Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

How Were People in the Old Testament Saved?


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Bible Doctrine
Author Message
JB
Lion King



Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 1075


PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GospelCompilation,

I went back to the Greek LXX and this is what I found in regards to Genesis 2:7.

Since I have very little knowledge of the Hebrew, I rely on the LXX for Old Testament parsing.

kai eplasen o qeos ton anqrwpon coun apo thv ghv kai enefushsen eiv to proswpon autou pnohn zwhv kai egeneto o anqrwpoV eiV yuchn zwsan

And God formed the dust person from the earth - and breathed into his face a breath of life. And the person became a living soul.

If God had breathed into him physically, the proper Greek word would have been en. That isn't the case.

The Old Testament also offers another idea about the breath. It was the giving of the human soul.

Here is a Hebrew break down from a site I frequent.

Word study

1) The letter waw, means and. Verb yasar means fashion, form. It differs from bara, to create (Gen 1:1) and asa, to make or do (Gen 1:16). This word is used when something is made from something else (for instance a jar from clay).

2) YHWH Elohim: The second creation Name of God. See our article on that Name in the Name Vault

3) Et-ha-adam. The particle et is usually not translated. It's a grammatical label, denoting either the accusative, or a proximity. The letter ha is like our word the, although it is much rarer. It stresses the subject. Adam means man in the sense of being a corporeal being. The adjacent word adamah (here number 6) means acre or arable ground.

4) Apar is the common word for dry, fine crumbs of earth.

5) The preposition min means from, but generally indicates a separation. The phrase "dust from the ground" does not simply mean earth-dust, but dust taken from the earth. In Genesis 2:6 the same word is used when we see a mist rise from the earth.

6) Adamah is the feminine derivation of the root 'dm of which adam is the masculine word. It means ground, acre or arable ground.

7) Again the letter waw, meaning and. The verb napah means breathe, breathe out, blow.

8) The letter beth means in. Ap means nose or nostril, and comes from the root anep, meaning anger, possibly because anger is shown by violently breathing or snorting.

9) The word neshama is usually translated with breath, although it indicates a typical sign of life, much rather than the mechanical intake of air. Sometimes it is even translated with mind or spirit.

10) Hayim is the general word for life, or living.

11) Again the letter waw, meaning and. The verb haya is the regular word for to be, but it must be stressed that the Hebrew reckons being after behavior. For a closer look at to be in Hebrew, take a brief detour to our article to be is to do.

12) Same as 3.

13) The particle lamed (to, at, for) indicates direction or location. Instances that this particle may denote a transition are highly debatable. Commonly a relation is indicated between an object and something else. Even in the 1 Cor 15:45 quote, the particle eis, a particle with the primary idea of motion into or towards a thing, is generally ignored:


14) The word nepesh denotes the difficult concept of soul or even appetite, yearning or craving. Perhaps this word most fundamentally indicates the difference between living things and inanimate things: the having of a preference, and the ability to act upon it. We claim that Genesis 2:7 tells about the making of a primary unit or building block for the realm of life (see our article on the Chaotic Set Theory. The preceding realm, that of matter, has energy for a soul, which existed before the initiation of the primary unit we call the atom. The succeeding realm, that of mind, has the conscious creature as unit, and multicellular sub-consciousness existed before its initiation in closely knitted communities of single-cellular organisms. The fourth realm is the realm of Christ, which will begin at the Second Coming, and which was preceded by the outpour of the Holy Spirit. Likewise is life initiated in the material realm (day five), long before its primary unit is established in Adam2:7 .

15) Same as 11.

Hence we have:
Genesis 2:7, "And YHWH Elohim made the earthling a building block and blew into his nostrils the breath of life, and he became the earthling for the life soul "

There seems to be a difference between your idea and that of the LXX and this particular translator. I doubt highly that God breathed into man but more likely upon man. (eis)

JB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JB
Lion King



Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 1075


PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 1:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GospelCompilation'

You said:

The Hebrew word ruach can be translated as "breath, spirit, or wind,"

This is true, but in Genesis 2:7 ruach wasn't used. Is there another word for ruach that means the same thing?

I keep studying this and I don't find any thing that leads me to the Spirit that moved over the face of the deep, only this word and definition:

n@shamah {nesh-aw-maw'}
Word Origin:
from 5395
TWOT:
1433a
Part of Speech:
noun feminine
Usage in the KJV:
breath 17, blast 3, spirit 2, inspiration 1, souls 1

Total: 24
Definition:

1. breath, spirit
1. breath (of God)
2. breath (of man)
3. every breathing thing
4. spirit (of man)

If you could would share how you arrived at ruach, I would appreciate it.

