 |
Bible-Discussion.com Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
TBax King of the Jungle
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
  Posts: 1903
|
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vibrate,
The scriptures do not reveal a trinity. The one working together with God doesn't make that one God.
1 Cor 8: 6 there is actually to us one God the Father, out of whom all things are, and we for him; and there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things are, and we through him.
John 1:1 In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god.
From the original word structure, Greek speaking people would have understood that The Word was not "the God".
John 17:20 “I make request, not concerning these only, but also concerning those putting faith in me through their word; 21 in order that they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in union with me and I am in union with you, that they also may be in union with us,
If unity means they are the same person, then the disciples become God as well. Now you know that is not true. Working together with God doesn't make you God!!!
| Vibrate wrote: | | they will be inconclusive to someone who is just reading with their brain and not with their heart. |
Jer 17:9 “The heart is more treacherous than anything else and is desperate.
Matt 15:19 For example, out of the heart come wicked reasonings, murders, adulteries, fornications, thieveries, false testimonies, blasphemies.
Using your heart instead of reasoning or understanding is the entire problem. People rationalize the trinity as true by misunderstanding certain scriptures. John 17:20 is a perfect example of this.
| Vibrate wrote: | | I think that the reality of the trinity is something that you and the JW organization have never even thought about; but you have just dismissed it based on the grammar of finite reality, which we have discussed. |
The infinite God inspired the scriptures, and revealed Himself through them. If you choose to reject what He has revealed in favor of what your heart tells you, that is your choice. JW's believe what the Bible says. You allow your imperfect heart to alter the revealed identity of God.
The key is to read the Bible to learn the truth. NOT read the Bible to confirm preconcieved ideas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Vibrate Little Hamster
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don't worry, you'll get to understand one day. But you have to go through some processing to remove the arrogance. In order to learn someone has to come to a place where the acknowledge that they don't know, and this is only possible when they come face to face with the reality that they have been deceived.
Basically, what I'm saying is that without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins. You're not able to hear, because you've shut people out from your mind. So the only way to reach you is through hardship. But one way or the other we cannot continue to allow you to talk about God with empty words. It is no longer going to be allowed, this practice of reading the bible, interpreting, and promoting one view without being willing to listen, truly listen, and investigate impartially with a clear conscience of scientific method. When you close your mind to this process of dialectic and honest research, you will be shut off from the fullness of life, and will suffer for it, until you change.
So when it happens, just remember; don't be afraid, because you have heard the truth, and just need to give it a chance - really test it instead of hardening your mind, and remaining arrogant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Tiger
Joined: 31 May 2006
  Posts: 805 Location: Arlington Hts., Il. USA
|
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vibrate, you need to apply the above to yourself. The Bible nowhere describes God as an Athanasian Trinity. If you are interested in the Doctrine of Christ himself, then I recommend you read 2 John 9-10;
"Whosoever transgresseth, and ABIDETH NOT IN THE DOCTRINE OF CHRIST , hath not God. He that abideth in the DOCTRINE OF CHRIST, he hath both the FATHER and the SON."
10 "If there come any on to you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed."
1 John 2:22-23; "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is ANTICHRIST, that denieth the FATHER and the SON."
23 "Whosoever denieth the SON, the same hath not the FATHER: but he that acknowledgeth the SON hath the FATHER also."
24 "Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye shall continue in the SON and in the FATHER."
The Doctrine of Jesus, and John, acknowledges the FATHER and the SON only!! There is no mention of a third person coequal Holy Ghost. Trinitarians teach a false God and a false Gospel. They do not teach the doctrine of Christ, and as stated above, they are antichrist. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lone-traveler Emperor of the Universe
Joined: 02 Jul 2005
   Posts: 6342 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jhn 14:26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
Jhn 15:26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, [even] the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:
Jhn 16:7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
How can trinitarians be antichrists if they believe in the Father and the Son and the Spirit of Truth?
and what of this verse:
Mar 3:29 But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:
Now I'm not necessarily trinitarian and I'm not necessarily not trinitarian..it justs seems calling other's antichrist because they believe in the father son and holy spirit..which Jesus himself says he will send to us in His name and when He comes He will teach us all things..even though I believe "he" is a "she" nevertheless, we shouldn't go calling people antichrists if they believe in Christ in the first place right?
