the Baptist



 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Revelation and End of Times
Author Message
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:00 am    Post subject: John the Baptist Reply with quote

Who is this guy?

Jesus said that John is the messenger which is sent "before" him into the wilderness to preach the coming of the kingdom of God.

Is that all he was? Is John just a prophet?
Jesus says he was much more than a prophet..

much more than...what could that mean?

any thoughts?

hugs
lone
Back to top
Zathrus
King Kong



Joined: 28 Aug 2002

Posts: 2202

Location: WI USA

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A great topic, Lone!

John was more than a prophet, or had a greater role than the old testament prophets because he was one of the key figures on God's plan of salvation, along wth Jesus and the apostles. God chose him to a very special purpose and role in His plan.

John prepared the way of the Lord, Jesus died for man's sin, and the apostles proclaimed the message of the gospel after Jesus' redemptive work.

The prophets foretold of the work of salvation that God would one day bring to pass, but John was actually appointed to prepare the way for it.

His message was also different from that of the prophets. Many of the prophets wrote that what God revealed He was going to do was a long time off yet. John was the first to be sent with the message that the time had come and the fullfillment was near.
Back to top
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 12:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Awesome Zathrus!

I believe everything in the NT reveals exactly what took place in the OT.

What if John represents Jehovah who brought the message to Moses to show the people the Law.
The reason I say this is because John is a type which parted the hmm Jordan/Sea which became filled with the "sins" of the people who followed him into and through it in Baptism.
Also it is John who goes to the Herod and lays down the law telling him he should not have Phillips wife for his own wife.
So I see a "lawmaker" in John who brought the people out of Egypt through baptism of the sea which became as blood with their sins "like the Egyptians were the sinners but they came out clean".
those who were not my people.. Idea

And John was beheaded for the word of God, Just as the people in the wilderness "beheaded or removed Jehovah's head/leadership over them and chose to lead themselves through works and not his spirit.

And so when John was gone..the law which Jehovah gave the people, then the baton or Spirit was laid upon Jesus to pick up where John left off..the transition.

So does Jehovah represent Jesus' Father, His Brother/kinsman John, or Himself?
Or can all three be the same spirit working all in all?

Those who came out of Egypt were as the Egyptians in that they had accustomed themselves to their lifestyles, their ways of life.
As Lot's wife turned to see the destruction of Sodom, so did those who were called out of Egypt have their hearts turned back to it.
So in the NT we see John/Jehovah calling those in Egypt?under oppression to come out and go through the red sea/be baptised and leave their sins behind..the ways of the Egyptians. And we see Jesus who is the word that God promised them of entering into a land with milk and honey fulfilled when we enter into the Lord himself in His Day.

what do you think?

And then what follows in acts is spiritual fulfillment for those who walked by the spirit and not the flesh in the wilderness after coming through the red sea, which represents the blood of the lamb which was shed and covered overed, or overflowed those that were drowned in it.

Like when Pharaoh and his chosen captains went into the red sea after the Hebrews and multitudes of others did, then these would represent the Pharisees and scribes who did not follow Johns instructions which came from God, but were swallowed up by the waters or God's wrath..which I see as those demons who entered into the swine and ran headlong into the waters and perished.
They was found no more.

hmm..
still thinking..
hugs Zathrus
lone


.
Back to top
Zathrus
King Kong



Joined: 28 Aug 2002

Posts: 2202

Location: WI USA

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 6:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think you're on to it, Lone.
God revealed this through Malachi about John's ministry:
Quote:
4Remember ye the law of Moses my servant, which I commanded unto him in Horeb for all Israel, with the statutes and judgments.

5Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD:

6And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.

There's more there, but I need to keep it short. In the context it talks about putting Israel in remembrance of the law of Moses. This is certainly what John did. He was the fulfillment of this prophecy, as Jesus told His disciples. He was the Elijah being spoken of.

How did John turn the hearts of the children to the fathers? I don't think this is talking about literal nuclear families. John turned the hearts of the descendents (the generation in Jesus' day) to the patriarchs - Abraham, Isaac & Jacob. John put Jesus' generation in remembrance of where they came from, what requirements the law made if they wanted to gain eternal life by it, and what promises God had made to their fathers, of a savior who would come to save them from their sins.

So John's baptism certainly did correspond to the passing through the REd Sea. His preaching was certainly the message of Moses, from his telling the soldiers not to oppress the people and telling the tax collectors to be fair and stop price-gouging and skimming some money for themselves, to telling Herod he was sinning in his affair with his brother's wife.

