Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Witness Disfellowshipment


Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Jehovah's Witness
Author Message
Zathrus
King Kong



Joined: 28 Aug 2002
Posts: 2273

Location: WI USA

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:00 am    Post subject: Witness Disfellowshipment Reply with quote

Witnesses see themselves as trying to recreate the book of Acts church. Witness members on this forum have admitted they understand the 1st century church to have been controlling of its members, and see this as justification for the Witness organization being controlling and manipulating as well.

I must give the Witnesses credit for being honest about being controlling. As to whether the early church actually was, that is a matter of debate. I for one suspect that independent thought and freedom to receive and believe revelation from God were not prohibitted in the early church, as they are in the Witness organization today. But that is another topic.

One reason that the Witnesses believe themselves to be such a model of the 1st century book-of-Acts church is the fact they disfellowship "unrepentent wrongdoers". The following is something I read the other day on a website giving information on a variety of religious groups:

Quote:
The WBTS uses some of the most abusive and controlling tactics of all religious groups in keeping control of its membership. Individual members are expected to exhibit total, unquestioning obedience and loyalty to the directives of the Governing Body. Any expression of disagreement with any small point of doctrinal teaching or policy of the leadership may be grounds for disfellowshipment. And disfellowshipment in the JW organization imposes upon those still in the organization the requirement to practice total shunning of any disfellowshipped individuals. This even extends to close family members. Thus if a loyal adult JW has an adult son or daughter who was a member at one time but is now disfellowshipped, that parent is expected to have absolutely no fellowship with their own offspring. They are not to visit them in their home, invite them to family gatherings, or have any contact or communication with them at all except for the most perfunctory greetings or discussion necessary to take care of family business. This is not just true of situations in which the disfellowshipped person was perhaps removed from fellowship for valid biblical grounds such as being an unrepentant adulterer. Disfellowshipment within the ranks of JWs seems, from most of the evidence, to not often be imposed for such things. It is most often used as a method of dealing with those who have any questions at all about doctrines or policies of the Governing Body, and who thus might be expected to privately taint others with their questions. Even if their questions turn out to be totally valid, even if the Governing Body later changes its own mind and agrees that the question was valid, the disfellowshipment would stand. For the issue isn't truth, it is loyalty and obedience. And thus even if you knew your own mother had been disfellowshipped on false grounds, you would be absolutely bound to shun her unless or until she was officially reinstated into fellowship.


One thing I thought was interesting is that this writer observes that disfellowship is not as often imposed on Witness members whose behavior or lifestyle is considered immoral or a poor example of good Christian conduct. I find this interesting because I and others I know have observed the same thing. I know or know of Witnesses who have abused drugs and alchohol, and I know of a Witness woman who is currently cohabitating with a man she is not wed to.
I do not say these things to point a finger. In fact I hope anyone, Witness or otherwise, going through drug and alchohol problems seeks help.
I say bring these things up because as the writer of the article observed, these Witness members were/are allowed to continue attending Kingdom Hall meetings and give in the Witness offering. They are/were not disfellowshipped.

I am sure others here who personally know Witnesses have observed the same thing.

While it seems that going through a rough time in one's personal life is not grounds for disfellowshipment in practice, it does seem that disagreement on doctrinal matters and receiving greater revelation than what has been given to the Witness leadership is. This is equated with being proud and unteachable. Even if one is not disfellowshipped for having greater revelation than the leadership, going to Kingdom Hall meetings every week and knowing that your leaders there view you as proud and unteachable will soon make it not worth going anymore.

Have others here observed anything similar? Have any thoughts to share on this?
_________________
Establishing the law by receiving the righteousness which is by faith, without the deeds of the law!

2 Cor 3 "11For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious."

Certified Chalcedon Compliant
Officially approved in 451
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
holly102869
Fierce Poodle



Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 278

Location: Central, Florida USA

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zathrus,

It is like you read my mind. I was just going to post something similar to this about disfellowship. I am curious to why JW's judge their own people in this manner. To be disfellowshiped. Did Jesus do that or just the opposite? Did Jesus not love even his enemies?

