 |
Bible-Discussion.com Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Abdulhakeem Little Hamster
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:25 pm Post subject: Was Mohammed a Man of God? Debate |
|
|
I would like to debate on "Was Mohammed a Man of God? " and I will be using the Qur'an, the Bible, and the science.
So please nominate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TwoPutt Fierce Puppy
Joined: 12 Jul 2007 Posts: 227 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Don't you mean "a man of Allah"? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Abdulhakeem Little Hamster
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear brother,
God in Arabic is Alah which is Eloh in Hebrew because both Arabic and Hebrew are from Aramiac the mother language of the Samite Languages.
Jesus when on the cross said "Eloh Eloh lama shabktani?"which is translated as "My God My why have you foresaken me?"
Eloh is Allah, which is God in English. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TwoPutt Fierce Puppy
Joined: 12 Jul 2007 Posts: 227 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Abdulhakeem wrote: | Dear brother,
God in Arabic is Alah which is Eloh in Hebrew because both Arabic and Hebrew are from Aramiac the mother language of the Samite Languages.
Jesus when on the cross said "Eloh Eloh lama shabktani?"which is translated as "My God My why have you foresaken me?"
Eloh is Allah, which is God in English. |
So, you are saying Muslims worship the God of Israel? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
towshab Labrador

Joined: 23 Oct 2007 Posts: 312
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TwoPutt wrote: | | Abdulhakeem wrote: | Dear brother,
God in Arabic is Alah which is Eloh in Hebrew because both Arabic and Hebrew are from Aramiac the mother language of the Samite Languages.
Jesus when on the cross said "Eloh Eloh lama shabktani?"which is translated as "My God My why have you foresaken me?"
Eloh is Allah, which is God in English. |
So, you are saying Muslims worship the God of Israel? |
Don't seem so surprised. Both christianity and Islam are rooted in the Jewish scriptures. At least Islam retains a strict sense of monotheism, while the bulk of Christianity (excluding yourself and some others) does not.
I don't know much about Islam, but I think they derive their heritage or line of promise through Ishmael? I could very well be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Abdulhakeem Little Hamster
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Qur'an 1:1 teaches "God of all mankind" including Israel. Saying God is God of Israel alone makes God racial, which does not fit the majest of God the Perfect. Therefore, it is not acceptable in Islam to call God of Israel or God of Arabs because Qur'an 1:1 teaches "God of all mankind." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
composer2005 Fierce Wolf
Joined: 14 Jul 2007 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 4:26 pm Post subject: Was Muhammed a man of God? |
|
|
The unambiguous answer is No, the Islamic leader Muhammed was a fraud!
MAHOMET'S FLIGHT FROM MECCA TO MEDINA
(p. 673) - The first and most arduous conquests of Mahomet were those of his wife, his servant, his pupil, and his friend; since he presented himself as a prophet to those who were most conversant with his infirmities as a man. (Extract taken from Gibbon's - "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" D M LOW - A one-volume abridgement)
THE CHARACTER AND PRIVATE LIFE OF MAHOMET
. . . The use of fraud and perfidy, of cruelty and injustice, were often subservient to the propagation of the faith; and Mahomet commanded or approved the assassination of the Jews and idolaters who had escaped from the field of battle. By the repetition of such acts the character of Mahomet must have been gradually stained; and the influence of such pernicious habits would be poorly compensated by the practice of the personal and social virtues which are necessary to maintain the reputation of a prophet among his secretaries and friends. Of his last years ambition was the ruling passion; and a politician will suspect that he secretly smiled (the victorious imposter!) at the enthusiasm of his youth, and the credulity of his proselytes.1 A philosopher will observe that their credulity and his success would tend more strongly to fortify the assurance of his divine mission, that his interest and religion were inseparably connected, and that his conscience would be soothed by the persuasion that he alone was absolved by the Deity from the obligation of positive and moral laws. (Extract from Gibbon's - "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" D M LOW - A one-volume abridgement, p. 690) -
Mahomet breaks his own Laws -
Perfumes and women were the two sensual enjoyments which his nature required, and his religion did not forbid; and Mahomet affirmed that the fervour of his devotion was increased by these innocent pleasures. The heat of the climate enflames the blood of the Arabs, and their libidinous complexion has been noticed by the writers of antiquity.
