IronSharpensIron
House Cat
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Seoul, Korea
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:00 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Yeah flame bait is avoided well enough...byut staying OT-well....
here is an article on the topic for ya...Iraqis cheer Rumsfeld departure, look for changes in U.S. approach
Looks like an Iraqui boot that helped donald leave-hmmm didnt Trinity say something about if the enemy wants him gone and...oh heck ill have to dig that one up-any way point is-Iraquis wanted him gone too-lookin for positive change..does that mean the Iraquis are the enemy? Help me out trinity. 
Whoe really wanted rummy gone?
Rumsfeld has lost credibility with the uniformed leadership, with the troops, with Congress and with the public at large
 | Quote: | These officers have been loyal public promoters of a war policy many privately feared would fail. They have kept their counsel private, adhering to more than two centuries of American tradition of subordination of the military to civilian authority.
And although that tradition, and the officers' deep sense of honor, prevent them from saying this publicly, more and more of them believe it.
Rumsfeld has lost credibility with the uniformed leadership, with the troops, with Congress and with the public at large. His strategy has failed, and his ability to lead is compromised. And although the blame for our failures in Iraq rests with the secretary, it will be the troops who bear its brunt.
This is not about the midterm elections. Regardless of which party wins Nov. 7, the time has come, Mr. President, to face the hard bruising truth:
Donald Rumsfeld must go.
|
And another one for ya in this thread....WHO IS RUMSFELD?
One marine's knowledge... |
|
FAQ 
Search 
Make a Donation 
Usergroups 
Contact
Register
Submit Articles 
Log in to check your private messages 
