Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

What form after the resurrection?


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion.
Author Message
composer2005
Fierce Wolf



Joined: 14 Jul 2007

Posts: 561


PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:45 pm    Post subject: trinity discussion Reply with quote

Colter wrote:
The creator son was created in perfection

All have sinned (Rom. 3:23, 5:12) KJV

. . . . no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end. 12 I know that [there is] no good in them, but for [a man] to rejoice, and to do good in his life. (Eccl. 3:11, 12) KJV(my Bold)
NB: Christ was a man (Acts 2:22) KJV who was 'approved of' by his God and superior and there is NO GOOD inherently in any man and that includes the trinitarian man Christ and Christ confirms that (Matt. 19:17, John 5:30) KJV. The only good that any man (including Christ) can do, is to learn and obey 'what his God teaches him to do' to 'please his God' which is what Christ also had to do and did. (Matt. 3:17) KJV Christ was rewarded for his efforts.
God needs no rewards for everything is already His. (Col. 1:16) KJV
Christ received rewards - God needs no rewards.
. . . the innocent and righteous slay thou not: . . . (Ex. 23: 7) KJV
God never punishes the innocent and the righteous.
Christ was therefore never inherently innocent nor inherently righteous and that is why he had to die and did but could not remain dead because he 'did no sins' (1 Pet. 2:22) KJV to compound the propensity to sin all men inherit by way of Adam's disobedience. (Rom. 3:23, 5:12) KJV
Christ is not God!
The trinity is a man made development which strayed from the Original Teachings. read the words of a trinitarian scholar -
The late Dr. W R Matthews, Dean of St Paul's Cathedral, wrote:

"It must be admitted by everyone who has the rudiments of an historical sense that the doctrine of the Trinity, as a doctrine, formed no part of the original message. St Paul knew it not, and would have been unable to understand the meaning of the terms used in the theological formula on which the Church ultimately agreed". (27)

Or more recently:

"In order to understand the doctrine of the Trinity it is necessary to understand that the doctrine is a development, and why it developed. ... It is a waste of time to attempt to read Trinitarian doctrine directly off the pages of the New Testament". (28) (my BOLD)

27. "God in Christian Thought and Experience", p.180
28. A & R Hanson: "Reasonable Belief, A survey of the Christian Faith, p.171-173,1980

Cheers!
Back to top
Colter
Rabid Pit Bull



Joined: 20 Mar 2007

Posts: 409


PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Christ was therefore never inherently innocent nor inherently righteous and that is why he had to die and did but could not remain dead because he 'did no sins'



I'm speechless!






Colter
Back to top
composer2005
Fierce Wolf



Joined: 14 Jul 2007

Posts: 561


PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:55 am    Post subject: trinity discussion Reply with quote

. . . the innocent and righteous slay thou not: . . . (Ex. 23: 7) KJV

God never punishes the innocent.

God's Laws are consistent.

They applied equally to Christ.

Christ was 'put to death' for the propensity to sin all men inherit by way of Adam (Christ via his mortal Mother Mary, Rom. 3:23, 5:12) KJV

As the Scriptures also confirm, Christ couldn't 'remain dead' because he DID NO ADDED SINS (1 Pet. 2:22) KJV to the inherent propensity to sin he couldn't help inherit at his birth.

If Christ was exempt from the potential to sin (by way of Adam Rom. 3:23, 5:12) KJV then Christ would have been a false and hypocrytical example to us all. The Scriptures however confirm however that this is not the case and Christ had to overcome the propensity to sin that all men have to overcome. In God's strength Christ succeeded because of his Faith, Submission and Obedience to his God's Will rather than succumbing to his own 'Self Will' (Luke 22:42) KJV

The 'can't possibly ever sin and exempt from God's Laws that apply equally to ALL men(Rom. 3:23, 5:12 KJV)' trinitarian christ, is an imposter!

Cheers!
Back to top
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a question..

we have a law...no speeding or you will get a ticket and pay a fine. Maybe even have your liscence revoked.

God says..hurry I need you to go quick to save a life.

Now If I break the law and obey God..am I guilty of sin?

hugs
Lone
Back to top
Colter
Rabid Pit Bull



Joined: 20 Mar 2007

Posts: 409


PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:29 am    Post subject: Re: trinity discussion Reply with quote

composer2005 wrote:
. . . the innocent and righteous slay thou not: . . . (Ex. 23: 7) KJV

God never punishes the innocent.