Their incontinence was regulated by the civil and religious laws of the Koran: their incestuous alliances were blamed: the boundless licence of polygamy was reduced to four legitimate wives or concubines; their rights of both bed and of dowry were equitably determined; the freedom of divorce was discouraged; adultery was condemned as a capital offence; and fornication, in either sex, was punished with an hundred stripes. Such were the calm and rational precepts of this legislator; but in his private conduct Mahomet indulged the appetites of a man, and abused the claims of a prophet. A special revelation dispensed him from the laws which he had imposed on his nation; the female sex, without reserve, was abandoned to his desires; and this singular prerogative excited the envy rather than the scandal, the veneration rather than the envy, of the devout Musulmans. (Extract from Gibbon's - "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" D M LOW - A one-volume abridgement, p. 691)
INFLUENCE OF MAHOMET
Mahomet was instructed to preach and to fight; and the union of these opposite qualities, while it enhanced his merit, contributed to his success: the operation of force and persuasion, of enthusiasm and fear, continually acted on each other, till every barrier yielded to their irresistible power. His voice invited the Arabs to freedom and victory, to arms and rapine, to the indulgence of their darling passions in this world and the other: the restraints which he imposed were requisite to establish the credit of the prophet, and to exercise the obedience of the people; and the only objection to his success was his rational creed of the unity and perfections of God. (Extract from Gibbon's - "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" D M LOW - A one-volume abridgement, p. 693)
Christ was the opposite to the ungodly man Muhammed / Mahomet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
towshab Labrador

Joined: 23 Oct 2007 Posts: 312
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Abdulhakeem wrote: | | Qur'an 1:1 teaches "God of all mankind" including Israel. Saying God is God of Israel alone makes God racial, which does not fit the majest of God the Perfect. Therefore, it is not acceptable in Islam to call God of Israel or God of Arabs because Qur'an 1:1 teaches "God of all mankind." |
Hi Abdul,
I tend to agree with this. I am not Jewish but I certainly find more truth in the Jewish scriptures that the Christian. Too many contradictions. I tried reading some Qu'ran before, but the translation was either a very poor one, or (no offense) Mohamed was a poor writer. I had difficulty reading any of it because it just didn't flow well.
But I have to ask this: if you truly believe G-d is for all of mankind, as I do, do you believe that all people need to convert to Islam? If so, why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Abdelaleem Big Goldfish
Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I am not Jewish but I certainly find more truth in the Jewish scriptures that the Christian. |
I've many comments on this thought.
| Quote: | | the translation was either a very poor one, or (no offense) Mohamed was a poor writer |
Mohamed doesn't know how to read or write. The Quran is the words of Allah. FYI, the Quran is a big challenge in Arabic for Arabs that they can't drive even a sentence like it . I believe the translations was not good . please find attached a certified Moslems translation
"I'm new not allowed to submit URLS"
| Quote: | | do you believe that all people need to convert to Islam? If so, why? |
This is the longest subject that we can talk about. Why Islam? Please find some points”-
• It’s from Allah who created the world
• Allah is unique, nothing like him. No wife no sun none at all
• He sent many profits Abraham, Isaac, Ishmael, Jacob, Moses , Jesus, and last Mohamed
• So, Mohamed is the last. He has all what is needed for all people
• Islam recognized all profits including Jesus but as a human profit not a god or son of god
• Islam has everything from Allah for man’s good in life and the last day
This why we believe Islam is for all mankind .
