Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Why so many military suicides?


Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> NEW! - Political Forum - Scripture and Christianity in Politics
Author Message
atoz
Emperor of the Solar System



Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 4189


PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:52 am    Post subject: Why so many military suicides? Reply with quote

[Update, 5:30pm: CBS has just released some of those numbers:

"At least 120 Americans who served in the U.S. military killed themselves per week in 2005,

CBS News learned in a five-month investigation into veteran suicides.

That's 6,256 veteran suicides in one year, in 45 states."]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/11/13/stunning-cbs-news-disc_n_72417.html

from the aisle of view,
atoz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
saintmichaeldefendthem
Big Lion



Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 979

Location: Boise, Idaho

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The question should really be: "Why are people so gullible as to be fooled by leftist news organizations that have their own clearly defined agendas?"

They make such headlines as a part of an ongoing effort to undermine our military in every way possible during a time of war. In another era in this country, this would be called treason and they would be hanged. So let's start with the facts.

There are 1,426,713 current active duty military personnel, and another 1,259,000 in various reserve components. According to the Center for Disease Control, a far more credible source than your liberal news channel, the suicide rate overall in this country is at about 9.1 per 100,000 (that 1/10th of a person is always a mystery).

Using leftist mathematics, they are probably, for the sake of their agenda, including all who have ever served, which today is about 20 million. They are also probably including KIA deaths overseas since they likely view volunteering for combat an act of suicide that comes to fruition every time a soldier dies in battle. All of this creates a smoke screen to buttress a false impression.

There are actually college courses on statistics and how they are used to lie. The more saavy among us, having seen the mechanism of statistical analysis, have learned to distrust statistics in general, especially those that conceal the study data used to acquire them. Although I'm no statistical genius, I bet if a study were done comparing the rate of suicide in the military to that of the general public, there would be little, if any difference. That's a statistic that's more realistic and credible.

Moreover, having served myself, I can attest to just how much effort the Army puts into training every soldier to detect and report signs of depression and suicide in fellow soldiers. I have been through more training classes on this subject than I can count; and one thing can be sure, the general public is not nearly so well informed. With this in mind, I would surmise that a soldier contemplating suicide has a far greater chance of being detected and receiving the help he needs than a civilian counterpart. I, myself, have on a couple occasions alerted my chain of command when I suspected someone might be having trouble.

So, Atoz, with age comes wisdom, and the wise are not so easily fooled by the craft of liars. I would hope we all woud aspire to this.

In Christ's most Sacred Heart
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Posts: 2673

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SMDT please just listen to yourself. you wrote
Quote:
The question should really be: "Why are people so gullible as to be fooled by leftist news organizations that have their own clearly defined agendas?"


It sounds like you think all news organization are leftists and that there are no rightists news organizations. There are by the way.

Bush is about as extreme right wing as is possible so those leftists new organizations feel they are providing balance rather than extending their own agenda. Of course if you are a bushie then they might seem unpatriotic to you but that is merely your perspective not some absolute truth.

Now opinions are valuable but everyone has one and they do vary from individual to another.
_________________
My boss is a Jewish carpenter.



Read the
www.Christian-Thinktank.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
saintmichaeldefendthem
Big Lion



Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 979

Location: Boise, Idaho

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Now opinions are valuable but everyone has one and they do vary from individual to another.


And some opinions are right and others wrong. Have you ever researched the methodology of statistics reporting?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atoz
Emperor of the Solar System



Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 4189


PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

saintmichaeldefendthem wrote:
The question should really be: "Why are people so gullible as to be fooled by leftist news organizations that have their own clearly defined agendas?"

......
So, Atoz, with age comes wisdom, and the wise are not so easily fooled by the craft of liars. I would hope we all woud aspire to this.

In Christ's most Sacred Heart


Thanx for your answer, smdt, altho it was an answer to your q!smile

By the way,
only with Love comes wisdom, for example, to deal with liars:

Trust and verify.
Distrust and verify!

Age is not necessarily wise,
nor
youth necessarily unwise.