God's Laws are consistent.

They applied equally to Christ.

Christ was 'put to death' for the propensity to sin all men inherit by way of Adam (Christ via his mortal Mother Mary, Rom. 3:23, 5:12) KJV

As the Scriptures also confirm, Christ couldn't 'remain dead' because he DID NO ADDED SINS (1 Pet. 2:22) KJV to the inherent propensity to sin he couldn't help inherit at his birth.

If Christ was exempt from the potential to sin (by way of Adam Rom. 3:23, 5:12) KJV then Christ would have been a false and hypocrytical example to us all. The Scriptures however confirm however that this is not the case and Christ had to overcome the propensity to sin that all men have to overcome. In God's strength Christ succeeded because of his Faith, Submission and Obedience to his God's Will rather than succumbing to his own 'Self Will' (Luke 22:42) KJV

The 'can't possibly ever sin and exempt from God's Laws that apply equally to ALL men(Rom. 3:23, 5:12 KJV)' trinitarian christ, is an imposter!

Cheers!


Composer,

I have recovered from my astonishment at your words only to find your endorsement of Mithraism.

Jesus never taught original sin nor did he ever teach that his death was some barbaric sacrifice. "Forgive them Father, for they know not what they do".

There are many similarities between Mithraism and Christianity because of Pauls religious heritage as a Roman citizen from Tarsus, a center of Pagan religions.

Jesus taught that sin is a choice, man can forsake sin in the rebirth of the spirit, gaining strength from the spirit to live as God wills for man. It is not possible to inherit sin, sin a a knowing choice to rebel against Gods will.


The Jesus of Mithrachristianity is the real imposter.



Colter


Last edited by Colter on Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:13 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Colter
Rabid Pit Bull



Joined: 20 Mar 2007

Posts: 409


PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lone-traveler wrote:
I have a question..

we have a law...no speeding or you will get a ticket and pay a fine. Maybe even have your liscence revoked.

God says..hurry I need you to go quick to save a life.

Now If I break the law and obey God..am I guilty of sin?

hugs
Lone


How can Gods will be sin?

The answer is no!



Colter
Back to top
kejonn
Show Poodle



Joined: 21 Jul 2007

Posts: 251


PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

c2005,

What do these verses mean to you?
    2Co 5:21 For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.

    Heb 4:15 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.

    Heb 7:26 For it was indeed fitting that we should have such a high priest, holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens.

If any sin can be placed at Yeshua's feet, it is the our sin, not his own. 2 Co 5:21 says as much: God made Yeshua to be sin so they he may be sacrificed on the tree. Of himself, he did no sin.

If you take the verses that say all have sinned to include Yeshua, then you must also believe that Yeshua's name is even above his Father's name because that is what scripture says

Php 2:9 Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name
Back to top
composer2005
Fierce Wolf



Joined: 14 Jul 2007

Posts: 561


PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:21 pm    Post subject: trinity discussion Reply with quote

lone-traveler wrote:
I have a question..

we have a law...no speeding or you will get a ticket and pay a fine. Maybe even have your liscence revoked.

God says..hurry I need you to go quick to save a life.

Now If I break the law and obey God..am I guilty of sin?

hugs
Lone

I would say God wouldn't put you in that position. God asks we respect Laws and would get some one else to do what was required who wouldn't have to break the Law. (Col. 3:22) KJV

Cheers!
Back to top
composer2005
Fierce Wolf



Joined: 14 Jul 2007

Posts: 561


PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:10 pm    Post subject: trinity discussion Reply with quote

kejonn wrote:
c2005,

What do these verses mean to you?
    2Co 5:21 For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.

Well as God 'made him (Christ) to be sin' then Christ must have inherited the Adamic 'propensity to sin' as do all men (Rom. 3:23, 5:12) KJV If he didn't have that same potential / propensity to sin like every one else, then he wasn't actually 'like us' but was a hypocrytical exception to God's Laws and therefore a false example.

Another Scripture I use is - So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation. (Heb. 9:28) KJV

NB: . . . he appear the second time without sin . . .

So obviously he must have come 'the first time' 'with the potential to sin by way of Adam's disobedience and confirming again (Rom. 3:23, 5:12) KJV

kejonn wrote:
Heb 4:15 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.

