Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

South Carolina is so gay!



 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Homosexuality and the Bible
Author Message
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 1094


PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:30 pm    Post subject: South Carolina is so gay! Reply with quote

Anyone heard about this ad campaign?

http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/business/story/517808.html

Thoughts?

Should a city promote, encourage, and entice homosexual tourism locally and abroad?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Key of Twilight
Big Hamster



Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 97


PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why not? Homosexuality is not contagious and the advertisements will not turn unsuspecting readers gay and its not saying being gay is okay... All it says is hey if you are gay come here we will not chase you out of town or gay bash you. Homosexuals are a great market for things like tourism etc since a great percentage of homosexuals do not have children.
_________________
Nowhere does the Bible state that the sexual orientation of homosexuality is sinful — it merely instructs anyone, gay or straight, that any sexual act that does not spring from a place of love, respect and commitment to the other person involved is sinful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 1094


PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Key of Twilight wrote:
Why not? Homosexuality is not contagious and the advertisements will not turn unsuspecting readers gay and its not saying being gay is okay... All it says is hey if you are gay come here we will not chase you out of town or gay bash you. Homosexuals are a great market for things like tourism etc since a great percentage of homosexuals do not have children.


May not be contagious but it is repulsive to me. On Saturday me and one of my cousins sat down for a free concert in the park. These two guys in front of us were just touchy, feely, play-me on their beach blanket to an extent that after five minutes my cousin told me he just HAS TO MOVE and wanted to sit somewhere else.

I tried my best to look over them and enjoy the concert going on the stage. But I didn't blame my cousin's revulsion.

Sometimes I wish the homosexuals kept their act in the closet rather than putting it into the face of people. Certainly advertizing for that kind of behavior is not going to benefit anybody except drive the people out to some other city which they can enjoy with their familes and young ones where they don't have to have this in their faces.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FFT
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 6337

Location: Memphis

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ryck wrote:
May not be contagious but it is repulsive to me.
Awwww

Ryck wrote:
On Saturday me and one of my cousins sat down for a free concert in the park. These two guys in front of us were just touchy, feely, play-me on their beach blanket to an extent that after five minutes my cousin told me he just HAS TO MOVE and wanted to sit somewhere else.
This is the correct response anyway. If it bothers you, move. I do the same (or ignore it) when I see any couple making out, regardless of their genders.

Ryck wrote:
Sometimes I wish the homosexuals kept their act in the closet rather than putting it into the face of people. Certainly advertizing for that kind of behavior is not going to benefit anybody except drive the people out to some other city which they can enjoy with their familes and young ones where they don't have to have this in their faces.
How is it inherently any more repulsive than heterosexuals doing the same thing beyond that homosexuality apparently makes you uncomfortable?

I mean, do you feel like you should have been consulted or something?
_________________
When Science was in its crib, Religion tried to strangle it. When Science was in its infancy, Religion tried to abuse it. Now that Science is grown up, Religion wants to be in its good graces.

Theology is philosophy/ethics for people who already know what conclusion they want to come to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 1094


PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FFT wrote:
Ryck wrote:
May not be contagious but it is repulsive to me.
Awwww


I know you don't have feelings. LOL!


FFT wrote:

Ryck wrote:
On Saturday me and one of my cousins sat down for a free concert in the park. These two guys in front of us were just touchy, feely, play-me on their beach blanket to an extent that after five minutes my cousin told me he just HAS TO MOVE and wanted to sit somewhere else.
This is the correct response anyway. If it bothers you, move. I do the same (or ignore it) when I see any couple making out, regardless of their genders.


I don't mind romance between the sexes. I like it. I think if heterosexuals and homosexuals want to foreplay, they should go rent a room rather than doing it in the park where people are TRYING to see and listen to a concert with their children around.

If these people wanted to smoke ten pound stogies, I'd move to another section of the park too. But why INSIST on being an annoyance to others? Why can't you just maintain a common denominator of behavior with everyone else for just a couple of hours?

Or, as I said, just leave, get a motel room, and take care of your business.

FFT wrote:

Ryck wrote:
Sometimes I wish the homosexuals kept their act in the closet rather than putting it into the face of people. Certainly advertizing for that kind of behavior is not going to benefit anybody except drive the people out to some other city which they can enjoy with their familes and young ones where they don't have to have this in their faces.
How is it inherently any more repulsive than heterosexuals doing the same thing beyond that homosexuality apparently makes you uncomfortable?

I mean, do you feel like you should have been consulted or something?


Is that like a smoker asking me if they can light up a cigarette in my presense?

Sure, it would be nice. I'll tell them that I'm sensitive to tobacoo smoke and would appreciate their refraining from that for the duration.

Then after that you have those that do it anyway or those that are considerate. I appreciate the latter because I've seen too much assuming of the former.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FFT
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 6337

Location: Memphis

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ryck wrote:
I don't mind romance between the sexes. I like it. I think if heterosexuals and homosexuals want to foreplay, they should go rent a room rather than doing it in the park where people are TRYING to see and listen to a concert with their children around.

If these people wanted to smoke ten pound stogies, I'd move to another section of the park too. But why INSIST on being an annoyance to others? Why can't you just maintain a common denominator of behavior with everyone else for just a couple of hours?

Or, as I said, just leave, get a motel room, and take care of your business.
The problem here isn't their resspective gender, but that they're inconsiderate people. Why not leave it at that?
_________________
When Science was in its crib, Religion tried to strangle it. When Science was in its infancy, Religion tried to abuse it. Now that Science is grown up, Religion wants to be in its good graces.

