 |
Bible-Discussion.com Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby |
|
|
| Do you believe in the Holy Trinity? Why or why not? |
| Yes, I believe in the Trinity (and this is why..) |
|
5% |
[ 1 ] |
| No, I don't believe in the Trinity (and here's why) |
|
94% |
[ 16 ] |
| I'm not sure if I believe or not (here are my questions) |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
composer2005 Fierce Wolf
Joined: 14 Jul 2007
 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:46 pm Post subject: trinity discussion |
|
|
Hi Bitterlily,
Great you have started to read the Bible itself having been hopping around various belief systems before that really don't use the Bible but a corrupted form of their own making.
Perhaps when you have actually 'read the Bible in full' and had your current conclusions 'tested / scrutinised' your opinion of the legitimacy of a trinity / the trinity doctrine will be shattered.
Cheers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
towshab Labrador
Joined: 23 Oct 2007 Posts: 312
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
BL,
Actually if you read the 'old testament' first and wait on the 'new testament' you'd come to realize that Christianity was created as 'Judaism Lite'. Paul the apostate wanted to take Judaism to the masses because the idea of one G-d really appealed to the Gentiles who had to worship one god for this thing, another god for another thing and so on. But Paul wasn't stupid, he knew two major things that would keep Gentiles from converting: circumcision and keeping that dreadfully long list of commandments found in the Torah.
In Acts 15 you have Paul going to the head guys in the Jewish Christian church. James was among them. If you read the book of James you will see that he opposed Paul's 'Judaism Lite'. There was really was no love loss between Peter and James and Paul.
Paul was quite accepting of James recommendations while he was among the Jewish Christians but soon thereafter he debunked what they had to say. Lets look what was said in Acts 15 first
Act 15:20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.
'Pollution of idols' basically means eating meat that has been offered to idols. But what does Paul the apostate say later?
-----------------------------
1Co 8:4 As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one.
1Co 8:7 Howbeit there is not in every man that knowledge: for some with conscience of the idol unto this hour eat it as a thing offered unto an idol; and their conscience being weak is defiled.
1Co 8:8 But meat commendeth us not to God: for neither, if we eat, are we the better; neither, if we eat not, are we the worse.
1Co 8:10 For if any man see thee which hast knowledge sit at meat in the idol's temple, shall not the conscience of him which is weak be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols;
1Co 8:13 Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend.
---------------------------
Basically Paul is saying to abstain from eating of meat that is offered to idols only if it offends someone! This goes against what was given to him to teach in Acts 15. So Paul was the first one to encourage 'easy believism'. He knew if he offended too many pagan worship acts that he'd not be able to spread 'Judaism Lite'.
Then after Paul came the 'eyewitnesses' who wrote the gospels. To make Jesus much more appealing to the new followers of 'Judaism Lite', they threw in such pagan mythological ideas as virgin birth, angel/god in flesh incarnation, child of a god, drinking blood and eating flesh, atonement by human sacrifice, etc. Thing is, none of this stuff was ever said of the promised Messiah in Jewish scripture but that didn't stop the writers of the Christian bible. They figured that the Gentiles wouldn't know the difference and this new Jesus had a pagan flare they could dig. Son of the the Jewish one G-d with all of the other elements they knew of with other gods like Mithras, Horus, Krishna, etc.
With the destruction of the temple and other happenings in Jerusalem, Jewish Christianity fizzled. After all, it was a just another sect of Judaism to the Romans. But 'Judaism Lite', later called Christianity, had its followers.
Paul was not stupid. He created one of the world's largest religions. But I wonder if Paul ever envisioned so many different sects of Christianity, each one saying the other is a cult full of lost people?
Deu 7:6 For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.
Deu 7:7 The LORD did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people:
Finally, remember that the apostate Paul was at least honest about being a deceitful person
----------------------
1Co 9:20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;
1Co 9:21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.
1Co 9:22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.
In other words, Paul said he wore whatever hat was necessary to get someone to follow his new 'Judaism Lite'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Colter Rabid Pit Bull
Joined: 20 Mar 2007
 Posts: 409
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good morning Bitterlilly,
Thank you so much for sharing your faith journey with me, it especially touched me and made my day.
You truly have found the presence of the "shepherds voice" as well as the "pure spirit" which God puts in all of us.
I to have had difficulty with the representation of God the Father in scripture. It wasn't until I came to understand that there is an evolution of God revealing himself to mankind, that it made more sense. In other words, I believe that the scriptures represent God as man understood him, they get better. Then we have the Father as revealed in Jesus, which is a God of justice tempered by mercy, love, and grace. It was God calling man out from the bondage of traditionalism to the realization of the personality of God the Father. If we know the personality of the Son then we come to know the personality of the Father better. The life of Jesus was mercy in the flesh.