There we go, precisely my point. Christ 'was tempted' but never succumbed because God empowered him to resist temptation because of Christ's Obedience and Submission to his God's Will rather than succumbing to his own propensity to sin will that ALL men inherit by way of Adam's disobedience (Rom. 3:23, 5:12) KJV.

kejonn wrote:
Heb 7:26 For it was indeed fitting that we should have such a high priest, holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens.

Christ was indeed 'holy and separate from all other men, because Christ was empowered by his God to do what no other man had done i.e. submit to God completely. Because of that complete submission, Christ's God empowered him as He will empower ALL who are prepared to 'follow Christ's total submission' example.

kejonn wrote:
If any sin can be placed at Yeshua's feet, it is the our sin, not his own. 2 Co 5:21 says as much: God made Yeshua to be sin so they he may be sacrificed on the tree. Of himself, he did no sin.

Heb. 7:27 says that Christ sacrificed FIRST for Himself BUT ONLY ONCE unlike the other high priests who had to do it ON A DAILY BASIS. -
Who needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people's: for this he did once, when he offered up himself. (Heb. 7:27) KJV (My BOLD)
I also agree that Christ DID NO SINS (1 Pet. 2:22) KJV to compound the inherited potential to sin propensity by way of Adam's disobedience. (Rom. 3:23, 5:12) KJV
My analysis concurs perfectly with Christ adhering to God's Laws. Other analyses do not?

kejonn wrote:
If you take the verses that say all have sinned to include Yeshua, then you must also believe that Yeshua's name is even above his Father's name because that is what scripture says

God doesn't have the propensity to sin and God doesn't need to sacrifice to Himself. Christ inherited the same as all men (by way of his Mother Mary (Rom. 3:23, 5:12) KJV) and Christ also offered up a sacrifice for that (but only once) to his God (Heb. 7:27) KJV

kejonn wrote:
Php 2:9 Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name

Again your quote confirms my position. Christ isn't God because God doesn't have to 'exalt Himself' He is already exalted. More so:-
God gave Christ a name. Therefore before God 'gave him (Christ) the name' therefore he (Christ) didn't literally 'have the name' until it was 'given' and you can't 'be given' anything that is already inherently yours.
Unlike Christ, his God has to be 'given' nothing, for everything is already ALL HIS. (Col. 1:16) KJV

Further more:-

Christ DID NO SIN (1 Pet. 2:22) KJV but to be a proper EXAMPLE (1 Pet. 2:21) KJV he COULD HAVE but didn't because his God empowered him to overcome that temptation because Christ submitted his will to God's Will. If we do likewise God will empower us to DO NO MORE SINS. (John 5:20 ; 14:12) KJV

Cheers!


Last edited by composer2005 on Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
composer2005
Fierce Wolf



Joined: 14 Jul 2007

Posts: 561


PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:44 pm    Post subject: trinity discussion Reply with quote

Colter wrote:
Jesus never taught original sin . . .

The Scriptures say he did. (Rom. 3:23, 5:12, Heb. 7:27) KJV

Colter wrote:
. . . nor did he ever teach that his death was some barbaric sacrifice.

Precisely my point.
trinitarians degrade Christ's sacrifice including his personal sacrifice 'first for his own sins and then for the people's' (Heb. 7:27) KJV to a barbaric act where a God requires the sacrificial blood of itself as a sacrifice to itself?
The trinity is sick!
Back to top
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The temptation to sin was for him to be as unmerciful to them as they were to others.

In their eyes Jesus was a sinner because he broke their laws. He was made "Sin" to them. Who knew no sin,because he did not follow their laws of vain glory and murder.
He came to give rest for everyone..not just those who felt they were approved to have rest or who felt they had the authority to make men rest, but he gave rest to all from the burdens of the law.

Mar 7:7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching [for] doctrines the commandments of men.
Mar 7:8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, [as] the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
Mar 7:9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
Mar 7:10 For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death:
Mar 7:11 But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, [It is] Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; [he shall be free].
Mar 7:12 And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother;
Mar 7:13 Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
what then?

What did Moses say?
What did they say?

they had "doctored" the laws.

I was wondering..

When Jesus is talking he says "commandment(s)" plural of men...
And he says "commandment" singular of God.

You suppose this is a TYPO?

Or is that commandment of God the ONE which John speaks of here:

2Jo 1:5 And now I beseech thee, lady, not as though I wrote a new commandment unto thee, but that which we had from the beginning, that we love one another.

If this was the commandment that we had from the beginning...WHY was it added to?

