Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Lining up with the New and Old Testament


Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Bible Debate Forum
Author Message
Adam_Love
Rabid Pit Bull



Joined: 04 Nov 2004

Posts: 413

Location: Walla Walla, WA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 2:51 am    Post subject: Lining up with the New and Old Testament Reply with quote

(This is for Brother John, and anyone else who would like to join in on the discussion. The subject started in another thread.)

I hold that nothing can line up with both the New and Old Testament without contradiction, mainly because the NT and OT contradict each other, and have a great many of their own contradictions.

Quote:
I couldn't disagree anymore strongly than I already do toward this opinion of yours...
-Brother John

John,
I see it as a matter of fact, and not opinion.
It would be great if you could change my mind about it, though.

By that same token, I'd like to share some verses that I see as being contradictory.
Back to top
Adam_Love
Rabid Pit Bull



Joined: 04 Nov 2004

Posts: 413

Location: Walla Walla, WA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 3:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Bible starts off with contradictions. In Chapter one of Genesis, the order of creation is given. In Chapter two, a different order is given.

Genesis 1: plants, then sea creatures and birds, then land animals, then man and woman (together).

Genesis 2 : man, then plants, then land animals and birds, then woman.


The Old Testament contradicts itself. I fail to to see how this is not a plain and simple fact.
Back to top
Adam_Love
Rabid Pit Bull



Joined: 04 Nov 2004

Posts: 413

Location: Walla Walla, WA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 3:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The New Testament gives us two different explanations as to how Judas died.

In Matthew, Judas dies by hanging himself. (27:5)

In Acts, Judas dies by falling down and having his guts burst out. (1:18)

Which verse is reporting the truth?

The New Testament contradicts itself. I fail to to see how this is not a plain and simple fact.
Back to top
JB
Cobra



Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 490


PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 3:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adam Love
You ask which one is true. They both are. If you were to study the Geography of where Judas hung himself, you would be looking at a tree that draped over a sharp stoney valley. When he hung himself, after a period of time the rope broke and he fell against the sharp rocks from a distance and his guts burst out. Also there are other writing in which this is verified.
Back to top
Adam_Love
Rabid Pit Bull



Joined: 04 Nov 2004

Posts: 413

Location: Walla Walla, WA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 3:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the Old testament, the laws were to be followed, and were to last forever.

"It shall be a statute for ever throughout your generations."

"And ye shall observe this thing for an ordinance to thee and to thy sons for ever."

"Know therefore that the LORD thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations"

but in the New Testament, it says that Jesus came to end those laws:

"We are delivered from the law"

"Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth."

"Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law."

"Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster."


The Old Testament contradicts the New Testament.
Again, I fail to to see how this is not a plain and simple fact.
Back to top
Adam_Love
Rabid Pit Bull



Joined: 04 Nov 2004

Posts: 413

Location: Walla Walla, WA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are hundreds of contradictions within the Bible.

This is a convenient link:

http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/by_name.html

Many of these contradictions are just mistakes with ages, family relations, and things like that. No big deal.

But the ones dealing with significant historical events, laws, morals, facts about God and Jesus, and things like that, those have a huge impact. Like this one:

Quote:
2 Samuel 24:1
And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go number Israel and Judah.


Quote:
1 Chronicles 21:1
And Satan stood up against Israel and provoked David to number Israel.


In one book we are told that the Lord was responsible for an event, but in another, we are told that Satan is responsible of the same event.

That's a pretty big difference!
Back to top
Adam_Love
Rabid Pit Bull



Joined: 04 Nov 2004

Posts: 413

Location: Walla Walla, WA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JB wrote:
Adam Love
You ask which one is true. They both are. If you were to study the Geography of where Judas hung himself, you would be looking at a tree that draped over a sharp stoney valley. When he hung himself, after a period of time the rope broke and he fell against the sharp rocks from a distance and his guts burst out. Also there are other writing in which this is verified.


Thanks JB.

I'll agree that it is a (an unlikely) possibility
If it is fact, though, I find it very odd that Acts does not mention the hanging. That makes absolutely no sense to me. Especially since it seems most likely that he would have been dead by the time he fell.

Even so, there are still many more examples of the NT being contradictory. Wink
Back to top
Adam_Love
Rabid Pit Bull



Joined: 04 Nov 2004

Posts: 413

Location: Walla Walla, WA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's one more:

Jesus says that he is giving peace.

Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you.
These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. -(John 14:27,16:33)

But then Jesus says that he is not giving peace:

Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:

(Matthew 10:34, Luke 12:51)
Back to top
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005

Posts: 2416

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So we have another skeptic here...

Well those are only contradictions to those who dont dig deeper and try and understand them. Truth is paradoxical. just to trap those skeptics.

I dont supposed you've ever studied western Mystical traditions, have you? They are the essence of paradox, yet bring the truth of God down to the human level.

Skeptics are left outside in discussions like these because they have nothing to contribute. Being a believer is the first key to entry into the most profound and glorious experiences humans can ever have and skeptics need not apply.
Back to top
FFT
Emperor of the Galaxy



Joined: 26 Mar 2005

Posts: 5847

Location: Memphis

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So it's all some test to prevent rational people from joining the club?

Really?
Back to top
trettep
Lion



Joined: 24 Nov 2005

Posts: 910


PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So really if we can apply the same motive of the Skeptics Annotated Bible to itself we could therefore also conclude the Skeptics Annotated Bible (SAB) as being irrelevant, correct? Merely find one thing not contradicting that the SAB says is a contradiction and we sink the whole relevancy of the SAB? If you say no, then how can we sink the relevancy of the Holy Bible?

Paul
Back to top
JB
Cobra



Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 490


PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

45,
Out of curiosity, what is your take on Adam love's feelings about the apparent contradiction or paradox, on peace.
Maybe your thoughts could help him.
Back to top
45degreeN
King Kong



Joined: 02 Aug 2005

Posts: 2416

Location: Salem Oregon

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can the "Prince of Peace" bring a sword?

God's peace is "cessation of againstness" God no long seeks to fighting against us but rather the sin in us. But there will always be those who, living according to the world's ways, prefer to reject the gospel and live according to their own counsel. That's hardly paradoxical.

Try this for paradox:

God is ineffable, nothing we say or do will ever accurately explain who God is in His altogether completeness, words simply refuse to be precise enough. However God Himself chose to use words to communicate with us. That's paradoxical!
Back to top
trettep
Lion



Joined: 24 Nov 2005

Posts: 910


PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adam_Love wrote:
Here's one more:

Jesus says that he is giving peace.

Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you.
These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. -(John 14:27,16:33)

But then Jesus says that he is not giving peace:

Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:

(Matthew 10:34, Luke 12:51)


Adam_Love, the peace is in the Sword. The Sword is to destroy the hateful, arrogant, selffish, rebellious attitude which will bring peace but that peace doesn't come from Jesus first visit for the sword was given then and later will come the peace after all have been put under subjection. Adam_Love if you take the scriptures in a earthly manner solely then Jesus is accomplishing in YOU exactly what He intends to do. But if you take those things spoken of in earthly ways with a spiritual value then He is no longer a stumbling block to YOU. So whether we believe now or disbelieve it is Him that creates us thus.

Paul
Back to top
JB
Cobra



Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 490


PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

45,
Good answer. John Wesley once said, "when someone seems to think that there is a contradiction in the scriptures, that paradox, if solved, leads them to a deeper truth. It wasn't a paradox for you, but it was for Adam.
I genuinely liked that answer. Thanks.

JB
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Bible Debate Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 

© 2001-2007