Job 32:
5When Elihu saw that there was no answer in the mouth of these three men,
then his wrath was kindled.

6And Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite answered and said,
I am young,
and
[b]ye are very old
;
wherefore I was afraid, and durst not shew you mine opinion.

7I said,
]b]Days should speak, and multitude of years should teach wisdom.[/b]

8But there is a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding.

9Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgment.

10Therefore I said,
Hearken to me;
I also will shew mine opinion.

11Behold, I waited for your words;
I gave ear to your reasons, whilst ye searched out what to say.

12Yea, I attended unto you,
and, behold,
there was none of you that convinced Job, or that answered his words:

A word to the wise is enough.smile

in the Love-wise aisle of view,
atoz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pondering
King of the Jungle



Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 1512


PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

45degreeN wrote:
Quote:
The question should really be: "Why are people so gullible as to be fooled by leftist news organizations that have their own clearly defined agendas?"


It sounds like you think all news organization are leftists and that there are no rightists news organizations. There are by the way.


Want to compare lists? Let's see...on TV...Fox on the Right, everyone else on the Left. In print, Washington Times on the Right just about every other city daily on the left...Talk Radio? the Right dominates. All other Radio? I'd have to say the Left. Movies? Really...

45degreeN wrote:

Bush is about as extreme right wing as is possible


WHAT!? he's a neo-con right? that makes him a "compassionate conservative"....that means he supports big federal social programs (like No Child Left Behind) and has been an advocate for illegal alien amnesty...puuuuu-leeze. He's not an "extreme right wing" anything...

45degreeN wrote:
[
so those leftists new organizations feel they are providing balance rather than extending their own agenda.


Really? Economy is Up...what's the lede in the papers and on TV news. We're winning in Iraq...# of "good news storys" since the war began would fit in my back pocket...#of "quagmire" stories would fill my basement...puuuuu-leeze....Balance my rear end.


45degreeN wrote:
[
Now opinions are valuable but everyone has one and they do vary from individual to another.


True...the problem is the lines have been blurred between "News" and "editorial" and no one in the media makes any attempt to discern between the two...
_________________
Links of note:"Review for Doubting Christians"
Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs
“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong...You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” - Ronald Reagan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Posts: 2673

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 6:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Something we can agree upon
Quote:
True...the problem is the lines have been blurred between "News" and "editorial" and no one in the media makes any attempt to discern between the two...


Actually I might be a little more cynical and suggest that it is more "entertainment value" rather than news per se. ratings being the core issue for them.

In the case of Bush he is primarily authoritarian in nature and that I equate with "right wing." (I guess authoritarians need not , of necessity, be right wing) His agenda is to coalesce all the powers of our government into the presidency relegating the other two parts of the government into merely advisers rather than co-equal branches of government.

Whoever gains the reins of power after the next election will have to resist the temptation to use those abusive powers.
_________________
My boss is a Jewish carpenter.



Read the
www.Christian-Thinktank.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7005

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The truth of the matter is that suicide rates for military members is significantly higher than for the general population. They always have been and most likely they always will be.

There is also a definitive increase in that rate since the hostilities in Iraq have began.

One would also find the same statistical comparative during and just after WWII, Korea, and Viet Nam. It is the nature of war that people have to do and experience things that they simple are unable to contend with emotionally and mentally.

In most cases the rates reflect the correlation between sheer volumes of numbers and nothing more. The more people put into these situations that had no previous inclination to be involved in this type of activity necessarily places more people in the position of trying to deal with stresses they are not prepared for, or may not be capable of handling.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Pondering
King of the Jungle



Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 1512


PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RevJP wrote:
The truth of the matter is that suicide rates for military members is significantly higher than for the general population. They always have been and most likely they always will be.


actually, that's not true...
CHECK LINK


In short, military members are about on par with the population at large...slightly higher, but not significantly.

RevJP wrote:

There is also a definitive increase in that rate since the hostilities in Iraq have began.