And can you show me from the beginning of creation who kept this law perfectly?

Did Eve love the serpent by accusing him? Did Adam love Eve by accusing her?
Did Cain Love Abel? Did David love Goliath?
Did Jacob love Leah? Did Rebekah love Esau?
Did Noah love Ham? Did Sarah love Haggia?
Did MOSES LOVE THE EGYPTIAN?

But GOD so Loved the world....He always keeps his law!

Man got a bit upset because Jesus broke their "carnal" laws. But he ALWAYS kept God's law.

To Love God with all his heart and mind and soul, and to love his neighbour as himself. Even if it meant breaking man's law in order to keep the law.

Jesus was also sent to show them their sins. He broke their own laws, the ones he was born under, to show them how far from the truth they had strayed.

If Jesus had been born a Gentile then there would have been no law against him to cause them to kill him.
He had to die by their hand to show them how unfaithful and unmerciful their laws were.

So Jesus did many miracles...even some we don't understand..for their own good.

Like being a Nazarene and not keeping the laws of a Nazarite...

Jer 35:1 ¶ The word which came unto Jeremiah from the LORD in the days of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah king of Judah, saying,
Jer 35:2 Go unto the house of the Rechabites, and speak unto them, and bring them into the house of the LORD, into one of the chambers, and give them wine to drink.

Jer 35:5 And I set before the sons of the house of the Rechabites pots full of wine, and cups, and I said unto them, Drink ye wine.
Jer 35:6 But they said, We will drink no wine: for Jonadab the son of Rechab our father commanded us, saying, Ye shall drink no wine, [neither ye], nor your sons for ever:
Jer 35:8 Thus have we obeyed the voice of Jonadab the son of Rechab our father in all that he hath charged us, to drink no wine all our days, we, our wives, our sons, nor our daughters;
Jer 35:9 Nor to build houses for us to dwell in: neither have we vineyard, nor field, nor seed:
Jer 35:10 But we have dwelt in tents, and have obeyed, and done according to all that Jonadab our father commanded us.

Jer 35:12 ¶ Then came the word of the LORD unto Jeremiah, saying,
Jer 35:13 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Go and tell the men of Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem, Will ye not receive instruction to hearken to my words? saith the LORD.
Jer 35:14 The words of Jonadab the son of Rechab, that he commanded his sons not to drink wine, are performed; for unto this day they drink none, but obey their father's commandment: notwithstanding I have spoken unto you, rising early and speaking; but ye hearkened not unto me.
Jer 35:15 I have sent also unto you all my servants the prophets, rising up early and sending [them], saying, Return ye now every man from his evil way, and amend your doings, and go not after other gods to serve them, and ye shall dwell in the land which I have given to you and to your fathers: but ye have not inclined your ear, nor hearkened unto me.
Jer 35:16 Because the sons of Jonadab the son of Rechab have performed the commandment of their father, which he commanded them; but this people hath not hearkened unto me:
Jer 35:17 Therefore thus saith the LORD God of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will bring upon Judah and upon all the inhabitants of Jerusalem all the evil that I have pronounced against them: because I have spoken unto them, but they have not heard; and I have called unto them, but they have not answered.

Did Jesus Listen to his Father?

Mat 11:19 The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. But wisdom is justified of her children.

Did Jesus break the carnal commandments, yet keep his fathers commandment...to Love one another?
To be no respector of persons? To love thy neighbour as thyself?

Is it better to Obey God or man?

ramblin...
hugs
Lone
Back to top
composer2005
Fierce Wolf



Joined: 14 Jul 2007

Posts: 561


PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:16 pm    Post subject: trinity discussion Reply with quote

lone-traveler wrote:
The temptation to sin was for him to be as unmerciful to them as they were to others.

You are saying Christ was unmerciful?


lone-traveler wrote:
In their eyes Jesus was a sinner because he broke their laws. He was made "Sin" to them. Who knew no sin, because he did not follow their laws of vain glory and murder.
He came to give rest for everyone..not just those who felt they were approved to have rest or who felt they had the authority to make men rest, but he gave rest to all from the burdens of the law.

Christ also had to 'fulfil the Laws himself and did - Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. (Matt. 5:17) KJV and he had first to 'give rest to himself' (Heb. 7:27) KJV before he could show how others can also 'get rest' themselves (i.e. by being their / our example (1 Pet. 2:21) KJV

lone-traveler wrote:
When Jesus is talking he says "commandment(s)" plural of men...
And he says "commandment" singular of God.