Doesn't Jesus say, that those who are with him are not against him???
Now if they denied him I'd say you might have a point, but they aren't denying anyone, they are including all. isn't that a good thing? to leave no one out? rather than leave someone out?
It's way too easy to make enemies, it sure is harder to make friends..isn't it?
but we could try...maybe huh?
maybe..
hugs
lone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vibrate Little Hamster
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pete wrote: | | Vibrate, you need to apply the above to yourself. The Bible nowhere describes God as an Athanasian Trinity |
| Pete wrote: | | The Doctrine of Jesus, and John, acknowledges the FATHER and the SON only!! There is no mention of a third person coequal Holy Ghost. Trinitarians teach a false God and a false Gospel. They do not teach the doctrine of Christ, and as stated above, they are antichrist. |
I like to keep conversations clear, and not to get caught up in labels. I don't have a clue, pretty much, what you're getting at.
Have you read and understood my posts? If so, I would be happy to discuss any element that you consider to be incorrect in any way. If you're willing to discuss one point at a time and keep things organized, I'm sure there's much to be gained from discussing together.
Btw, I do agree with all the statements that you have quoted from the bible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Tiger
Joined: 31 May 2006
  Posts: 805 Location: Arlington Hts., Il. USA
|
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lone-traveler wrote: | Jhn 14:26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
Jhn 15:26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, [even] the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:
Jhn 16:7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
How can trinitarians be antichrists if they believe in the Father and the Son and the Spirit of Truth?
and what of this verse:
Mar 3:29 But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:
Now I'm not necessarily trinitarian and I'm not nevertheless, we shouldn't go calling people antichrists if they believe in Christ in the first place right?
Doesn't Jesus say, that those who are with him are not against him???
It's way too easy to make enemies, it sure is harder to make friends..isn't it?
but we could try...maybe huh?
maybe.. :?
hugs
lone |
John 14 has been completely corrupted by Trinitarians in an effort to justify the Holy Spirit as a third person of a trinity. They purposely mistranslate three words: “Another,” “He,” and “Comforter.”
“Another” in context here, does not mean another person, it means, in the context of what Jesus is telling his disciples, that, while he will no longer be with them in a physical form, he will be with them in “another” invisible form spiritually. This is the meaning of the entire chapter. Read verse 18; “I will not leave you comfortless; I will come to you.” Verse 20; “At that day ye shall know that I am in the Father, and ye in me, and I in you.”
“He” is from the Greek autos which means baffling wind, or could be a third person pronoun. The exact use depends on context, and here it is the Father’s invisible Spirit, akin to a baffling wind, and not a third person, as the context makes clear.
The whole thrust of John 14 is that Jesus is telling his disciples that he will soon be crucified, and leaving them physically, but that he and the Father would still be with them in spirit. This is reiterated in chapter. 17:21; “That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us. No mention of a third person here.
2 Corinthians 1:3-4 also backs this up: “Blessed be God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies, and the God of ALL COMFORT;” 4; “Who comforteth us in all our tribulation, that we may be able to comfort them which are in any trouble, by the comfort wherewith we ourselves are comforted of God.”
The doctrine of the trinity relies on twisting the Scriptures to try and make it work, Especially for Sola Scriptura Protestants who deny papal authority, and yet accept papal doctrine. The Vatican doesn't rely on the Bible for its doctrines. It relies on its own authority as the "only true church", and anyone that is not a part of that church is their enemy.
