 |
Bible-Discussion.com Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
JimD Rattlesnake
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Posts: 439
|
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Tree said:
Rom 8:20 For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope,
Rom 8:21 Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.
Wow, powerful stuff that settles the question. God created man subject to vanity. |
So, is being subject to vanity a good thing, or bad? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
trettep Lion
Joined: 24 Nov 2005
  Posts: 910
|
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JimD wrote: | | Quote: | Tree said:
Rom 8:20 For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope,
Rom 8:21 Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.
Wow, powerful stuff that settles the question. God created man subject to vanity. |
So, is being subject to vanity a good thing, or bad? |
God did it so I would say it is a Good thing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MoJo Moderator
Joined: 31 Jul 2003
     Posts: 3190 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 12:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Strong's vanity;
1) what is devoid of truth and appropriateness
2) perverseness, depravity
3) frailty, want of vigour
This Greek word used in three NT scriptures;
Rom 8:20 For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected [the same] in hope,
Eph 4:17 ¶ This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind,
2Pe 2:18 ¶ For when they speak great swelling [words] of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, [through much] wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error.
So, trettep, why must it be interpreted that God created Adam subject to vanity and not that Adam was made subject to vanity after he transgressed?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trettep Lion
Joined: 24 Nov 2005
  Posts: 910
|
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MoJo wrote: | Strong's vanity;
1) what is devoid of truth and appropriateness
2) perverseness, depravity
3) frailty, want of vigour
This Greek word used in three NT scriptures;
Rom 8:20 For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected [the same] in hope,
Eph 4:17 ¶ This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind,
2Pe 2:18 ¶ For when they speak great swelling [words] of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, [through much] wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error.
So, trettep, why must it be interpreted that God created Adam subject to vanity and not that Adam was made subject to vanity after he transgressed?
 |
Mojo, the verse TELLS who made the creature subject to vanity. It is the same one that MAKES the creature HOPE.
Rom 8:20 For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope,
So the verse is telling us ADAM didn't will himself to be subject to vanity. But furthermore, it tells us a bit about who did because as the verses says someone MADE the creature subject to vanity. It says because of him who has subjected the same in hope. Who do you believe that him is? Whoever it is - it is the same that made the creature subject to vanity.
So if we listen to the scriptures it is TELLING us who did.
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MoJo Moderator
Joined: 31 Jul 2003
     Posts: 3190 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| trettep wrote: | | So the verse is telling us ADAM didn't will himself to be subject to vanity. But furthermore, it tells us a bit about who did because as the verses says someone MADE the creature subject to vanity. It says because of him who has subjected the same in hope. Who do you believe that him is? Whoever it is - it is the same that made the creature subject to vanity. |
This is not in question, nor was it my question. My question was **when** did he subject the creature to vanity (devoid of truth, perverseness, depravity) and why you say the creature was subjected to vanity **before** he transgressed? Where does it tell us that Adam was subjected to vanity (devoid of truth, depravity, perverseness) before he transgressed?
Actually Romans 1 tells you when and why.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JimD Rattlesnake
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Posts: 439
|
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Mojo said:So, trettep, why must it be interpreted that God created Adam subject to vanity and not that Adam was made subject to vanity after he transgressed? |
Good point Mojo but this scripture probably is saying that God made us subject to vanity in the hope that we can be delivered from the bond of corruption. Vanity causes us great trials and tribulations from which the worst of us are the most likely to flee to God for salvation. If this is true, then vanity is a good thing, in a manner of speaking.
Could we say God did not create vanity but He made us subject to it if we choose to go that way.
Just like God did not create sin but He gives us the freedom to choose to sin, and even though He knew we would all sin we cannot blame Him because it is ourchoice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trettep Lion
Joined: 24 Nov 2005
  Posts: 910
|
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JimD wrote: | | Quote: | | Mojo said:So, trettep, why must it be interpreted that God created Adam subject to vanity and not that Adam was made subject to vanity after he transgressed? |
Good point Mojo but this scripture probably is saying that God made us subject to vanity in the hope that we can be delivered from the bond of corruption. Vanity causes us great trials and tribulations from which the worst of us are the most likely to flee to God for salvation. If this is true, then vanity is a good thing, in a manner of speaking.
