 |
Bible-Discussion.com Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
RevJP Moderator
Joined: 18 Apr 2003
     Posts: 6828 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 6:05 am Post subject: Is God cruel? |
|
|
There are atheists and agnostics who argue that the God who is presented in the Bible is cruel. By labeling God as cruel, they are appealing to our human, moral sensibilities. The word “cruelty” is defined as "callous indifference to, or pleasure in, causing pain and suffering.” The question before us now is: Is God cruel? To answer in the affirmative, we would have to allow that God either doesn’t care about pain and suffering, or He actually enjoys watching His creatures suffer.
The atheists / agnostics who claim that God is cruel have a large burden of proof. They are not merely claiming to know about the actions of God; they are also claiming to sufficiently know the circumstances in which He performed those actions, as well as His motivations. Additionally, they are claiming to know the very mind of God, ascribing to Him the attitudes of indifference and/or sadistic pleasure necessary to define Him as cruel. Quite frankly, this is beyond the skeptic’s ability to demonstrate—they can’t possibly know the mind of God. “’For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,’ declares the LORD. ‘As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts’” (Isaiah 55:8-9).
There is no doubt that God both allows and, at times, causes pain and suffering, but God’s goodness cannot be impugned because He commits an act that appears cruel to us. While we can’t claim to know His reasoning in every circumstance, we do know several reasons for actions that can appear to us to be cruel, especially if we don’t know—or don’t bother to find out—the circumstances:
1. Just punishment - If a punishment is just, can it be said to be cruel? What critics usually do not understand is that God’s love is not diminished when He brings punishment on people. God is able to bring judgment on an evil group of people in order to spare those who are devoted to Him. To allow evil and wrongdoing to go unpunished would indeed be cruel and would indicate a callousness toward the innocent. When God caused the Red Sea to close, drowning Pharaoh’s entire army, He was punishing Pharaoh’s rebellion against Him and preserving His chosen people from certain slaughter and annihilation (Exodus 14). Wrongdoing that does not result in punishment inevitably results in greater and greater wrongdoing, which benefits no one and is detrimental to the common good. Even when God told the Israelites to completely destroy the enemies of God, including women and children, He knew that to let them live would ensure the existence of future generations devoted to evil idolatrous practices—including in some cases child sacrifices on the altars of false gods.
2. To bring about a greater good - Pain and suffering that produce a greater good sometimes can be brought about by no other means. The Bible tells us that trials and difficulties produce stronger, better Christians, and we should “count it all joy” (James 1:2) when we encounter them. God brings these about for our benefit, in order to refine us like gold in the fire of affliction. The Apostle Paul saw his own suffering—beatings, stonings, shipwrecks, hunger, thirst, cold, imprisonments—as a means of ensuring that he would be ever conscious of his own weakness, would remember always that the power at work in him was from God, not himself, and would never be deluded into relying on his own power (2 Corinthians 1:8-10; 4:7-12). Against nonbelievers, God's justice is vindicated when he causes pain and suffering to them because they deserve it. He demonstrates His mercy to them by warning them repeatedly of the consequences of sin. When through their own rebellion, they bring upon themselves calamity, this is just punishment, not cruelty. The fact that He lets rebels go on shaking their fists at Him as long as He does indicates His mercy and patience, not cruelty.
3. To glorify Himself - God is glorified by the exhibition of His attributes. We all agree that He looks pretty good to us when His love and mercy are on display, but since each and every attribute is holy and perfect, even the exhibition of His wrath and anger bring Him glory. And that is the ultimate goal—His glory, not ours. Our tiny finite brains can't even adequately imagine Him, much less call Him into question.
All these are worthy, valid, noble causes for pain and suffering. Contrary to the claims of skeptics, there are good reasons for God’s allowing evil and suffering in this world. We are privileged to know some of those reasons, but we do not always know why God allows evil and suffering. To trust God in spite of not knowing the reasons is not a blind leap of faith. Rather, we trust Him with the things we don’t understand because we see His faithfulness in those actions which we do understand.
If we read the Bible carefully, rather than seeing God act out of cruelty, we see Him acting out of His love for us. For example, the book of Job is often pointed to as an example of God’s sadistic actions against an innocent man. The book declares that Job was innocent of the suffering that came upon him, which appears to favor the claim of the atheist. But to claim that it proves God is sadistic betrays a very superficial understanding of the book of Job.