[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Abdelaleem Big Goldfish
Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 1:33 pm Post subject: Re: Was Muhammed a man of God? |
|
|
| composer2005 wrote: |
(p. 673) - The first and most arduous conquests of Mahomet were those of his wife, his servant, his pupil, and his friend; since he presented himself as a prophet to those who were most conversant with his infirmities as a man. |
This is normal for all profits that he starts with people who can listen and believe in him. Mohamed was recognized before becoming a profit as “Man who never lies or betrayed”
| composer2005 wrote: |
approved the assassination of the Jews and idolaters who had escaped from the field of battle. |
Never happened this is what is always said about Islam but FYI . Mohamed put a war law much better than Geneva law of war before it by 1400 years
| composer2005 wrote: |
By the repetition of such acts …. was absolved by the Deity from the obligation of positive and moral laws. |
All what you’re saying is some thoughts of people who are not balanced in their judgment
| composer2005 wrote: |
Mahomet breaks his own Laws |
What I say about this point is that it’s untrue. It’s full of hate and lies
| composer2005 wrote: |
INFLUENCE OF MAHOMET
Mahomet was instructed to preach and to fight; and the union of these opposite qualities, while it enhanced his merit, contributed to his success: the operation of force and persuasion, of enthusiasm and fear, continually acted on each other, ,,, |
This is not right as he was defending on his religious. On the other hand most of profits have faought David, Moses, Solomon and many. Jesus was exception as his profit life was 3 years and he was preaching in believers Jewish society.
| Quote: | | Christ was the opposite to the ungodly man Muhammed / Mahomet. |
Christ was different in many things but not what you’ve said above.
[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
composer2005 Fierce Wolf
Joined: 14 Jul 2007 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You present absolutely no evidence to support any of your answers?
You admit Muhammed murdered to defend his religion. That is enough to condemn him and his murderous religion.
You mention other Prophets, however Christianity is based upon 'Christ' and Christ murdered no one!
There lies the distinction between the murderous Islamic religion and the Non-murderous teachings of Christ. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Abdelaleem Big Goldfish
Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| composer2005 wrote: | | You present absolutely no evidence to support any of your answers? |
Will you accept mine? I doubt
I’ve much more than what you expect but I’m sure you’ll not accept it
| composer2005 wrote: | | You admit Muhammed murdered to defend his religion. That is enough to condemn him and his murderous religion. |
Do you think that no one has the right to defend himself? It’s normal. But if you think this is enough for you to say murderous religion I don’t think I can help you to change your mind as it’s absolutely biased
| composer2005 wrote: | | You mention other Prophets, however Christianity is based upon 'Christ' and Christ murdered no one! |
Do you really think that Christ didn’t kill no body?
By the way Moselms respect and love Christ more than Christians do.
What about his fellowships? How millions of Christians (put the others aside) they killed by the name of Christ?
Do you know that he said so before he goes?
Matthew 10 :34-36
34"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35For I have come to turn
" 'a man against his father,
a daughter against her mother,
a daughter-in-law against her mother in law—
36a man's enemies will be the members of his own household.'[e]
| composer2005 wrote: | | There lies the distinction between the murderous Islamic religion and the Non-murderous teachings of Christ. |
See the above not. I don’t say that Christ is murderous. We respect him exactly as we respect Mohamed.
I’m proving that all religious have to face others and defend itself. And this explains what Christ said. He doesn’t mean he comes for this but he means what he is going to preach will cause wars and blood. No one can deny how many people are killed under the name of Christ.
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
composer2005 Fierce Wolf
Joined: 14 Jul 2007 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Abdelaleem wrote: | | composer2005 wrote: | | You present absolutely no evidence to support any of your answers? |
Will you accept mine? I doubt
I’ve much more than what you expect but I’m sure you’ll not accept it |
Present it by all means and give us the opportunity of examining it. (I hope it is better than your admission below that "Oh well others have murdered to defend their Religion, so Islam is justified as being as bad as them?)
| composer2005 wrote: | | You admit Muhammed murdered to defend his religion. That is enough to condemn him and his murderous religion. |
| Abdelaleem wrote: | | [Do you think that no one has the right to defend himself? It’s normal. But if you think this is enough for you to say murderous religion I don’t think I can help you to change your mind as it’s absolutely biased |
Of course its biased! Its biased towards Christ who didn't kill any body!
| composer2005 wrote: | | You mention other Prophets, however Christianity is based upon 'Christ' and Christ murdered no one! |
| Abdelaleem wrote: | | [Do you really think that Christ didn’t kill no body? |
Please show us whom you say Christ killed / murdered and killed / murdered especially to 'defend his Religion?'