Have a source? I don't that's true...I do believe that reporting has increased because it fits a certain desired meme...
_________________
Links of note:"Review for Doubting Christians"
Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs
“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong...You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” - Ronald Reagan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6365

Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

their all going to burn in hell forever anyways because they committed suicide...right?.. Sad
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Pondering
King of the Jungle



Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 1512


PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

no...I think that's a "big boogie man in the sky" kind of prohibition added by men ("church" scholars) in order to better control thier populations....

If God is capable of miracles and can intervene in each and every suicide but doesn't, then who's also complicit in each death? Wink

Just did a quick look around and there are no Biblical prohibitions...seems to stem from Jewish tradition (but not the OT) and the Christian view that a) all life is sacred and b) all life belongs to God...
_________________
Links of note:"Review for Doubting Christians"
Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs
“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong...You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” - Ronald Reagan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Plotinus
Lion King



Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 1049

Location: Canada

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pondering wrote:
RevJP wrote:
The truth of the matter is that suicide rates for military members is significantly higher than for the general population. They always have been and most likely they always will be.


actually, that's not true...
CHECK LINK


Pondering, I took a look at the web page you linked to. I am not sure if I believe the argument on that page. Or at least, there remains considerable doubt. Let us consider one of the passages:

"the rate for veterans [ages 20-24] was found to be between 22.9 and 31.9 per 100,000"

These are 2005 figures apparently. Now this is presumably a 95% confidence interval. That puts the point estimate at approximately 27.4 per 100,000. By working with the numbers from 2004 the author of that page cannot match this.

For example, the figures quoted:

"If we run it again as white males because the military is majority white (58% across all services and components with wild variations among occuapational specialties) and male (about 85%):

15-19 years, 13.5; 20-24 years, 22.0; 25-34 years, 21.7; 35-44 years, 25.6; 45-54 years, 27.5; 55-64 years, 23.9; 65-74 years, 24.1; 75-84 years, 37.0; and 85+ years, 48.3."

These are not convincing, because although the military is majority white and male, it is not all white and male. So these figures for the general population are not an appropriate comparison group.

I am not saying that the page you linked to is wrong. I dont have enough information to determine that. But the page does not convince me.
_________________
One would never discover the limits of soul, should one traverse every road -- so deep a measure does it possess.

Heraclitus, fragment 45, quoted in Diogenes Laertius 9.7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
james
Lion



Joined: 18 Sep 2007
Posts: 901

Location: Portland, Ore

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those numbers seem low to me. Even if with smdt figures of 9.1 out of 100,000 thats 27,300 for a population of 300 million. And with these figures military personal only make up less than 25%, nation wide. With the vast number of homeless people, depression and other mental illnesses (of whom I believe many military individuals fall into this category) and so many children growing up in a sense of hopelessness, I would think the subject to address is, What can I (or WE) do, for them???
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pondering
King of the Jungle



Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 1512


PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you may be right (both of you)...I'm just saying, from my personal experience, suicide is tragic, but not disproportionately represented in military populations...

as for the homeless...out of all veterans, how many are homeless? a very very very very small number I expect...the fact to me seems to be that it fits the anti-war/anti-military folks ideal of portraying veterans not as heroes...but as victims.

too many folks are making a concious effort to relive Vietnam...one basic truth is this: during Vietnam there was a draft but the draft allowed the wealthy and many of the middle class to "defer" out. The current conflict is being fought 100% by volunteers...and everyone of the officers are college graduates, many who could have chosen another career path...but instead, chose to serve their nation. But the media doesn't like to talk about that...
_________________
Links of note:"Review for Doubting Christians"
Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs
“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong...You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” - Ronald Reagan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7005

Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The difficulty is that all reliable statistics available are from '04 and earlier, and none of the US Census statistics segregate military, or ex-military from the standard ethnic categories.

One of the few military sources I could find from the Navy began with the admonition that suicide rates are significantly higher for the military than for the general population (one must remember that 'significant' in statistical terms is a 5% difference and how that percentage is applied and/or calculated is random to whomever is doing the statistical analysis)

However, I stand by my original assertions unless someone can 'prove' me wrong... Razz
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> NEW! - Political Forum - Scripture and Christianity in Politics All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 

© 2001-2007