Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Are the dead alive now


Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion.
Author Message
Ray J
Not So Newbie



Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 6

Location: PA

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:24 am    Post subject: Are the dead alive now Reply with quote

Are The Dead Alive Now ?
Good question, and I'll give it my best shot. We all know what the Church teaches, but what does God's Word say about it.
I'm all about looking at the big picture when it comes to the Bible so when I see 46 clear verses speak to a particular thought and a few that seem to be saying something else, well... majority wins.

I Thessalonians 4:13-17 "But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep will God bring with him. For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not precede them which are asleep. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, and with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God and the dead in Christ shall rise first: then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air and so shall we ever be with the Lord."

I Corinthians 11:30 "For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep." (and it's not talking about bed time)

I Corinthians 15:52 "In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed."

Job 14:12-14 "So a man lieth down, and riseth not till the heavens be no more, they shall not awake, nor be raised out of their sleep. O that thou wouldest hide me in the grave, that thou wouldest keep me secret, untill thy wrath be past, that thou wouldest appoint me a set time, and remember me! If a man die, shall he live again? all the days of my appointed time will I wait, till my change come."

Long before Jesus, the concept of an immediate afterlife in heaven or hell began with the Greeks, and later continued by the Romans. It was not taught in the Hebrew scriptures, and it was not believed by the Jews, except for certain sects of Jews which had adopted certain elements of Greek mythology into their doctrine. The Jews did not believe in an immediate afterlife in heaven, but in a future resurrection of the dead.

Daniel 12:2 "Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt."

Other verses that refer to death as sleep ...
I Kings 2:10 11:43 14:20 15:8 15:24 16:6 16:28 22:40 22:50
II Kings 8:24 10:35 13:9 13:13 14:16 14:22 14:29 15:7 15:22 15:38 16:20 20:21 21:18 24:6
II Chronicles 9:31 12:16 14:1 16:13 21:1 26:2 26:23 27:9 28:27 32:33 33:20
Psalms 13:3
Proverbs 3:24
Deuteronomy 31:16
II Samuel 7:12
Acts 13:36
Ephesians 5:14

John 3:13 "No one has ever gone to heaven except the one who came from heaven-the Son of Man."

What is the hope of the Church?
Your answer should be the return of Christ. If Satin wanted to cloud that hope, how would he go about doing that? How about promoting the idea that when you die, your eternal life starts at that point. Why wait or hope for the return when we are all floating around praising God and having a good old time now. The Church teaches that when we die we are somehow judged and either go to heaven or are sent to hell. Wait a minute, when is judgement day? Revelation places this event after the return of Christ. Why then, does the Church continue to believe that the dead are alive now?
I guess they are just not comfortable with the whole sleep thing or don't trust God to raise them from the dead when Christ returns as He promised.

The cool thing about sleep is that you do not sense the passage of time. At night in your bed, from the moment you fall asleep till the next morning, eight hours have passed, and to you, it was nothing. So it is for those who take their last breath. There is no passage of time. The next moment for them is the return of Christ. "And so shall we ever be with the Lord." Not bad, I say.


(Just a simple word study of "sleep" turned up some interesting truths.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pete
Big Lion



Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 992

Location: Arlington Hts., Il. USA

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi RJ, You are right on. Nowhere does the Bible teach that one goes immediately to heaven or hell at death.

Another interesting verse is 1 Corinthians 15:20-23; "But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept."
V 21; "For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection from the dead."
V.22 "For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive."
V.23 "But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming.

It is obvious that no one goes to heaven or hell immediately at death.

As a sidelight, this is when folks are born again, and not when they have an emotional "religious" experience, and become converted.

On another point, pretribulation rapture folks believe that Christ will return halfway to earth before the tribulation, and secretly resurrect the dead in Christ from their graves, along with the living, and take them back to heaven where they have already been. What's that about?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ragman13
German Shepherd



Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 325


PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello Ray J, Nice to meet you. I am not going to tell you that you are wrong or right, but I would like for you to address some passages and explain what is meant by them if we are not to be present with the Lord upon death.

1)
Luke 23:43
Quote:
And he said to him, “Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise.”


Was Christ lying to the man on the cross?

2)
Rev. 4:4
Quote:
Around the throne were mtwenty-four thrones, and seated on the thrones were twenty-four elders, nclothed in white garments, with ogolden crowns on their heads.

Who are the 24 elders if man is to be asleep until the return of Christ.
_________________
If Jesus Christ were to come today, people would not even crucify him. They would ask him to dinner, and hear what he had to say, and make fun of it. —Thomas Carlyle

Shh. Don't tell anyone that I am a Fundamentalist!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pete
Big Lion



Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 992

Location: Arlington Hts., Il. USA

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 3:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ragman13 wrote:
Hello Ray J, Nice to meet you. I am not going to tell you that you are wrong or right, but I would like for you to address some passages and explain what is meant by them if we are not to be present with the Lord upon death.

1)
Luke 23:43
Quote:
And he said to him, “Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise.”


Was Christ lying to the man on the cross?


Nope. Try moving the comma one word forward. Mark 16:9 is another example of misplacing a comma. It should be placed after risen, and not week.

Also, KJV says "to day", not "today." The words "to day" can have a future tense application, such as "that day"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mattathias
King of the Jungle



Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 1991

Location: Atlanta

PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete wrote:
Try moving the comma one word forward. Mark 16:9 is another example of misplacing a comma. It should be placed after risen, and not week.