This is the hardest thing to understand. This should be the big tip off to you guys that are JW's. Open your eyes and see the truth that God doesn't want you to bow before anyone or anything under the sun. You are bowing to the leaders that tell you how to act. You think your judgement day is close but you live in a communist society that tells you to judge.
_________________
Bless you,
Holly
Ask,Seek,Knock

For only you can Save yourself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wolvo
Alley Cat



Joined: 06 Jul 2008
Posts: 181


PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Zathrus, the act of disfellowshipping is so unchristian. I do not see love amongst this cult when it acts in this way.

This cult splits up families, i am sure witnesses here have seen examples of parents not speaking to children and vice versa because of their policy on disfellowshipping.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TBax
King Kong



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 2131


PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zathrus wrote:
Witness members on this forum have admitted they understand the 1st century church to have been controlling of its members,


What has actually been said is that your words condemn the first century Christians along with all other organizations. It is your criteria that condemns them. Rolling Eyes

Regarding disfellowshiping: If following the example of the first century Christians is wrong, then we are wrong. If following God's inspired word is wrong, then we are wrong.

1 Cor 5:9 In my letter I wrote YOU to quit mixing in company with fornicators, 10 not [meaning] entirely with the fornicators of this world or the greedy persons and extortioners or idolaters. Otherwise, YOU would actually have to get out of the world. 11 But now I am writing YOU to quit mixing in company with anyone called a brother that is a fornicator or a greedy person or an idolater or a reviler or a drunkard or an extortioner, not even eating with such a man. 12 For what do I have to do with judging those outside? Do YOU not judge those inside, 13 while God judges those outside? “Remove the wicked [man] from among yourselves.”

Was this opposed to Jesus teachings? Does following this scripture mean you do not have love?

Wolvo wrote:
This cult splits up families


Matt 10:34 Do not think I came to put peace upon the earth; I came to put, not peace, but a sword. 35 For I came to cause division, with a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a young wife against her mother-in-law. 36 Indeed, a man’s enemies will be persons of his own household. 37 He that has greater affection for father or mother than for me is not worthy of me; and he that has greater affection for son or daughter than for me is not worthy of me.


The truth does indeed seperate families for many different reasons. Mostly for people thinking we are weird for following it. Another proof the truth is here, with JW's. Very Happy
_________________
Agape,
TBax
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wolvo
Alley Cat



Joined: 06 Jul 2008
Posts: 181


PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
This cult splits up families


The following scripture is often used as "proof" that JW's have "the truth" when families get split up.

Matt 10:34
Do not think I came to put peace upon the earth; I came to put, not peace, but a sword. 35 For I came to cause division, with a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a young wife against her mother-in-law. 36 Indeed, a man’s enemies will be persons of his own household. 37 He that has greater affection for father or mother than for me is not worthy of me; and he that has greater affection for son or daughter than for me is not worthy of me.

Notice Jesus didn't say....

37He that has greater affection for father or mother than for the watchtower bible and tract society is not worthy of me; and he that has greater affection for son or daughter than for the watchtower bible and tract society is not worthy of me.

Yet this is how the WTBTS construe this verse.

Quote:
The truth does indeed seperate families for many different reasons. Mostly for people thinking we are weird for following it. Another proof the truth is here, with JW's.


It is a shame when a JW offers this as a "proof" that they have the truth, yet at the same time cannot defend doctrine.

John 13:35
"By this all will know that you are my disciples if you have love among yourselves."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wolvo
Alley Cat



Joined: 06 Jul 2008
Posts: 181


PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 10:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JW's also use this scripture in support of their disfellowshipping stance...

1 Cor 5:9 In my letter I wrote YOU to quit mixing in company with fornicators, 10 not [meaning] entirely with the fornicators of this world or the greedy persons and extortioners or idolaters. Otherwise, YOU would actually have to get out of the world. 11 But now I am writing YOU to quit mixing in company with anyone called a brother that is , not even eating with such a man. 12 For what do I have to do with judging those outside? Do YOU not judge those inside, 13 while God judges those outside? “Remove the wicked [man] from among yourselves.”

Notice it didn't say do not speak to or acknowledge them.

Notice also that it didn't mention all the invented rules that The Watctower Bible and Tract Society use when applying to disfellowship. Neither does it mention someone who disassociates him/herself.