John reaffirmed the covenant of the law. He put the people in remembrance of the law because the end, or fulfillment of the law - Jesus Christ - was at hand. the law showed all men to be sinners. And like you said, lone, the "baton" was passed to Jesus. He came as the answer to their sin problem.
Back to top
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zathrus!

The cloud by day and the fire by night..
and I will give them a fiery law..
a cloud which covers (washes, cleans conscience) their sins and a fiery law which burns their hearts..

Luk 24:32 And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures?

opened their eyes..scriptures..eyes of the Lord..
thinking out loud here.. Very Happy
Back to top
Christopher_John
Tadpole



Joined: 21 Jun 2007

Posts: 15

Location: Montreal, Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zathrus wrote:
Quote:


5Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD:

6And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.

There's more there, but I need to keep it short. In the context it talks about putting Israel in remembrance of the law of Moses. This is certainly what John did. He was the fulfillment of this prophecy, as Jesus told His disciples. He was the Elijah being spoken of.

How did John turn the hearts of the children to the fathers? I don't think this is talking about literal nuclear families. John turned the hearts of the descendants (the generation in Jesus' day) to the patriarchs - Abraham, Isaac & Jacob. John put Jesus' generation in remembrance of where they came from, what requirements the law made if they wanted to gain eternal life by it, and what promises God had made to their fathers, of a savior who would come to save them from their sins.

So John's baptism certainly did correspond to the passing through the Red Sea. His preaching was certainly the message of Moses, from his telling the soldiers not to oppress the people and telling the tax collectors to be fair and stop price-gouging and skimming some money for themselves, to telling Herod he was sinning in his affair with his brother's wife.

John reaffirmed the covenant of the law. He put the people in remembrance of the law because the end, or fulfillment of the law - Jesus Christ - was at hand. the law showed all men to be sinners. And like you said, lone, the "baton" was passed to Jesus. He came as the answer to their sin problem.


Great thread!

Malachi 4 is a very interesting chapter, however it is to be read in it's entirety in order to apply verse 5. Chapter 4 is a Prophecy of Elijah's ministry which takes place just prior to "the great and dreadful day of the LORD".

Chapter 3 also speaks of Judgment having been past on Israel and that they have drawn nearer to God because of His judgment.

Malachi 3
Quote:
1Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me: and the LORD, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in: behold, he shall come, saith the LORD of hosts.

2But who may abide the day of his coming? and who shall stand when he appeareth? for he is like a refiner's fire, and like fullers' soap:

3And he shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver: and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and purge them as gold and silver, that they may offer unto the LORD an offering in righteousness.

4Then shall the offering of Judah and Jerusalem be pleasant unto the LORD, as in the days of old, and as in former years.


The ministry of Elijah was never promised before the first coming of Christ. The confusion comes from interpreting Malachi 3:1 and Malachi 4:5 as being both John the Baptist, don't get me wrong they are both Elijah but it is Elijah performing two different ministries.

Quote:
1Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me: and the LORD, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in: behold, he shall come, saith the LORD of hosts.


Malachi 3:1 speaks of Christ's first coming as indicated by the Lord speaking the words "and the LORD, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple,"

Isaiah 40:3-5 also speaks of the forerunner before the first coming. However, Malachi 4:3 is distinctively 2nd coming in nature in that it God re-establishes the Law of Moses because the New Covenant by which we are now under, the Covenant of Grace, will have been fulfilled and a new Covenant will be re-established for the Messianic Kingdom which will be similar to the Mosaic Law but one that Gentiles will have to submit to.
Quote:
4Remember ye the law of Moses my servant, which I commanded unto him in Horeb for all Israel, with the statutes and judgments.


Malachi 4 is God speaking hope to Israel with verse 3 indicating that Israel will defeat her enemies which again is 2nd Advent.

Quote:
3And ye shall tread down the wicked; for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet in the day that I shall do this, saith the LORD of hosts.


Israel had their opportunity to receive Elijah but because of their rejection of both John and Christ the fulfillment of Elijah's 2nd ministry will now come just prior to or during the Tribulation period.

Mathew 17:9-13
Quote:
9And as they came down from the mountain, Jesus charged them, saying, Tell the vision to no man, until the Son of man be risen again from the dead.

10And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias must first come?

