Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Jesus God & Man At The Same Time


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion.
Author Message
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

24 Then comes the end, when he delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power.

Luk 23:46 And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said thus, he gave up the ghost.

25 For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet.
26 The last enemy to be destroyed is death.

Pro 12:28 In the way of righteousness [is] life; and [in] the pathway [thereof there is] no death.
Rom 6:9 Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.

1Cr 15:54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.
1Cr 15:55 O death, where [is] thy sting? O grave, where [is] thy victory?
1Cr 15:56 The sting of death [is] sin; and the strength of sin [is] the law.
1Cr 15:57 But thanks [be] to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.
1Cr 15:58 Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye stedfast, unmoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord.
Back to top
composer2005
Fierce Wolf



Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 561


PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:21 pm    Post subject: trinity discussion Reply with quote

towshab wrote:
. . . Then you have used Jesus as your "middle man" to G-d. This is totally foreign to Jewish scripture.

I hardly think so, and I recall this has been mentioned before or perhaps on another Thread but God provided Moses and the Aaronic Priesthood as His appinted mediators for the people to continue throughout the generations virtually until Christ (God's later appointed mediator (1 Tim. 2: 5) KJV) came along. (See e.g. Ex. 39 - 40) KJV
Back to top
towshab
Labrador



Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 312


PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:34 pm    Post subject: Re: trinity discussion Reply with quote

composer2005 wrote:
towshab wrote:
. . . Then you have used Jesus as your "middle man" to G-d. This is totally foreign to Jewish scripture.

I hardly think so, and I recall this has been mentioned before or perhaps on another Thread but God provided Moses and the Aaronic Priesthood as His appinted mediators for the people to continue throughout the generations virtually until Christ (God's later appointed mediator (1 Tim. 2: 5) KJV) came along. (See e.g. Ex. 39 - 40) KJV

Yes, but the priest is only needed during temple times. There is no temple right now. Beyond that, Jesus was never anointed as king or priest, so how can he be either?
Back to top
theseldomscene
Banned



Joined: 17 Mar 2005

Posts: 7817


PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing Laughing Laughing ...man you got to be joking... Laughing Laughing Laughing
Back to top
composer2005
Fierce Wolf



Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 561


PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:53 pm    Post subject: Re: trinity discussion Reply with quote

towshab wrote:
Yes, but the priest is only needed during temple times. There is no temple right now. Beyond that, Jesus was never anointed as king or priest, so how can he be either?

You claim - . . .Jesus was never anointed as king or priest . . .

The Bible says differently: -

The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel . . . (Luke 4:18) KJV

How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him. (Acts 10:38) KJV

Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto [his] brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things [pertaining] to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people. (Heb. 2:17) KJV

But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building; (Heb. 9:11) KJV

Cheers!
Back to top
Colter
Rabid Pit Bull



Joined: 20 Mar 2007

Posts: 409


PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello towshab,

I take it you converted back to Judaism from Christianity.

In answer to your post I will state my beliefs:

* I don't pray though Jesus as a middle man, his spirit and the Fathers are indistinguishable.

* Yes, forgiveness was already available, Jesus made the way to God more clear. He taught man to own his sins, go and sin no more. The atonement doctrine is Pagan, Jesus NEVER taught that forgiveness comes as the result of human sacrifice.

* Sadly the Jews lost their way as torch bearers of spirituality for all of mankind. They turned inward on themselves as an exclusive race/class of people. They were held hostage by the corruption of their own priest class, they mistreated every prophet of truth that rose up among them, even the Son promised to them. It is a sad chapter in the history of the world. "Oh Israel, how I would have taken you under my wing, but you would not have it"

THE RELIGION OF JESUS

Some day a reformation in the Christian church may strike deep enough to get back to the unadulterated religious teachings of Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith. You may preach a religion about Jesus, but, perforce, you must live the religion of Jesus. In the enthusiasm of Pentecost, Peter unintentionally inaugurated a new religion, the religion of the risen and glorified Christ. The Apostle Paul later on transformed this new gospel into Christianity, a religion embodying his own theologic views and portraying his own personal experience with the Jesus of the Damascus road. The gospel of the kingdom is founded on the personal religious experience of the Jesus of Galilee; Christianity is founded almost exclusively on the personal religious experience of the Apostle Paul. Almost the whole of the New Testament is devoted, not to the portrayal of the significant and inspiring religious life of Jesus, but to a discussion of Paul's religious experience and to a portrayal of his personal religious convictions. The only notable exceptions to this statement, aside from certain parts of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, are the Book of Hebrews and the Epistle of James. Even Peter, in his writing, only once reverted to the personal religious life of his Master. The New Testament is a superb Christian document, but it is only meagerly Jesusonian.

