Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Will only 144,000 people go to heaven?


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Revelation and End of Times
Author Message
Ron
Grizzly Bear



Joined: 27 Aug 2002
Posts: 750

Location: home, wa, usa

PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kris007 wrote:
after the antichrist , christ will rule the new earth for 1000 years and then all saints will go to heaven forever and ever and all others will be in hell forever and ever


Please point me to Scripture you base this on. Many people point to passages in the Book of Revelation (20:1-6 in particular). Let us first cover what it does NOT say:

- The second coming of Christ is not mentioned.

- A bodily resurrection is not mentioned- He saw "souls" reigning.

- A thousand year reign of Christ is not mentioned- the passage says that souls reigned.

- A reign on earth is not mentioned. Could souls that have died and been separated from their physical bodies rule in a physical world?

- David's throne, Jerusalem or Palestine are not mentioned.

- Those who are living are not mentioned- Only those who died violent deaths for their faith.

- Christ is never said to set foot on earth.

What does the 1,000 year describe? It is no more literal than the chain mentioned- you could not bind a spiritual being with a physica chain. Rather 1,000 is a number that stands for an undertmined, but full period of time. This term is often used to describe fullness or completeness of time- see Job 9:3; Psalm 50:10; Ecc 7:28; 2 Peter 3:8.
_________________
"He that hath ears to hear, let him hear." Matthew 11:15

Yours in Christ with much love,
Ron

http://www.arkwebshost.com/theology/ron
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
kris007
Sea Monkey



Joined: 09 Feb 2004
Posts: 12


PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

revelations 20:2
And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

revelations 20:6

Blessed and holy [is] he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.


and also revelations 20:7 , 8 and 9

And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,
And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom [is] as the sand of the sea.
And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.


this proves to me that jesus will reign on earth for 1000 years after the final beast

if it isn't on earth , uhm how can satan then gather all those nations and attack the saints(christians ) ??

where would they reign according to you ? do you have an alternative ?

and if you doubt that the 1000 years is really 1000 years then you might have a problem too , the bible is the truth and nothing but the truth , the bible is infallable , if you say that 1000 years aren't 1000 years then you say the bible is wrong , that is the same as what some try to prove with the gaptheorie in genesis

also about the issue that those souls were seperated from their bodies , if anyone can recreate those bodies it is god , he created everything so recreating a few bodies won't be a problem for him , he also says they will be priests , that sounds like they have a body to me , the priests we know now seem to have one , no reason to change that .

if you think that i am wrong , plse feel free to explain to me why and also tell me what your alternative is ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ron
Grizzly Bear



Joined: 27 Aug 2002
Posts: 750

Location: home, wa, usa

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kris007 wrote:
and if you doubt that the 1000 years is really 1000 years then you might have a problem too , the bible is the truth and nothing but the truth , the bible is infallable , if you say that 1000 years aren't 1000 years then you say the bible is wrong , that is the same as what some try to prove with the gaptheorie in genesis


I am short on time but wanted to reply to this particular part of your post. I believe in the infallability of Scripture for sure. And your point on Genesis is well taken. Lets look at the phrase "the first day". It is only understood as that, the first day. However, if you look at Strong's Greek concordance and dictionary, you see that there are several uses for the term "thousand". In the Scriptures we are discussing it ALWAYS mean "of uncertain affinity, an unknown length of time, but considered a 'fullness' of time". This is how I read these passages as well. I do not believe God keeps a calendar in human sense of time. I think, just as Jesus came in the fullness of time, when the time was right, so too He will return.

I must go pick up 6 boys from school so I will have to pick up on this later. God bless.
_________________
"He that hath ears to hear, let him hear." Matthew 11:15

Yours in Christ with much love,
Ron

http://www.arkwebshost.com/theology/ron
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
gswisher
Rabid Pit Bull



Joined: 04 Jun 2003
Posts: 421


PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2004 6:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kris007 wrote:
and if you doubt that the 1000 years is really 1000 years then you might have a problem too , the bible is the truth and nothing but the truth , the bible is infallable , if you say that 1000 years aren't 1000 years then you say the bible is wrong , that is the same as what some try to prove with the gaptheorie in genesis


Then the Lamb is a literal lamb, the beast is a literal beast, stars are just stars, the scroll john ate was literal, etc., etc...
_________________
The God of our Lord Jesus Christ give to you a spirit of wisdom and revelation in the FULL knowledge of Him.--Eph 1:17
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kris007
Sea Monkey



Joined: 09 Feb 2004
Posts: 12


PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2004 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i guess you could be right about that ron , you prolly know alot more about scripture than me , but :

revelation 20:3 ,5 and 7

the scripture talks about "the thousand years "

it is true however that it also says 2 times in verse 2 and 4
"a thousand years"

but i think that it still means 1000 years , cause in rev 20:5 it says:

"But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This [is] the first resurrection."