The great mistake of finite man is that he mistaking petrifies Gods revelations, man forgets that more will be revealed. Jesus made it clear that we too can reveal God in our love for one another, although we are not God the Father, we are his children.
The religion of Jesus was all about doing the will of the Father as we find the Father in our personal human experience. Sadly, Christianity became about Jesus more then about having a personal relationship with God as you pointed out with your Catholic upbringing.
I think Jesus taught unity but not necessarily
uniformity. In the kingdom we are to have the common goal of seeking God in faith but that doesn't mean that we are all to think the same way. Religion tends to create systems of thought, creeds, formal prayers and ceremonies. They want everyone to think the same way, it's all about believing facts of the past rather then having a relationship with God personally and right now.
Thanks again for your inspiring story.
Colter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
composer2005 Fierce Wolf
Joined: 14 Jul 2007
 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 11:14 am Post subject: trinity discussion |
|
|
| Colter wrote: | | I think Jesus taught unity but not necessarily uniformity. In the kingdom we are to have the common goal of seeking God in faith but that doesn't mean that we are all to think the same way. Religion tends to create systems of thought, creeds, formal prayers and ceremonies. They want everyone to think the same way, it's all about believing facts of the past rather then having a relationship with God personally and right now. |
You think Christ didn't teach 'uniformity?'
I think he did, why?
Because you have two ultimate Free Will choices -
1. Obey God as Christ did and live.
2. Disobey God as Adam did and perish.
3. By 'believing the facts of the past' experiences and repercussions of others (e.g. Adam & God's messenger Jesus Christ) God, by His grace and mercy and through His inspired Word given to man, has awarded us all equally, the opportunity of making an 'informed Free Will choice' about the kind of relationship we personally want with the God, both now and in the future.
4. So I agree with you that we 'don't all have to think the same way', we can choose Adam's way and death, or God's way and life, as demonstrated by His messenger Jesus Christ.
Cheers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Colter Rabid Pit Bull
Joined: 20 Mar 2007
 Posts: 409
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:09 pm Post subject: Re: trinity discussion |
|
|
| composer2005 wrote: | | Colter wrote: | | I think Jesus taught unity but not necessarily uniformity. In the kingdom we are to have the common goal of seeking God in faith but that doesn't mean that we are all to think the same way. Religion tends to create systems of thought, creeds, formal prayers and ceremonies. They want everyone to think the same way, it's all about believing facts of the past rather then having a relationship with God personally and right now. |
You think Christ didn't teach 'uniformity?'
I think he did, why?
Because you have two ultimate Free Will choices -
1. Obey God as Christ did and live.
2. Disobey God as Adam did and perish.
3. By 'believing the facts of the past' experiences and repercussions of others (e.g. Adam & God's messenger Jesus Christ) God, by His grace and mercy and through His inspired Word given to man, has awarded us all equally, the opportunity of making an 'informed Free Will choice' about the kind of relationship we personally want with the God, both now and in the future.
4. So I agree with you that we 'don't all have to think the same way', we can choose Adam's way and death, or God's way and life, as demonstrated by His messenger Jesus Christ.
Cheers! |
Composer,
Old friend, why do you make conflict where there is none?
Can you not see that I'm simply saying that having faith in God is the central thing that believers DO have in common, that doing Gods will uniquely in our lives may not make robots out of men and women?
I was under the impression that you did not like creeds and structure created by the Catholic church.
Colter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bitterlily Big Pit Bull
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
 Posts: 398 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:05 pm Post subject: Re: trinity discussion |
|
|
| Colter wrote: | ...that doing Gods will uniquely in our lives may not make robots out of men and women?
I was under the impression that you did not like creeds and structure created by the Catholic church. |
Hi Colter,
Thanks for your previous message to me.
Your comment here reminds me of what Jesus said:
But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the counsel of God against themselves, being not baptized of him. And the Lord said, To what then shall I liken the men of this generation? and to what are they like? They are like unto children sitting in the marketplace, and calling one to another, and saying, We have piped unto you, and you have not danced; we have mourned to you, and you have not wept. For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine; and you say, He has a demon. The Son of man has come eating and drinking; and you say, Behold a gluttonous man, and a winebibber, a friend of tax collectors and sinners! But wisdom is justified by all her children. Luk 7:30-35
Love
Bitterlily |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
composer2005 Fierce Wolf
Joined: 14 Jul 2007
 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:41 pm Post subject: trinity discussion |
|
|
Hi Colter,
If you call 'creeds and structure' choosing between Adam or Christ then so be it?
