Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

An Address From Hell(The First Shall Be Last)


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Revelation and End of Times
Author Message
Zathrus
King Kong



Joined: 28 Aug 2002

Posts: 2168

Location: WI USA

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 4:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mindonfire wrote:
Good Day
So are you of the mind that this mindset or mentality of the Pharisees was limited to the 1st century.
I'm sorry, Mr Onfire, you are not proving your point by misinterpreting what I say. What I wrote is there in text for anyone to read.

Mindonfire wrote:
Your statement is contradictory. Hypocrisy is a big personality flaw. If Jesus was pointing out the hypocrisy of those who trusted in their own righteousness then he was pointing out a flaw. And they didn’t appreciate it. Why do you think they killed him.
Jesus's ministry was to show Israel first that their trusting in their good works would not lead to salvation. He did not go around pointing out peoples' moral and personality flaws just because He thought His Father wanted to straighten everyone out. Nor is that the job of the church today.

Mindonfire wrote:
Thirdly what you don’t seem to understand is that the parables that Jesus spoke are not constrained by time.
You are, again, misinterpreting me here. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt this time. The parable of the wedding feast and the parable of the vineyard - both of these very clearly dealt with national Israel in the 1st century rejecting the gospel and the gospel then being preached to the Gentiles. If that means to you that those parables are constrained by time and have no significance to us today, then I guess you're wrong and some parables are constrained by time.

If OTOH, you believe as I do that these parables were addressed to 1st century Israel and foretold events that were to happen in the 1st century, but they have profound implications for us today (and I think the LOrd opening the door of salvation to us non-Jews is a profound implication), then you are again mistaken when you say I'm wrong about the parable of the rich man and Lazarus, because that parable deal with that same subject matter.

Mindonfire wrote:
This is the same mindset that is prevalent amongst Christians today. They believe that they will be raptured and therefore not go through the tribulation or judgement of God just because they call Jesus their savior.
Well, let me assure you, Brother Fire, I am certainly not one of those Christians who believe anyone is going to be "raptured" off this planet for any reason! Laughing

Mindonfire wrote:
Finally what is superficial about taking care of the less fortunate?
There's misunderstanding and there's twisting words. This is twisting words. What I was describing as superficial was a person's financial status, not using it to help others. I think I see what's happening here. You don't have scripture to back up your dogma, and you're not open to the possibility that you don't know it all, so you twist what others say. Can I expect attacks on my character next?

Mindonfire, you have not answered my question about how you know anything about my financial status. And your response to my explanation of the parable of the rich man and Lazarus did not refute any of my points. You simply denied them. That doesn't prove anything.
Back to top
Mindonfire
Alley Cat



Joined: 24 Aug 2005

Posts: 188


PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 9:07 am    Post subject: Re: esthalogy Reply with quote

golfjack wrote:
Hi all, we have been going over this topic over and over. You know my position and I know yours. I don't think we can agree. There is no sense for me to go over and over what I believe is Biblical.

Mind: I have one question: Does a believer have to go through the Tribulation: I know an unbeliever will have too, whether Jew or gentile.I believe the Bible says that a remant (converted Jews) and a Multitude will be saved during the first three and a half years. Also, if one takes the Mark of the beast, He is doomed for all eternity. I do believe in the departure of the believers before the tribulation starts.


May God bless, golfjack




Good Day
All Believers will go through the tribulation or judgement of God. Some will make it and some will not. Read what I wrote in Wrath in Tribulation and you will see what the Tribulation or judgement of God is about.
Back to top
golfjack
Lion King



Joined: 24 Aug 2005

Posts: 1112

Location: arizona

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 9:21 am    Post subject: reply Reply with quote

Yes, all will have to through judgement. There are many judgements mentioned in the Bible, but there are 2 Judgements that we should be concerned about. The judgement seat of Christ is for believers, and the Great White Thrown judgement is for unbelievers.

May God bless, golfjack
Back to top
Fake
Tiger



Joined: 03 May 2003

Posts: 862


PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:16 am    Post subject: Re: esthalogy Reply with quote

golfjack wrote:
some might favor communism
Not really that impossible to understand, as Jesus was one of the very first persons in written history that were clearly socialist in his politics.


Fake
Back to top
golfjack
Lion King



Joined: 24 Aug 2005

Posts: 1112

Location: arizona

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 12:20 pm    Post subject: reply Reply with quote

It would be a complete collapse of America if She became socialistic.


May God bless, golfjack
Back to top
FFT
Emperor of the Galaxy



Joined: 26 Mar 2005

Posts: 5845

Location: Memphis

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 12:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why?
Back to top
Mindonfire
Alley Cat



Joined: 24 Aug 2005

Posts: 188


PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 12:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zathrus wrote:
Mindonfire wrote:
Good Day
So are you of the mind that this mindset or mentality of the Pharisees was limited to the 1st century.
I'm sorry, Mr Onfire, you are not proving your point by misinterpreting what I say. What I wrote is there in text for anyone to read.

