Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Global warming on Mars? and now Jupiter


Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> NEW! - Political Forum - Scripture and Christianity in Politics
Author Message
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005

Posts: 2416

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:45 pm    Post subject: Global warming on Mars? and now Jupiter Reply with quote

Yes NASA has determined that Mars is experiencing global warming also. The big polar ice caps have been shrinking dramatically over the last few years.

I wonder when humans got there to pollute that planet also? Or Martians I guess.


Last edited by 45degreeN on Sun May 25, 2008 5:35 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Pondering
Lion King



Joined: 15 Sep 2005

Posts: 1273


PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FWIW, I pointed this out months ago...and it's not just Mars...NASA is seeing "anomalies" in our entire solar system....but hey, what do I know? The Gore-acle told me so???
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6772

Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Venus is a much better example. The surface of Venus is hot enough to melt lead. Why? Because of the greenhouse effect there.

And what's causing the greenhouse effect there? It's CO2.

The temperature of our planet has gone up by like 1 degree Celsius over the past hundred years. In the same time, our CO2 levels have gone up by 50%.

We can see what the greenhouse effect has done on Venus. Anyone who denies that increasing our atmospheric CO2 levels by 50% has caused the 1 degree increase in temperature and that it will continue to go up is being *extremely* reckless.
Back to top
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005

Posts: 2416

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 6:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Venus was at first considered an example of the greenhouse effect but while Venus is certainly hot it has nothing at all to do with the processes going on here on Earth, totally different.

The problem of using Venus as the classical example is that we have no evidence whatsoever of what it was like prior to it getting very hot, (if it was ever not hot). Nor do we know yet just what processes took place to make it the way it is. There certainly were popular images of Venus as some paradise but they were merely fictional. More importantly there were never any humans there to do the dirty deed, whatever happened was a perfectly natural process.

Still the environmentalist use Venus as the example and tell us how bad it will get here if we just ignore their signs. Their use of Venus is disingenuous.

Mars is quite a different story. NASA has photographed the polar ice sheaths for many years and noted the fact that they are growing smaller. According to sources this phenomenon is based upon solar cycles and the energy that comes to Mars from the sun.

Unlike Venus which has an incredibly dense atmosphere Mars' atmosphere is transparent and can easily be seen through. It appears that Venus has internal source of heat which radiates outward and keeps the atmosphere intensely hot, whereas Mars is much colder and the only heat there comes from the sun.
Back to top
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005

Posts: 2416

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 6:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Venus' atmosphere is heated from internal sources and the Magellan space probe observed that it expands and collapses on a 4 day basis as much as 1 km. It is like the lid on a boiling pot which bounces around due to the expanding steam.

Quote:
Measurements reveal that Venus radiates twice the energy it receives from the sun. The internal heat of Venus ensures that the temperature of each layer of the atmosphere is uniform from pole to pole and from day side to night side, despite Venus’ slow rotation.
NASA

In fact the atmosphere of Titan one of Saturn's moons is more similar to Venus than the Earth.
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6772

Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

45degreeN wrote:
Venus was at first considered an example of the greenhouse effect but while Venus is certainly hot it has nothing at all to do with the processes going on here on Earth, totally different.


It's not different at all. It shows what too much CO2 in the atmosphere can do.

Venus is excessively hot PRECISELY because of its greenhouse effect which helps to trap heat energy in the atmosphere rather than letting it escape into space.

It's a *HIGHLY* relevant example to global warming on Earth.
Back to top
Pondering
Lion King



Joined: 15 Sep 2005

Posts: 1273


PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

/smackforehead

Exhibit C...

so P#s, how did all that CO2 get into Venus' atmosphere?

and aren't you the one that says don't ignore the scientists? yet it's NASA that 45degree used as a source....so you know better than NASA?
Back to top
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005

Posts: 2416

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 9:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NASA's Magellan probe showed us all that heat does escape from Venus' atmosphere it is not kept in at all, almost twice as much heat escapes than heat caused by global warming.
It is convection from internal Venus sources that accounts for all of that heat like an inner core that is bigger and hotter than earth's.

Yes I realize that Venus is one of the environmental movement's cherished examples but it is based upon speculative accounts of Venus, not science at all. It was back in the sixties when science jumped on Venus as a runaway greenhouse example and that was far before any of the science was performed. We know far more now about the Venusian system and it is not runaway greenhouse situation at all.

What gets me is that Mars is showing an increase in warmth global warming.
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6772

Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

45degreeN wrote:
NASA's Magellan probe showed us all that heat does escape from Venus' atmosphere it is not kept in at all, almost twice as much heat escapes than heat caused by global warming.
It is convection from internal Venus sources that accounts for all of that heat like an inner core that is bigger and hotter than earth's.