Could we say God did not create vanity but He made us subject to it if we choose to go that way.
Just like God did not create sin but He gives us the freedom to choose to sin, and even though He knew we would all sin we cannot blame Him because it is ourchoice. |
Are you saying JimD that there are some things that are made that God didn't make? Didn't God make Evil? Scriptures say He did.
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lone-traveler Emperor of the Universe
Joined: 02 Jul 2005
   Posts: 6342 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Prior to God saying Thou shalt not eat, there was no sin in the world.
Only after the law was introduced was sin allowed to enter.
Sin is the transgression of the law. Where there is no law, there is no sin.
So God knowing before hand that giving man the law would also introduce sin or the opportunity of sin into the world, why didn't he just let them keep on a going, and not put up a stop sign in the first place?
There was no sin "in" the world, doesn't mean to say that there was no tendency of sin "in" Adam.
Only that it hadn't manifested itself as sin until the law came.
And only after breaking the law was sin/death manifested in the flesh.
what does Paul say...??
It's that confusing chapter..
Rom 7:7 ¶ What shall we say then? [Is] the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
Rom 7:8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin [was] dead.
Rom 7:9 For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.
Rom 7:10 And the commandment, which [was ordained] to life, I found [to be] unto death.
Rom 7:11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew [me].
Rom 7:12 Wherefore the law [is] holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
Rom 7:13 ¶ Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.
Rom 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
( Rom 7:15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
Rom 7:16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that [it is] good.
Rom 7:17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.)
someday, maybe someone can break that down into language I can understand..
Rom 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but [how] to perform that which is good I find not.
So for Adam to "perform" to do that which is good, he would have had to "just say no"..But he couldn't perform the good until he learned what evil was. And evil was already with him, he just didn't see it.
Rom 7:19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
Rom 7:20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
Rom 7:21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.
Rom 7:22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
Rom 7:23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
Rom 7:24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
Rom 7:25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
I can actually see Adam trying to explain what happened in the garden.
just sharin some thoughts..
hugs
lone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yehushuan King Kong
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
  Posts: 2465 Location: Charismatic
|
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| trettep wrote: | | God did it so I would say it is a Good thing. |
And just exactly where does it say GOD did it?
Darth Yehu |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JimD Rattlesnake
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Posts: 439
|
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Loan said:So God knowing before hand that giving man the law would also introduce sin or the opportunity of sin into the world, why didn't he just let them keep on a going, and not put up a stop sign in the first place? |
Because for love to be love there has to be a choice.
Tree, God created the potential for evil, but man actualized it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trettep Lion
Joined: 24 Nov 2005
  Posts: 910
|
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yehushuan wrote: | | trettep wrote: | | God did it so I would say it is a Good thing. |
And just exactly where does it say GOD did it?
Darth Yehu |
Been over that - read back.
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trettep Lion
Joined: 24 Nov 2005
  Posts: 910
|
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JimD wrote: | | Quote: |
Loan said:So God knowing before hand that giving man the law would also introduce sin or the opportunity of sin into the world, why didn't he just let them keep on a going, and not put up a stop sign in the first place? |
Because for love to be love there has to be a choice.
Tree, God created the potential for evil, but man actualized it. |
JimD, you only make choices though within a framework. In other words. If you enter a room you can only take the choice of doors attached in that room. You can take the door attached to another room and say your not going to take any of the doors in the existing room. For how would you get to the other room if not by taking one of the doors in the existing room. It is in this manner your have to look at choice. God controls the framework for choice. Look at Jonah. He didn't want to warn Ninevah because he had choices that allowed the strength of his flesh to prevail UNTIL that framework changed. Obviously, he did end up making the choice even though he stubbornly refused to. His ability to withstand God couldn't prevail - nobody's choice to withstand God can prevail. We all eventually make the choice that He wants us to make. Jonah did, Pharoh did, Nebuchnezzar did, Paul did, etc... Everyone will.