Jesus' life in the flesh portrays a transcendent religious growth from the early ideas of primitive awe and human reverence up through years of personal spiritual

communion until he finally arrived at that advanced and exalted status of the consciousness of his oneness with the Father. And thus, in one short life, did Jesus traverse that experience of religious spiritual progression which man begins on earth and ordinarily achieves only at the conclusion of his long sojourn in the spirit training schools of the successive levels of the pre-Paradise career. Jesus progressed from a purely human consciousness of the faith certainties of personal religious experience to the sublime spiritual heights of the positive realization of his divine nature and to the consciousness of his close association with the Universal Father in the management of a universe. He progressed from the humble status of mortal dependence which prompted him spontaneously to say to the one who called him Good Teacher, "Why do you call me good? None is good but God," to that sublime consciousness of achieved divinity which led him to exclaim, "Which one of you convicts me of sin?" And this progressing ascent from the human to the divine was an exclusively mortal achievement. And when he had thus attained divinity, he was still the same human Jesus, the Son of Man as well as the Son of God.


Mark, Matthew, and Luke retain something of the picture of the human Jesus as he engaged in the superb struggle to ascertain the divine will and to do that will. John presents a picture of the triumphant Jesus as he walked on earth in the full consciousness of divinity. The great mistake that has been made by those who have studied the Master's life is that some have conceived of him as entirely human, while others have thought of him as only divine. Throughout his entire experience he was truly both human and divine, even as he yet is.

But the greatest mistake was made in that, while the human Jesus was recognized as having a religion, the divine Jesus (Christ) almost overnight became a religion. Paul's Christianity made sure of the adoration of the divine Christ, but it almost wholly lost sight of the struggling and valiant human Jesus of Galilee, who, by the valor of his personal religious faith and the heroism of his indwelling Adjuster, ascended from the lowly levels of humanity to become one with divinity, thus becoming the new and living way whereby all mortals may so ascend from humanity to divinity. Mortals in all stages of spirituality and on all worlds may find in the personal life of Jesus that which will strengthen and inspire them as they progress from the lowest spirit levels up to the highest divine values, from the beginning to the end of all personal religious experience.

At the time of the writing of the New Testament, the authors not only most profoundly believed in the divinity of the risen Christ, but they also devotedly and sincerely believed in his immediate return to earth to consummate the heavenly kingdom. This strong faith in the Lord's immediate return had much to do with the tendency to omit from the record those references which portrayed the purely human experiences and attributes of the Master. The whole Christian movement tended away from the human picture of Jesus of Nazareth toward the exaltation of the risen Christ, the glorified and soon-returning Lord Jesus Christ.

Jesus founded the religion of personal experience in doing the will of God and serving the human brotherhood; Paul founded a religion in which the glorified Jesus became the object of worship and the brotherhood consisted of fellow believers in the divine Christ. In the bestowal of Jesus these two concepts were potential in his divine-human life, and it is indeed a pity that his followers failed to create a unified religion which might have given proper recognition to both the human and the divine natures of the Master as they were inseparably bound up in his earth life and so gloriously set forth in the original gospel of the kingdom.


You would be neither shocked nor disturbed by some of Jesus' strong pronouncements if you would only remember that he was the world's most wholehearted and devoted religionist. He was a wholly consecrated mortal, unreservedly dedicated to doing his Father's will. Many of his apparently hard sayings were more of a personal confession of faith and a pledge of devotion than commands to his followers. And it was this very singleness of purpose and unselfish devotion that enabled him to effect such extraordinary progress in the conquest of the human mind in one short life. Many of his declarations should be considered as a confession of what he demanded of himself rather than what he required of all his followers. In his devotion to the cause of the kingdom, Jesus burned all bridges behind him; he sacrificed all hindrances to the doing of his Father's will.

Jesus blessed the poor because they were usually sincere and pious; he condemned the rich because they were usually wanton and irreligious. He would equally condemn the irreligious pauper and commend the consecrated and worshipful man of wealth.

Jesus led men to feel at home in the world; he delivered them from the slavery of taboo and taught them that the world was not fundamentally evil. He did not long to escape from his earthly life; he mastered a technique of acceptably doing the Father's will while in the flesh. He attained an idealistic religious life in the very midst of a realistic world. Jesus did not share Paul's pessimistic view of humankind. The Master looked upon men as the sons of God and foresaw a magnificent and eternal future for those who chose survival. He was not a moral skeptic; he viewed man positively, not negatively. He saw most men as weak rather than wicked, more distraught than depraved. But no matter what their status, they were all God's children and his brethren.

He taught men to place a high value upon themselves in time and in eternity. Because of this high estimate which Jesus placed upon men, he was willing to spend himself in the unremitting service of humankind. And it was this infinite worth of the finite that made the golden rule a vital factor in his religion. What mortal can fail to be uplifted by the extraordinary faith Jesus has in him?