i just think that if you don't take the 1000 years literal , but just as a very long time then how long does it take before everyone else is judged ??
and what about the forever and ever then ? is that also just a very very long time and not the same as eternity ??


and to answer gswisher :
i know that not everything is literal and certain things are just comparisons , but in this particular case about the thousand years and when the scripture refers to a certain period of time and to dates i think unless the scripture itself indicates that it is a comparison we have to take it literally

and also if you or ron or anyone else has a good explanation why we shouldn't take those 1000 years literal then be so free to post it , if i am wrong then i am wrong , i am not saying that i know for sure that those 1000 years are 1000 years , it is just my personal opinion


[/b]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Javan
Fierce Puppy



Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 235

Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2004 9:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

One day is as a thousand years...a thousand years as one day ( 2 Peter 3:8 )

The statements cancel themselves out - time is meaningless to God. We only have a linear concept of time, but time in Revelation (according to God and/or the spiritual realm) is relative and does not correlate with "earth time" at all.
_________________
(Father God) Take this mask off - Let me see you with my own eyes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
larryjf
Tiger



Joined: 01 Jul 2002
Posts: 848

Location: boothwyn, pa, usa

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2004 11:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does that mean the earth could have been created in 7,000 years instead of 7 days??

In 2 Peter 3:8 in context is speaking of God coming to judge mankind.

2 Peter 3:3,4
Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as [they were] from the beginning of the creation.

What Peter is saying here is that just because it is a long time to us, that doesn't mean it is a long time to God.
Peter is not saying that God does not know the difference between 1,000 years and 1 day.

If God says something will happen for 1,000 years - it will.
If God says something was created in 7 days - it was.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Javan
Fierce Puppy



Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 235

Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2004 11:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

John was looking at spiritual events in Revelation...not physical events.

Since when do we physically see Satan and angels (I'm not saying that people have never seen angels in "disguise")? We do not see the spiritual realm around us. I highly doubt that linear time has any effect on spiritual beings.

The seven days of creation is referring to our physical sense of time - "evening and morning". Daniel's prophecies always referred to physical events and physical times. Jesus was physcally dead for three days. But with God all these times are inconsequential - He sees the beginning and the end all rolled into one.
_________________
(Father God) Take this mask off - Let me see you with my own eyes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kris007
Sea Monkey



Joined: 09 Feb 2004
Posts: 12


PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2004 12:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i have to say that i agree with you larryjf

javan , when Peter says "One day is as a thousand years...a thousand years as one day" ( 2 Peter 3:8 )
he says that for God time has no meaning , but where does he say that God = scripture ??
show me in what verse he says that ?
the scripture is inspired by God but it isn't God

and in revelation when john talks about those 1000 years he says 3 times "the thousand years " , hhmm that sounds to me like he means 1000 years and not just a very long period of time

you can't choose which dates and periods of time are literal and which aren't , either they all are or none of them are .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Javan
Fierce Puppy



Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 235

Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2004 3:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kris007 wrote:
he says that for God time has no meaning , but where does he say that God = scripture ??
show me in what verse he says that ?
the scripture is inspired by God but it isn't God


I fail to see what you point is in even asking this...??? I beg to differ that scripture is not God. No, we do not worship the physical book that we have, but that book states, "And the Word WAS God". The importance of the Bible is the Spirit behind the letter, not the letter itself.

Now, back to time:

In Revelation John states at one point a half-hour of silence in heaven. So, what is the purpose in mentioning this break in the action? How much time actually passed on earth? Do we know? No, we don't - the spiritual realm is not bound captive by time like we are.

Not that the whole point matters that much anyway. Very Happy
_________________
(Father God) Take this mask off - Let me see you with my own eyes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ron
Grizzly Bear



Joined: 27 Aug 2002
Posts: 750

Location: home, wa, usa

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 10:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kris007 wrote:
i just think that if you don't take the 1000 years literal , but just as a very long time then how long does it take before everyone else is judged ??
and what about the forever and ever then ? is that also just a very very long time and not the same as eternity ??


...a good explanation why we shouldn't take those 1000 years literal then be so free to post it


You are doing well to try and read Scripture in its proper context and should be commended on your questions. I hope this post helps.

We see the term "thousand" many, many times in Scripture. There are several accepted definitions for this term and it depends on the context in which it is used. Remember, context is king when translating meaning of Scripture.

When we see the word "thousand" in Genesis, Exodus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges,1 & 2 Samuel, 1 & 2 Kings, 1 & 2 Chronicles the meaning understood is derived from the Hebrew word "eleph". Originally derivation is from the Hebrew word "family" but eventually was used as a number. Thus in this context it is a countable number.

When we transition into the books of the Prophets, we see this term change considerably. This definition of the Greek word "chilioi", pronounced, "khil'-ee-oy" has the meaning of an undetermined but full measure of time. This definition is consistent in the context of Revelation as well. The only variation is Revelation 5:11 and 9:16 the author uses the Greek word "murias", defined as "innumerably many", still not representing a quantitative thought.