Mindonfire wrote:
Your statement is contradictory. Hypocrisy is a big personality flaw. If Jesus was pointing out the hypocrisy of those who trusted in their own righteousness then he was pointing out a flaw. And they didn’t appreciate it. Why do you think they killed him.
Jesus's ministry was to show Israel first that their trusting in their good works would not lead to salvation. He did not go around pointing out peoples' moral and personality flaws just because He thought His Father wanted to straighten everyone out. Nor is that the job of the church today.

Mindonfire wrote:
Thirdly what you don’t seem to understand is that the parables that Jesus spoke are not constrained by time.
You are, again, misinterpreting me here. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt this time. The parable of the wedding feast and the parable of the vineyard - both of these very clearly dealt with national Israel in the 1st century rejecting the gospel and the gospel then being preached to the Gentiles. If that means to you that those parables are constrained by time and have no significance to us today, then I guess you're wrong and some parables are constrained by time.

If OTOH, you believe as I do that these parables were addressed to 1st century Israel and foretold events that were to happen in the 1st century, but they have profound implications for us today (and I think the LOrd opening the door of salvation to us non-Jews is a profound implication), then you are again mistaken when you say I'm wrong about the parable of the rich man and Lazarus, because that parable deal with that same subject matter.

Mindonfire wrote:
This is the same mindset that is prevalent amongst Christians today. They believe that they will be raptured and therefore not go through the tribulation or judgement of God just because they call Jesus their savior.
Well, let me assure you, Brother Fire, I am certainly not one of those Christians who believe anyone is going to be "raptured" off this planet for any reason! Laughing

Mindonfire wrote:
Finally what is superficial about taking care of the less fortunate?
There's misunderstanding and there's twisting words. This is twisting words. What I was describing as superficial was a person's financial status, not using it to help others. I think I see what's happening here. You don't have scripture to back up your dogma, and you're not open to the possibility that you don't know it all, so you twist what others say. Can I expect attacks on my character next?

Mindonfire, you have not answered my question about how you know anything about my financial status. And your response to my explanation of the parable of the rich man and Lazarus did not refute any of my points. You simply denied them. That doesn't prove anything.



Good Day

First of all how am I misinterpreting what you said? This is what you said“Even if the parable was spoken to the disciples, which it may certainly have been, it was about the mentality that the Pharisees and others in 1st century Israel had.” All I asked was “ So are you of the mind that this mindset or mentality of the Pharisees was limited to the 1st century.” How is that misinterpreting anything that you said.

Secondly contrary to popular teaching the ministry of Jesus was geared for the Gentiles and not for the Jews. Jesus came so that through Him the Gentiles or those who were non-Jewish might be included back into the fold of God. In the process it showed the Jews or specifically the Pharisees or religious leaders and the whole world their hypocrisy and hardness of heart. Just like the parable of the rich man and Lazarus shows any individual; How can you claim to be in God and of God and yet you can sit there and see your brother who is made in the image of God in need of and wanting help and yet you refuse to help him.

The parable is not only applicable to the Pharisees and Israel. The parables of Jesus are applicable to every human being. By your statements you seem to be of the mindset that some of the parables are limited to Israel.

Thirdly how is a person not using his riches to help the less fortunate who are in superficial . Helping the poor or the less fortunate if you are able to is not superficial at all. It is the duty of the believer. You can’t just sit there and preach Jesus yet ignore someone that you see who is begging for help. You can’t have faith without works. The two go hand in hand like water and wet. You cant ask someone to hand you a glass of water but hold the wet. Just like someone cannot have true faith without the works. Both are inseparable. Just because one claims to be saved by Jesus does not mean that one does not have to bear any good fruit. The evidence of your faith is seen in your fruit.

Finally your financial status is of no importance to me. The money is given to you. Do as you please with it

1 John 3:17 But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels [of compassion] from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him
Back to top
Mindonfire
Alley Cat



Joined: 24 Aug 2005

Posts: 188


PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:43 am    Post subject: Re: esthalogy Reply with quote

Fake wrote:
golfjack wrote:
some might favor communism
Not really that impossible to understand, as Jesus was one of the very first persons in written history that were clearly socialist in his politics.


Fake


What most people especially Christians do not understand is that the early Church were socialist Study the book of acts. They were not capitalists.

Acts 4:34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,

Acts 4:35 And laid [them] down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.

Acts 4:36 And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, [and] of the country of Cyprus,

Acts 4:37 Having land, sold [it], and brought the money, and laid [it] at the apostles' feet.
Back to top
Star
King of the Jungle



Joined: 05 Sep 2004

Posts: 1765

Location: Just moved to south Carolina

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here the Lords rebuke was in accordance to their so called richness and increase of goods they believed they were in NEED OF NOTHING

Rev 3:17 Because thou sayest,"""" I am rich, and increased with goods"""" and have """"need of nothing"""" and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:

Here it shows those who would to GIVE """"ALL THOSE GOODS AWAY"""" Paul shows THIS AS """PROFITTING NOTHING"""Was giving all their goods away the answer here???

1Corinth 13:3 And though I """"bestow all my goods to feed the poor""", and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it PROFITETH ME NOTHING.