Jesus offered no rules for social advancement; his was a religious mission, and religion is an exclusively individual experience. The ultimate goal of society's most advanced achievement can never hope to transcend Jesus' brotherhood of men based on the recognition of the fatherhood of God. The ideal of all social attainment can be realized only in the coming of this divine kingdom.
Urantia Book 1955


Colter
Back to top
composer2005
Fierce Wolf



Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 561


PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 2:27 pm    Post subject: trinity discussion Reply with quote

Colter wrote:

* I don't pray though Jesus as a middle man, his spirit and the Fathers are indistinguishable.can be realized only in the coming of this divine kingdom.

Yes Hi Towshab,
Sadly Colter picks and chooses what he wants to believe and what doesn't suit him he rejects regardless of the facts against him.
During my discussions with him he has consistently been a 'double minded man' and thus unstable. (James 1: 8) KJV quoting from the Bible 'what suits him' and then denying and defying the Bible evidence as a reliable source?

Just take this prime example here. Colter openly admits he doesn't want to accept the Scriptural Bible facts that Jesus is his God's anointed and appointed 'middle man / mediator' but typically, because the Bible refutes him, he turns to his spurious Urantia Book.

The Bible says explicitly: - For [there is] one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; (1 Tim. 2: 5) KJV Please also see: Heb. 8: 6, 9:15, 12:24 KJV.

Cheers!
Back to top
Colter
Rabid Pit Bull



Joined: 20 Mar 2007

Posts: 409


PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello composser,

God is the Father of all mankind, he has no need for a "mediator". He loves us with a fatherly affection.

Jesus never referred to himself as "mediator".

Mediator is a term derived from the Persian Mystery religions, It is based on the theory that man is born into some sort of debt to God, it is original sin inheritance nonsense. Jesus never taught any such thing as inherited sin. These are the ideas brought to the NEW GOSPEL which Paul taught. This corrupt doctrine came about in some respect due to Peters impulsive thinking post-Pentecost.

What happened to the old gospel taught for three years by Jesus?

"What has happened to these men whom Jesus had ordained to go forth preaching the gospel of the kingdom, the fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man? They have a new gospel; they are on fire with a new experience; they are filled with a new spiritual energy. Their message has suddenly shifted to the proclamation of the risen Christ: "Jesus of Nazareth, a man God approved by mighty works and wonders; him, being delivered up by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, you did crucify and slay. The things which God foreshadowed by the mouth of all the prophets, he thus fulfilled. This Jesus did God raise up. God has made him both Lord and Christ. Being, by the right hand of God, exalted and having received from the Father the promise of the spirit, he has poured forth this which you see and hear. Repent, that your sins may be blotted out; that the Father may send the Christ, who has been appointed for you, even Jesus, whom the heaven must receive until the times of the restoration of all things."

The gospel of the kingdom, the message of Jesus, had been suddenly changed into the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ. They now proclaimed the facts of his life, death, and resurrection and preached the hope of his speedy return to this world to finish the work he began. Thus the message of the early believers had to do with preaching about the facts of his first coming and with teaching the hope of his second coming, an event which they deemed to be very near at hand.


Christ was about to become the creed of the rapidly forming church. Jesus lives; he died for men; he gave the spirit; he is coming again. Jesus filled all their thoughts and determined all their new concept of God and everything else. They were too much enthused over the new doctrine that "God is the Father of the Lord Jesus" to be concerned with the old message that "God is the loving Father of all men," even of every single individual. True, a marvelous manifestation of brotherly love and unexampled good will did spring up in these early communities of believers. But it was a fellowship of believers in Jesus, not a fellowship of brothers in the family kingdom of the Father in heaven. Their good will arose from the love born of the concept of Jesus' bestowal and not from the recognition of the brotherhood of mortal man. Nevertheless, they were filled with joy, and they lived such new and unique lives that all men were attracted to their teachings about Jesus. They made the great mistake of using the living and illustrative commentary on the gospel of the kingdom for that gospel, but even that represented the greatest religion mankind had ever known.

Unmistakably, a new fellowship was arising in the world. "The multitude who believed continued steadfastly in the apostles' teaching and fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in prayers." They called each other brother and sister; they greeted one another with a holy kiss; they ministered to the poor. It was a fellowship of living as well as of worship. They were not communal by decree but by the desire to share their goods with their fellow believers. They confidently expected that Jesus would return to complete the establishment of the Father's kingdom during their generation. This spontaneous sharing of earthly possessions was not a direct feature of Jesus' teaching; it came about because these men and women so sincerely and so confidently believed that he was to return any day to finish his work and to consummate the kingdom. But the final results of this well-meant experiment in thoughtless brotherly love were disastrous and sorrow-breeding. Thousands of earnest believers sold their property and disposed of all their capital goods and other productive assets. With the passing of time, the dwindling resources of Christian "equal-sharing" came to an end--but the world did not. Very soon the believers at Antioch were taking up a collection to keep their fellow believers at Jerusalem from starving. UB 1955


*And it should be recorded that Mithraism was the dominant religion of Tarsus during his adolescence. Paul little dreamed that his well-intentioned letters to his converts would someday be regarded by still later Christians as the "word of God." Such well-meaning teachers must not be held accountable for the use made of their writings by later-day successors.

