Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

WAS JESUS RESURRECTED? DEBATE


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> One on One!
Author Message
HeKkLeR
King Kong



Joined: 18 Aug 2003

Posts: 2277

Location: Europe

PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Abdulhakeem wrote:
You saying "So, this entire time when I have been explaining to you that the 1 Corinthians 15:45 verse where Paul states "As it is written", is not pertaining to what he had just written in verse 44, but to what scripture states in Genesis 2:7" is not fully correct because the second half of 1 Corinthians 15:45 does not pertain to what scriptures states in Genesis 2:7. Also, 1 Corinthians 14:45 explains 1 Corinthians 1 Corinthians 15:44 because 1 Corinthians 15:45 explains the resurrected nature according to 1 Corinthians 15:45 (Amplified Bible) "45 Thus it is written, The first man Adam became a living being (an individual personality); the last Adam (Christ) became a life-giving Spirit [restoring the dead to life]." In any case, the resurrected will be spirit at least to 1 Corinthians 15:50 because it says "Flesh and blood cannot inherit the Kingdom of God." However, Jesus after he rose was not a spirit. Rather, Jesus after he rose was flesh and blood as Jesus seeking food after he rose in Luke 24:41 and John 21:5 proves Jesus was still flesh and blood.


Give it up already, Abdul. You have been proven to be unread, wrong, confused, and downright disingenuous in discussing the same ignorant argument that is quoted above. Here, just for you, I am giving the 15:45 verse from other bibles that have footnotes in them showing what I have already claimed. Note: There are bibles that support exactly what I state. Are there any that support exactly what you state? NO.

1 Corinthians 15:45 (English Standard Version)
    Thus it is written,(A) "The first man Adam became a living being";[a](B) the last Adam became a(C) life-giving spirit.

    Footnotes:

    a. 1 Corinthians 15:45 Greek a living soul

    Cross references:

    A. 1 Corinthians 15:45 : Gen 2:7
    B. 1 Corinthians 15:45 : Rom 5:14
    C. 1 Corinthians 15:45 : John 5:21; John 6:33, 39, 40, 54, 57; Rom 8:2, 10


1 Corinthians 15:45 (New American Standard Bible)
    So also it is written, "The first (A)MAN, Adam, BECAME A LIVING SOUL " The (B)last Adam became a (C)life-giving spirit.

    Cross references:

    A. 1 Corinthians 15:45 : Gen 2:7
    B. 1 Corinthians 15:45 : Rom 5:14
    C. 1 Corinthians 15:45 : John 5:21; 6:57; Rom 8:2


Abdulhakeem wrote:
In reality, Jesus saying after he rose "For a spirit has no flesh and bones as you see me have" according to Luke 24:39 proves Jesus was not equal unto angels, which are spirits according to Hebrews 1:14. Therefore, Jesus was not resurrected.


Wrong. You are only ignorant to what scripture states about spirits and about angels.

Hebrews 13:2
    Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.


Angels can surely eat, and some angels have surely been flesh and bone. The examples that I gave you from the Genesis 18 and 19 accounts prove such. Rolling Eyes

Abdulhakeem wrote:
I never said the Lord was not the Lord in Genesis 18 and the two angels in Genesis 19 are not two angels.


You have stated that because Jesus ate food with His disciples after His resurrection, proves that He was not resurrected... because He ate food... and because He ate food, He must have needed food for sustenance. Yet, scripture states that the Lord has eaten food with Abraham, and that the angels ate food with Lot.

Therefore, your argument is stupid and invalid. Must I quote you again???
Back to top
Abdulhakeem
Little Hamster



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 78


PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes brother,

The resurrected will be immaterial because Paul said in 1 Corinthains 15:50 "Flesh and blood cannot inherit the Kingdom of God"; therefore, Paul, who believed Jesus rose, said "the Last Adam was a life giving spirit" after Jesus rose because the Ampified Bible of 1 Corinthains 15:45 does not only say "the last Adam (Christ) became a life-giving Spirit", but also goes on to say directly " [restoring the dead to life]" proving that Jesus after he rose was a spirit.

However, Jesus denied to be a spirit or equal unto angels after he rose as Jesus said "For a spirit has no flesh and bones as you see me have" in Luke 24:39.

You saying "Lord has eaten food with Abraham, and that the angels ate food with Lot" or "You have stated that because Jesus ate food with His disciples after His resurrection, proves that He was not resurrected" is not my point. My point is that Jesus after he rose ASKING TWICE in Luke 24:41 and John 21:5 proves Jesus NEEDED.