I know you mean well Lone, but its hard to cuddle up to a cobra. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lone-traveler Emperor of the Universe
Joined: 02 Jul 2005
   Posts: 6342 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Pete,
God Bless You.
I know you know my heart..
| Quote: | | The doctrine of the trinity relies on twisting the Scriptures to try and make it work, Especially for Sola Scriptura Protestants who deny papal authority, and yet accept papal doctrine. The Vatican doesn't rely on the Bible for its doctrines. It relies on its own authority as the "only true church", and anyone that is not a part of that church is their enemy. |
And this is where "they" err...true?
Are we not told to love our enemies and to pray and to do good those who do not love us back?
Aren't we told that unless we exceed the righteousness of the Pharisees we will not see the kingdom of heaven?
And that if we do the same things they do, what reward do we have? But if we are like our father we will show the same care for them that the Lord does? Because he gives rain to both the good and the evil, the just and the unjust..
and we know that if there was no rain then people would die of thirst huh?
And so do we give them water (love, compassion, mercy, forgiveness) so that they won't die, even if they seem unrighteous in our own eyes?
Or do we just let them die with no mercy and no forgiveness as under the law they themseves are under?
God loves cobras, otherwise he never would have made creeping things on the earth. He also loves wolves and ostriches and even ugly vultures. He feeds them even when no one else will.
One of the greatest dividing factors between God and the world is, that even while the world was His enemy God still loved them.
Aren't we supposed to do the same..even if they re cobras and we are lions?
Isn't is written somewhere that all will lie down together and alittle child shall lead them?
And that we are to become as little children having no guile in our mouths and no malice in our hearts, and to live in peace with one another as much as is in us to do?
For such is the kingdom of God.
Everyone has different beliefs and different understandings..are we supposed to consider them our enemies too or are we supposed to love them knowing that God's mercy is great enough to cover the whole world's misunderstandings?
When are we going to start turning swords into plowshares anyways if it doesn't start somewhere?
Let there be peace on earth..and let it begin to day.
Isn't that the message?
Peace on earth, goodwill towards men..
who's going to put down that first stone?
who is going to walk away first knowing that all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God?
What's it going to take..another war? another, I'm right your wrong and do it this way or die?
another inquisition? another Holy war? another Jihad?
they never worked in the past..maybe it's time to learn from history and try something new..
Ye have heard it said..hate thine enemy..
But I say..love thy enemy.
and if they don't love their enemies are we supposed to follow their example or what the Lord said?
Why call ye me Lord, Lord, and do not the things I say?
Isn't that the doctine of Christ that we are supposed to believe and not whether God is one, three, ninety and nine...
we have some real issues facing this world today. Serious issues.
I have a question..
there was a very big earthquake in China yesterday. So much suffering, so much loss..students and children my heart hurts...
If there was an earthquake of this kind of devestation in your backyard, are you only going to save those who believe like you do? or will you try to save any for th sake of loving and having compassion on your fellow man.
Oh, your a trinitarian, I'm going to let you die under that rock because you beieve in the trinity..
Is this something you would do?
If not then why does your words not represent your actions?
Because our tongues are no less harmful than leaving someone under a rock to die. we cause more harm with our tongues than all the earthqakes in the world.
I'm not picking on you Pete or anyone else for that matter. I'm just speaking my heart to anybody that will hear.
The sun is coming up where I am, and it's a new day.
Maybe we can make a fresh start to day.
the words we speak to one another, they are swords and they can cut and hurt and kill..why don't we start turning them into plowshares and turn over some new ground.
maybe huh?
maybe..
hugs all
lone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TBax King of the Jungle
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
  Posts: 1903
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vibrate,
| Vibrate wrote: | | Basically, what I'm saying is that without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins. You're not able to hear, because you've shut people out from your mind. So the only way to reach you is through hardship. But one way or the other we cannot continue to allow you to talk about God with empty words. |
Vibrate, who are you talking to? If that was for me then you are showing your ineptitude.