* It was only natural that the cult of renunciation and humiliation should have paid attention to sexual gratification. The continence cult originated as a ritual among soldiers prior to engaging in battle; in later days it became the practice of "saints." This cult tolerated marriage only as an evil lesser than fornication. Many of the world's great religions have been adversely influenced by this ancient cult, but none more markedly than Christianity. The Apostle Paul was a devotee of this cult, and his personal views are reflected in the teachings which he fastened onto Christian theology: "It is good for a man not to touch a woman." "I would that all men were even as I myself." "I say, therefore, to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them to abide even as I." Paul well knew that such teachings were not a part of Jesus' gospel, and his acknowledgment of this is illustrated by his statement, "I speak this by permission and not by commandment." But this cult led Paul to look down upon women. And the pity of it all is that his personal opinions have long influenced the teachings of a great world religion. If the advice of the tentmaker-teacher were to be literally and universally obeyed, then would the human race come to a sudden and inglorious end. Furthermore, the involvement of a religion with the ancient continence cult leads directly to a war against marriage and the home, society's veritable foundation and the basic institution of human progress. And it is not to be wondered at that all such beliefs fostered the formation of celibate priesthoods in the many religions of various peoples.


* The ancient social brotherhoods were based on the rite of blood drinking; the early Jewish fraternity was a sacrificial blood affair. Paul started out to build a new Christian cult on "the blood of the everlasting covenant." And while he may have unnecessarily encumbered Christianity with teachings about blood and sacrifice, he did once and for all make an end of the doctrines of redemption through human or animal sacrifices. His theologic compromises indicate that even revelation must submit to the graduated control of evolution. According to Paul, Christ became the last and all-sufficient human sacrifice; the divine Judge is now fully and forever satisfied.

But the great step which marked the transplantation of the teachings of Jesus from a Jewish to a gentile soil was taken when the Messiah of the kingdom became the Redeemer of the church, a religious and social organization growing out of the activities of Paul and his successors and based on the teachings of Jesus as they were supplemented by the ideas of Philo and the Persian doctrines of good and evil.

line 142: 2. The gentile Christians began very early to accept the doctrines of Paul, which led increasingly to the general belief that Jesus was the Redeemer of the children of the church, the new and institutional successor of the earlier concept of the purely spiritual brotherhood of the kingdom.

line 143: The church, as a social outgrowth of the kingdom, would have been wholly natural and even desirable. The evil of the church was not its existence, but rather that it almost completely supplanted the Jesus concept of the kingdom. Paul's institutionalized church became a virtual substitute for the kingdom of heaven which Jesus had proclaimed.

line 156: Jesus' ideal concept largely failed, but upon the foundation of the Master's personal life and teachings, supplemented by the Greek and Persian concepts of eternal life and augmented by Philo's doctrine of the temporal contrasted with the spiritual, Paul went forth to build up one of the most progressive human societies which has ever existed on Urantia.

line 157: The concept of Jesus is still alive in the advanced religions of the world. Paul's Christian church is the socialized and humanized shadow of what Jesus intended the kingdom of heaven to be--and what it most certainly will yet become. Paul and his successors partly transferred the issues of eternal life from the individual to the church. Christ thus became the head of the church rather than the elder brother of each individual believer in the Father's family of the kingdom. Paul and his contemporaries applied all of Jesus' spiritual implications regarding himself and the individual believer to the church as a group of believers; and in doing this, they struck a deathblow to Jesus' concept of the divine kingdom in the heart of the individual believer. UB 55




Colter
Back to top
towshab
Labrador



Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 312


PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:12 pm    Post subject: Re: trinity discussion Reply with quote

composer2005 wrote:
towshab wrote:
Yes, but the priest is only needed during temple times. There is no temple right now. Beyond that, Jesus was never anointed as king or priest, so how can he be either?

You claim - . . .Jesus was never anointed as king or priest . . .

The Bible says differently: -

The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel . . . (Luke 4:18) KJV

How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him. (Acts 10:38) KJV

Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto [his] brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things [pertaining] to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people. (Heb. 2:17) KJV

But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building; (Heb. 9:11) KJV

Cheers!

Wow, he was called 'anointed', but where do we ever see that he was anointed? Never.
--------------------
Exo 30:22 Moreover the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
Exo 30:23 Take thou also unto thee principal spices, of pure myrrh five hundred shekels, and of sweet cinnamon half so much, even two hundred and fifty shekels, and of sweet calamus two hundred and fifty shekels,
Exo 30:24 And of cassia five hundred shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary, and of oil olive an hin:
Exo 30:25 And thou shalt make it an oil of holy ointment, an ointment compound after the art of the apothecary: it shall be an holy anointing oil.