I see it as a simple God given Free Will choice?
Just as embracing an institution / doctrine founded upon violence and death Laws is not a healthy choice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Colter Rabid Pit Bull
Joined: 20 Mar 2007
 Posts: 409
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:18 pm Post subject: Re: trinity discussion |
|
|
| composer2005 wrote: | Hi Colter,
If you call 'creeds and structure' choosing between Adam or Christ then so be it?
I see it as a simple God given Free Will choice?
Just as embracing an institution / doctrine founded upon violence and death Laws is not a healthy choice. |
Composer,
I have no conflict with the ideas presented here. I have never embraced any " institution / doctrine founded upon violence and death Laws".
The mistakes of the early Church are to be forgiven if we seek forgiveness for ourselves.
Colter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steven3 Lion King
Joined: 10 Jul 2007
 Posts: 1205 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Colter
No problem, I just mean please don't act as spokesman for or expert on non-Trinitarian beliefs and I won't do so for yours. Agreed?
Thanks
Steven |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
composer2005 Fierce Wolf
Joined: 14 Jul 2007
 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:30 pm Post subject: Re: trinity discussion |
|
|
| Colter wrote: | | composer2005 wrote: | Hi Colter,
If you call 'creeds and structure' choosing between Adam or Christ then so be it?
I see it as a simple God given Free Will choice?
Just as embracing an institution / doctrine founded upon violence and death Laws is not a healthy choice. |
Composer,
I have no conflict with the ideas presented here. I have never embraced any " institution / doctrine founded upon violence and death Laws".
The mistakes of the early Church are to be forgiven if we seek forgiveness for ourselves.Colter |
The huge trinitarian mistakes and blunders may not be forgiven because the Bible actually says that such blasphemy's against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven.
The Holy Spirit includes God's Word!
Likewise, I can't see any reference to the UB in the Bible either, so Christ and the Original Apostles and followers obviously realised it was superfluous to the Original Gospel that Christ taught directly.
Cheers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Colter Rabid Pit Bull
Joined: 20 Mar 2007
 Posts: 409
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | The huge trinitarian mistakes and blunders may not be forgiven because the Bible actually says that such blasphemy's against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven.
The Holy Spirit includes God's Word!
Likewise, I can't see any reference to the UB in the Bible either, so Christ and the Original Apostles and followers obviously realised it was superfluous to the Original Gospel that Christ taught directly. |
Composer,
It could be that because you live in Europe that the RCC and it's history is more prevalent in your thought life. Where I live their are very few Catholics, we just don't spend time rehashing the mistakes of the past ( nor do we hold Catholics responsible in any way for the mistakes of their leadership long ago).
You seem to be rationalizing your grudge for Trinitarians. God has explained to us that mortal man is not a competent judge of the souls of others.
Did Abraham have the knowledge that the prophets were coming? Those who abused the prophets ALSO hid behind the so called "word of God". They refused to let "living truth" penetrate their hearts. Those who rejected, abused and killed Christ were also deaf and blind to the spiritual teachings of the Master. They also hid behind the superstition of "book Idolatry" or "book fetish".
I know that inside of you lives the perfect spirit of God, it wait's patiently for you to surrender to it's guidance. You are a son of God yourself! God is calling you for a purpose, consider Nicodemus!
Colter
Last edited by Colter on Wed Oct 31, 2007 11:18 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Colter Rabid Pit Bull
Joined: 20 Mar 2007
 Posts: 409
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Steven3 wrote: | Colter
No problem, I just mean please don't act as spokesman for or expert on non-Trinitarian beliefs and I won't do so for yours. Agreed?
Thanks
Steven |
Steven,
Yes, I hear you and will abide. And your right, I'm no expert on non-Trinitarian beliefs. I'm still learning that there are different "camps" on the issue.
Happy Holloween.
Colter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
composer2005 Fierce Wolf
Joined: 14 Jul 2007
 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Colter wrote: | | Quote: | The huge trinitarian mistakes and blunders may not be forgiven because the Bible actually says that such blasphemy's against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven.
The Holy Spirit includes God's Word!
Likewise, I can't see any reference to the UB in the Bible either, so Christ and the Original Apostles and followers obviously realised it was superfluous to the Original Gospel that Christ taught directly. |
Composer,
It could be that because you live in Europe that the RCC and it's history is more prevalent in your thought life. |
I live in Australia and I am most familiar with Catholicism / RCC
| Colter wrote: | | Where I live their are very few Catholics, we just don't spend time rehashing the mistakes of the past ( nor do we hold Catholics responsible in any way for the mistakes of their leadership long ago). |
Big mistake. The leaven has already poisened their doctrine and ignoring it is silly. It was (like trinitarianism in general) founded upon atrocities and was not the Original Gospel and perpetuating it in any form is agreeing and condoning it.
| Colter wrote: | | You seem to be rationalizing your grudge for Trinitarians. God has explained to us that mortal man is not a competent judge of the souls of others. |
Who is judging souls?