Did God or angels in the Bible ASK for food?
Back to top
HeKkLeR
King Kong



Joined: 18 Aug 2003

Posts: 2277

Location: Europe

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Abdulhakeem,
do you have a problem with english? If so, I know a good translation website where I can translate my posts to whatever language would be better for you to understand.

I'm serious in asking this, because you seem to be reading something very totally wrong. If it is not because of language problems, then what is it? God just does not want you to understand the truth, or what? Question

This is very interesting for me.

But, I will not give up on you, for perhaps there was a higher reason for you to even ask for such a debate about the resurrection of Christ.

So, I pray for even more patience with you on my part. I will take things a bit slower for you.
Back to top
HeKkLeR
King Kong



Joined: 18 Aug 2003

Posts: 2277

Location: Europe

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Version Information
The Amplified Bible was the first Bible project of The Lockman Foundation. It attempts to take both word meaning and context into account in order to accurately translate the original text from one language into another. The Amplified Bible does this through the use of explanatory alternate readings and amplifications to assist the reader in understanding what Scripture really says. Multiple English word equivalents to each key Hebrew and Greek word clarify and amplify meanings that may otherwise have been concealed by the traditional translation method. The Amplified Bible present on the Bible Gateway matches the 1987 printing.


1 Corinthians 15 (Amplified Bible)
    Thus it is written, The first man Adam became a living being (an individual personality); the last Adam (Christ) became a life-giving Spirit [restoring the dead to life].


I wrote:
1 Corinthians 15:45 in the Amplified Bible states, "restoring the dead to life" as a definition of what a life-giving spirit is.


Can we agree that "(an individual personality)" is given as a definition for "living being"?

Can we agree that "(Christ)" is given as a definition for "the last Adam"?

Can we agree that "[Restoring the dead to life]" is given as a definition for "life-giving spirit"?
Back to top
Abdulhakeem
Little Hamster



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 78


PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

-Can we agree that "(an individual personality)" is given as a definition for "living being"?

Yes

-Can we agree that "(Christ)" is given as a definition for "the last Adam"?
Yes

-Can we agree that "[Restoring the dead to life]" is given as a definition for "life-giving spirit"? No.

Adding "restoring the dead to life" after saying "the last Adam that is Christ was a life giving spirit" proves that Jesus after rising was a spirit.
Back to top
Abdulhakeem
Little Hamster



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 78


PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

CHAPTER: THE SIGN OF JONAH

Jesus gave the Jews of his time only one sign upon their request. According to the Gospel According to ST. Luke 11:29&30, Jesus said;

“This is a wicked generation. It asks for a miraculous sign but none will be given it except the sign of Jonah. For as Jonah was a sign to the Ninivites so also will the Son of Man be to this generation.”

Before explaining the sign, it is important to mention that “Christians refer to the above passage of the Bible to demonstrate Jesus’ confidence that, in his capacity as the Son of God, he would rise from the dead after his crucifixion. In the view of Christianity, this prophecy is one of the various Biblical signs that establish the truth of Jesus Christ. Well, how could Jesus Christ have known that he would come out of the “heart of the earth” after being buried in the open and airy tomb of Joseph of Arimathea? Whether he was the Son of God, as Christians believe, or a prophet, as Muslims believe, or an enlightened Buddha, as Buddhists believe, if it is assumed that he was some kind of great, spiritually endowed person, then it is not surprising that he may have received some kind of premonition or even direct verbal revelation from God that he would be “resurrected”.”

Please understand that the word “sign” of Jonah in Luke 11:29 & 30 means “miracle” of Jonah. As a result, New International Version uses first “miraculous sign” then uses “sign” synonymously.

Therefore, the sign was the miraculous sign of Jonah. So what happened to Jonah must happen to Jesus so that the prophecy is fulfilled. Therefore, one needs to read the four short chapters of the book of Jonah to see the sign of Jonah, which Jesus promised to perform.

Coming to the sign of Jonah, the sign is hereunder;

God asked Jonah to warn the city of Nineveh, but he tried to escape from God command by taking a boat from the city of Joppa heading to Tarrshesh. When Jonah was the ship with others, God sent a violent storm, which threatened the ship and its people. So they cast the lots to know who the cause of the storm was. And it was Jonah, the cause of the storm.

Now the miraculous sign of Jonah begins;
Jonah 1:12 "Pick me up and throw me into the sea," he replied, "and it will become calm. I know that it is my fault that this great storm has come upon you."

Jonah 1:14 "Then they cried to the LORD, "O LORD, please do not let us die for taking this man's life. Do not hold us accountable for killing an innocent man, for you, O LORD, have done as you pleased."


Jonah 1:15 "Then they took Jonah and threw him overboard, and the raging sea grew calm."