Theology is philosophy/ethics for people who already know what conclusion they want to come to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7005

Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agree = FFT
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Evee
Moderator



Joined: 13 Sep 2005
Posts: 676


PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ryck,

Seems to me that you were repulsed by the PDA, not the homosexuality. If the couple were sitting there holding hands enjoying the show as you were, it probably would not have bothered you. Although I could be wrong.
_________________
Don't get caught in the trap of thinking you know everything God has to say b/c you've read the Bible. Remember, God is STILL speaking. And surprisingly, through people we DON'T expect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 1094


PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 7:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FFT wrote:
Ryck wrote:
I don't mind romance between the sexes. I like it. I think if heterosexuals and homosexuals want to foreplay, they should go rent a room rather than doing it in the park where people are TRYING to see and listen to a concert with their children around.

If these people wanted to smoke ten pound stogies, I'd move to another section of the park too. But why INSIST on being an annoyance to others? Why can't you just maintain a common denominator of behavior with everyone else for just a couple of hours?

Or, as I said, just leave, get a motel room, and take care of your business.
The problem here isn't their resspective gender, but that they're inconsiderate people. Why not leave it at that?


Granted, they were inconsiderate people. Perhaps they wanted to add an extra level of disgust to the inconsideration in a family forum. It was their gender that raised the shock value so it played a factor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 1094


PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Evee wrote:
Ryck,

Seems to me that you were repulsed by the PDA, not the homosexuality. If the couple were sitting there holding hands enjoying the show as you were, it probably would not have bothered you. Although I could be wrong.


Sorry, I don't know "PDA".

If they were holding hands I can look above them and ignore them if they just stayed still. But they just kept touching and fondling between themselves. The motion in my periphery kept catching my attention to what they were doing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003
Posts: 7005

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Public Display of Affection
_________________
JP's Mind - my blog


Psa 118:8 It is better to trust and take refuge in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
FFT
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 6337

Location: Memphis

PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ryck wrote:
Perhaps they wanted to add an extra level of disgust to the inconsideration in a family forum.
Or they were just inconsiderate. Are you actually pondering whether they were intentionally doing it to make people uncomfortable?

Ryck wrote:
It was their gender that raised the shock value so it played a factor.
No doubt.

Ryck wrote:
Sorry, I don't know "PDA".
"Public Display(s) of Affection"

Ryck wrote:
If they were holding hands I can look above them and ignore them if they just stayed still. But they just kept touching and fondling between themselves. The motion in my periphery kept catching my attention to what they were doing.
Maybe you're just overly concerned with the actions of others, then? Particularly to those of the same gender for its "shock value."
_________________
When Science was in its crib, Religion tried to strangle it. When Science was in its infancy, Religion tried to abuse it. Now that Science is grown up, Religion wants to be in its good graces.

Theology is philosophy/ethics for people who already know what conclusion they want to come to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Ryck
Lion King



Joined: 05 Dec 2002
Posts: 1094


PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 9:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FFT wrote:
Ryck wrote:
Perhaps they wanted to add an extra level of disgust to the inconsideration in a family forum.
Or they were just inconsiderate. Are you actually pondering whether they were intentionally doing it to make people uncomfortable?


It's no secret or shouldn't be these days.

For example, in Gay Pride parades you often see obscene behavior. They are doing that intentionally to make people uncomfortable or are we straight people just imagining things?

I guess I missed the notice that waving dildos into the air was not supposed to be interpreted as anything but family valued entertainment.

Quote:

Ryck wrote:
If they were holding hands I can look above them and ignore them if they just stayed still. But they just kept touching and fondling between themselves. The motion in my periphery kept catching my attention to what they were doing.
Maybe you're just overly concerned with the actions of others, then? Particularly to those of the same gender for its "shock value."


No. But when it is done in your face, its hard not to miss it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Key of Twilight
Big Hamster



Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 97


PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ryck wrote:
For example, in Gay Pride parades you often see obscene behavior. They are doing that intentionally to make people uncomfortable or are we straight people just imagining things?

I guess I missed the notice that waving dildos into the air was not supposed to be interpreted as anything but family valued entertainment.


First let it be known that we are not all like the people you see in the parades, not implying that you were saying we were, but all the same let it be known. The people committing these "obscene behaviors" are acting out against a society they have devalued because it has demoralized them their entire lives. There is a large percentage of the gay community that are reaching out for something anything to give their life meaning and when the are constantly told wherever they go that they have no seat in the house of God they find other places to go. These things being not of God are of the world and of sin. WE TURN GAY PEOPLE AGAINST GOD. So when we see people striking out against us with obscene behavior we should not recoil or think lowly of them, we should feel sympathy and show them Jesus loves all of us just the way we are, He may not approve of the things we do but he loves us none the less. We should not tell them "God will love you only if you become straight or celibate". Whether it is we ourselves, or someone else that has told a gay person that they are unwanted in the Kingdom of God, we should take responsibility for it. We are the children of God, each and everyone of us, and to just let people slip away from God because of what someone said and justifying ourselves with "I was not the person who said it it is not my problem" we are doing a terrible disservice to our Lord and to our brothers and sisters here on Earth.

Ryck wrote:
If they were holding hands I can look above them and ignore them if they just stayed still. But they just kept touching and fondling between themselves. The motion in my periphery kept catching my attention to what they were doing.


You are singling the gay couple out just because of who they are and because they were by you. If it had been a straight couple doing the same thing it is unlikely you would be on here talking about it.
_________________
Nowhere does the Bible state that the sexual orientation of homosexuality is sinful — it merely instructs anyone, gay or straight, that any sexual act that does not spring from a place of love, respect and commitment to the other person involved is sinful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Homosexuality and the Bible All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

© 2001-2007