JB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JimD
Bear Cub



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 630


PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
GC, and Wife said:God's breath is God's Spirit and vice versa.


Beautiful! I probably do not need to tell you but more to let you know where I am coming from. Hebrew, and Greek scholarship are wonderful but cannot be relied on totally for all the answers, especially if pushed to literal extreme. We must rely on the Spirit to recognize, and teach us the truth, and even then we don't always get it. This just motivates me to keep on searching, and realize what an awesome God we are trying to learn more about. I own a Greek lexicon, and have about ten hours training on how to use it, pitiful, right.

So, to carry this a step further, do you believe people in the Old Testament who embraced God in faith, had the Holy Spirit of God abiding in them or was he just among or upon them? I hope this does not seem like a silly question in view of what we have already discussed. Also I am still wondering why you stopped at John the Baptist in a previous post. I hope I am not becoming obnoxious.
_________________
Anyone can point out a scripture here and there and prove anything they want to believe, but good theology is understanding the message of the gospel as a whole. Sincerely, JimD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JimD
Bear Cub



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 630


PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The following is from the International Standard Bible Dictionary : Ezk 37:5,6,8,9,10). The examples cited, however, and other passages reveal a lack of uniformity of usage. Yet generally XAwRis the expression, HMÆŠÆNi,the principle, of life. Yet when employed of God they of course signify the principle, not of His own life, but of that imparted to His creatures. “Breathe” in EV of the OT requires no remark except at Ps 27:12 (“such as breathe out cruelty”), from XPÁYF,“to breathe hard,” “to snort” (compare Acts 9:1). In the NT “breath” pnohÉ occurs once Acts 17:25 in the plain sense of vital principle, the gift of God. “Breathed” is employed in Jn 20:22 of our Lord’s concrete symbolism of the giving of the Spirit. to His disciples (Mt 28:19). As the agent in redemption and sanctification His work is glorified by lives “renewed” in the very “spirit of the mind” — a collocation of terms which has puzzled many interpreters (Eph 4:23,24), where pneuma and nous appear together, to indicate a renewal which is all-embracing, `renewed in the spirit of your mind, so that the new man is put on, created in righteousness and true holiness’ (see also Jn 14:17,26; 15:26; 16:13; 1 Cor 12:11, etc.).
_________________
Anyone can point out a scripture here and there and prove anything they want to believe, but good theology is understanding the message of the gospel as a whole. Sincerely, JimD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JimD
Bear Cub



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 630


PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Drawing from all available resources available, it seems to me that, one body, and one spirit equal one soul. As I read the scripture with this in mind, it makes sense about 98% of the time.
_________________
Anyone can point out a scripture here and there and prove anything they want to believe, but good theology is understanding the message of the gospel as a whole. Sincerely, JimD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
GospelCompilation
Grizzly Bear



Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 709

Location: Arizona

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JB wrote:
"In Genesis 2:7 ruach wasn't used."

HaHa! Remember when I said, "we're probably wrong anyway"? Well, this is a perfect example of being wrong.

Yes, Genesis 2:7 uses the Hebrew word neshawmaw, which means (literally), "breath." So, yes, God blew His breath into Adam's nostrils - not His Spirit (which would have been indicated by the Hebrew word, ruach). I stand corrected.

What my wife wants to know is:

Was the breath that God blew into Adam's nostrils His Spirit, or was it something else? We need to be careful that we don't try to defend an idea once the idea is proved incorrect; however, we also want to be careful that we don't discredit the entire idea, just because one part of the idea was incorrect. So... if we may...

JB wrote:
"If you could, would you share how you arrived at ruach, I would appreciate it."

As stated before, we incorrectly used ruach, when neshawmaw should have been used instead.

However, I'm sure we can still answer the question, Where did we get the idea that God breathed His Spirit into Adam? We got it from a similar experience with Jesus, recorded in John 20:22, when He "breathed on the disciples and said, 'Receive the holy Spirit'."

We've always understood this to be a parallel to Genesis 2:7. Especially since (we assume) the same words for breathe were used. Thank you, JB, for pointing out this discrepancy. It seems we need to be more careful with our assumptions, eh?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MoJo
Moderator



Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 3397

Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't know if this helps, but according to Ezekial which uses the same word for breath, interpretation would indicate this is the same thing as the Holy Spirit.