Jonah 1:17 "But the LORD provided a great fish to swallow Jonah, and Jonah was inside the fish three days and three nights."

According to Jonah 1:12, Jonah asked the people on the ship to throw him onto the sea, so was Jonah dead or alive? Of course, Jonah was alive.

WHEN YOU THROW A PERSON ONTO A RAGING SEA, DO YOU EXPECT HIM TO BE ALIVE OR DEAD?
Of course, he must be dead. And because of that the people on the ship were afraid of letting Jonah die in the sea (Jonah 1:14).

WHEN JONAH WAS THROWN ONTO THE SEA, WAS HE DEAD OR ALIVE?
He was alive. When Jonah was thrown onto the sea, “The LORD had prepared a great fish to swallow up Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights” according to Jonah 1:17.

“Then Jonah prayed unto the LORD his God out of the fish's belly” according to Jonah 2:1.

WHEN A PERSON SWALLOWED BY A WHALE, DO YOU EXPECT HIM TO BE ALIVE OR DEAD?
Of course, he must be dead.

WAS JONAH ALIVE INSIDE THE FISH?
Of course he was alive. Otherwise, how Jonah could pray inside the fish as Jonah 2:1 says.

So then the fish vomited Jonah out into dry land.

WHEN A PERSON IS VOMITED AFTER THREE NIGHTS AND DAYS OUT OF A WHALE, DO YOU EXPECT HIM TO BE ALIVE OR DEAD?
Of course, he must be dead.

Then God asked Jonah to go again and preach the city of Nineveh.

DOES GOD ASK DEAD PEOPLE LIKE JONAH TO PREACH OTHERS?
No, God does not. So Jonah was alive.

This is the miracle of Jonah that Jesus promised to perform. The sign of Jonah is indeed a miracle in which three miracles are inside. You expect Jonah to die first time when he was thrown onto the sea, but he remained alive. Then you expect him to die again inside the fish, but he remained alive praying to God for rescue. Lastly, you expect him to die when the fish vomited him out but he remained alive.

So the sign of Jonah is that Jonah remained alive unexpectedly when Jonah was thrown onto the sea, continued to be living unexpectedly inside the fish, and continued to live unexpectedly when he was vomited out of the fish.

Now Jesus promised that what happened to Jonah must happen to him.

SO HOW WAS JESUS ON THE CROSS? WAS HE DEAD OR ALIVE?
According to the sign of Jonah Jesus gave, he must be alive in order to fulfill it.

ONCE AGAIN, HOW WAS JESUS IN THE TOMB? WAS HE DEAD OR ALIVE?
According to the sign of Jonah Jesus gave, he must be alive in order to fulfill it.

LAST HOW WAS JESUS WHEN HE CAME OUT OF THE TOMB? WAS HE DEAD OR ALIVE?
According to the sign of Jonah Jesus gave, he must be alive in order to fulfill it.

Saying that the miracle of Jonah that Jesus promised to do is Jesus coming out alive from the whale’s belly as Jonah did is a part of the sign that Jesus promised but not the whole sign because Jonah coming out of the fish alive was the last part of the miracle. The miracle of Jonah is of three parts. There are still two parts of the miracle of Jonah. The first, Jonah remained alive when thrown onto the raging sea. The second, Jonah was alive inside the fish. The third, Jonah came alive after vomited by the fish.

MIRACLOUS TIMING FACTOR

There is nothing miraculous about Jesus being in the heart of the earth for three days and three nights as Jonah was for the same period inside the fish for the following reasons;

1- Had the timing factor been important and miraculous, the author of Luke would have mentioned it. However, the author did not mention any thing about the timing factor.

2- Had the timing factor been what the sign of Jonah that Jesus was about, Jesus would have failed in fulfilling the prophecy he gave because Jesus promised to be for three days and three nights. However, Jesus was in the tomb for two days and two nights between Friday night and Sunday morning.

1st Night is Friday Night in which Jesus inside the tomb

1st Day is Saturday Morning in which Jesus was inside

2nd Night is Saturday Night in which Jesus was still inside

2nd Day is Sunday Morning in which Jesus was outside the tomb

So practically Jesus was in the tomb for one day and two nights.

Jesus did not reckon any part of the whole day as one day because Jesus defined the day as 24 four hours period divided into 12 hours for night and another 12 hours for day for five reasons;

1- Had Jesus wanted to define the day as any part of the whole day, he would not have been specific when he divided the days into three days and three nights as Jesus said in Matthew 12:40 “For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.”

2- Jesus defined the day as 24 four hours period divided into 12 hours for night and another 12 hours for day according to Jesus in John 11:9 when Jesus said to the disciples “Are not there twelve hours of daytime?”

