Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Violence in American Society


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> NEW! - Political Forum - Scripture and Christianity in Politics
Author Message
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6772

Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 2:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete wrote:

Drive by shootings are all the rage and it seems that half the time an innocent person is shot. I would hazzard a guess that most, if not all of these weapons are unregistered to start with. Banning guns wouldn't slow this mayhem down one iota.


The number of handguns in the hands of gang bangers is a direct function of how many handguns are available on the black market.

The number of handguns available on the black market is a direct function of how liberal the gun laws are.

If your country's gun laws would have been conservative this whole time, then you wouldn't have nearly as many guns on the black market, and gang bangers wouldn't have nearly as many of them. It really is that simple.

Whether or not banning guns NOW would actually change anything is another issue. Since there are millions of guns already on the black market, banning them isn't going to change that.
Back to top
theseldomscene
Banned



Joined: 17 Mar 2005

Posts: 7817


PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pondering wrote:
If God is omnibenevolent and loves everyone and he decides to intervene and save 1 person, but not others in the same situation...that's capricious.


yes...GOD does what HE wants...
Back to top
theseldomscene
Banned



Joined: 17 Mar 2005

Posts: 7817


PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

.....this conversation reminds me of the time a guy i knew shot himself in the leg in my car while we were riding down the highway...we were pretty buzzed and he had been playing with 22 target pistol, built according to the old luger design...anyway he kept pulling the hammer back and dry firing playing around which irritated me because of the constant snapping sound for one plus i told him you weren't supposed to play with guns and on top of that the unnecssary pulling of the hammer wears the spring ...he didn't listen...and we pulled up in another guys yard to buy some bootleg gin or something of that sort and my friend loaded a round in the chamber and place the pistol in the glove box...after we got all our goodies for the rest of the evening we got in the car and headed to the party spot...about a mile up the road he pulls the pistol out has it pointing down and pulls back the hammer and i remembered he had loaded it but before i could speak...BANG...the windows were up so it was momentarily deafening...and the next sound i heard was this high pitched squeel from the guy whose eyes were as big as saucers at this point...

we stopped and surveyed the damage for a second...the bullet didn't hit any bones and made a clean entrance and exit through the left calve and coming out the side of his cowboy boot...i wanted to take him to the hospital and the injury deserved it but he would not allow it...he poured peroxide through the hole and squelled again... Laughing Laughing ...i found the mashed bullet under the floor board carpet and padding...

later that day i found out from him the reason he could not go to the hospital was because he stole the gun and it was reported to the police that it was taken and the owners had copies of the serial number... Laughing Laughing
Back to top
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the good ole days huh tss??... Laughing Rolling Eyes
Back to top
theseldomscene
Banned



Joined: 17 Mar 2005

Posts: 7817


PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing ...

"the good ol' days weren't all that good"...billy joel... Laughing
Back to top
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

well, that's because we were children then.. Wink
Back to top
Pondering
Lion King



Joined: 15 Sep 2005

Posts: 1273


PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

P1234567890 wrote:

The number of handguns in the hands of gang bangers is a direct function of how many handguns are available on the black market.


Probably a true statement, but I'm thinking this is more your opinion than a supported fact....

P1234567890 wrote:

The number of handguns available on the black market is a direct function of how liberal the gun laws are.


Opinion statement unsupported by fact, unless you've got a citation. I've given you data from 3 countries that demonstrate that the # of guns on the black market INCREASES when gun laws are STRICT.

P1234567890 wrote:

If your country's gun laws would have been conservative this whole time, then you wouldn't have nearly as many guns on the black market, and gang bangers wouldn't have nearly as many of them. It really is that simple.


You're deliberately ignoring evidence to spout your preconceived opinion....that's not cricket Wink

P1234567890 wrote:

Whether or not banning guns NOW would actually change anything is another issue. Since there are millions of guns already on the black market, banning them isn't going to change that.


True, true....
Back to top
Pondering
Lion King



Joined: 15 Sep 2005

Posts: 1273


PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 4:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

P1234567890 wrote:

Do you think that it should be legal to sell guns to crazy people? Or do you agree with me that it should be illegal?


In Virginia, it is illegal (as it is in most states)...but, the VT murderer lied (Shocked *gasp* what?!?!) on the form...

We also have very very restrictive laws about who can see what medical information about an individual. Those laws were designed to protect people from insurance companies (denying them life insurance because they carry recessive-gene-whatever, for example) and protect them from employers who may discriminate against employees or job seekers becuase of health issue...PARTICULARLY mental health issues.

The VT murder "voluntarily" submitted to evaluation. Despite the psychiatric findings, the judge determined that "involuntary" placement in a funny farm was "unsuitable"...so he walks away.

It's called the Law of Unintended Consequences...In this case, a law designed to protect millions of people from unfair treatment, actually enables a very small minority of extremely disturbed people to continue to stay within the "population"....hmmmmm, sound like any other laws you've suggested P#s..