I am not judging any thing, I am just observing the facts of their ungodly history and foundations.
God also told us Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. (1 John 4: 1) KJV
| Colter wrote: | | Did Abraham have the knowledge that the prophets were coming? |
Was Abraham a Prophet?
| Colter wrote: | Those who abused the prophets ALSO hid behind the so called "word of God". They refused to let "living truth" penetrate their hearts. Those who rejected, abused and killed Christ were also deaf and blind to the spiritual teachings of the Master. They also hid behind the superstition of "book Idolatry" or "book fetish".
I know that inside of you lives the perfect spirit of God, it wait's patiently for you to surrender to it's guidance. You are a son of God yourself! God is calling you for a purpose, consider Nicodemus! |
I surrendered to God's guidance a long time ago. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Colter Rabid Pit Bull
Joined: 20 Mar 2007
 Posts: 409
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Composer,
Then please, by all means, take up your issue with the Catholic Church! I have never in my life read what the Catholic Church believes about the Trinity! Most protestant Churches that I know of concede the mystery, trust Jesus, and don't quarrel with him!
If people have been mislead to think that Jesus came down from heaven, was the Son of God incarnate in the flesh, returned to God's right hand where he is our Lord, then that misconception came from Jesus himself not the Catholic Church!
If people believe that Satan was a real, "volitional being", who mislead the whole world, that belief came from the Bible !
If people believe in Demons who talk to Jesus, that belief came from the Bible!
This guy towshab, who converted back to Judaism is right, Christianity tried to become a new form of Judaism when we should have jettisoned it altogether like the space shuttle jettison's the solid rocket boosters!
The religion of Jesus was totally different then Judaism and Christianity is very different then the religion of Jesus!
Colter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
composer2005 Fierce Wolf
Joined: 14 Jul 2007
 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:30 pm Post subject: trinity discussion |
|
|
| Colter wrote: | Composer,
Then please, by all means, take up your issue with the Catholic Church! I have never in my life read what the Catholic Church believes about the Trinity! Most protestant Churches that I know of concede the mystery, trust Jesus, and don't quarrel with him!
If people have been mislead to think that Jesus came down from heaven, was the Son of God incarnate in the flesh, returned to God's right hand where he is our Lord, then that misconception came from Jesus himself not the Catholic Church! |
One minute you know nothing of the Catholic Church and in the same breath you become an expert who tries to tell me that the Catholic Church wasn't responsible for any misconceptions derived from what it taught?
| Colter wrote: | | If people believe that Satan was a real, "volitional being", who mislead the whole world, that belief came from the Bible ! |
No, it came from misunderstandings of the Bible and based in part upon a corruption of the Hebrew Term that IS NEVER A PROPER NAME for any thing.
| Colter wrote: | | If people believe in Demons who talk to Jesus, that belief came from the Bible! |
THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF DEMON-POSSESSION: MAPPING DEMON BELIEF IN THE NEW TESTAMENT
Abstract
Demon-possession in the Gospel accounts is not a geographically-uniform phenomenon. Specific cases of demon-possession in the synoptics occur in regional clusters, always in northern environs such as Galilee, rather than occurring throughout every location through which Christ travelled and performed healings.
Conversely, not a single case of demon-possession in Judea or Jerusalem is recorded by Matthew, Mark, Luke or John. Moreover, the Synoptics include several quantitative summaries of demon-possession that imply that demon-possession was a common and even characteristic phenomenon in Galilee and the northern regions. No comparable statements for Judean areas are found in the Gospel records.
Finally, certain ostensibly physical pathological conditions, such as blindness, deafness and muteness, which are sometimes attributed to demon-possession in the north, are never so characterized in the south, even though descriptions of these conditions do occur in texts commenting on the Judean ministry. (Steven Snobelen - http://www.thechristadelphians.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=7870)
| Colter wrote: | This guy towshab, who converted back to Judaism is right, Christianity tried to become a new form of Judaism when we should have jettisoned it altogether like the space shuttle jettison's the solid rocket boosters!
The religion of Jesus was totally different then Judaism and Christianity is very different then the religion of Jesus!Colter |
I totally agree that Orthodox Christianity is far different and a seriously corrupted form of Christ's Original Gospel. trinitarianism is just one form of that corrupted Original Doctrine.
Cheers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|