3- The Bible defines the day as 24 four hours period made of night and day according to Genesis 1:5 “There was evening and there was morning, one day.”

4- Booking a room in a hotel for three days can mean to stay for one day and two days.

5- However, booking a room in a hotel for three days and three nights cannot mean to stay for one day and two nights in any language and in any country or culture.

Matthew 12:40 “For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.”

GOOD WEDENSAY OR GOOD FRIDAY

While mainstream Christianity believes Jesus was crucified on GOOD FRIDAY, there has started a new trend which insists that Jesus was crucified on GOOD WEDNESDAY, so the prophecy of Jesus in Matthew 12:40 will fulfill;

1-“Jesus Wasn't Crucified on Friday—or Resurrected on Sunday! > The Good News : March/April 2006”

2-“Prophecy Truths -- The Good Friday Myth, Jesus Died on a Wednesday!!”

3-“The Myth of Good Friday-Easter Sunday Exposed! How Long Was Jesus Christ in the Grave?”

4-“In Defense of a Wednesday Crucifixion”

5-Jesus Christ was NOT Crucified on "Good Friday"

6-The Myth of "Good Friday"
Back to top
HeKkLeR
King Kong



Joined: 18 Aug 2003

Posts: 2277

Location: Europe

PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 2:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Abdulhakeem wrote:
-Can we agree that "(an individual personality)" is given as a definition for "living being"?

Yes

-Can we agree that "(Christ)" is given as a definition for "the last Adam"?
Yes

-Can we agree that "[Restoring the dead to life]" is given as a definition for "life-giving spirit"? No.

Adding "restoring the dead to life" after saying "the last Adam that is Christ was a life giving spirit" proves that Jesus after rising was a spirit.


Abdulhakeem,
Nothing else that you write will interest me in the very most infinitesimal least, until you can solidly explain to me why you would say that two of three definitions are "definitions" to you, except for the one definition that you choose to not call a definition, because it would show you to be a liar and it would show your entire argument to be nothing more than vain ignorance.

This is past being childish, it is retarded.
Rolling Eyes


Last edited by HeKkLeR on Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:57 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Abdulhakeem
Little Hamster



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 78


PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Luke, a medical doctor by profession and inspired by God, said in Acts 1:3 "After He had SUFFERED, He also presented Himself ALIVE to them by many convincing proofs, appearing to them during 40 days and speaking about the kingdom of God."

Jesus when reappearing to the disicples, Jesus was ALIVE AFTER HE HAD SUFFERED NOT AFTER HE DIED according to an inspired medical professional named Luke in Acts 1:3.

Luke in Acts 1:3 was just confirming what Jesus said after he rose in Luke 24:46 "The Scriptures say that the Messiah must suffer, then three days later he will rise rom death."

the Greek word of "suffering" is " Pascho" which is used by Jesus in Luke 24:46 and Acts 1:3 means " to be affected or have been affected" according to the KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon. Therefore, "suffering" or "Pascho" means only undergoing pain not death the KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon.
Back to top
HeKkLeR
King Kong



Joined: 18 Aug 2003

Posts: 2277

Location: Europe

PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

HeKkLeR wrote:
Abdulhakeem wrote:
-Can we agree that "(an individual personality)" is given as a definition for "living being"?

Yes

-Can we agree that "(Christ)" is given as a definition for "the last Adam"?
Yes

-Can we agree that "[Restoring the dead to life]" is given as a definition for "life-giving spirit"? No.

Adding "restoring the dead to life" after saying "the last Adam that is Christ was a life giving spirit" proves that Jesus after rising was a spirit.


Abdulhakeem,
Nothing else that you write will interest me in the very most infinitesimal least, until you can solidly explain to me why you would say that two of three definitions are "definitions" to you, except for the one definition that you choose to not call a definition, because it would show you to be a liar and it would show your entire argument to be nothing more than vain ignorance.

This is past being childish, it is retarded.
Rolling Eyes
Back to top
HeKkLeR
King Kong



Joined: 18 Aug 2003

Posts: 2277

Location: Europe

PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 4:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is supposed to be a One on One Debate.

Not a propaganda toilet.

If that is the best that you can do, then I have no further interest in 'debating' you, for you have no clue of debate, and no clue of the truth.
Back to top
HeKkLeR
King Kong



Joined: 18 Aug 2003

Posts: 2277

Location: Europe

PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

HeKkLeR wrote:
Abdulhakeem wrote:
I want to debate on if Jesus was resurrected. The debate title is "WAS JESUS RESURRECTED?" that I want to see.