And...I've subtly thrown down the gauntlet regarding US/UK/CANADA/AUSTRALIAN gun crime stats...you've not taken the bait to refute the data....any particular reason?
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6772

Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 4:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pondering wrote:

P1234567890 wrote:

The number of handguns available on the black market is a direct function of how liberal the gun laws are.


Opinion statement unsupported by fact, unless you've got a citation. I've given you data from 3 countries that demonstrate that the # of guns on the black market INCREASES when gun laws are STRICT.


You're using the wrong metric; you seem to be comparing the number of guns in a country before and after stricter gun laws were passed. That's NOT what I'm talking about. I am saying that if you compare countries with stricter gun laws with those that have more liberal gun laws, there is a HUGE difference in gun crime and gun deaths.

For example, just compare Canada, the U.K., Germany, France, Sweden, Luxembourg, Italy, Greece, etc. or ANY other civilized country with America. EVERY SINGLE ONE of them has stricter gun laws than America, and EVERY SINGLE ONE of them has considerably lower gun crime rates (by like a factor of ten) than America.

So I'd say that the facts support my argument; there aren't even any counterexamples! You could call it "P's law of gun crime." All of what I'm saying is supported by basic economic theory as well. Liberal gun laws make guns easier to buy. If they are easier to buy, then there is a bigger market for them. If there is a bigger market for them, then more of them will be manufactured. It is literally true that if gun laws were more strict, then fewer guns would physically exist. It's basic economics.

Besides, my argument here hasn't been, "Let's make the gun laws in America more strict in some general sense." I'm just saying that you shouldn't sell guns to crazy people. How can you even be arguing with this? Isn't it OBVIOUS that crazy people shouldn't have guns?!?
Back to top
Pondering
Lion King



Joined: 15 Sep 2005

Posts: 1273


PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 6:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

P1234567890 wrote:


You're using the wrong metric; you seem to be comparing the number of guns in a country before and after stricter gun laws were passed.


No, I'm comparing % of gun crime or ratio per 100,000 residents...that normalizes the differences in population. Yes, the US is higher than all the countries you listed, but I'm saying the factor that drives that is not gun control laws (of which I support the current measures), but rather the other cultural factors we've discussed.


Having some data comparison problems becuase of different sampling years...

For comparison (1999-2001):
Switzerland had a homicide rate per 100,000 of 1.2 average over the years 1999-2001,
England & Wales at 1.61 for the same time period.
Scotland was at 2.16,
Northern Ireland was 2.65.
Irish Republic was 1.42
US was roughly 1.7

US data Eurpeon data from wiki pages not linked here.

So, no...I'm not comparing # of guns to population, I'm comparing gun crime incidents to population by %.


P1234567890 wrote:

So I'd say that the facts support my argument; there aren't even any counterexamples! You could call it "P's law of gun crime." All of what I'm saying is supported by basic economic theory as well. Liberal gun laws make guns easier to buy. If they are easier to buy, then there is a bigger market for them. If there is a bigger market for them, then more of them will be manufactured. It is literally true that if gun laws were more strict, then fewer guns would physically exist. It's basic economics.


That's possibly true, but rising rates in the UK and Australia, where guns are illegal and the black market flourishes show that market pressures still apply...they're just outside the "system".

P1234567890 wrote:

I'm just saying that you shouldn't sell guns to crazy people. How can you even be arguing with this? Isn't it OBVIOUS that crazy people shouldn't have guns?!?


I agree...who would? But I've already pointed out that the Gun law requires self-disclosure of psych problem. Health information protection laws (not gun laws) prohibit the release of "personal information". Maybe we need more liberal health information laws? Or a requirement for nutjobs to be branded since we know we can't trust them self-disclose...

My point is...your solutions only inhibit otherwise law-abiding citizens. Criminals and the insane are already operating "outside" the legal system...You want to limit the supply...then place pressure on manufacturers (but you'd have to do that globally...in Australia the hottest seller on the black market apparently are Chinese made assault rifles Shocked)

Honestly, I think the answer is to recognize that not all men are created equal. Some are created broken and we delude ourselves to think we can medicate them and send them out among the population...

Universities are vary wary of taking action against student that demonstrate "weird" behavior. One school was sued by the parents of student who killed himself because he had sought counselling at the schools health clinic, but the parents weren't notified. Another school was sued by a student that was "being denied his educational rights" because he was asked to leave after attempting suicide...they get cut both ways. Intervene? get sued. Don't intervene? get sued.
Back to top
Pondering
Lion King



Joined: 15 Sep 2005

Posts: 1273


PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let's use the VT killer as an example...as an editorial comment, I won't use his name as that humanizes him and , as a monster, I choose not to do that. "Good Guys" like Professor Liviu Librescu deserve name recognition..."Bad Guys" like the shooter deserve demonizing tags. That's one way to provide positive models as "favorable" and negative models as "non-favorable"....end editorial.