11And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things.

12But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them.
13Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.


In Mathew 11:11-14 Christ Himself speaks of John the Baptist as being Elijah but interesting enough He speaks of Him in the "Future Tense"...
Quote:
11Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.

12And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.

13For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.

14And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come.



Peace
CJ
Back to top
Chrissie
Not So Newbie



Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 6


PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very interesting thread. Exclamation Exclamation

I think I will have to read it again to take it all in. Embarassed

One question, though.

Christopher,

Why do you say that

14And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come.

is stated in the "future tense"? I don't read it that way. Question
Back to top
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mar 6:17 For Herod himself had sent forth and laid hold upon John, and bound him in prison for Herodias' sake, his brother Philip's wife: for he had married her.

Rev 1:9 I John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ.

Patmos:

Patmos = "my killing"

1) a rugged and bare island in the Aegean Sea


Mat 3:13 ¶ Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to Jordan unto John, to be baptized of him.
Mat 3:14 But John forbad him, saying, I have need to be baptized of thee, and comest thou to me?
Mat 3:15 And Jesus answering said unto him, Suffer [it to be so] now: for thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness. Then he suffered him.

Jhn 1:33 And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.

Jhn 21:24 This is the disciple which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things: and we know that his testimony is true.

2Ti 1:8 Be not thou therefore ashamed of the testimony of our Lord, nor of me his prisoner: but be thou partaker of the afflictions of the gospel according to the power of God;

Rev 19:10 And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See [thou do it] not: I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.

Rev 22:10 And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand.

Luk 3:16 John answered, saying unto [them] all, I indeed baptize you with water; but one mightier than I cometh, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire:

Jhn 1:29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.

Rev 5:1 ¶ And I saw in the right hand of him that sat on the throne a book written within and on the backside, sealed with seven seals.
Rev 5:2 And I saw a strong angel proclaiming with a loud voice, Who is worthy to open the book, and to loose the seals thereof?
Rev 5:3 And no man in heaven, nor in earth, neither under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look thereon.
Rev 5:4 And I wept much, because no man was found worthy to open and to read the book, neither to look thereon.
Rev 5:5 And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.

Who sent John to baptize with water?
Is this the same John who recieved the testimony of Christ?
Is this the same John who was in prison in patmos whom Herod held prisoner and beheaded?

Did John recieve the testimony before he met Jesus?
Was the book of revelation given to John before Jesus was made known to the world?

Was this same testimony given to Paul?

The testimony of Christ is the spirit of prophecy..
Did John prophecy of Christ and that is why when he speaks to the pharisees he John says:

Mat 3:7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

Had they already heard the book of revelation which was given to John?
And if so, who did they here it from?
And why did John not suffer them to be baptised?

1Th 1:5 For our gospel came not unto you in word only, but also in power, and in the Holy Ghost, and in much assurance; as ye know what manner of men we were among you for your sake. Confused or disgusted
1Th 1:6 And ye became followers of us, and of the Lord, having received the word in much affliction, with joy of the Holy Ghost:
1Th 1:7 So that ye were ensamples to all that believe in Macedonia and Achaia.
1Th 1:8 For from you sounded out the word of the Lord not only in Macedonia and Achaia, but also in every place your faith to God-ward is spread abroad; so that we need not to speak any thing.
1Th 1:9 For they themselves shew of us what manner of entering in we had unto you, and how ye turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God;
1Th 1:10 And to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead, [even] Jesus, which delivered us from the wrath to come.

which "delivered us" from the wrath to come..hmm

so, having been delivered from the wrath to come, is the book of revelation still in effect, or did Jesus deliver us all from it?

Luk 9:54 And when his disciples James and John saw [this], they said, Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did?

Rev 11:3 And I will give [power] unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred [and] threescore days, clothed in sackcloth.
Rev 11:4 These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth.
Rev 11:5 And if any man will hurt them, fire proceedeth out of their mouth, and devoureth their enemies: and if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed.
Rev 11:6 These have power to shut heaven, that it rain not in the days of their prophecy: and have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to smite the earth with all plagues, as often as they will.

Luk 9:55 But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
Luk 9:56 For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save [them]. And they went to another village.

thinking.. Very Happy

hugs
lone
Back to top
Christopher_John
Tadpole



Joined: 21 Jun 2007

Posts: 15

Location: Montreal, Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 5:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chrissie wrote:
Very interesting thread. Exclamation Exclamation

I think I will have to read it again to take it all in. Embarassed

One question, though.