Abdulhakeem wrote:
HeKkLeR

I am ready at any time to debate you.


Beautiful! Very Happy

Nobby, would you so kindly set up the debate?

As far as any rules:
Abdulhakeem wrote:
My evidence will be the Bible as a former preacher.
As will mine, also. No other printed text will be used as a source in the debate.

Besides that... I say "Let's get it on!!"

Abdul, once Nobby gives the go-ahead, please state your case.


Abdulhakeem,
It seems as if the truth has frustrated you so badly... has cut deep and wounded your pride so thoroughly to the soul... even to the marrow... that you have blatantly broken the rules of this debate by constantly copying other printed text into the debate.

You have not only lied, and been caught lying... but you have deceived yourself... in an attempt to deceive me... in order to gain in a lost battle of wits and wisdom.

tsk tsk tsk

I truly wonder if the teachings of your religion do condone such actions? Rolling Eyes

Anyway, unless you can prove to me that everything you have used in this debate as "Evidence" was typed by you, and not acquired from another printed text source, I will humbly step down from the podium, and let this debate be officially ended.

I will however, address the last stupidity that you left in this thread... only because it is the most laughable thing that you have given me:
Abdulhakeem wrote:
Luke, a medical doctor by profession and inspired by God, said in Acts 1:3 "After He had SUFFERED, He also presented Himself ALIVE to them by many convincing proofs, appearing to them during 40 days and speaking about the kingdom of God."

Jesus when reappearing to the disicples, Jesus was ALIVE AFTER HE HAD SUFFERED NOT AFTER HE DIED according to an inspired medical professional named Luke in Acts 1:3.

Luke in Acts 1:3 was just confirming what Jesus said after he rose in Luke 24:46 "The Scriptures say that the Messiah must suffer, then three days later he will rise rom death."

the Greek word of "suffering" is " Pascho" which is used by Jesus in Luke 24:46 and Acts 1:3 means " to be affected or have been affected" according to the KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon. Therefore, "suffering" or "Pascho" means only undergoing pain not death the KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon.


It is so hilarious of you to write the above quote and claim Luke's words as evidence that Jesus did not die, and was not resurrected, when in the Gospel according to Luke,
Saint Luke wrote:
Luke 23:46
    And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said thus, he gave up the ghost.

Saint Luke also wrote:
Luke 24:51
    And it came to pass, while he blessed them, he was parted from them, and carried up into heaven.
Back to top
Abdulhakeem
Little Hamster



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 78


PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear brother,

Did angels or the Lord ask for food? is a question I asked and I deserve an answer.

The phrase which Jesus used in Luke 23:46 "Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit" is a phrase taken from Psalm 31:5 FOLLOWED BY "RESCUE ME" in Psalm 31:5 proving that the phrase "Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit" does not mean death.

Jesus giving up his spirit is true because the Gospels teach Jesus gave up the spirit, which is a biblical phrase that means going unconscious as shown when the daughter of Jairus gave up her spirit as "her spirit returned and rose" in Luke 8:55though she did not die before her rising as Jesus said "stop wailing for she is not dead, but sleeping" in Luke 8:52.
Back to top
HeKkLeR
King Kong



Joined: 18 Aug 2003

Posts: 2277

Location: Europe

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Abdulhakeem wrote:
Did angels or the Lord ask for food? is a question I asked and I deserve an answer.

Shocked

And what makes you think you deserve an answer, after you have not answered me at all in my last 4 out of 5 posts? Question Exclamation

Pure arrogance on your part. Confused or disgusted

But the answer to your question is way too simple... so simple in fact, that you would surely deny the truth of it, as you have lied too many times so far.

Answer this last question of mine, and I will answer your above question: Have you been copying other printed text as your evidence, than the Holy Bible?
Back to top
Abdulhakeem
Little Hamster



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 78


PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear brother,

Jesus after he rose was not equal unto angels because Jesus ASKING FOOD AFTER HE ROSE in Luke 24:41 and John 21:5 proves Jesus was in need of food ; therefore, JEsus was mortal and not resurrected. The angels never asked for food.
Back to top
HeKkLeR
King Kong



Joined: 18 Aug 2003

Posts: 2277

Location: Europe

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shocked

Rolling Eyes

Confused or disgusted



    ** The HeKkLeR steps down from the podium, and heads toward a pizza shop to get some pepperoni pizza... with extra, extra pepperoni. Never to return.

    His last audibly heard sentence:
    "Why, the insolent [inaudible]... how dare he attempt to [inaudible]...[inaudible] me? I'm out of here. Nobby, this is ended... [inaudible]" **
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> One on One! All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 

© 2001-2007