Now, you ask, what about eternity? Another good question.

The Greek term here is "eis", pronounced "ice". This carries the meaning of "abundant, far more exceeding, so much". When read with this understanding and in the context of, say Revelation 20:10, we see that we could indeed apply the meaning for our word eternity. It fits well within the context.
_________________
"He that hath ears to hear, let him hear." Matthew 11:15

Yours in Christ with much love,
Ron

http://www.arkwebshost.com/theology/ron
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
auntiem
Not So Newbie



Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Posts: 6


PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2004 10:15 am    Post subject: Church Fathers Take on this Reply with quote

larryjf wrote:
In response to Eli
Quote:
The 144,000 sealed are of all the tribes of Israel

The 144,000 are not from ALL the tribes of Israel. You will notice that the tribe of Dan is missing. And they place the tribes of Joseph and Mannasah as seperate tribes to make up for this difference.

Looking back to the blessings given to the tribes in Genesis 49:17 we read - Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path, that biteth the horse heels, so that his rider shall fall backward.
It may very well be that out of this tribe comes the false prophet.

It is interesting that normally Ephraim and Mannasah are mentioned as tribes but in Rev 7 it is Joseph and Mannasah. I'm not sure of the full implications of this, but on the OT God says that Ephraim is His firstborn - maybe that is a clue???


Hi All! I'm new here & just thought I'd share a bit I've read on this subject from "Irenaeus Against Heresies, Book V: Chapter XXX, 2.


[quote] These men, therefore, ought to learn [what really is the state of the case], and go back to the true number of the name, that they be not reckoned among false prophets. But, knowing the sure number declared by Scripture, that is, six hundred sixty and six, let them await, in the first place, the division of the kingdom into ten; then, in the next place, when these kings are reigning, and beginning to set their affairs in order, and advance their kingdom, [let them learn] to acknowledge that he who shall come claiming the kingdom for himself, and shall terrify those men of whom we have been speaking, having a name containing the aforesaid number, is truly the abomination of desolation. This, too, the apostle affirms: "When they shall say, Peace and safety, then sudden destruction shall come upon them." And Jeremiah does not merely point out his sudden coming, but he even indicates the tribe from which he shall come, where he says, "We shall hear the voice of his swift horses from Dan; the whole earth shall be moved by the voice of the neighing of his galloping horses: he shall also come and devour the earth, and the fulness thereof, the city also, and they that dwell therein." This, too, is the reason that this tribe is not reckoned in the Apocalypse along with those which are saved. [end of quote]

~Margie B.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
auntiem
Not So Newbie



Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Posts: 6


PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2004 10:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kris007 wrote:


but i think that it still means 1000 years , cause in rev 20:5 it says:

"But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This [is] the first resurrection."

[/b]


I have always wondered whether this could possibly have any connection to Matthew 27:51-53 "At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth shook and the rocks split. The tombs broke open and the bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life. They came out of the tombs, and after Jesus' resurrection they went into the holy city and appeared to many people."

There is no more mention of these holy people being raised to life, so there is little to go on, but this seems extremely important to me!! Could it be possible that this is connected to the "first resurrection"? Confused or disgusted
~Margie B.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zathrus
King Kong



Joined: 28 Aug 2002
Posts: 2270

Location: WI USA

PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2004 11:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mind if I volunteer my $.02? On the subject of the 144,000, read this description of them in Rev 7:
Quote:
"14 And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.
15 Therefore are they before the throne of God, and serve him day and night in his temple: and he that sitteth on the throne shall dwell among them.
16 They shall hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall the sun light on them, nor any heat.
17 For the Lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall feed them, and shall lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes."


Compare that with this description in Rev 22, commonly accepted as being of us Christians in our eternal state:
Quote:
"3 And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him:
4 And they shall see his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads.
5 And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever."


And this passage from Rev 21, also dealing with the church:
Quote:
"3 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.
4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away."


Moreover, the 144,000 are described in Rev 14 as having the Father's name written in their foreheads. Compare that with Rev 22:4 above.
I color coded sections of the passages above so you can easily see the parts of the description of the 144,000 that match up with descriptions of us believers.

It sure seems like the 144,000 is not a group of natural Jews, but a metaphorical description of the true Israel, those who are of faith.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
thunder
Lion King



Joined: 13 Sep 2003
Posts: 1222


PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2004 11:54 am    Post subject: 144,000 .... ? Reply with quote

144,000 .... ?

What an interesting position to take considering the ages past combined with the current billions per earth capita.

Trillions of people are known to have lived, died ... during the earth age ... and to think that a mere 144,000 are custom picked to fill a heavenly expance and eternal ether of everlasting immortality.

Heaven will be nearly hollow if that were true ... yes ... no ?

thunder
_________________
Submit to God in Christ
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Revelation and End of Times All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 5 of 8

 

© 2001-2007