Eze 37:9 Then said he unto me, Prophesy unto the wind, prophesy, son of man, and say to the wind, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live.

Eze 37:10 So I prophesied as he commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army.
Eze 37:11 ¶ Then he said unto me, Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel: behold, they say, Our bones are dried, and our hope is lost: we are cut off for our parts.
Eze 37:12 Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel.
Eze 37:13 And ye shall know that I [am] the LORD, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves,

Eze 37:14 **And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, ** (the breath that breathed on them that they may live in verse 9 ) and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the LORD have spoken [it], and performed [it], saith the LORD.

You will also notice that verse 9 says breathe upon, but verse 10 says **into** and 14 says *put my spirit **in** you* effectively making "upon" and "into" and "in" all the same thing.

Smile Smile
_________________
matt 6: 34 "Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JimD
Bear Cub



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 630


PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
GC said: What my wife wants to know is:

Was the breath that God blew into Adam's nostrils His Spirit, or was it something else?


Since the scripture is saying, Eccl.12:7, that it returns to God, I doubt that it was only the ability to live, and breath. But more likely to be a spirit with the ability to have a relationship with God, since it came from God. Paul also speaks of dying and being with the Lord or remaining alive for the benefit of those still living. It seems to me that only a spirit that came from God could loose and possibly reform a relationship and then return to him.
_________________
Anyone can point out a scripture here and there and prove anything they want to believe, but good theology is understanding the message of the gospel as a whole. Sincerely, JimD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JB
Lion King



Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 1075


PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

GospelCompilation,


You said: "My wife wants to know"

Quote:
Was the breath that God blew into Adam's nostrils His Spirit, or was it something else?


One of the struggles I have is with the idea of in the nostrils. The LXX said upon the face. It is very possible that in the nostrils was an ancient Hebrew idiom.

Another concern that I have is that the Old Testament that we read is biased. It was developed by the Mosorets. We know the Old Testament as the Masoretic Text. (AV) This text wasn't written by Christians for Christians but by Jews who believed that Jesus wasn't the Messiah and Hence I believe there was a bias in their interpretation. By the way, they used the LXX for most of their translations and we see discrepancies between the two texts.

In the original thread, JimD and I discussed the work of the Holy Spirit in the Old Testament. I maintained that the Holy Spirit didn't dwell in people but came upon them And this only happened to Prophets, Priests , Kings and some times Judges.

As a result of our debate, I found only one verse in the entire Old Testament that remotely suggested that the Holy Spirit could dwell in people. I spent countless hours on this subject. I did word studies in the LXX which I believe is superior to the Old Testament used by the English reader.

In the New testament Jesus said, "I must leave so that the comforter can come. I believe that He meant just that.If you would like, I could cut and paste some of my old quotes in the other post if they still exist.

JB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JimD
Bear Cub



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 630


PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 5:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

JB said:One of the struggles I have is with the idea of in the nostrils. The LXX said upon the face. It is very possible that in the nostrils was an ancient Hebrew idiom.


Whether it is in the nostrils or upon the face, this is obviously a statement that God imparted something of himself to a lifeless form, and what is God? What Image of God did this lifeless form take on that was able to commune, and have a relationship with him? was it only the ability to brethe, and live, like an animal? I believe it included the very image of God, ("God is Spirit"), "in the image of God he created him" thats what the scripture says. Here is where I have been referring to scholarship failing you, if you do not listen to the Spirit now, you will not get it.
_________________
Anyone can point out a scripture here and there and prove anything they want to believe, but good theology is understanding the message of the gospel as a whole. Sincerely, JimD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JimD
Bear Cub



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 630


PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 6:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

God is sitting in Heaven when a scientist says to Him, "Lord, we
don't need you anymore. Science has finally figured out a way to
create life out of nothing.

In other words, we can now do what you did in the 'beginning'."

"Oh, is that so? Tell me..." replies God.

"Well", says the scientist, "we can take dirt and form it into
the likeness of you and breathe life into it, thus creating man."

"Well, that's interesting. Show Me."

So the scientist bends down to the earth and starts to mold the
soil.

"Oh no, no, no..." interrupts God,

"Get your own dirt."
_________________
Anyone can point out a scripture here and there and prove anything they want to believe, but good theology is understanding the message of the gospel as a whole. Sincerely, JimD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
GospelCompilation
Grizzly Bear



Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 709

Location: Arizona

PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JB wrote:
"In the original thread, JimD and I discussed the work of the Holy Spirit in the Old Testament. I maintained that the Holy Spirit didn't dwell in people but came upon them. And this only happened to prophets, priests , kings and some times judges."