1. With me you didn't discuss "without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins." You were saying "Jesus is God". Do you understand the difference?
2. I hear what people say and reject what goes against the Bible. i.e. your ideas
3. The scriptures are not empty words, but prove your ideas wrong.
| Vibrate wrote: | | It is no longer going to be allowed, this practice of reading the bible, interpreting, and promoting one view without being willing to listen, truly listen, and investigate impartially with a clear conscience of scientific method. When you close your mind to this process of dialectic and honest research, you will be shut off from the fullness of life, and will suffer for it, until you change. |
Did you write that for yourself? I am attempting to explain the truth from the scriptures yet you won't allow it because your heart doesn't see it. You call that "scientific method", or "honest research"???????????? I believe your "scientific method" and "honest research" involves actually discussing the words. Yet you make no attempt.
Arrogance is denying scriptures in favor of your heart.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vibrate Little Hamster
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I am attempting to explain the truth from the scriptures yet you won't allow it because your heart doesn't see it. |
You are saying that Jesus, God and the Holy Spirit cannot be the same entity, because of the relationships that are explained in the bible.
If you are listening, what was my response that point? And how have you responded to my response? The record is there for anyone to see, and I say that you have not responded at all, and not even understood my response.
Why do you continue to say that I try to understand things with my heart? If you have been listening, what was my response to this claim, and how have you responded to that response?
In both cases, you have not responded, and probably not understood at all. The record is there. Prove me wrong. Oh yes, there was a server crash... well, maybe you'll say your response was lost there, but if so, just state clearly once and for all. Say what my responses have been to those two statements of yours, and what your response is.
I suppose you will just say "Vibrate, you are wrong, and you don't know what you're talking about." And call that a response.
| Quote: | | With me you didn't discuss "without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins." You were saying "Jesus is God". Do you understand the difference? | I know we didn't talk about that scripture, although they are related. But that isn't the point I was making by quoting that scripture to you. If you read my post you will see that I was explaining to you that by suffering the negative consequences of your unwillingness to reason things through from fundamental precepts, you will learn to understand the truth that you have been ignoring. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pete Tiger
Joined: 31 May 2006
  Posts: 805 Location: Arlington Hts., Il. USA
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lone, I think it’s one thing to show concern for people in need an unbiased manner, but it is another to sit calmly by when institutions and self- appointed leaders abuse their positions and lead people astray. In Jesus day, those who abused their positions for personal gain and power were the Jewish priests, Scribes, Pharisees and Sadducees. They not only enslaved the people materially, but also spiritually with their man-made tradition.
In Matthew 23 Jesus wasted no words in condemning their actions and their pompous, self-righteous behavior. They used their positions to enslave the masses, while lining their pockets with gold. In fact, Jesus spent a good third of his time castigating the Jewish leadership in no uncertain terms. It's interesting that gentile Christianity has fallen into the same condition as the Judaism of Jesus' day.
One can demonstrate love in many ways, but at the same time, it involves pointing out sin when it raises its ugly head. I have a lot of Catholic, Protestant and even atheist friends, but when the issue of religion comes up, especially Biblical Christianity, I think it’s important to defend the truth of Scripture, especially when someone, knowingly or unknowingly, twists it to say what it doesn’t. You kind of remind me of my wife, who gets on my case for taking issue with folks when the subject of religion or their church comes up.
Often, I get the argument;”Well, you are only one person, and you don’t even belong to a church, and I belong to a church with millions of members led by pastors with doctorate degrees.” Apparently numbers are more important than facts. I’ve been of the opinion for a long time that majority opinion is almost always wrong. I will say that I have never been offended when others disagree with me, and even get personally objectionable. It’s always an indication that the have no solid argument.
Incidentally, I would try to lift a rock off of anyone, especially a theological one. Take care, Pete |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lone-traveler Emperor of the Universe
Joined: 02 Jul 2005
   Posts: 6342 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Pete,
I don't belong to a church either. Except the spiritual church..the one not made with hands.