--------------------
Aaron was anointed (Ex 29:7), King Saul was anointed (1 Sam 10:1), King David was anointed (1 Sam 16:13), King Solomon was anointed (1 Kings 1:39). Jesus was NEVER anointed. Baptism, a pagan ritual, does not take the place of the anointing by oil that was sanctified by Hashem.
Back to top
composer2005
Fierce Wolf



Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 561


PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:00 am    Post subject: Re: trinity discussion Reply with quote

towshab wrote:
Wow, he was called 'anointed', but where do we ever see that he was anointed? Never.

How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him. (Acts 10:38) KJV

Strong's concordence renders: 'anoint'
BDB/Thayers # 5548
5548 chrio {khree'-o}
probably akin to 5530 through the idea of contact; TDNT - 9:493,1322; v
AV - anoint 5; 5
1) to anoint
1a) consecrating Jesus to the Messianic office, and furnishing him with the necessary powers for its administration
1b) enduing Christians with the gifts of the Holy Spirit

CHRIST. (See Anointed.) A Greek word answering to the Hebrew word, Messiah, and signifying the anointed or consecrated one, the Messiah — three terms of similar import, John i. 41. The name Christ is an official title, and is not a mere appellative, to distinguish our Lord from other persons named Jesus (EMPHATIC Diaglott Alphabetical Appendix)

ANOINTED, The – English translation of the Greek term, ho Christos, and is given to Jesus, God’s Son on account of his being anointed with the Holy Spirit, to the sacred offices of Prophet, Priest and King. See Psa. ii. 6 ; xiv. 7 ; lxxxix 20; Ex. 4 ; Isa. lxi. 1 ; Luke iii. 22 ; iv. 18 ; Acts x. 38. (EMPHATIC Diaglott Alphabetical Appendix)

And lo, a messenger of a Lord stood near to them, and glory of a Lord shone round them; and they feared a fear great. 10 And said to them the messenger: Not fear you; lo for, I bring glad tidings to you a joy great, which shall be to all the people; 11 that was born to you to-day a savior, who is Anointed, Lord, in a city of David. ((Luke 2:9 - 11) EMPHATIC Diaglott NT Original Greek to English 'Word for Word' Interlinear.)

ANOINTING, A Jewish ceremony, by which persons and things under the law were of God, anointing them with oil of ointment of a peculiar composition, prescribed in Exod. xxx. 23 — 33. The common use of which was expressly forbidden. Priests and Kings were appointed with it, probably typical of the anointing of Messiah and his associates with the Holy Spirit. Samuel anointed Saul, (1 Sam. x. 1,) and David, (1 Sam. xvi. 13,) and on this account they were called the lord’s anointed ones ; 1 Sam. xxiv. 6,10 ; 2 Sam. xxiii. 1. The reception of the Holy Spirit by believers is called an anointing. 1 Cor. I. 21 ; 1 John ii . 27. (EMPHATIC Diaglott Alphabetical Appendix)


Cheers!
Back to top
towshab
Labrador



Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 312


PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:39 pm    Post subject: Re: trinity discussion Reply with quote

composer2005 wrote:
towshab wrote:
Wow, he was called 'anointed', but where do we ever see that he was anointed? Never.

How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him. (Acts 10:38) KJV

Strong's concordence renders: 'anoint'
BDB/Thayers # 5548
5548 chrio {khree'-o}
probably akin to 5530 through the idea of contact; TDNT - 9:493,1322; v
AV - anoint 5; 5
1) to anoint
1a) consecrating Jesus to the Messianic office, and furnishing him with the necessary powers for its administration
1b) enduing Christians with the gifts of the Holy Spirit

CHRIST. (See Anointed.) A Greek word answering to the Hebrew word, Messiah, and signifying the anointed or consecrated one, the Messiah — three terms of similar import, John i. 41. The name Christ is an official title, and is not a mere appellative, to distinguish our Lord from other persons named Jesus (EMPHATIC Diaglott Alphabetical Appendix)

ANOINTED, The – English translation of the Greek term, ho Christos, and is given to Jesus, God’s Son on account of his being anointed with the Holy Spirit, to the sacred offices of Prophet, Priest and King. See Psa. ii. 6 ; xiv. 7 ; lxxxix 20; Ex. 4 ; Isa. lxi. 1 ; Luke iii. 22 ; iv. 18 ; Acts x. 38. (EMPHATIC Diaglott Alphabetical Appendix)

And lo, a messenger of a Lord stood near to them, and glory of a Lord shone round them; and they feared a fear great. 10 And said to them the messenger: Not fear you; lo for, I bring glad tidings to you a joy great, which shall be to all the people; 11 that was born to you to-day a savior, who is Anointed, Lord, in a city of David. ((Luke 2:9 - 11) EMPHATIC Diaglott NT Original Greek to English 'Word for Word' Interlinear.)