Christopher,

Why do you say that

14And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come.

is stated in the "future tense"? I don't read it that way. Question


Hi Chrissie,
I see what you mean...I kind of rushed the end of that post and didn't quite clarify that part. If we look at the verse again using the NIV translation it becomes a little clearer too.

So I'll just re-arrange the previous post a bit.

Quote:
14And if you are willing to accept it, he is the Elijah who was to come.


The key question here is what were they supposed to accept?... Christ was to be recognized "Accepted" as the Messiah. If the religious leadership of Israel had accepted Christ as the Messiah then the prophecies and promises of the Old Testament would have begun and Christ would have lead Israel to victory over her enemies and the ministry of Elijah would have taken place already.

One of the main reasons why many Jews denounce Christianity is based on the fact that they have always been looking forward, waiting (from propehtic scripture), for a King to lead them to Victory. So when their King rode into to town on a donkey...they scoffed at the idea of placing themselves into subjection of someone so humble and without earthly riches to speak of.

The main point is Christ makes it very clear in verse 14 that "if you are willing to accept it (His Messiaship and right to Davids throne), he (John the Baptist) is the Elijah who was to come".

Christ now makes the point that John the Baptist was Elijah, but it is the prophecy of Elijah's coming He refers to in the past tense and not in his person, which now means that the prophecy of Elijah who was to come reamains the Elijah who is still to come.

So John the Baptist came in the "spirit and power" of Elijah prior to Christ's first coming. It's important to know that the promise of Elijah's coming was never based on the first coming of Christ. It was promised before the period of Tribulation or the emphasis of the prophecy of his coming was based on pre-tribulation.

Malachi 4:5-6
Quote:
5 "See, I will send you the prophet Elijah before that great and dreadful day of the LORD comes. 6 He will turn the hearts of the fathers to their children, and the hearts of the children to their fathers; or else I will come and strike the land with a curse."


Even Christ referred to the Tribulation as "a day Like no other" so we know based on this verse that the emphasis is pre-tribulation and not pre-advent.

However, Malachi 3:1 defines a direct relationship between Christ and John the Baptist. The 1st part of the verse speaks of the Messenger being sent, and, preparing the way before the Lord.
Quote:
"See, I will send my messenger, who will prepare the way before me.


John the Baptist prepared the people by water Baptism, which water baptism was nothing new during that time period with the exception that John was doing it for the "remission of sins" (Mat. 3:11).

The next half of Malachi 3:1 brings them both together, after the Lord indicates that a Messenger will prepare His way He finishes with:
Quote:
Then suddenly the Lord you are seeking will come to his temple; the messenger of the covenant, whom you desire, will come," says the LORD Almighty.


The Lord whom you are seeking will come to His "temple". The body is the temple so this finalizes the Ministry of John the Baptist as being one to prepare the way of the Lord and John fulfilled that by first and foremost preparing the people via repentance through baptism and ultimately announced to Israel through a sign from God that their Messiah had come.

John 1:29-33
Quote:
29The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, "Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!

30This is the one I meant when I said, 'A man who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.'

31I myself did not know him, but the reason I came baptizing with water was that he might be revealed to Israel."

32Then John gave this testimony: "I saw the Spirit come down from heaven as a dove and remain on him.

33I would not have known him, except that the one who sent me to baptize with water told me, 'The man on whom you see the Spirit come down and remain is he who will baptize with the Holy Spirit.'

34I have seen and I testify that this is the Son of God."


What confuses alot of people is that they make a connection of Malchi 4:6 which serves a different purpose. All through the Gospel when Christ was amongst family and friends including the children His gentleness and caring always centered around brotherly love...caring for one another and never referring to anyone as not being a brother or a sister.

These family values are fading and unfortunately it will only get worse as the family structure continuously diminishes towards the end times but because God has a different plan for Israel Elijah will be sent prior to the tribulation period and "He will turn the hearts of the fathers to their children, and the hearts of the children to their fathers".

In other words his ministry will be of one that will re-establish the family unit and to strengthen it to prepare them for the "Time of Jacob's Troubles".

So as long winded as it may be...the implication of verse 14 is future tense because of their rejection of Christ's Messiaship which "post-poned" Elijah's earthly ministry until a later date but Pre-Tribulation.

Peace
CJ
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Revelation and End of Times All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

© 2001-2007