Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Who will be McCain's running mate


Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> NEW! - Political Forum - Scripture and Christianity in Politics
Author Message
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005

Posts: 2462

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:33 am    Post subject: Who will be McCain's running mate Reply with quote

He has in fact mentioned that since he is so old that this choice is very important and for more than one reason since he might just not live through the term, but also he might just pack the supreme court with only conservative judges so there will be no one to fight for the people.

Anyone care to guess who he might choose?
Back to top
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003

Posts: 6844

Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
but also he might just pack the supreme court with only conservative judges so there will be no one to fight for the people.
I doubt that McCain actually said this.
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6791

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regardless of whether or not he said it, it is much more likely that Obama would choose liberal judges than McCain.
Back to top
Pondering
Lion King



Joined: 15 Sep 2005

Posts: 1307


PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the fact that a judge is identified as either Liberal or Conservative is part of the problem....their job is to determine if a lower courts ruling is in accordance with the Constitution...not ideology, not political party...

We have a legislature to make laws, an Executive to enforce them and a judicial system to administer them....the fact that we have bench decided laws is a HUGE problem in my book.
Back to top
Pondering
Lion King



Joined: 15 Sep 2005

Posts: 1307


PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

P1234567890 wrote:
Regardless of whether or not he said it, it is much more likely that Obama would choose liberal judges than McCain.


Is that "duh!" statement or an implied endorsement of Obama? Smile Obama won't need judges; the appartchik of the Central Party will make those determinations....maybe he'll appoint Rev Wright and Farrakhan as it's head.
Back to top
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005

Posts: 2462

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A conservative judge rules based upon original intent and tries not to interpret it in modern terms. As though they can go back in time and re-interview the writers of the constitution. Sure there are massive amounts of material from the founding fathers but it doesn't usually deal with modern issues and these judges still must apply their own interpretation of what they think the founding fathers would think based upon that limited material.

A liberal judge will apply all their common sense and base their judgment on how things have changed and how the rules need to be relevant to modern interpretations. Frequently adding items from their own case histories when deciding a case.

It is not so much a politically conservative vs politically liberal issue. Still the terms conservative and liberal apply to their styles.
Back to top
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003

Posts: 6844

Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So you are saying that a 'conservative' judge has no common sense or judgment?
Back to top
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005

Posts: 2462

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No just doesn't rely on it at all.
Back to top
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003

Posts: 6844

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 6:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rolling Eyes
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6791

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pondering wrote:
P1234567890 wrote:
Regardless of whether or not he said it, it is much more likely that Obama would choose liberal judges than McCain.


Is that "duh!" statement or an implied endorsement of Obama? Smile Obama won't need judges; the appartchik of the Central Party will make those determinations....maybe he'll appoint Rev Wright and Farrakhan as it's head.


Unlikely. As for your claims that Obama will get his marching orders from headquarters, this is also far-fetched. He is a constitutional scholar. He knows what he's doing, and doesn't have to defer to anyone on this.

Plus, you think that the Democratic central party bosses are at all effective? They're the biggest morons in politics!
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6791

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
So you are saying that a 'conservative' judge has no common sense or judgment?


No, they have conservative common sense and conservative judgment, and social conservatism is extremely bad for the country.
Back to top
Pondering
Lion King



Joined: 15 Sep 2005

Posts: 1307


PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

P1234567890 wrote:
social conservatism is extremely bad for the country.


other than making us the most powerful, wealthy, and successful democracy in the history of the world...you're right, it's extremely bad for the country Rolling Eyes
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6791

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 2:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pondering wrote:
P1234567890 wrote:
social conservatism is extremely bad for the country.


other than making us the most powerful, wealthy, and successful democracy in the history of the world...you're right, it's extremely bad for the country Rolling Eyes


You're powerful DESPITE them. If it weren't for LIBERAL thought in the history of America, your country wouldn't be the bastion of freedom and democracy that we see today.

Do you think that social conservatives rallied to abolish slavery? Was it they who marched for women's suffrage? Did they march with MLK? Are they currently fighting for gay rights?

NO! In fact, they do the opposite! Social conservatives fought tooth and nail AGAINST freedom and democracy at every single one of those important steps!!!

And who is it opposing the teaching of evolution in the classroom? Is it the left-wing? If the religious right got its way, science education in America would go from bad to worse. You'd have ID taught as science, generating massive confusion about science among all students. And you think that would help America stay powerful?

Your country is great, but social conservatives have nothing to do with that. It's more like they've done their best to hurt your country at every step and turn.
Back to top
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005

Posts: 2462

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pondering must be confusing fiscal conservatives with social conservatives. They are not necessarily the same people. Conservatism is hardly monolithic it shatters when people like McCain are the nominee for the republicans.


Fiscal conservatism---liberal or conservative in their social attitudes and/or religion
Socially conservative- liberal or conservative in their finances and/or their religion
Religious conservatives- may be liberal or conservative in their politics and/or financial dealings

We can probably cite examples of each form of conservative and how it may or may not interact with other expressions of conservatism within their life. As I wrote earlier in another thread the conservative movement prior to WWII was scattered into many different groups all who failed to share the same agenda. Iit has only been since then that they more or less have been together. Bush certainly offered a carrot to those religious conservatives and then beat them over the head with a stick so that connection will not fly this election cycle.
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6791

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree that fiscal conservatives can be socially liberal. For example, there are rich people who are fiscally conservative because they just don't want to pay taxes, but they still support gay rights and abortion.

I also agree that there are fiscal liberals who spend taxpayer money like drunken sailors and yet are socially conservative. This is the worst of both worlds. The current administration is a good example.

But I don't think that there is much of a distinction between religious views and social views. People who are religiously conservative tend to be socially conservative, and vice versa.

You don't see many atheists at anti-abortion rallies, and you don't see many fundamentalist Christians cheering for gay rights.


Last edited by P1234567890 on Sun Apr 06, 2008 12:18 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> NEW! - Political Forum - Scripture and Christianity in Politics All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 

© 2001-2007