Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

New Christian - ex new age


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Creation vs. Evolution Debate
Author Message
Trinity1
Emperor of the World



Joined: 02 Apr 2006

Posts: 3111


PostPosted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FFT wrote:
I count one reference to taxpayer money supporting evolution (as a religion in schools of course) Wink
Edit: Two references!
Edit 2: There was a third while I edited
: 4!
: 5!


Laughing Laughing Laughing Don't know what the big deal is... he wasn't paying any iin the first place... right?

Maybe that is why he didn't pay taxes? Confused or disgusted
Back to top
Trinity1
Emperor of the World



Joined: 02 Apr 2006

Posts: 3111


PostPosted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 7:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

P1234567890 wrote:
Trinity1 wrote:

Knowledge and intellect are still respected... it is the way it has been abused that has led us to this point.

Trinity, I like you and you're a good guy, but you have an EXTREME disrespect for academia, learning, and science.


Yes... no... and no.

Quote:
You believe that virtually all of the thousands of atomic physicists, evolutionary biologists, geneticists, geologists, astronomers, cosmologists, zoologists, and many other gists are totally full of b.s. and that many of the core theories they believe in are all totally wrong...


No, no, no, no, no, no, no, and... um... 'other gists'... no.

Core theories being wrong... not really. Most of the same evidence they have derived their conclusions from creationists get their different conclusions from.

Quote:
Academia and intellectuals are definitely not respected by creationists. Heck, they're not even respected by the average members of society.


The main problem I have with 'Academia' is that 3 out of 4 (I'll have to find the exact figures0 born again Christians that attend a secular university, at the end of the 4 years, is no longer a Christian.

I can understand a few of them falling away from the faith. College is tough time for kids to follow Christian values... even at Christian colleges... but we aren't talking about a few... the very folks we are told to leave the teaching about God in the Church... will vilify Him at our Universities... state funded universities... without challenge. This complete, unchallenged, anti-God bias permeates every public university in the country. Universities that were built to teach Christian values in the first place. Now, the majority of them don't have departments of Theology... they have departments of religion.. or religious studies. God has been pushed out of these schools, vilified and made essentially irrelevant to any who profess a faith, and these atmospheres have destroyed the faiths of thousands of young Christians.

So, you asserted I have a disrespect for Academia... yea... absolutely. Academia disrespects the very core values and beliefs it was built upon, vilifies the God I worship... love more than life, and is instrumental in the destruction of faith of countless thousands of young Christians every year. I have nothing but contempt for them P.

I can provide you with a few personal examples myself... and those that I know.
Back to top
Nobby
Board - Admin



Joined: 16 Sep 2002

Posts: 5050

Location: Missouri

PostPosted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Amen! Trinity, thank you for this post!! Smile Smile
Back to top
Trinity1
Emperor of the World



Joined: 02 Apr 2006

Posts: 3111


PostPosted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby wrote:
Amen! Trinity, thank you for this post!! Smile Smile


Thanks Nobby... this subject just gets my gander up.

I respect P and the perspectives he brings here. He is considerate, respectful, and often brings points up that often are not even considered... FFT does the same thing... they listen... consider... and at least extend respect to others PoV.

This does not occur in college today. Case in point... I'm in a graduate level education program at a local university. We were discussing a concept the other day called 'constructivism'. It is a post modern philosophy that discusses the need to allow students to employ their own understanding... blah blah blah.... but a key element of the philosophy, as it was being taught... is /was that all understanding is relative.

ALL understanding is relative. ALL understanding. ALL.

All implies an objective statement. Meaning, all understanding can not be subjective... as this understanding of understanding is objective. Therefore, it is not subjective, nullifying the statement.

The discussion didn't last too long... and the Prof is extremely nice... so I didn't push her too terribly hard on it... but she admitted the philosophy was incorrect... but... she is stuck in the curriculum and can not change it.
Back to top
FFT
Emperor of the Galaxy



Joined: 26 Mar 2005

Posts: 5907

Location: Memphis

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trinity1 wrote:
The main problem I have with 'Academia' is that 3 out of 4 (I'll have to find the exact figures) born again Christians that attend a secular university, at the end of the 4 years, is no longer a Christian.
Awesome. Looks like those required elementary logic courses are doing their job Wink

I'm not sure I trust the statistic, though (Christianity seems remarkably resilient in the face of rationality in my experience). I'd love to see some hard numbers if you can find them.
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6796

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trinity1 wrote:
Nobby wrote:
Amen! Trinity, thank you for this post!! Smile Smile


Thanks Nobby... this subject just gets my gander up.

I respect P and the perspectives he brings here. He is considerate, respectful, and often brings points up that often are not even considered... FFT does the same thing... they listen... consider... and at least extend respect to others PoV.

This does not occur in college today. Case in point... I'm in a graduate level education program at a local university. We were discussing a concept the other day called 'constructivism'. It is a post modern philosophy that discusses the need to allow students to employ their own understanding... blah blah blah.... but a key element of the philosophy, as it was being taught... is /was that all understanding is relative.

