Brainwashing

HeKkLeR · Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:25 pm Post subject:

Oh... you really need to brush up on your Latin, by the way. Laughing

_________________
Peace

The HeKkLeR

Yehushuan · Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:08 pm Post subject:

Yehushuan · Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:11 pm Post subject:

JB · Lion King Joined: 16 Feb 2008 Posts: 1048

Hey HeKkLer,
Sometime, I find that I type a little to fast and I miss a letter. That really doesn't mean that I need to brush up on my Latin but it means that I must brush up on my typing. Very Happy

I will get back to you shortly on a topic and I will use Bible only. As you would say bring it on.

Evee · Moderator Joined: 13 Sep 2005 Posts: 676

Guys, can we please stay on topic & quit w/the insults? Thanks in advance.
_________________
Don't get caught in the trap of thinking you know everything God has to say b/c you've read the Bible. Remember, God is STILL speaking. And surprisingly, through people we DON'T expect.

JB · Lion King Joined: 16 Feb 2008 Posts: 1048

Evee,
I mean no disrespect, but I didn't see any insults in my post and I am truly sorry if what I said was construed in such a manner.

God Bless JB

HeKkLeR · Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:26 pm Post subject:

Evee,
thank you, Sister, for setting us straight. Very Happy

JB,
good deal. Please pick your best flawed doctrine, though. I mean... how would it look if you chose a topic that we both agree on? Shocked

Yehu,
Ok, I watched the stuff at the link. While it is very interesting (and I mean that sincerely), the focus was on no evidence of the plane wreckage, but what about any evidence of what was suspected to have hit the Pentagon?

Good questions were raised by someone else in this thread, too. What do you suggest happened to the real plane, and the passengers on board?

Something that troubles me, truly, is: Who would be dumb enough to use a scenario of 4 jumbo jets being used to attack 4 distinct buildings in the US, only to use three jumbo jets and one missile, instead; And then, to still use the scenario of 4 jumbo jets to the media?

I mean... if a missile was used, and not the fourth 757, then why not just say "3 jumbo jets and a missile"? Would it not be much easier?

Using a missile instead of a 757, yet claiming it was a 757 and not a missile, would seem to take greater pain and permit a much greater margine for error... which in turn would mean a greater possibility for the entire conspiracy plan to be sniffed out and brought to light.

Unless, of course, stating that it was a missile would lead to questions about just "what kind of missile" was used, and if it was an "American missile or not", and, if the former, was it "an American plane that shot the missile" (I dont know how an American military missile could be successfully fired from a civilian plane).

Interesting stuff, indeed. Very Happy

Thanks for sharing.
_________________
Peace

The HeKkLeR