Ok...so, the VT killer:
- had stalked two women,
- took cameras of girls legs under his desk in class
- set a fire in his room,
- wrote morbid and violent plays and poems,
- had been expelled from one class,
- had been declared by a judge to be "mentally ill"
- avoided as much direct human interaction, even when his suite mates "reached out" to him

finally acts upon his murderous ideations and reaks havoc against peaceable people he had more than a reasonable chance to believe would be unarmeed.

Afterwards, the school psychologists and other officials say:

- the murderer was "troubled";
- he clearly had "issues";
- it would have been good if someone had "reached out"; - it's too bad America doesn't have better "support services."

??? People did reach out...one professor even taking what is really an extreme step for academia and calling the cops on him...Can anyone describe was better "support services" we're talking about here? "support services" are voluntary centers...you come to them....Authority is what steps in and says "You come here"...Rolling Eyes

The officials decried "the lack of a government "safety net." ???? What in the wide wide world of sports does that mean ???? Does anyone think that orphanages are a better solution to child rearing? It's better than leaving a child in a dangerous home, but I don't think anyone would call it "good"....but that's an example of a government "safety net"....

... and inadequate "funding for mental health services in the United States." Unless that funding comes with the willingness and authority to lock up nutcases...more $$$ doesn't help!

AAAGGGHH!!!

P#s solution is that if we keep the guns out of the hands of 299 million Americans that AREN'T psychopaths..we can avoid this....but does nothing to address the MURDERERS!!!!! who...consistently fit the profile of the VT killer!

I know...lets ban being a psychopath! That'll fix 'em Wink
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6772

Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pondering wrote:

Ok...so, the VT killer:
- had stalked two women,
- took cameras of girls legs under his desk in class
- set a fire in his room,
- wrote morbid and violent plays and poems,
- had been expelled from one class,
- had been declared by a judge to be "mentally ill"
- avoided as much direct human interaction, even when his suite mates "reached out" to him


And yet he was able to LEGALLY buy handguns!!! Obviously the background check is a JOKE!

Pondering wrote:

P#s solution is that if we keep the guns out of the hands of 299 million Americans that AREN'T psychopaths..we can avoid this....


You're fundamentally misunderstanding what I'm saying. 'Good' Americans should be able to buy guns; I have no problem with that.

All I'm saying is that Virginia's laws are stupid, they don't work, and they need to be reformed. The background checks they do are obviously a joke, and the laws clearly need to be changed in order to fix these problems.

What's so unreasonable about this position?
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6772

Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pondering wrote:

Having some data comparison problems becuase of different sampling years...

For comparison (1999-2001):
Switzerland had a homicide rate per 100,000 of 1.2 average over the years 1999-2001,
England & Wales at 1.61 for the same time period.
Scotland was at 2.16,
Northern Ireland was 2.65.
Irish Republic was 1.42
US was roughly 1.7


I'm glad you brought this up, because Wikipedia has a very nice table showing murder rates over the decades broken down by country and year:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_rate

America's murder rate is OFF THE CHARTS when compared with that of other civilized countries. Your country really does have a serious problem. Look at the 2000s... America has a murder rate of 5.9, which is higher than that of the Ivory Coast and Palestine! It's safer in Israel!

The civilized country with the next-highest murder rate is Switzerland, at 2.94. In other words, your murder rate is about twice as high as that of any other proper country. That's not good!

Canada is only at 2.01, which means that yours is like three times as high as ours! Don't you think you guys should be able to do a little better than this?

But check out South Africa!!!

I don't know where you got your 1.7 number for America, but it seems to be off by quite a lot!
Back to top
Pondering
Lion King



Joined: 15 Sep 2005

Posts: 1273


PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 11:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

P1234567890 wrote:


I don't know where you got your 1.7 number for America, but it seems to be off by quite a lot!


It was rough math...# of homicides by gun/280 million people...I had to guestimate the # from a graph....I'm a liberal arts background guy, so I probably misunderestimated or dorked up the division....

I still want to beat the dead horse that handgun control is not the panacea answer:

Since 1 January 2007:
Philidephia,
Pennsylvania: 128 (Philly population = 1.5 million, roughly 50/50 white/black male/female)

Washington DC:
49 (population 600,000 roughly 60/40 black/white, 50/50 male/female)

Baltimore Md:
76 (population 650,000 roughly 70/30 black/white, 50/50 male/female)

Now why is this not the national tragedy that either Imus or Virginia Tech? Because 80% of it is black on black drug related crime....
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6772

Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, I wouldn't want to live in Baltimore...

But to answer your question, single incidents where a shooter goes crazy and kills dozens is much more dramatic than a few gang bangers and drug dealers getting killed every few days at a steady pace.

It's more of a 'story', and the news media knows how to capitalize on it. I happen to agree with you that the gun crime rates in inner cities is a MUCH bigger story.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> NEW! - Political Forum - Scripture and Christianity in Politics All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 

© 2001-2007