|
|
| Author |
Message |
Van King Kong
Joined: 19 Oct 2002 Posts: 2646 Location: San Clemente, California
|
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:36 pm Post subject: Born in the USA |
|
|
| All persons born in the United States or naturalized have the right to life, liberty and property. But is born the past tense of “birth” or the past tense of “bear”? And does birth mean the beginning of existence or passage out of the uterus? Born means “brought into life or being.” But the Justices found that the Constitution did not protect the in uterus baby, finding that the little tyke is not a person. The Justices apparently chose to find that born is not the past tense of bear, what a mother does during pregnancy to support the baby’s needs. Nor did they find that Born is the past tense of Birth, meaning brought to life at conception. No. The Court found that born means birth and birth means passage out of the uterus, and thus they apparently denied personhood to a crying baby because her head is still touching the birth canal. But what did the founders intend? They were trying to be inclusive and they clearly did not intend to exclude and leave unprotected the smallest humans. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nobby Board - Admin

Joined: 16 Sep 2002 Posts: 5301 Location: Missouri
|
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2003 2:17 pm Post subject: Born in the USA |
|
|
Van, It is nothing short of murder to kill a new baby because it's still touching the birth canal! "PBA" Partial-Birth-Abortion! It's sick!!
Ps: My thoughts go much deeper than that, but I best stay out of it! For now.
Nobby
[This message has been edited by Nobby (edited 01-16-2003).] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Magnum PI Big Pit Bull
Joined: 25 Aug 2002 Posts: 393 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2003 9:48 pm Post subject: Born in the USA |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Van:
All persons born in the United States or naturalized have the right to life, liberty and property. But is born the past tense of “birth” or the past tense of “bear”? And does birth mean the beginning of existence or passage out of the uterus? Born means “brought into life or being.” But the Justices found that the Constitution did not protect the in uterus baby, finding that the little tyke is not a person. The Justices apparently chose to find that born is not the past tense of bear, what a mother does during pregnancy to support the baby’s needs. Nor did they find that Born is the past tense of Birth, meaning brought to life at conception. No. The Court found that born means birth and birth means passage out of the uterus, and thus they apparently denied personhood to a crying baby because her head is still touching the birth canal. But what did the founders intend? They were trying to be inclusive and they clearly did not intend to exclude and leave unprotected the smallest humans.
It's called "The Quickening," and the Justices referred to it in their decision(s).
MPI
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phinehas Show Poodle

Joined: 08 Jan 2003 Posts: 262 Location: St. Cloud
|
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2003 11:21 am Post subject: Re: Born in the USA |
|
|
| Magnum PI wrote: | | It's called "The Quickening," and the Justices referred to it in their decision(s). |
Well hell's bells! It sure is good to see that they've got a name for this idea. Too bad giving it a name isn't the same as it being true any more than the idea being discussed by supreme court justices makes it credible.
Hey, I have a novel idea! Let's vote to determine Truth!
Phin _________________ “When they chose new gods, war came to the city gates, and not a shield or spear was seen among forty thousand in Israel. My heart is with Israel's princes, with the willing volunteers among the people. Praise the LORD!” Judges 5:8-9 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|