I hear your concern too and I se the things going on, I hear the "messages" on the tv. And I know that most of them make a living off of other peoples fears.
When Jesus was talking to the people themselves, he wasn't blasting them, he held out his and and exrended peace and mercy and forgiveness. He taught them the difference between who he was and who those who were in power were. He set a good example for the to want to follow.
When it came to the leaders and teachers of the law themselves, then he told them, your wrong. You are hypocrites because you say this and do that.
They believed they had the authority of God jimself.
He knocked them down, like a tower they fell, but he didn't change those ston hearts, he did however change the hearts of those who came out of her.
Now sometimes your going to find yourself baging your head against brick walls. Just the way it is. And they will remain bricks until God crushes them himself.
In the meantime we can explain to those who arecoming out of one slave driven religion how they are not bound to enter into another one. That there is way which avoids being snared by all kinds of wolves. That way is a very narrow way indeed. And not too many want to hear it because it's just way too simple.
Love.
And whoever won't hear it, we are told to shake the dust off our feet and move along. Easier said than done. Because even the ones who won't hear become a part of our hearts and we want to help them more than they want help themselves.
I am very aware of what goes on in the world. I've been in a few of the different houses myself. And after a while if you really want to find the truth it will hit you right between the eyes. But until one seeks it, no argument and debate and name calling and ridiculing is going to make one bit of difference. They are as adamant stone.
So then the question is, if we can't fight a rock with stick how do we cause the rock to crumble...?
and the answer is..under the skin. in the hearts of those we are trying to plant good seed in. And if I see you coming at me with a pitchfork and a sword..there aint no way your coming near me..no how.
You want to change the world, you have to change it from the inside out. You have to give them a reason to want to change. Hey, if they're happy where they are and they don't have a problem with it, then leave them alone. When they start getting uncomfortable in their surroundings then they will choose to leave themselves.
I mean you can drag them screaming and fighting, but if they don't want to go then what are you going to do?
All we can do is be there. When things start hitting the fan the last hing you want to do is say I told ya so..
that's no way of helping, that just causes more friction and strife and hard feelings.
Put it this way..
I don't care where your from, what your religion is, or what doctrine you follow. All I know is that we are told to love our neighbours as ourselves. And we know that we are of God when we love one another.
Doesn't say If after that sentaence..just says that's the way it is.
Now anyone can go looking for reasons why we shouldn't love our neighbour, why we should hate our enemies, and you know what? You will find a reason or a fault in every living person on the planet. So what then? hate them all, turn them all away because they are different or think different or talk different or look different..
But I challenge everyone..go looking for a reason to love each other, to just be friends, to just knock down those walls that divide us..
Now, that's a fight..and the goal is well worth the journey.
And you will make more head way, knock down more cement towers and brick heads, than any ranting and raving will ever do.
Gorbechev...tear down this wall!
so be it.
amen.
God Bless You Pete
I hear ya brother, can you hear me?
hugs
lone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TBax King of the Jungle
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
  Posts: 1903
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vibrate,
| Vibrate wrote: | You are saying that Jesus, God and the Holy Spirit cannot be the same entity, because of the relationships that are explained in the bible.
If you are listening, what was my response that point? And how have you responded to my response? |
That is the entire problem. You do not respond to the points, but go off on tangents. You act like because God is infinite everything you say is true, yet haven't backed anything up with scripture.
After I explained certain scriptures regarding the trinity, your responce was:
| Vibrate wrote: | Don't worry, you'll get to understand one day.
...
Basically, what I'm saying is that without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins. You're not able to hear |
Your point was not about the shedding of blood. You speak of points that weren't brought up, and cannot understand the ones that are.
