Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Mutations DO Increase Functionality


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Creation vs. Evolution Debate
Author Message
The Barbarian
Hamster



Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 85


PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Let me get this straight: You believe that every single human alive today is literally a descendant of two individuals?


Yep. Did you know every hamster in the US is literally a descendant of two individuals? It's true. They've evolved a little in the last hundred years or whatever, but then so have humans.

Quote:
Do you also believe that God created them or do you believe that they evolved from lower primates?


That is two ways of saying the same thing. Of course, "lower" really has no meaning in taxonomy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 7662

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Barbarian wrote:
Quote:
Let me get this straight: You believe that every single human alive today is literally a descendant of two individuals?


Yep. Did you know every hamster in the US is literally a descendant of two individuals? It's true. They've evolved a little in the last hundred years or whatever, but then so have humans.


Do you have a citation for this?

The Barbarian wrote:

Of course, "lower" really has no meaning in taxonomy.


That's what they call them. I didn't invent the terminology.
_________________
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction."
-Blaise Pascal
"...with or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil -that takes religion..."
-Steven Weinberg
"I would bless my children with your destruction instead."
-Someone who shall remain anonymous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Barbarian
Hamster



Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 85


PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"These observations were limited to the commercially available standard Syrian hamsters that are descendants of three littermates captured in Syria in 1930."
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1365-3083.1997.d01-109.x

Erm... three, not two. And apparently, some others have breen brought in since the 1970s, but essentially the millions of hamsters are descended from three.

Evolutionarily, scientists don't distinguish a lower or higher organism. The proper term is "primitive" (for those which exhibite traits of the basal type) or "derived" for those with traits not associated with them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 7662

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Barbarian wrote:
"These observations were limited to the commercially available standard Syrian hamsters that are descendants of three littermates captured in Syria in 1930."
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1365-3083.1997.d01-109.x

Erm... three, not two. And apparently, some others have breen brought in since the 1970s, but essentially the millions of hamsters are descended from three.


That's an interesting case, but I don't see any scientific reason to think that the same thing happened with humans...

The Barbarian wrote:

Evolutionarily, scientists don't distinguish a lower or higher organism. The proper term is "primitive" (for those which exhibite traits of the basal type) or "derived" for those with traits not associated with them.


This is true, but the term, 'lower primates' is so-well entrenched in the vernacualr, that there is no harm in using it. If I always gave the 'correct' definition here, I'd even have less success getting through to the more hard-core creationists (that is, if it's possible to have negative success!).
_________________
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction."
-Blaise Pascal
"...with or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil -that takes religion..."
-Steven Weinberg
"I would bless my children with your destruction instead."
-Someone who shall remain anonymous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Creation vs. Evolution Debate All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 

© 2001-2007