ANOINTING, A Jewish ceremony, by which persons and things under the law were of God, anointing them with oil of ointment of a peculiar composition, prescribed in Exod. xxx. 23 — 33. The common use of which was expressly forbidden. Priests and Kings were appointed with it, probably typical of the anointing of Messiah and his associates with the Holy Spirit. Samuel anointed Saul, (1 Sam. x. 1,) and David, (1 Sam. xvi. 13,) and on this account they were called the lord’s anointed ones ; 1 Sam. xxiv. 6,10 ; 2 Sam. xxiii. 1. The reception of the Holy Spirit by believers is called an anointing. 1 Cor. I. 21 ; 1 John ii . 27. (EMPHATIC Diaglott Alphabetical Appendix)


Cheers!

Forgive me for asking, but what was this supposed to prove? Here's the facts:
(1) Jesus was Jewish
(2) Jesus believed in the Torah
(3) Torah prescribed the formulation for the oil of anointing.
(4) Disobedience to the Torah is sin.

With these 4 facts (yes, they are facts, read your 'old testament') in mind, since Jesus was not anointed according to Torah, he could not be the Messiah. If you say otherwise, he violated #4, and thus sinned. Not perfect like the Christian bible says he was.
Back to top
composer2005
Fierce Wolf



Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 561


PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:38 pm    Post subject: Re: trinity discussion Reply with quote

towshab wrote:
[Forgive me for asking, but what was this supposed to prove? Here's the facts:
(1) Jesus was Jewish
(2) Jesus believed in the Torah
(3) Torah prescribed the formulation for the oil of anointing.
(4) Disobedience to the Torah is sin.
With these 4 facts (yes, they are facts, read your 'old testament') in mind, since Jesus was not anointed according to Torah, he could not be the Messiah. If you say otherwise, he violated #4, and thus sinned. Not perfect like the Christian bible says he was.

Paul 'was a Jew' but became a 'Christian Jew' accepting the teachings of Christ whilst rejecting much of his 'Orthodox Judaic upbringing'
Therefore, Jesus the Christ 'wasn't an ordinary Jew either' was he?
The Lord Jesus Christ brought (from his God (John 14:10) KJV) 'a better / more excellent ministry' to show the Jews (strictly under the Law) where they had failed. - Please read Heb. 8:4 -13 KJV to give you a better understanding of the 'New Covenant (agreement) and the 'more excellent ministry' he brought and first offered to the Jews.

Most of the Jews however rejected Christ so they would hardly 'anoint' him in the normal manner. That is why Christ was 'anointed by God Himself' - How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: . . . (Acts 10:38) KJV also, the angel told Mary that the child she would bear was anointed by God Himself (Luke 2:9 - 11 cf. 3:22) KJV

Cheers!
Back to top
towshab
Labrador



Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 312


PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 4:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

composer2005 wrote:
towshab wrote:
[Forgive me for asking, but what was this supposed to prove? Here's the facts:
(1) Jesus was Jewish
(2) Jesus believed in the Torah
(3) Torah prescribed the formulation for the oil of anointing.
(4) Disobedience to the Torah is sin.
With these 4 facts (yes, they are facts, read your 'old testament') in mind, since Jesus was not anointed according to Torah, he could not be the Messiah. If you say otherwise, he violated #4, and thus sinned. Not perfect like the Christian bible says he was.

Paul 'was a Jew' but became a 'Christian Jew' accepting the teachings of Christ whilst rejecting much of his 'Orthodox Judaic upbringing'
Therefore, Jesus the Christ 'wasn't an ordinary Jew either' was he?
The Lord Jesus Christ brought (from his God (John 14:10) KJV) 'a better / more excellent ministry' to show the Jews (strictly under the Law) where they had failed. - Please read Heb. 8:4 -13 KJV to give you a better understanding of the 'New Covenant (agreement) and the 'more excellent ministry' he brought and first offered to the Jews.

This is all Christian bible speak for 'Jesus came to violate the Torah given by YHVH to the children of Israel'. If he was doing his father's will, then his father was not YHVH. The Torah law had been in effect for 1400 years, so now it had been changed?
------------------
Deu 7:9 Know therefore that the LORD thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations;

Deu 4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.

Deu 4:40 Thou shalt keep therefore his statutes, and his commandments, which I command thee this day, that it may go well with thee, and with thy children after thee, and that thou mayest prolong thy days upon the earth, which the LORD thy God giveth thee, for ever.


G-d's Torah is everlasting. Why would Jesus come and contradict it? Easy, he wouldn't ------ if he was the Jewish Messiah. Even Jesus said
------------------------------
Mat 5:18 (KJV) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

Mat 5:18 (CJB) Yes indeed! I tell you that until heaven and earth pass away, not so much as a yud or a stroke will pass from the Torah -- not until everything that must happen has happened.