In the Near East during the time of the patriarchs, a common belief was that God always blessed the righteous and brought suffering on the unrighteous. The book of Job is a polemic against that theology. The story shows that man’s view of God’s justice needed to be modified. We need to understand that God is not limited to using suffering as a means of retribution. He also uses it to tear people away from the earthly things that so easily entice them. Additionally, Job brings people closer to understanding God’s work of atonement on the cross. If mankind continued to think that God couldn’t allow an innocent man to suffer, then we would have missed God’s plan for redeeming the world. For God allowed the suffering of a perfectly innocent Man (Jesus Christ) in order to bring His own to salvation. So this book ends up being an invaluable contribution to the history of redemption.
So in summary, the skeptic must bear a very large burden of proof in claiming that God’s actions are characterized by cruelty. In context, the biblical passages which appear to paint God as cruel actually do no such thing. In fact, with a proper understanding of the Scriptures, we see that God’s actions are always motivated by, and consistent with, His holy and perfect character.
J.I. Packer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Niall Big Goldfish
Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 74 Location: Columbia SC
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well the god of the OT promoted murder, incest, rape, temptation, changing his word/mind. Its all there to read. Doesn't matter what the OT god thought, its the deeds that are the subject matter.
Certainly Yeshua didn't condone of such things. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pondering Lion King
Joined: 15 Sep 2005
  Posts: 1285
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
RevJP, that's a well put together apologia...and I understand your argument...I think the "final word" is that "in the end, if you put your trust in God, you'll find relief and salvation in the afterlife"...oddly enough, that's one of the arguments used to first Christianize and then keep enslaved Blacks during the early 19th Century...
I have several problems with your argument though...
first, if God is omnipotent, why does he have to "prove" his power to anyone or anything? I believe the the story of Job has its beginning with a bet between Satan and God...that seems to be a very "human" behavior of "I'll show you!" and yet you ask that we not consider God in human terms, despite a) being made in his image and b) God displaying very human traits (anger, disappointment, jelousy), especially the OT God.
Secondly, God doesn't merely allow misery to visit adults...he litteraly "suffers the little children."...individuals powerless to change their circumstance...maybe that's becuase he wants others to feel pity and intervene...fair enough...
Yet in the case of Moses in Egypt, God "hardened Pharoah's heart"...so God personally intervened to specifically prevent the one thing that could have saved the Egyptians...
So, I'm still left where I started...God is cruel. Not sadistic, but rather apethetic...As such, whether God exists or not becomes irrelevant except in the very specific case of whether I'm concerned about what happens to my "spirit" once my mortal form expires.
Nice sermon though...I'm sure it will provide comfort to believers.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RevJP Moderator
Joined: 18 Apr 2003
     Posts: 6828 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pondering;
| Quote: | | oddly enough, that's one of the arguments used to first Christianize and then keep enslaved Blacks during the early 19th Century... | Irrelevant to this thread. What mankind does is not the issue. Many people do bad things with 'good' intentions, or mistaken ideologies. It isn't by God though.
| Quote: | | if God is omnipotent, why does he have to "prove" his power to anyone or anything? | First I would argue that God does not have to prove anything. Nothing in scripture would support the idea that He has to do anything. The question you may be asking is why would He want to do something, or demonstrate something?
| Quote: | | Secondly, God doesn't merely allow misery to visit adults...he litteraly "suffers the little children."...individuals powerless to change their circumstance...maybe that's becuase he wants others to feel pity and intervene...fair enough... | I would argue your understanding of the english language as used in 'suffer the little children to come unto me'.
In the usage you reference, 'suffer' means: To allow; to permit; not to forbid or hinder.
This is defined by the use of suffer in Luke in reference to Christ's crucifixion where the King James English word 'suffer' is translated from:
πάσχω, πάθω, πένθω
paschō pathō penthō
pas'-kho, path'-o, pen'-tho
Apparently a primary verb (the third form used only in certain tenses for it); to experience a sensation or impression (usually painful): - feel, passion, suffer, vex.