The scripture only mentions ... "a fornicator or a greedy person or an idolater or a reviler or a drunkard or an extortioner"

In applying this scripture to their disfellowshipping rule, they yet again twist a verse to fit into the Watchtower Bible and Tract Societies and not Jesus' regulations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Luvnlife
Lion King



Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 1271

Location: US

PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am a disfellowshipped JW. I did not do immoral or illegal acts to get disfellowshipped. My family asked to be disfellowshipped/disassociated about 1979.

There were several things that happened within the church along with a couple of outside factors that influenced our decision. I have spoken about a couple of very painful issues that occurred within the church in other posts and I am choosing not to re-hash them again in this thread but I would like to emphasize that there were doctrinal issues as well that came in to play when our family decided to secede from the organization.

I thought at one point that I may want to go back. I did start attending meetings again. Some people I had known for years came up to me at this time and told me they were glad to see me there and asked how I was doing. I was pulled aside by the elders and told that I could not speak to anyone there because of my disfellowshipped status. Some of the 'brethren' there were pulled aside also and rebuked for speaking to me.

I continued going but I missed a meeting. The so-called 'brothers/elders' got up in front of the congregation during my abscence and told the congregation from the altar/podium that they could not speak to me at all. I found this out at the last meeting I ever attended there.

My mother became a JW in good standing again and was told by the elders that she cannot associate with me. My brothers were never baptized so they were only 'disassociated' from the organization. My mother was allowed to see them but not me. She told me that I was not to come to her house to visit, she would not come to visit me and that if we saw each other in public or at a family reunion for example that we could exchange pleasantries (in other words, say hello) but we could not associate with one another. I told her if that's the way she feels, don't even bother saying hello. My siblings got wind of this and told my mother that if she doesn't associate with me, they would have nothing to do with her. A few months later, she said she changed her mind, said she loved me and she just couldn't do that. I have always believed that she changed her mind because of my siblings and not because of her love for me.

How's that for God-fearing Christians?

Luv
_________________
Matthew 6:21
For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.
Biblegateway Christian Viewpoints
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
MoJo
Moderator



Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 3397

Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 9:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My brother was disfellowshipped when he was just nineteen years old and living at home. He made the mistake of confessing to the elders something he did wrong and they disfellowshipped him without ever speaking to my parents. My parents only found out to their shock on the meeting night that they announced it.

The offence was inappropriate behavior with a witness girl. Not intercourse, but heavy petting and he told them about it. Part of the problem is allowing people who are really too young to become dedicated.

That was the end of our relationship with the witnesses, but it caused years of grief, so I suggest to all witnesses that they never confess their wrongdoings.

Actually, I really believe that there were underlying motives and that they looked for an occassion against my parents.

Sad Sad
_________________
matt 6: 34 "Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zathrus
King Kong



Joined: 28 Aug 2002
Posts: 2273

Location: WI USA

PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 3:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TBax wrote:
The truth does indeed seperate families for many different reasons. Mostly for people thinking we are weird for following it. Another proof the truth is here, with JW's. Very Happy
No doubt, the more wierd it is, the more it must be God's Truth. Laughing Laughing
_________________
Establishing the law by receiving the righteousness which is by faith, without the deeds of the law!

2 Cor 3 "11For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious."

Certified Chalcedon Compliant
Officially approved in 451
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TBax
King Kong



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 2131


PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 4:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

1 Tim 5:22 Never lay your hands hastily upon any man; neither be a sharer in the sins of others; preserve yourself chaste.


2 John 1:9 Everyone that pushes ahead and does not remain in the teaching of the Christ does not have God. He that does remain in this teaching is the one that has both the Father and the Son. 10 If anyone comes to YOU and does not bring this teaching, never receive him into YOUR homes or say a greeting to him. 11 For he that says a greeting to him is a sharer in his wicked works.



Disfellowshipping is discipline to the wrong doer, and an act that keeps the congregation clean.

Heb 12:11 True, no discipline seems for the present to be joyous, but grievous; yet afterward to those who have been trained by it it yields peaceable fruit, namely, righteousness.