Here is where my wife and I must depend on the English translation, as it would take too long to get into the Hebrew... so we're depending on you two for assistance. Okay?

Christianity teaches that "the holy Spirit didn't dwell in people in the Old Testament, but only came upon them."

THE SPIRIT WAS IN THEM

But, in the Old Testament, Scripture seems to indicate that the Spirit entered the prophet Ezekiel (see Ezekiel 2:2 and 3:24, for example). The Pharaoh of Egypt recognized that Joseph had the Spirit of God in him (see Genesis 41:38), and Nebuchadnezzar recognized that Daniel had the Spirit of the holy God in him (see Daniel 4:8-9). Joshua the son of Nun was chosen by God to succeed Moses supposedly because the Spirit was in him (see Numbers 27:18). Bezalel was a simple artisan, but God chose him to design the Tabernacle and its articles because he was supposedly filled with the Spirit of God (see Exodus 35:30-31).

According to Nehemiah 9:30, prophets had the Spirit of God in them, and Isaiah 63:11 seems to say that God put His Spirit inside the children of Israel. God also promised that once He restored Israel (following their captivity in Babylon), He would put His Spirit inside them (see Ezekiel 36:27) - and that was long before the day of Pentecost.

WHAT "UPON" MEANS

Yes, there are a lot of verses in the Old Testament that say, "the Spirit of God came upon them. But, my wife brought up an interesting correlation to the New Testament that might explain exactly what the phrase means.

She pointed out that the Messianic prophecy in Isaiah 61:1, which Jesus attributed to Himself in Luke 4:18, says that the Spirit of God would be "upon" the Messiah - and not in Him.

But, would we ever think such a thing? Of course not. And yet, when Jesus was baptized, we are again told that the holy Spirit came upon Him (see Matthew 3:16, Mark 1:10, Luke 3:22, and John 1:32-33), but did not enter Him. And yet, we would never question the fact that the holy Spirit literally dwelt inside Jesus' body.

My wife also pointed out the prophecy in Joel 2:28, which Peter attributed to the events at Pentecost in Acts 2:16-17, which said that God would pour out His Spirit upon all flesh - and not in them.

But, would we ever think such a thing? Of course not. And yet, when the Spirit was poured out on the day of Pentecost, Scripture records that "there came a sound from heaven, as of a mighty rushing wind, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting. Then there appeared to them divided tongues, as of fire, that sat upon each of them" (Acts 2:2-3).

There is that phrase, "upon," again... and (as always) it is used in reference to the holy Spirit coming upon people. But, if we look at the very next verse, we will see the key that unlocks this mystery:

"And they were filled with the holy Spirit."

So, we conclude that the phrase "the Spirit of God came upon them" is simply a Hebrew idiom that means the same thing as "the Spirit of God entered them."

SYNONYMS THAT MEAN THE SAME THING

And this agrees with the beautiful illustration that Mojo used from Ezekiel 37:9-14 where the words upon and in were used synonymously with the holy Spirit.

Therefore, we believe it is safe to assume that the holy Spirit dwelt in the people of the Old Testament in the same manner as He indwells us today. What do you think?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JB
Lion King



Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 1075


PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

GospelCompilation,

I see you have been digging. That is good. I will get back to you on this one because it will take some time and I will probably address each text that you quoted individually in individual posts.

By the way, this is a great discussion.

JB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JimD
Bear Cub



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 630


PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
GC said: Therefore, we believe it is safe to assume that the holy Spirit dwelt in the people of the Old Testament in the same manner as He indwells us today. What do you think?


I looked up all your O. T. references in Strongs, and they say, filled him, in him, in me, in hand of, in within, but you already know what I think. I just hope we do not get so buried in the trees that we cannot see the forest, if you know what I mean. Very Happy Your wifes observations are really good, two heads really are better than one eh.
_________________
Anyone can point out a scripture here and there and prove anything they want to believe, but good theology is understanding the message of the gospel as a whole. Sincerely, JimD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JB
Lion King



Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 1075


PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mojo,

The discussion is on The work Of the Holy Spirit in the Old Testament. Ezekiel 37 clearly point to an end time event, when the children of Israel are gathered together once again. My argument is that only Prophets Priests and kings and sometimes judges experienced the Holy Spirit in the Old Testament and the Spirit came upon them, not in them.

Ezekiel 37 is a promise to Israel after the death and resurrection of Christ.

JB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Bible Doctrine All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 

© 2001-2007