The extant Greek manuscripts do not, with few exceptions, contain punctuation marks. The translators decsions about where and how to punctuate sentences may (or may not) reveal a personal bias on the part of the translator.

The comma may be moved as you suggest, but is it warranted? I think so.

Jesus stated precisely where he would be for three days and three nights (Matthew 12:40). The resurrected Jesus told Mary that he had "not yet ascended to the Father" (John 20:17). Jesus was resurrected to life from the grave ("the heart of the earth"). He came forth from the grave, not from Paradise.

Jesus has been resurrected to life. The dead who have placed their trust in Jesus, including the thief on the cross, are still in their graves - awaiting the return of Jesus and their own resurrection to life.

Moving the placement of the comma preserves the Christian hope of resurrection to life in the age to come.
_________________
"All wish to possess knowledge, but few, comparatively speaking, are willing to pay the price." - Juvenal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ragman13
German Shepherd



Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 325


PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Nope. Try moving the comma one word forward.
That sounds good but it doesn't work. It doesn't sound right. There is no other references to Jesus speaking this way. Its not even in the same clause.

So lets just agree to disagree on that one. What about Rev. 4:4? Who are the 24 elders?
_________________
If Jesus Christ were to come today, people would not even crucify him. They would ask him to dinner, and hear what he had to say, and make fun of it. —Thomas Carlyle

Shh. Don't tell anyone that I am a Fundamentalist!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mattathias
King of the Jungle



Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 1991

Location: Atlanta

PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ragman13 wrote:
That sounds good but it doesn't work. It doesn't sound right. There is no other references to Jesus speaking this way. Its not even in the same clause.


Do you think it would sound right if Paul spoke this way?
_________________
"All wish to possess knowledge, but few, comparatively speaking, are willing to pay the price." - Juvenal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pete
Big Lion



Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 992

Location: Arlington Hts., Il. USA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ragman13 wrote:


Rev. 4:4
Quote:
Around the throne were mtwenty-four thrones, and seated on the thrones were twenty-four elders, nclothed in white garments, with ogolden crowns on their heads.

Who are the 24 elders if man is to be asleep until the return of Christ.


One must remember that the book of Revelation is about what John saw when he was carried forward into the future through vision.

Rev. 4:2; "And immediately I was in the spirit:"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pete
Big Lion



Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 992

Location: Arlington Hts., Il. USA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Revelation 1:10 also tells us that the entire book is about the "Lord's Day", that is , Christ's yet future return. That's what Revelation is about - future events.

As an aside, Trinitarians insist that "Lord's day" here, is a reference to Sunday, and is proof that John observed the first day of the week instead of the seventh. Just shows you the length that Trins go to in twisting Scripture in order to justify their pagan practices.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ray J
Not So Newbie



Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 6

Location: PA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:49 am    Post subject: Are the dead alive now Reply with quote

Wow! I'm surprised to see the large response to my first post. Looks like I got people thinking. Thanks for taking the time to add your thoughts.
Ray J
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Nobby
Board - Admin



Joined: 16 Sep 2002
Posts: 5286

Location: Missouri

PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ray J, you have copied this same post on four different forums & this is against the rules. I will delete some of them.
Nobby, Board Admin
_________________
Much Love Nobby
CVP Smilies
dictionary Bible
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ragman13
German Shepherd



Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 325


PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete wrote:
Revelation 1:10 also tells us that the entire book is about the "Lord's Day", that is , Christ's yet future return. That's what Revelation is about - future events.
Ok thank you for that information, now if you could tell me who the 24 elders are in Rev. 4:4. In the passage Christ has not yet returned so there is a problem with your theory of soul sleep.


Matt wrote:
Do you think it would sound right if Paul spoke this way?

Matt come on man you know what I was getting at. Show me another passage where Christ speaks in this manner. I tell you the truth today? but not yesterday? This sounds more like something that Yoda would say in a starwars movie than Christ.
_________________
If Jesus Christ were to come today, people would not even crucify him. They would ask him to dinner, and hear what he had to say, and make fun of it. —Thomas Carlyle

Shh. Don't tell anyone that I am a Fundamentalist!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mattathias
King of the Jungle



Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 1991

Location: Atlanta

PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ragman13 wrote:
Matt come on man you know what I was getting at. Show me another passage where Christ speaks in this manner. I tell you the truth today? but not yesterday? This sounds more like something that Yoda would say in a starwars movie than Christ.


Yes, I understand what you were getting at. A few years ago I heard R.C. Sproul and his son (I don't recollect the son's name at the moment) discussing this issue on the radio. They rejected moving the comma for this very reason. (As best I remember now, it was the only objection they expressed.)

The point I was making is that scripture contains an example of Paul speaking this way. I've never heard anyone criticize the translation of Paul's statement.
_________________
"All wish to possess knowledge, but few, comparatively speaking, are willing to pay the price." - Juvenal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ragman13
German Shepherd



Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 325


PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matt wrote:
The point I was making is that scripture contains an example of Paul speaking this way.


What verse are you speaking of Matt?
_________________
If Jesus Christ were to come today, people would not even crucify him. They would ask him to dinner, and hear what he had to say, and make fun of it. —Thomas Carlyle

Shh. Don't tell anyone that I am a Fundamentalist!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mattathias
King of the Jungle



Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 1991

Location: Atlanta

PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ragman13 wrote:
What verse are you speaking of Matt?


Acts 20:26
_________________
"All wish to possess knowledge, but few, comparatively speaking, are willing to pay the price." - Juvenal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion. All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 

© 2001-2007