Quote:
Most of the Jews however rejected Christ so they would hardly 'anoint' him in the normal manner. That is why Christ was 'anointed by God Himself' - How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: . . . (Acts 10:38) KJV also, the angel told Mary that the child she would bear was anointed by God Himself (Luke 2:9 - 11 cf. 3:22) KJV

Cheers!

The majority of the Jews who rejected Jesus were the ones that knew the Jewish scriptures. The common people who did not know it as well were the one's who accepted him.
Back to top
composer2005
Fierce Wolf



Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 561


PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 4:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

towshab wrote:
The majority of the Jews who rejected Jesus were the ones that knew the Jewish scriptures. The common people who did not know it as well were the one's who accepted him.

Well actually Saul (later Paul) was a scholar of Jewish Law and he certainly accepted Christ.

The Lord Jesus recognised the hypocrisy of the majority of the Jewish Leaders -

But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. 14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation. 15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves. 16 Woe unto you, [ye] blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! (Matt. 23:13 - 16) KJV

Of course the Lord Jesus Christ also recognised the readiness of heart of those who would embrace him and reject the hypocricy of those claiming superioroty because 'they knew the Laws intimately'. That was the whole point. Those that 'knew the Laws' were in the main hypocrites and imposed unfair excesses to the Law on those less knowledgable. That was the downfall of the hypocrites and God is interested in those that do 'God's Will' and accept His Word and by the Free Will God gave all men, the hypocrites make their choice to their own detriment.

How wonderful the Free Will God has given every man rather than the violent threat of death by the sword of the hypocrite Muhammed, whose ungodly and shameful indulgences and violation of his own Laws (just like the Jewish hypocrites) are described in Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. -

MAHOMET'S FLIGHT FROM MECCA TO MEDINA

(p. 673) - The first and most arduous conquests of Mahomet were those of his wife, his servant, his pupil, and his friend; since he presented himself as a prophet to those who were most conversant with his infirmities as a man.

THE CHARACTER AND PRIVATE LIFE OF MAHOMET

. . . The use of fraud and perfidy, of cruelty and injustice, were often subservient to the propagation of the faith; and Mahomet commanded or approved the assassination of the Jews and idolaters who had escaped from the field of battle. By the repetition of such acts the character of Mahomet must have been gradually stained; and the influence of such pernicious habits would be poorly compensated by the practice of the personal and social virtues which are necessary to maintain the reputation of a prophet among his secretaries and friends. Of his last years ambition was the ruling passion; and a politician will suspect that he secretly smiled (the victorious imposter!) at the enthusiasm of his youth, and the credulity of his proselytes.1 A philosopher will observe that their credulity and his success would tend more strongly to fortify the assurance of his divine mission, that his interest and religion were inseparably connected, and that his conscience would be soothed by the persuasion that he alone was absolved by the Deity from the obligation of positive and moral laws. (Extract from Gibbon's - "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" D M LOW - A one-volume abridgement, p. 690) -

Mahomet breaks his own Laws -

Perfumes and women were the two sensual enjoyments which his nature required, and his religion did not forbid; and Mahomet affirmed that the fervour of his devotion was increased by these innocent pleasures. The heat of the climate enflames the blood of the Arabs, and their libidinous complexion has been noticed by the writers of antiquity.

Their incontinence was regulated by the civil and religious laws of the Koran: their incestuous alliances were blamed: the boundless licence of polygamy was reduced to four legitimate wives or concubines; their rights of both bed and of dowry were equitably determined; the freedom of divorce was discouraged; adultery was condemned as a capital offence; and fornication, in either sex, was punished with an hundred stripes. Such were the calm and rational precepts of this legislator; but in his private conduct Mahomet indulged the appetites of a man, and abused the claims of a prophet. A special revelation dispensed him from the laws which he had imposed on his nation; the female sex, without reserve, was abandoned to his desires; and this singular prerogative excited the envy rather than the scandal, the veneration rather than the envy, of the devout Musulmans. (Extract from Gibbon's - "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" D M LOW - A one-volume abridgement, p. 691) -

INFLUENCE OF MAHOMET

Mahomet was instructed to preach and to fight; and the union of these opposite qualities, while it enhanced his merit, contributed to his success: the operation of force and persuasion, of enthusiasm and fear, continually acted on each other, till every barrier yielded to their irresistible power. His voice invited the Arabs to freedom and victory, to arms and rapine, to the indulgence of their darling passions in this world and the other: the restraints which he imposed were requisite to establish the credit of the prophet, and to exercise the obedience of the people; and the only objection to his success was his rational creed of the unity and perfections of God. (Extract from Gibbon's - "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" D M LOW - A one-volume abridgement, p. 693)


[Is] the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law . 22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe. 23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. 24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster. 26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. 27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. (Gal. 3:21 - 29) KJV

Thus Christ was most certainly doing his God's Will, bringing Peace and Free Will choices, unlike Muhammed whom history testifies, only perpetuated the ungodly examples of Jewish hypocrisy, of murder and denial of Free Will.

