 |
Bible-Discussion.com Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Trinity1 Emperor of the World

Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 3123
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:49 am Post subject: Carbon Credits |
|
|
I am curious about 'Carbon Credits'...
Who actually gets to sell these things in the first place? What legitimacy do they posess for 'owning' them in the first place? Where does the money go? Who decides how it is spent? Where does that authority come from?
Please, someone tell me how these 'Carbon Credits' are any different then the Catholic selling of 'indulgences' during the 15th century. _________________ Exodus 20:11 "For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them..."
‘The German Führer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.’ Sir Arthur Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ana King of the Jungle

Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1566 Location: BC
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Answers to your questions can be found HERE
| Quote: | | Please, someone tell me how these 'Carbon Credits' are any different then the Catholic selling of 'indulgences' during the 15th century. |
One was an agreement between participants and the other was an abuse of authority. _________________ Truth doesn't care about theology, and theology doesn't care about truth.
Ana's Bananas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pondering King of the Jungle

Joined: 15 Sep 2005 Posts: 1512
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm with Trinity on this one....for a good answer as to why Global Warming theory is linked to CO2...
"Since allowances and carbon credits are tradeable instruments with a transparent price, financial investors can buy them on the spot market for speculation purposes, or link them to futures contracts. A high volume of trading in this secondary market helps price discovery and liquidity, and in this way helps to keep down costs and set a clear price signal in CO2 which helps businesses to plan investments. This market has grown substantially, with banks, brokers, funds, arbitrageurs and private traders now participating in a market valued at about $60 billion in 2007"
But that's right, it's Evil Bush and his friends the Oil Companies that are so invested in killing the Earth
It's market economics...they must create a market, and then a vehicle to trade, and then create "supply and demand" pressures....[/b] _________________ Links of note:"Review for Doubting Christians"
Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs
“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong...You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” - Ronald Reagan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ana King of the Jungle

Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 1566 Location: BC
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pondering, you're with Trinity on what, precisely? All he did was ask questions and insinuate that carbon credits are like indulgences, which they are not, and as he appears to be asking his questions from a position of ignorance, obviously this comparison is formed in similar fashion.
Look, the idea behind the UNFCCC is of course to reduce global warming. Whatever the motivation behind the goal of reducing carbon emissions, however, the treaty about carbon credits was agreed to by the participating parties. There was no abuse of authority there the way there was with indulgences.
What I think is funny is how your post embodies the American attitude toward this treaty.
 _________________ Truth doesn't care about theology, and theology doesn't care about truth.
Ana's Bananas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
P1234567890 Emperor of the Universe

Joined: 11 Mar 2006 Posts: 8324 Location: Victoria, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pondering wrote: | I'm with Trinity on this one....for a good answer as to why Global Warming theory is linked to CO2...
"Since allowances and carbon credits are tradeable instruments with a transparent price, financial investors can buy them on the spot market for speculation purposes, or link them to futures contracts. A high volume of trading in this secondary market helps price discovery and liquidity, and in this way helps to keep down costs and set a clear price signal in CO2 which helps businesses to plan investments. This market has grown substantially, with banks, brokers, funds, arbitrageurs and private traders now participating in a market valued at about $60 billion in 2007"
But that's right, it's Evil Bush and his friends the Oil Companies that are so invested in killing the Earth
It's market economics...they must create a market, and then a vehicle to trade, and then create "supply and demand" pressures....[/b] |
Pondering, this is exactly what I describe as an unscientific argument. I really wish you wouldn't say stuff like this.
You're basically saying, "There's a lot of money to be made in carbon credits, and therefore global warming is a hoax."
This is NOT a scientific argument, and it really muddies the waters. Global warming is a scientific issue, and people should NOT use unscientific arguments when describing it, so please don't do this! _________________ "Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction."
-Blaise Pascal
"...with or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil -that takes religion..."
-Steven Weinberg
"I would bless my children with your destruction instead."
-Someone who shall remain anonymous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trinity1 Emperor of the World

Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 3123
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So the money goes to the UN? I didn't follow. If it does, under what authority does the UN collect 'taxes' from the United States? Last time I checked I didn't see a single person in the UN on a ballot... nor did I see where they are able to usurp the sovereignty of a country.
Also... I might add,
Is this from the same treaty where all of the signatories have had higher increases in CO2 emissions than the United States?
Is the same treaty that NONE (that means ALL) of the counties that signed it haven't even come close to abiding by its protocols or meeting its goals?
I'm not exactly sure how international treaties that we didn't sign or approve have any bearing on what happens in our country, can you point this provision out to me? _________________ Exodus 20:11 "For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them..."
‘The German Führer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.’ Sir Arthur Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trinity1 Emperor of the World

Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 3123
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ana wrote: | | What I think is funny is how your post embodies the American attitude toward this treaty. |
And what I think is even funnier is your country's failure to come close to meeting the treaty's demand for decreases in carbon emissions even after it signed it... and the United States having a lower increase as a percentage in emissions than any other country that signed it. If you look at China or India, there has been an explosion in emissions… and their attitude is to comply… they signed it… and yet, they are butchering the agreement.
Now that is really funny. _________________ Exodus 20:11 "For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them..."
‘The German Führer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.’ Sir Arthur Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trinity1 Emperor of the World

Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 3123
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ana wrote: |
| Trinity wrote: | | Please, someone tell me how these 'Carbon Credits' are any different then the Catholic selling of 'indulgences' during the 15th century. |
One was an agreement between participants and the other was an abuse of authority. |
Is purposely exceeding your 'fair share' of polluting by paying out a fee another form of abuse of the agreement they made? I see no difference... at all. It is PC BS to shake down industrialized nations by the UN... period. _________________ Exodus 20:11 "For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them..."
‘The German Führer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.’ Sir Arthur Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trinity1 Emperor of the World

Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 3123
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| P1234567890 wrote: | | You're basically saying, "There's a lot of money to be made in carbon credits, and therefore global warming is a hoax." |
P, I don't think this is what he was saying at all. The global warming hoax has nothing to do with the UN trying to shake down industrialized nations for $$$... and everything to do with their insatiable desire for power and control. This is only a means in which they can 'guilt' rich countries in paying them $$$ so a few of them can continue to embezzle said funds.
It really isn't more complicated then that. _________________ Exodus 20:11 "For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them..."
‘The German Führer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.’ Sir Arthur Keith
Last edited by Trinity1 on Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:58 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trinity1 Emperor of the World

Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 3123
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mistake.... I tried to edit... _________________ Exodus 20:11 "For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them..."
‘The German Führer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.’ Sir Arthur Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pondering King of the Jungle

Joined: 15 Sep 2005 Posts: 1512
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'll try to summarize a response...
calling bunko on the UN/Kyoto accords has nothing to do with calling global warming a hoax. "Currently", or roughly over the last 30 years, the planet has warmed by a degree or two. At the same time, CO2 levels have increased. Those two things may be related, but then again, they may not.
the Kyoto accords claim that they are related and that by setting emission standards and fining folks for exceeding those standards, you'll curb CO2 output...however, the creation of a commodities market allows for the comparison indulgences....For example, supposedly folks want to decrease the CO2 levels by discouraging things like private jets flying from say, Europe to Bali (not that the High Priest of the Church of Global Warming would do that...)...however, if I'm rich enough, as an individual or a country, I just buy "credits" from places that haven't exceeded their quota...say Rwanda.
Now on it's face, this is good for Rwanda, they get cash. And China can continue it's industrial expolosion, becuase the total global CO2 limit is capped....nice idea, but it's bunk.
And for the record, the US Senate voted 95-0 (5 not voting) NOT to accept Kyoto accords. For those that don't know, the Senate and not the President ratifies treaties...
otherwise, Trinity's points are pretty much spot on. _________________ Links of note:"Review for Doubting Christians"
Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs
“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong...You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” - Ronald Reagan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
P1234567890 Emperor of the Universe

Joined: 11 Mar 2006 Posts: 8324 Location: Victoria, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pondering wrote: | I'll try to summarize a response...
calling bunko on the UN/Kyoto accords has nothing to do with calling global warming a hoax. "Currently", or roughly over the last 30 years, the planet has warmed by a degree or two. At the same time, CO2 levels have increased. Those two things may be related, but then again, they may not. |
They are definitely related. In order to argue that they are not related, one has to argue that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas, but we know that it is for a fact. That's what it comes down to. _________________ "Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction."
-Blaise Pascal
"...with or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil -that takes religion..."
-Steven Weinberg
"I would bless my children with your destruction instead."
-Someone who shall remain anonymous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trinity1 Emperor of the World

Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 3123
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| P1234567890 wrote: |
They are definitely related. In order to argue that they are not related, one has to argue that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas, but we know that it is for a fact. That's what it comes down to. |
Oh boy... are you saying that it is a fact that global warming is being caused by the increase of CO2 emisisons that man is producing? It has no other plausible cause?
Please say this is not so. This is a classic case of closing our minds... and this is completly out of character for you P. _________________ Exodus 20:11 "For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them..."
‘The German Führer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.’ Sir Arthur Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pondering King of the Jungle

Joined: 15 Sep 2005 Posts: 1512
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll try to make it simple:
Your position
Observation 1: Global temps have increased.
Observation 2: Global CO2 have increased.
Conclusion: Rising CO2 is the cause for rising temps
A comparative example:
Observation 1: roughly 100 Americans are killed every day in traffic accidents across the country.
Observation 2: The sun "rises" every morning
Conclusion: The rising of the sun kills 100 Americans.
See...correlation does not equal causality  _________________ Links of note:"Review for Doubting Christians"
Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs
“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong...You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” - Ronald Reagan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
P1234567890 Emperor of the Universe

Joined: 11 Mar 2006 Posts: 8324 Location: Victoria, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pondering wrote: | I'll try to make it simple:
Your position
Observation 1: Global temps have increased.
Observation 2: Global CO2 have increased.
Conclusion: Rising CO2 is the cause for rising temps
A comparative example:
Observation 1: roughly 100 Americans are killed every day in traffic accidents across the country.
Observation 2: The sun "rises" every morning
Conclusion: The rising of the sun kills 100 Americans.
See...correlation does not equal causality  |
This isn't the scientific reasoning AT ALL. Scientists are well aware of the dangers of confusing correlation and causation, and that is DEFINITELY NOT happening here.
The argument goes more like this:
1. CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and increasing its concentration in air just a little bit significantly increases the amount of the sun's heat which will be trapped by said air.
-----------------------------------------------------
Conclusion: Increasing global atmospheric CO2 concentrations will without a doubt increase average global temperatures.
Then we look at the evidence, and we see that the hypothesis is confirmed by the evidence. Over the past 150 years, the CO2 went up, and so did the average global temperature.
CO2 IS a greenhouse gas, and that's the bottom line. It is IMPOSSIBLE to significantly increase atmospheric CO2 concentrations WITHOUT temperature going up, because we KNOW that CO2 traps heat very efficiently.
It's a slam-dunk scientific argument, which is why every major scientific organization on the planet including the NAS, NSF, Royal Society, NSERC, etc. etc. has released strongly-worded statements to the effect that humans are causing global warming by increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. _________________ "Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction."
-Blaise Pascal
"...with or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil -that takes religion..."
-Steven Weinberg
"I would bless my children with your destruction instead."
-Someone who shall remain anonymous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|