--------
| Vibrate wrote: | | Why do you continue to say that I try to understand things with my heart? |
Why??? Maybe because you said:
| Vibrate wrote: | | As far as showing in the bible where it does say that Jesus is God, that is easy, but again, they will be inconclusive to someone who is just reading with their brain and not with their heart. |
You speak of "scientific method", or "honest research" when your posts deny such things in favor of your preconcieved ideas or the guidings of your heart. Honest research shows your ideas are incorrect.
| Vibrate wrote: | | The record is there for anyone to see |
Indeed.
If you truly do respond, then do so now.
Is God one person, or 3 persons in one God?
Please be concise.
Also explain your tangent. "without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins."
What made you think I was ignoring this truth?
Again, please be concise.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vibrate Little Hamster
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | If you truly do respond, then do so now. Cool
Is God one person, or 3 persons in one God?
Please be concise. |
God is one person, who takes on many forms. Do you consider that to be an answer?
| Quote: | | Also explain your tangent. "without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins." |
We were talking about the trinity. I did not mention this quote in terms of that discussion about the trinity. I mentioned it because I was saying to you the following:
1) You are not paying the due attention to words, to analyze them carefully.
2) Whoever does not hear, will have to feel.
Does this explain why I mentioned that quote? Do you understand that it was neither a tangent, nor a part of the discussion about trinity?
| Quote: | What made you think I was ignoring this truth?
Again, please be concise. | It is was a statement about how that discussion was going. That's all.
I won't say anything else in this post, because I don't want to confuse you. I can now see exactly what has been going on, why we have been getting nowhere. If you're still willing, we can continue slowly like this. You have asked two questions. Do you feel that I have answered appropriately? If not, explain what else you think I should say. If I have answered, then go ahead and ask about anything else that has been unclear. I won't add anything else until you are clear on where we are so far in the discussion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TBax King of the Jungle
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
  Posts: 1903
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 5:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vibrate,
| Vibrate wrote: | | God is one person, who takes on many forms. Do you consider that to be an answer? |
For once, Yes! Thank you.
Now do you believe Jesus is one of those forms?
Regarding what you said about me ignoring the truth about "without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins."
| Vibrate wrote: | | It is was a statement about how that discussion was going. That's all. |
Unacceptable. You introduced a tangent that had nothing to do with our discucssion. You have not explained how you know I was ignoring the truth regarding "without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins." Another example of how you will say things without feeling it is necessary to back up.
| Vibrate wrote: | | TBax wrote: | | Also explain your tangent. "without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins." |
We were talking about the trinity. I did not mention this quote in terms of that discussion about the trinity. I mentioned it because I was saying to you the following:
1) You are not paying the due attention to words, to analyze them carefully.
2) Whoever does not hear, will have to feel.
Does this explain why I mentioned that quote? Do you understand that it was neither a tangent, nor a part of the discussion about trinity?
|
What????????????????????????
Was that a reasonable conclusion from your statement? Not one bit.
From May 12, 8:58 AM my time.
| Vibrate wrote: | | Basically, what I'm saying is that without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins. You're not able to hear, because you've shut people out from your mind. |
Sorry, but you speak in a code I cannot decifer.
| Vibrate wrote: | | and not even understood my response. |
Amen!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vibrate Little Hamster
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's fine TBax. Let's go through these points one by one until we're on the same page, and at least you know what I'm trying to get at. Then you can see if you accept or reject.
| Quote: | | You have not explained how you know I was ignoring the truth regarding "without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins." Another example of how you will say things without feeling it is necessary to back up. |
I have never said that you ignored the truth regarding "without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins." When I mentioned that quote, my intention was not to suggest that you were ignoring the truth about that quote. I mentioned it for an entirely different reason.
Do you understand that my intention was not to suggest [quote]that you were ignoring the truth about that quote?
| Quote: | | Sorry, but you speak in a code I cannot decifer. | I understand what's going on here now. I will be happy to explain point by point by point what each of my statements means, no matter how long it will take. Once you acknowledge that you understand the explanation above, we can go on to different points, and eventually you will get what I am saying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|