Cheers!
Back to top
towshab
Labrador



Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 312


PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

composer2005 wrote:
towshab wrote:
The majority of the Jews who rejected Jesus were the ones that knew the Jewish scriptures. The common people who did not know it as well were the one's who accepted him.

Well actually Saul (later Paul) was a scholar of Jewish Law and he certainly accepted Christ.

According to the Christian bible. Can this be verified other wise? His writings do not show that high of a familiarity with Jewish scripture.

Quote:
The Lord Jesus recognised the hypocrisy of the majority of the Jewish Leaders -

But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. 14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation. 15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves. 16 Woe unto you, [ye] blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! (Matt. 23:13 - 16) KJV

Of course the Lord Jesus Christ also recognised the readiness of heart of those who would embrace him and reject the hypocricy of those claiming superioroty because 'they knew the Laws intimately'. That was the whole point. Those that 'knew the Laws' were in the main hypocrites and imposed unfair excesses to the Law on those less knowledgable. That was the downfall of the hypocrites and God is interested in those that do 'God's Will' and accept His Word and by the Free Will God gave all men, the hypocrites make their choice to their own detriment.

How wonderful the Free Will God has given every man rather than the violent threat of death by the sword of the hypocrite Muhammed, whose ungodly and shameful indulgences and violation of his own Laws (just like the Jewish hypocrites) are described in Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. -

MAHOMET'S FLIGHT FROM MECCA TO MEDINA

(p. 673) - The first and most arduous conquests of Mahomet were those of his wife, his servant, his pupil, and his friend; since he presented himself as a prophet to those who were most conversant with his infirmities as a man.

THE CHARACTER AND PRIVATE LIFE OF MAHOMET

. . . The use of fraud and perfidy, of cruelty and injustice, were often subservient to the propagation of the faith; and Mahomet commanded or approved the assassination of the Jews and idolaters who had escaped from the field of battle. By the repetition of such acts the character of Mahomet must have been gradually stained; and the influence of such pernicious habits would be poorly compensated by the practice of the personal and social virtues which are necessary to maintain the reputation of a prophet among his secretaries and friends. Of his last years ambition was the ruling passion; and a politician will suspect that he secretly smiled (the victorious imposter!) at the enthusiasm of his youth, and the credulity of his proselytes.1 A philosopher will observe that their credulity and his success would tend more strongly to fortify the assurance of his divine mission, that his interest and religion were inseparably connected, and that his conscience would be soothed by the persuasion that he alone was absolved by the Deity from the obligation of positive and moral laws. (Extract from Gibbon's - "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" D M LOW - A one-volume abridgement, p. 690) -

Mahomet breaks his own Laws -

Perfumes and women were the two sensual enjoyments which his nature required, and his religion did not forbid; and Mahomet affirmed that the fervour of his devotion was increased by these innocent pleasures. The heat of the climate enflames the blood of the Arabs, and their libidinous complexion has been noticed by the writers of antiquity.

Their incontinence was regulated by the civil and religious laws of the Koran: their incestuous alliances were blamed: the boundless licence of polygamy was reduced to four legitimate wives or concubines; their rights of both bed and of dowry were equitably determined; the freedom of divorce was discouraged; adultery was condemned as a capital offence; and fornication, in either sex, was punished with an hundred stripes. Such were the calm and rational precepts of this legislator; but in his private conduct Mahomet indulged the appetites of a man, and abused the claims of a prophet. A special revelation dispensed him from the laws which he had imposed on his nation; the female sex, without reserve, was abandoned to his desires; and this singular prerogative excited the envy rather than the scandal, the veneration rather than the envy, of the devout Musulmans. (Extract from Gibbon's - "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" D M LOW - A one-volume abridgement, p. 691) -

INFLUENCE OF MAHOMET

Mahomet was instructed to preach and to fight; and the union of these opposite qualities, while it enhanced his merit, contributed to his success: the operation of force and persuasion, of enthusiasm and fear, continually acted on each other, till every barrier yielded to their irresistible power. His voice invited the Arabs to freedom and victory, to arms and rapine, to the indulgence of their darling passions in this world and the other: the restraints which he imposed were requisite to establish the credit of the prophet, and to exercise the obedience of the people; and the only objection to his success was his rational creed of the unity and perfections of God. (Extract from Gibbon's - "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" D M LOW - A one-volume abridgement, p. 693)


[Is] the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law . 22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe. 23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. 24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster. 26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. 27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. (Gal. 3:21 - 29) KJV

Thus Christ was most certainly doing his God's Will, bringing Peace and Free Will choices, unlike Muhammed whom history testifies, only perpetuated the ungodly examples of Jewish hypocrisy, of murder and denial of Free Will.

Cheers!

How did Mohammed get in here?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion. All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 

© 2001-2007