You can accept it or deny it. The choice is yours. You are alway welcome back if you can accept the discipline. Cool


luvnlife, if you had enough knowledge to be dedicated and baptized, you should have known they weren't to talk to you. If you want to be offended, you will find a way to be offended. Sad Even Jesus offended people, but not those who truly followed him. They looked for reasons to stay. Now that I know you are disfellowshipped I will no longer talk to you either. Sad

Mojo wrote:
Part of the problem is allowing people who are really too young to become dedicated.


Facinating!!! Some are claiming too much control, and others are claiming not enough ??????????????????????????????????


Matt 11:18 Correspondingly, John came neither eating nor drinking, yet people say, ‘He has a demon’; 19 the Son of man did come eating and drinking, still people say, ‘Look! A man gluttonous and given to drinking wine, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.’ All the same, wisdom is proved righteous by its works.”

No matter what you do, people will complain and condemn. Rolling Eyes
_________________
Agape,
TBax
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 1094


PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 5:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

luvnlife wrote:
I am a disfellowshipped JW. I did not do immoral or illegal acts to get disfellowshipped. My family asked to be disfellowshipped/disassociated about 1979.


Was that because of the 1975 thing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 1094


PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MoJo wrote:
My brother was disfellowshipped when he was just nineteen years old and living at home. He made the mistake of confessing to the elders something he did wrong and they disfellowshipped him without ever speaking to my parents. My parents only found out to their shock on the meeting night that they announced it.

The offence was inappropriate behavior with a witness girl. Not intercourse, but heavy petting and he told them about it. Part of the problem is allowing people who are really too young to become dedicated.

That was the end of our relationship with the witnesses, but it caused years of grief, so I suggest to all witnesses that they never confess their wrongdoings.


Interesting suggestion. I wonder how many JWs learn to stay under the radar in this way.

Quote:

Actually, I really believe that there were underlying motives and that they looked for an occassion against my parents.

Sad Sad


So I take it that their revoking membership was a political rather than a biblical reason? JWs really allow this? No appeal process? That's it?

I still find it hard to take in how confessing to heavy foreplay which didn't lead to sexual intercourse led to such a final action. Unless he didn't promise he was not going to do it again to the same or other girls. Wink (Just kidding)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 1094


PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TBax wrote:
1 Tim 5:22 Never lay your hands hastily upon any man; neither be a sharer in the sins of others; preserve yourself chaste.


2 John 1:9 Everyone that pushes ahead and does not remain in the teaching of the Christ does not have God. He that does remain in this teaching is the one that has both the Father and the Son. 10 If anyone comes to YOU and does not bring this teaching, never receive him into YOUR homes or say a greeting to him. 11 For he that says a greeting to him is a sharer in his wicked works.



Disfellowshipping is discipline to the wrong doer, and an act that keeps the congregation clean.

Heb 12:11 True, no discipline seems for the present to be joyous, but grievous; yet afterward to those who have been trained by it it yields peaceable fruit, namely, righteousness.

You can accept it or deny it. The choice is yours. You are alway welcome back if you can accept the discipline. Cool



Makes sense.

Question: Are there any safeguards? Any checks and balances? Anything to make sure there is no abuse of power?

Mojo implied that her brother was kicked out for other than Biblical reasons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wolvo
Alley Cat



Joined: 06 Jul 2008
Posts: 181


PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JW's also use 2 John 1:9-11 as a reason for not giving a greeting or acknowledgment to a disfellowshipped person....

"Everyone that pushes ahead and does not remain in the teaching of the Christ does not have God. He that does remain in this teaching is the one that has both the Father and the Son. 10 If anyone comes to YOU and does not bring this teaching, never receive him into YOUR homes or say a greeting to him. 11 For he that says a greeting to him is a sharer in his wicked works. "


However if you look just two verses beforehand in v7 and put 9-11 in context....

"For many deceivers have gone forth into the world, persons not confessing Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist."

I'll let the reader make their own mind up as to who John was applyin 9-11 to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7005

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting thread.

I counseled a JW lady a couple of years ago who was disfellowshipped after leaving her husband. He was a drug user/dealer, adulterer, and abuser.

After a few years of suffering his behavior she decided it was best for her and her child's lives to leave him. The elders apparently thought this was inappropriate and disfellowshipped her. He's still with the JW's although he did get a 'talking to' from the elders regarding his behavior, which as of this date has not changed.
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Jehovah's Witness All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 1 of 10

 

© 2001-2007