If this is true, then you should have absolutely no problem giving a reference.
Back to top
rufus
Big Goldfish



Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 65

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

P1234567890 wrote:

Venus is excessively hot PRECISELY because of its greenhouse effect which helps to trap heat energy in the atmosphere rather than letting it escape into space.


Venus is excessively hot BECAUSE it is much closer to the Sun. You know, that big ball of hot fire that the planets circle around!

Then again, what do I know. I'm just a layperson.
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6772

Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 4:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rufus wrote:
P1234567890 wrote:

Venus is excessively hot PRECISELY because of its greenhouse effect which helps to trap heat energy in the atmosphere rather than letting it escape into space.


Venus is excessively hot BECAUSE it is much closer to the Sun. You know, that big ball of hot fire that the planets circle around!

Then again, what do I know. I'm just a layperson.


That's only part of it. It would be a lot cooler if it didn't have a runaway greenhouse effect.

Here's what Wikipedia says:

Quote:
The enormously CO2-rich atmosphere, along with thick clouds of sulfur dioxide, generates the strongest greenhouse effect in the solar system, creating surface temperatures of over 460 °C.[19] This makes Venus's surface much hotter than Mercury's which has a minimum surface temperture of -220 °C and maximum surface temperature of 420 °C, even though Venus is nearly twice Mercury's distance from the Sun and receives only 25% of Mercury's solar irradiance.


The greenhouse effect on Venus is the one and only reason it is so hot.

It's ridiculous to say that its heat comes from its core. If that were true, then its core would have solidified long ago.
Back to top
Pondering
Lion King



Joined: 15 Sep 2005

Posts: 1273


PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 7:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Earth's atmosphere:
"nitrogen (78 percent) and molecular oxygen (21 percent). Also present are much smaller amounts of gases such as argon (nearly 1 percent), water vapour (averaging 1 percent but highly variable in time and location), carbon dioxide (0.037 percent [370 parts per million] and presently rising), methane (0.00015 percent [1.5 parts per million]),"

http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-54196/Earth

Venus' atmosphere:

"Its gaseous envelope is composed of more than 96 percent carbon dioxide and 3.5 percent molecular nitrogen. Trace amounts of other gases are present, including carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, water vapour, argon, and helium. "

http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-54178/Venus

When the Earth's atmosphere gets to .1 %, then maybe we need to pay attention.....this isn't comparing apples to oranges...this is comparing apples to Democrats Rolling Eyes
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6772

Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We don't have to get up to 96% CO2 in order to all be dead. We'll have much bigger problems well before that.

At 1% CO2, people get extremely drowsy and can't work properly. At 2%, breathing the air will start to acidify your blood, and at 5% it's toxic.

But in any case, you're not understanding the important thing here. Yes, the concentration of CO2 in the Venusian atmosphere is REALLY high, but it's also REALLY hot -hot enough to melt lead on the surface of the planet.

If you increase it a little bit, then the temperature goes up a little bit.

Take a little greenhouse, and fill it with 200 ppm CO2 and air. Take one with 400 ppm CO2 and air. You will see that the temperature increase is EXACTLY in line with what has happened to the CO2 levels and temperature in our atmosphere.

Here, do the experiment yourself:

http://atmoz.org/blog/2007/08/15/greenhouse-gas-experiment/
Back to top
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005

Posts: 2416

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The idea of global warming means that at one time it was not warm and now it is. Otherwise it will not have 'warmed' but has always been warm! At best this might indicate how it remains warm.

At no point in time did Venus have an Oxygen/ Nitrogen atmosphere that eventually changed into what it has now. The comparison of the environmentalists is specious and I am still oppose any comparing Earth's system to Venus' system, they have never been similar and will remain dissimilar for as long as they exist.

There was a time when speculation lead us to believe that Venus' atmosphere was water vapor, this if course was prior to the time when any instruments told us otherwise. It has not changed from a water vapor atmosphere into a CO2 atmosphere it has always been primarily a CO2 atmosphere. So this using of Venus for the example of global warming is so very wrong. It is an invalid "apples and oranges" comparison used to pressure people into following some foolishness that will overthrow the world's economy and still produce nothing of value.
Back to top
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003

Posts: 6817

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apparently it is the 'scientific method' to form a conclusion, latch on to any tenuous evidence which may or may not support that conclusion and ignore everything else....
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> NEW! - Political Forum - Scripture and Christianity in Politics All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 

© 2001-2007