Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Somewhere between logic and belief.



 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Introduce Yourself - New Members Post Here First
Author Message
zeroKnots
Tadpole



Joined: 18 Apr 2007

Posts: 22

Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 4:33 pm    Post subject: Somewhere between logic and belief. Reply with quote

Hello,
Interesting conversations in this group, so I thought I`d just run this up the flag-pole and see if anyone salutes.

I'm wonderring if the concept of consciousness (outside of only the mechanism of a brain), is orphaned by both science and religeon.

I`m finding that scientific circles are unwilling to entertain notions of consciousness in a mystical way, let alone conscious design, but I think all religeons have this premise as a common, ancient root.

I`m raised cristian which only left me with an undying respect for their persuit, but I`m off on a tangent of seeking via examining various kinds of 'knowledge' for lack of better term. Logic, belief, intuition, empiricism(cross-corroboriation in the clouds amounting only to odds), etc.

If anyone would be interested in sort of a comparative discussion with a perpetual n00b, between how the bible may be interpreted and.. you know, universal mystical common-denominators, scientific implications, or anything along those lines, I`d be extremely interested in your own take on `the big picture`.

I have a very rough mystical/existential 'model-o-the-universe' I hold up to anyone's scrutiny, whether through logic, intuition, religeous or scientific dogma, whatever youve got.

I`ll just dive right in assuming anyone`s reading:

Einstin`s initial understanding of energy was purely intuitive. That`s my idea of pure `knowledge` which in it`s primal form, needn`t be substanciated by its little brother: scientific empiracism.

So assuming this availability of universal truth, I suggest that anything in the universe can be used to model the intentions of a creator for his creation.

Theres a device I glibly call `prevolance` that indicates not only conscious design, but that the universe can be thought of as God's metaphorical 'language'. The universa was the only possible way to say this thing, and the vocabulary is these common, repeating, reusable concepts and laws we find in the universe.
Ie: if you see a sphere way too many times in nature, it may be the logically optimal form that`s perfectly expected, but given perfection of design, it`s also God`s way of saying that this form is an important way of thinking, if one is seeking perfection. Very very vague analogy, but I would appeal to your intuition, not your mode of speaking.

So that`s too much info already. Smile
Cept....
to say that I believe that the consciousness we see right now out of our eyes IS the singularity of God between us, and IS `the beginning and the end` and it`s along those lines of intuitional language that I`d love to gather interest.
The impossibility of death truly IS the `good news`, etc etc, I could go on an on without ever intending to antagonise faith with reductionist ambiguities, especially where a certain poetic nature of christianity is to their infinite credit when in an incomprehensible uiniverse as this. Smile

Only reason I would persue this group is that I`m convinced that certain modes of religeon can be proven outright and that faith was never intended to be over-taxed by lazilly negating the possibilities of certain types of knowledge.
And of course we are in a stage of history where differing religeous premises seem to be reaching some kind of dangerous crescendo that is addressable as long as reason is never abandoned in favor of blind faith.

Feel free though, to honor my weirdest notions by subjecting them to violent opposition, revision, disregard.. I`m sure none of this is remotely new.

Thanks for reading this unintended epic novel,
Mark
Back to top
MoJo
Moderator



Joined: 31 Jul 2003

Posts: 3182

Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi zero. You posted this twice, so I deleted one of them. Welcome to the board. Very Happy

In regards to your post, I think I know what you mean, but could you clarify in a few simple sentences? And maybe you could do this in the debate section of the board to start a conversation as this section is really just for introductions. Thanks and enjoy!

Very Happy Very Happy
Back to top
FFT
Emperor of the Galaxy



Joined: 26 Mar 2005

Posts: 5857

Location: Memphis

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

zeroKnots wrote:
I`m finding that scientific circles are unwilling to entertain notions of consciousness in a mystical way, let alone conscious design, but I think all religeons have this premise as a common, ancient root.
What is true of consciousness, in your example, is also true of weather. I wouldn't read so much into it.
Back to top
zeroKnots
Tadpole



Joined: 18 Apr 2007

Posts: 22

Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 5:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks MoJo.
I always manage to double-post.. Embarassed
Back to top
theseldomscene
Banned



Joined: 17 Mar 2005

Posts: 7817


PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hello...
Back to top
Ana
King of the Jungle



Joined: 10 Mar 2006

Posts: 1549

Location: BC

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Welcome to the board. I think you will offer an interesting perspective! Very Happy
Back to top
zeroKnots
Tadpole



Joined: 18 Apr 2007

Posts: 22

Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 9:22 pm    Post subject: hey Reply with quote

FFT wrote:
What is true of consciousness, in your example, is also true of weather. I wouldn't read so much into it.


Hi FFT
I aint worried. Actully it's kinda fun to watch the little buggars wear huge shoes to keep from falling through the floor after they suddenly realize the nature of matter.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Introduce Yourself - New Members Post Here First All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

© 2001-2007