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lone-traveler Emperor of the Universe
Joined: 02 Jul 2005
   Posts: 6342 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
1Jo 2:24 ¶ Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father.
1Jo 2:25 And this is the promise that he hath promised us, [even] eternal life.
1Jo 2:26 These [things] have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
1Jo 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
This context can be applied to so many things.
In the beginning let's say Adam had the spirit of God "in" him. But he was "seduced" to give it up for the sake of Eve.
Jesus said..If I do not go away, then the comforter will not come. It is expedient that I go so that he can be sent into the world.
not sure where my trail of thought is going..
but somehow I think Adam had to give away eternal life so that the whole world could reap the benefits of it.
If he had kept it for himself, then Eve would have been condemned alone, and left alone to face death and destruction.
But because Adam gave up his life and chose to suffer with Eve and face death..together even after losing life were able to find it again..
By God's grace and compassion and forgiveness.
Maybe God wanted to see if Adam would lay his own life down for his friend..Eve..the mother of all living.
just thinking..
hugs
lone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trettep Lion
Joined: 24 Nov 2005
  Posts: 910
|
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lone-traveler wrote: | 1Jo 2:24 ¶ Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father.
1Jo 2:25 And this is the promise that he hath promised us, [even] eternal life.
1Jo 2:26 These [things] have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
1Jo 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
This context can be applied to so many things.
In the beginning let's say Adam had the spirit of God "in" him. But he was "seduced" to give it up for the sake of Eve.
Jesus said..If I do not go away, then the comforter will not come. It is expedient that I go so that he can be sent into the world.
not sure where my trail of thought is going..
but somehow I think Adam had to give away eternal life so that the whole world could reap the benefits of it.
If he had kept it for himself, then Eve would have been condemned alone, and left alone to face death and destruction.
But because Adam gave up his life and chose to suffer with Eve and face death..together even after losing life were able to find it again..
By God's grace and compassion and forgiveness.
Maybe God wanted to see if Adam would lay his own life down for his friend..Eve..the mother of all living.
just thinking..
hugs
lone |
He never had the eternal life for if he did then he couldn't lose it - for it wouldn't be eternal if it could be lost. That would go against the definition of eternal life. I have become convinced that Satan is not another being at all but is the personification of the spirit of disobedience that works in men. Could it be that the "serpent" was none other than a reference to a lowly spirit. That when one exhibits that spirit they are Satan. Surely Peter wasn't Satan but was surely and directly called Satan by Jesus at the time he exhibited such a spirit of disobedience. I happen to believe that Eve was actually talking to Adam when she took of the forbidden fruit. That she was actually deceived by the disobedient spirit in Adam.
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lone-traveler Emperor of the Universe
Joined: 02 Jul 2005
   Posts: 6342 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Paul,
| Quote: | | He never had the eternal life for if he did then he couldn't lose it - for it wouldn't be eternal if it could be lost. That would go against the definition of eternal life. |
Peter didn't want Jesus "eternal life" to be given into the hands of death. He wanted to keep "eternal life" for himself in his world in his time.
He wasn't ready to sacrifice "eternal life" for the rest of the world..
maybe that's why Jesus rebuked him?
So if Eve represents the church..and Peter's "insight" or "belief" is what the church is built upon.
Eve wanted to aquire this eternal life for herself through some other means than faith alone.
Peter's desire, when the Lord rebuked him, was not that of God, but that of men's. His desire was not built on faith but on seeing is believing..
AHHH..seeing is believing...and their eyes were opened.
Because unless they see "doubting Thomas" they would not believe..but blessed are those who believe and see not..
maybe you can follow my trail of thought..lol..
sometimes like breadcrumbs they get scattered..
hugs Paul,
lone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|