Compared to the words used in Matthew 19:14 where Jesus is telling the disciples to leave the children alone and let them approach Him:
ἀφίημι
aphiēmi
af-ee'-ay-mee
From G575 and ἵημι hiēmi (to send; an intensive form of εἶμι eimi (to go)); to send forth, in various applications: - cry, forgive, forsake, lay aside, leave, let (alone, be, go, have), omit, put (send) away, remit, suffer, yield up.
| Quote: | | Yet in the case of Moses in Egypt, God "hardened Pharoah's heart"...so God personally intervened to specifically prevent the one thing that could have saved the Egyptians... | So your argument is that because God caused a thing to happen that makes Him cruel? Do you understand His reasoning? Do you understand His master plan? or are you making an argument based on a limited understanding of limited available evidence for an unlimited intelligence and purpose? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pondering Lion King
Joined: 15 Sep 2005
  Posts: 1285
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RevJP wrote: | | So your argument is that because God caused a thing to happen that makes Him cruel? Do you understand His reasoning? Do you understand His master plan? or are you making an argument based on a limited understanding of limited available evidence for an unlimited intelligence and purpose? |
in short...yes, no, no, yes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RevJP Moderator
Joined: 18 Apr 2003
     Posts: 6828 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At least you are consistent in your honesty my friend.
To your "yes's" I will reiterate this:
| Quote: | | The atheists / agnostics who claim that God is cruel have a large burden of proof. They are not merely claiming to know about the actions of God; they are also claiming to sufficiently know the circumstances in which He performed those actions, as well as His motivations. Additionally, they are claiming to know the very mind of God, ascribing to Him the attitudes of indifference and/or sadistic pleasure necessary to define Him as cruel. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ana King of the Jungle
Joined: 10 Mar 2006
  Posts: 1549 Location: BC
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I take issue with your definition of 'cruel'.
| Merriam Webster wrote: | | 1: disposed to inflict pain or suffering : devoid of humane feelings <a cruel tyrant>2 a: causing or conducive to injury, grief, or pain <a cruel joke> b: unrelieved by leniency <cruel punishment> |
According to that, God is cruel. He is disposed to inflicting pain and suffering (see Job's story, for example). He does cause pain (see worldwide floods, Sodom/Gomorrah, and this hell story, if anyone can get that straight), he does cause grief (see warfare, Job's story, slavery - that may have been Noah, but who allowed that to happen?) he does promote injury (see castration and eye-for-an-eye, warfare, Sodom/Gomorrah, and Lot's wife being turned into a pillar of salt, though I'm not sure if reconfiguring someone's entire chemical make-up is 'injury' or not, though it very likely caused Lot and his daughters some grief), and I'm not sure God is characterized by 'leniency' either, which doesn't even matter given all the other examples I've given.
But let's not just go by one source.
| AskOxford wrote: | | 1 disregarding or taking pleasure in the pain or suffering of others. 2 causing pain or suffering. |
I would say that if God has any power to control things that happen at all, then he is disregarding the pain and suffering of others by allowing it to happen.
| dictionary.com wrote: |
1. willfully or knowingly causing pain or distress to others.
2. enjoying the pain or distress of others: the cruel spectators of the gladiatorial contests.
3. causing or marked by great pain or distress: a cruel remark; a cruel affliction.
4. rigid; stern; strict; unrelentingly severe. |
Does God know he's causing pain? I'd say 'yes' - if he knows everything he has to know about pain and suffering going on. Does he enjoy it? I can't claim to know, but perhaps Job knows.
| Cambridge Online Dictionary wrote: | 1 extremely unkind and unpleasant and causing pain to people or animals intentionally:
Don't tease him about his weight - it's cruel.
Children can be very cruel to each other.
2 causing suffering:
His death was a cruel blow. |
Does God cause pain to people or animals? Let's read about the flood story again. Is it intentional? Well, I don't see anywhere where it was an accident, seeing as it was premeditated (given that he hatched the plan, told Noah about it, and then gave Noah adequate time to prepare). Does he cause suffering? Job would know. Isaiah would know. Jesus would know. Pharaoh's people would know.
None of these definitions talk about motivation at all, so it's safe to quote you on this one, RevJP:
| Quote: | | There is no doubt that God both allows and, at times, causes pain and suffering |
Whether he means well or not, God is cruel. Surely an all-powerful God, creator of all existence, could have engineered a reality not so conducive to pain and suffering, but he didn't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adam_Love Rabid Pit Bull
Joined: 04 Nov 2004
   Posts: 413 Location: Walla Walla, WA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | There are atheists and agnostics who argue that the God who is presented in the Bible is cruel. |
There are theists who would argue the same thing.
Considering Ana's definitions of 'cruel' there is no way around the fact that Yahweh was cruel.