ALL understanding is relative. ALL understanding. ALL.

All implies an objective statement. Meaning, all understanding can not be subjective... as this understanding of understanding is objective. Therefore, it is not subjective, nullifying the statement.

The discussion didn't last too long... and the Prof is extremely nice... so I didn't push her too terribly hard on it... but she admitted the philosophy was incorrect... but... she is stuck in the curriculum and can not change it.


You could have stopped after saying that it is a postmodernist philosophy... Wink
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6796

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trinity1 wrote:

Quote:
You believe that virtually all of the thousands of atomic physicists, evolutionary biologists, geneticists, geologists, astronomers, cosmologists, zoologists, and many other gists are totally full of b.s. and that many of the core theories they believe in are all totally wrong...


No, no, no, no, no, no, no, and... um... 'other gists'... no.

Core theories being wrong... not really. Most of the same evidence they have derived their conclusions from creationists get their different conclusions from.


Trinity, you believe that atomic dating doesn't work, which necessarily implies that core fundamental concepts in atomic theory are wrong. You believe that the universe is only 6000 years old, which means that all of astronomy and cosmology are wrong, not to mention that plate tectonics and continental drift are all wrong. You believe that evolution is a fantasy, which means that all of the biologists, zoologists, biochemists, geneticists, and organic chemists are full of b.s.

You are the very DEFINITION of disrespecting science, research, and academia! You think that the vast majority of the mainstream scientific establishment is completely out to lunch and that you know better than all of them!

I hesitate to say that you DESPISE science, but you certainly have a very healthy disrespect for it.
Back to top
pastor2022
Moderator



Joined: 07 Dec 2006

Posts: 693


PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gee, and I all I wanted to do was to say welcome to lovemore!
Pastor2022 Laughing
Back to top
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005

Posts: 6342

Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing
Back to top
Trinity1
Emperor of the World



Joined: 02 Apr 2006

Posts: 3111


PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

P1234567890 wrote:

Trinity, you believe that atomic dating doesn't work, which necessarily implies that core fundamental concepts in atomic theory are wrong.


Not true. I believe there are too many assumptions involved in radiometric dating and there are results that are simply ignored that don't fit the old earth paradigm... it has nothing to do with me doubting atomic theory...

Quote:
You believe that the universe is only 6000 years old, which means that all of astronomy and cosmology are wrong, not to mention that plate tectonics and continental drift are all wrong.


Yes... no... no...no... and kinda a little bit.

Quote:
You believe that evolution is a fantasy,


Goo to you... yes... that is a fantasy.

Quote:
which means that all of the biologists, zoologists, biochemists, geneticists, and organic chemists are full of b.s.


No... no... no... no... no... and only half full of it.

Quote:
You are the very DEFINITION of disrespecting science, research, and academia!


no... no... and yes... I would be the poster child for that contempt... Wink

Quote:
You think that the vast majority of the mainstream scientific establishment is completely out to lunch and that you know better than all of them!


No.. not true...

Quote:
I hesitate to say that you DESPISE science, but you certainly have a very healthy disrespect for it.


The conclusions drawn from it... the manner in which it is used to divert folks from God... and the dogmatic assertions taught without challenge, thus destroying the ideal of free inquiry in our country... that part of it... yepper.
Back to top
P1234567890
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 11 Mar 2006

Posts: 6796

Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trinity, the vast majority of astronomers say that there are stars which are 10 billion light-years away from us, and that their light has reached us. Are they right or are they wrong?
Back to top
Nobby
Board - Admin



Joined: 16 Sep 2002

Posts: 5050

Location: Missouri

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm really thankful for our scientist they are now finding out things now that God knew when He put it all to gether! Laughing Laughing
Back to top
Trinity1
Emperor of the World



Joined: 02 Apr 2006

Posts: 3111


PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FFT wrote:
I'm not sure I trust the statistic, though (Christianity seems remarkably resilient in the face of rationality in my experience). I'd love to see some hard numbers if you can find them.


It was in a pamphlet I had for my Sunday School Teachers. I looked the source up HERE but I didn't see the poll cited for their numbers. The links were dead Confused or disgusted
Back to top
Trinity1
Emperor of the World



Joined: 02 Apr 2006

Posts: 3111


PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

P1234567890 wrote:
Trinity, the vast majority of astronomers say that there are stars which are 10 billion light-years away from us, and that their light has reached us. Are they right or are they wrong?


I'm not sure. We have talked about the science behind measuring these distances and how truly subjective it is. We have also talked about how if God, "Stretched out the heavens" as described by the Psalmist... this wouldn't be a problem anyhow..

So.. I don't know, and it really isn't important in a Biblical (literal Biblical) framework.
Back to top
Trinity1
Emperor of the World



Joined: 02 Apr 2006

Posts: 3111


PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby wrote:
I'm really thankful for our scientist they are now finding out things now that God knew when He put it all to gether! Laughing Laughing


And I object to them stating that they can explain it all without His existence or need to thank Him for it. Confused or disgusted
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Creation vs. Evolution Debate All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 3 of 6

 

© 2001-2007