| Abdelaleem wrote: | | [By the way Moselms respect and love Christ more than Christians do. |
You mean like calling Christ a killer like you just did above?
| Abdelaleem wrote: | | [What about his fellowships? How millions of Christians (put the others aside) they killed by the name of Christ? |
The Original followers of Christ (now called the Christ Adelphians) haven't killed or tortured or burned or slaughtered any one. They are unique in that they 1. Murdered no one to defend their Religion 2. They permit a 'Free Will' choice to accept their Religion or not, unlike others including Islam that threatens and murders those who will not submit to it. 3. Compared to all other Doctrines, their teachings are virtually as close to the Original Gospel of Christ as it gets.
Sure, other Religions have committed atrocities like Muhammed but they like Muhammed are false teachers preaching False Religions. You are saying, oh well, others have murdered so Islam is just as bad and that is your ungodly justification for supporting Islam?
That is a disgrace frankly!
| Abdelaleem wrote: | [Do you know that he said so before he goes?
Matthew 10 :34-36
34"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35For I have come to turn
" 'a man against his father,
a daughter against her mother,
a daughter-in-law against her mother in law—
36a man's enemies will be the members of his own household.'[e]
| composer2005 wrote: | | There lies the distinction between the murderous Islamic religion and the Non-murderous teachings of Christ. |
See the above not. I don’t say that Christ is murderous. We respect him exactly as we respect Mohamed.
I’m proving that all religious have to face others and defend itself. And this explains what Christ said. He doesn’t mean he comes for this but he means what he is going to preach will cause wars and blood. No one can deny how many people are killed under the name of Christ.
Regards |
The followers of ungodly and false Religions cause wars. Jesus never promoted violence but the opposite.
It is because most men disobey the teachings God gave to his Prophet Christ that wars are caused. If every one understood Christ's God given teachings and thus behaved accordingly (as do the Christ Adelphian Church) then there would be no wars or violence at all and God's Will (through Christ His Prophet) shall be done.
Your choice: - God's Will and no violence, or Muhammed's Religion of murder and fear (even against its own women (Sura 4:34)) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Abdelaleem Big Goldfish
Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
First evidence from Quran
109:[1] Say: O ye that reject Faith!
[2] I worship not that which ye worship,
[3] Nor will ye worship that which I worship.
[4] And I will not worship that which ye have been wont to worship,
[5] Nor will ye worship that which I worship.
[6] To you be your Way, and to me mine.
2:[256] Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects Evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things
15[85] We created not the heavens, the earth, and all between them, but for just ends. And the Hour is surely coming (when this will be manifest). So overlook (any human faults) with gracious forgiveness.
13: [89] But turn away from them, and say "Peace!" but soon shall they know!
What are you tring to prove that Islam is murderous religion and Adelphians are not?
I reviewed the home page of the (thechristadelphians ) your vision to the Christ as a human from a woman only without a father is exactly the same as Islamic vision.
Is your church is one of the Unitarian churches?
This is my interest to search for Unitarian churches. I think you need to read about Islam before you start to criticize it depending on what do you see in media.
I’m sure when you start reading neutrally about Islam and find some agreement about Christ you’ll change your thoughts.
My absolute search is for the Original followers of Christ. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
composer2005 Fierce Wolf
Joined: 14 Jul 2007 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:57 pm Post subject: Islam |
|
|
So where is the evidence that shows Christ killed or murdered to defend his Religion?
Historical facts prove that Muhammed killed to defend his Religion and you also agreed that he did.
Your own testimony condemns Islam as a murderous Religion.
I want nothing to do with it nor any Religion like it.
You would be well advised to reject any Religion that condones and even promotes violence (even against its own Women) and consider the Christ Adelphians who teach virtually the Original Gospel of Peace and Love and non-violence that Christ himself taught.
If you are interested, I can provide you with a Discussion Forum Link where you can learn more about the 'non-violent and virtual Original Religion that Christ taught?
Cheers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|