|
|
| Author |
Message |
Silver Surfer
King Kong
Joined: 12 Jul 2003
Posts: 2203
Location: Hayden, Idaho, USA
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:19 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| pastor2022 wrote: | | [The "Word of God" in John 1 referring to Jesus and the "Word of God" referring to the Bible are not the same. You need to do a bit of Greek/Biblical study I'm afraid. God transcends the written word. |
And just how does anyone possible separate God from His word ?
To me that would be like separating man's heart and lungs, from the man...and, the man is still alive ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Silver Surfer
King Kong
Joined: 12 Jul 2003
Posts: 2203
Location: Hayden, Idaho, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| pastor2022 wrote: | | The "Word of God" in John 1 referring to Jesus and the "Word of God" referring to the Bible are not the same. You need to do a bit of Greek/Biblical study I'm afraid. God transcends the written word. |
Man is saved by the word of God, not God Himself.
#1.) 1 Peter 1:23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
#2.) James 1:21 Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe
Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 6772
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| This is the atheism forum. If you think that quoting scripture in here is going to make your point, then you're barking up the wrong tree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Silver Surfer
King Kong
Joined: 12 Jul 2003
Posts: 2203
Location: Hayden, Idaho, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| P1234567890 wrote: | | This is the atheism forum. If you think that quoting scripture in here is going to make your point, then you're barking up the wrong tree. |
You may be right.
After all, who would want to gain knowledge from a God who knows everything, both past, present, and future ?
It is more logical to follow man's finite knowledge of things he knows nothing about, right ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe
Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 6772
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Silver Surfer wrote: |
After all, who would want to gain knowledge from a God who knows everything, both past, present, and future ? |
The problem is that there are a lot of people who don't believe that said God exists and that He has that knowledge.
I'll tell you what: Pray to God for a proof of the Goldbach conjecture or for a proof that P != NP, and post the proof here. That will make a believer out of me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PrysdieHeer!
Big Pit Bull
Joined: 30 Dec 2007
Posts: 379
Location: South Africa; Gardens of Pretoria
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| P1234567890 wrote: | | Silver Surfer wrote: |
After all, who would want to gain knowledge from a God who knows everything, both past, present, and future ? |
The problem is that there are a lot of people who don't believe that said God exists and that He has that knowledge.
I'll tell you what: Pray to God for a proof of the Goldbach conjecture or for a proof that P != NP, and post the proof here. That will make a believer out of me. |
?
What do you mean?
:::::::::::::::::
Prys die Heer! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ 
Search 
Make a Donation 
Usergroups 
Contact
Register
Submit Articles 
Log in to check your private messages 