I'd like to see if someone can find a bible verse that would fit with your (JP's) definition of cruel, though. I will be looking. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FFT Emperor of the Galaxy
Joined: 26 Mar 2005
   Posts: 5859 Location: Memphis
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| He does murder all the firstborns in Egypt for no real reason other than to make himself look awesome. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RevJP Moderator
Joined: 18 Apr 2003
     Posts: 6828 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| So, anyone who causes another pain or suffering, or allows another to suffer, is cruel? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FFT Emperor of the Galaxy
Joined: 26 Mar 2005
   Posts: 5859 Location: Memphis
|
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What about "causing suffering intentionally." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eleven Lion King
Joined: 28 Sep 2007 Posts: 1360 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| FFT wrote: | | He does murder all the firstborns in Egypt for no real reason other than to make himself look awesome. |
I thought you said you knew the Bible. Apparently not.
The killing of the firstborn of Egypt came after Pharoah clearly understood that the power Moses possessed was of God Himself. Pharoah knew that what God said was to happen, so now I ask you....who actually killed those firstborn? God or Pharoah?
Let me give you a story that relates. During the second world war, it was commonally understood that churches were not to be touched. It was considered the root of evil to fire on a church. Yet eventually, soldiers learned that they could fire at the enemy better from the steeple of a church, because it was considered off limits. So then, who was the dasteredly one? The one that fired on the chruch, or the one that hid in the steeple to ambush the enemy?
We are blaming God for killing the firstborn of Egypt (and may I take this moment to remind you that firstborn is NOT the equivelant of newborn. A firstborn could very easily be an adult. In which case, they had the opportunity to repent before the plague. )
Also, you have to remember, God never asks anything of anyone that He Himself does not give back. Jesus was God's firstborn Son also. And He sacrificed His life in the most horrendous murder of all times in order to save the very ones you are accusing God of being cruel to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eleven Lion King
Joined: 28 Sep 2007 Posts: 1360 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| FFT wrote: | | What about "causing suffering intentionally." |
What about it? My kids thought I was evil incarnate for taking them to the doctor to get vaccinated.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FFT Emperor of the Galaxy
Joined: 26 Mar 2005
   Posts: 5859 Location: Memphis
|
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| eleven wrote: | | I thought you said you knew the Bible. Apparently not. |
| eleven wrote: | | The killing of the firstborn of Egypt came after Pharoah clearly understood that the power Moses possessed was of God Himself. Pharoah knew that what God said was to happen, so now I ask you....who actually killed those firstborn? God or Pharoah? | Read the whole thing before claiming I don't know it.
11:9 The Lord said to Moses, “Pharaoh will not listen to you, so that my wonders may be multiplied in the land of Egypt.”
11:10 So Moses and Aaron did all these wonders before Pharaoh, but the Lord hardened Pharaoh’s heart, and he did not release the Israelites from his land.
So yeah, God killed them. Murdered them, in fact (except for the whole apologetic that nothing God does can be murder since He defines it blah blah blah). God Himself prevented Pharaoh from letting the Hebrews go so that He'd look awesome ("so that [His] wonders may be multiplied in the land of Egypt"). It's in the text.
| eleven wrote: | | Let me give you a story that relates. During the second world war, it was commonally understood that churches were not to be touched. It was considered the root of evil to fire on a church. Yet eventually, soldiers learned that they could fire at the enemy better from the steeple of a church, because it was considered off limits. So then, who was the dasteredly one? The one that fired on the chruch, or the one that hid in the steeple to ambush the enemy? | This story doesn't relate in the slightest.
| eleven wrote: | | We are blaming God for killing the firstborn of Egypt (and may I take this moment to remind you that firstborn is NOT the equivelant of newborn. A firstborn could very easily be an adult. In which case, they had the opportunity to repent before the plague. ) | I'm aware it wouldn't have just been newborns. But no Egyptians had any opportunity to repent, it was all down to Pharaoh and God prevented him from letting the Hebrews go.
| eleven wrote: | | Also, you have to remember, God never asks anything of anyone that He Himself does not give back. Jesus was God's firstborn Son also. And He sacrificed His life in the most horrendous murder of all times in order to save the very ones you are accusing God of being cruel to. | It's not a sacrifice when you get it back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RevJP Moderator
Joined: 18 Apr 2003
     Posts: 6828 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Let's get back to the topic at hand, which is not the Israelites leaving Egypt. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|