You suppose this is a TYPO?

Or is that commandment of God the ONE which John speaks of here:

2Jo 1:5 And now I beseech thee, lady, not as though I wrote a new commandment unto thee, but that which we had from the beginning, that we love one another.

If this was the commandment that we had from the beginning...WHY was it added to?

NB: . . . not as though I wrote a new commandment unto thee, . . .
Christ isn't saying it was a New commandment but the same commandment as always that his God gave to mankind and then to Christ after he was begotten by way of Mary.

lone-traveler wrote:
And can you show me from the beginning of creation who kept this law perfectly?

No one until Christ was sent by his God. God empowered Christ because of his submission and obedience (John 5:20) KJV

lone-traveler wrote:
Did Eve love the serpent by accusing him? Did Adam love Eve by accusing her?
Did Cain Love Abel? Did David love Goliath?
Did Jacob love Leah? Did Rebekah love Esau?
Did Noah love Ham? Did Sarah love Haggia?
Did MOSES LOVE THE EGYPTIAN?

The serpent must have 'loved' the trinitarian devil because it never blamed it but kept silent?

lone-traveler wrote:
But GOD so Loved the world....He always keeps his law!

Man got a bit upset because Jesus broke their "carnal" laws. But he ALWAYS kept God's law.

To Love God with all his heart and mind and soul, and to love his neighbour as himself. Even if it meant breaking man's law in order to keep the law.

Jesus was also sent to show them their sins. He broke their own laws, the ones he was born under, to show them how far from the truth they had strayed.

If Jesus had been born a Gentile then there would have been no law against him to cause them to kill him.
He had to die by their hand to show them how unfaithful and unmerciful their laws were.

Any one who sacrificed their life would have achieved exactly the same thing. That's called a Martyr. Christ was rewarded for his efforts and didn't DIE FOR US explicitly, because he was given his life back after only 3 days.

Cheers!
Back to top
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I noticed you say Christ and his God..

I'm going to take a longshot here and assume that Christ's God is not your God too?

Jesus was never unmerciful.
I suppose the temptation to be unmerciful was there..don't you?
I said Christ was tempted...
Consider if he had chosen to not follow the commandment of Love, and chose retribution instead?
Suppose he had enough followers to go into mortal combat with Jerusalem?
What would that have accomplished? Just more hate in the world than there is now. Probably would have destroyed ourselves a long time ago.
And He did enter into rest FIRST through Faith in God.
And Christ did fulfill the law. He is the unblemished lamb without spot whom they sacrificed for their sins.
He fulfiiled it.

Quote:
NB: . . . not as though I wrote a new commandment unto thee, . . .
Christ isn't saying it was a New commandment but the same commandment as always that his God gave to mankind and then to Christ after he was begotten by way of Mary.


I believe Christ already had this law written in his heart and in his mind as God had promised.. Wink

Quote:
Any one who sacrificed their life would have achieved exactly the same thing. That's called a Martyr. Christ was rewarded for his efforts and didn't DIE FOR US explicitly, because he was given his life back after only 3 days.


And Christs death led many back to faith and to the One commandment that was always there from the beginning.

Love and Faith and Mercy rose from the dead. And gave life to those who only knew how to live in hate and greed and envy..

A light for those who were heading down a wrong path and teaching their children the same...multiplying hatred on top of hatred until there was no love left in the world. Crying or Very sad
His Life, His Love is now our life and our love we share with all.

Quote:
Cheers!


and hugs to you too.. Very Happy
lone
Back to top
composer2005
Fierce Wolf



Joined: 14 Jul 2007

Posts: 561


PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lone-traveler wrote:
I noticed you say Christ and his God..

I'm going to take a longshot here and assume that Christ's God is not your God too?

My point being that God doesn't have a God for a God but Christ does therefore Christ is not God.

lone-traveler wrote:
Jesus was never unmerciful.
I suppose the temptation to be unmerciful was there..don't you?
I said Christ was tempted...

No you said Christ was not merciful -

lone-traveler wrote:

The temptation to sin was for him to be as unmerciful to them as they were to others.


Regards
Back to top
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 8:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I apologize if that's how it came over...

I believe the temptation to be unmerciful was there.

Exd 32:14 And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people.

be angry and sin not..
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> The Trinity Discussion. All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 2 of 6

 

© 2001-2007