THIS is to those (who GAVE """"ALL""" THEIR GOODS to feed the poor) and it PROFITTED """""NOTHING""""" showing they believed that they were RICH BY their GIVING ALL THE GOODS AWAY and BOTH the Lord and Paul point out this same truth = HERE BOTH ARE NOTHING.

Prov 13:7 There is that """"maketh himself rich""" YET HATH NOTHING: [there is] that """"maketh himself poor, yet [hath] great riches"""(Faith see below)

All pertaining to His own righteousness (Rich man) which is counted as loss and DUNG

Phil 3:8 I count all things [but] loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom """"I have suffered the loss of all things""" and do count them [but] DUNG, that I may win Christ. (Zep 1:17) their flesh as the DUNG.

Luke 16:20 And there was a """CERTAIN BEGGAR named Lazarus""" which was laid at HIS GATE, full of sores,

1Sam 2:8 He """"raiseth up the poor out of the dust"""", [and] """LIFTETH UP THE BEGGAR from the DUNGHILL"""" to set [them] among princes, and to """""make them inherit the throne of glory"""" for the pillars of the earth [are] the LORD'S, and he hath set the world upon them.

Luke 16:22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's (Father of faith) bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried

James 2:5 Hath not God """chosen the poor of this world RICH IN FAITH""" and heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him?

Prov 23:4 Labour not to be rich: """"cease from thine own wisdom"""

James 2:6 But ye have despised the poor. Do not RICH MEN oppress you, and draw you before the JUDGMENT SEATS? (Ye are WISE, Ye are KINGS, selfrighteousness)

James 5:1 Go to now, [ye] rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon [you].

They will realize they are miserable because it "comes upon them"

James 1:11 For the sun is no sooner risen with a burning heat, but it withereth the grass, and the flower thereof falleth, and the grace of the fashion of it perisheth: so also shall """the rich man fade away in his ways"""

1Peter 1:4 To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that ""fadeth not away""(as the law= Moses) reserved in heaven for you,

1Peter 5:4 And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a """crown of glory that fadeth not away"""

1Corinth 9:26 Now they [do it] to """obtain a corruptible crown""" but we an incorruptible.

These are all spiritual truths, you can run with these between the glory of man under the OC and the Glory that exceeds in Christ of the New covenant.

Gal 6:8 For he that """soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption""" but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.

Gal 3:3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?

Gal 6:8 For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption(corruptible crown after the flesh= praise of men) but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting (Incorruptible crown after the Spirit= praise of God)

Phil 3:3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God ""in the spirit"" and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and """have no confidence in the flesh"""

Rev 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but [are] the synagogue of Satan.

2Corinth 6:10 As sorrowful, yet alway rejoicing; as """poor, yet making many rich""" as having nothing, and [yet] """possessing all things"""

Yet there were those putting confidence in the flesh who thought they were rich but they were poor.

1 John 3:17 But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels [of compassion] from him, """"how dwelleth the love of God in him"""

Yet at the same time...

1Corinth 13:3 And though I """"bestow all my goods to feed the poor""", and though I give my body to be burned, and HAVE NOT CHARITY, it PROFITETH ME NOTHING.

By this example, even doing in "giving all your goods to the poor" does not say in itself testify on ones behalf that the love of God is in you. This is where doing so and the "bowels of compassion" born of love is the underlying cause for extending ones soul to the needy. So again an outer doing not in accordance with an inner work (by the Spirit) born of the love of God.


Nowadays you lay any form of money by any preachers feet it goes into their own pocket like Judas pretending he cares about the poor but always tipping his own hand into it. Think the Lord doesn't know that lol He shows it plainly. So if one wants to watch the "peddling of the word of God for profit" it surely shows the MANY that do such a thing. The corruptness was always shown standing at the pulpit. The rebuke was always for the religious leaders. Christ rocks!
Back to top
golfjack
Lion King



Joined: 24 Aug 2005

Posts: 1112

Location: arizona

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:46 pm    Post subject: reply Reply with quote

Star, I also think preachers who do their work just for money are wrong, however if a preacher wants to preach in the USA, and overseas, wouldn't you think that money is necesary for travel, food, lodging, and quite necessary to spread the message of the Gospel?



May God bless, golfjack
Back to top
Star
King of the Jungle



Joined: 05 Sep 2004

Posts: 1765

Location: Just moved to south Carolina

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are those indeed who emcompass land over sea and do more harm then good, even Jesus spoke this.

Each one is accountable to God, Judas is simply a fact. So also are those of whom Paul spoke of, the many he said peddle the word of God for profit. I did not write this, the Lord and Paul show this truth.

You needn't justify yourself or others to me, nor need my opinion on this. It is what it is. God knows mens motives, He's not stupid, are they not written?
Back to top
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003

Posts: 6817

Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
You needn't justify yourself or others to me, nor need my opinion on this. It is what it is. God knows mens motives, He's not stupid, are they not written?

Yet people never cease to express their opinions and quote scriptures which they assert supports those opinions.

True that God knows men's motive, isn't it best then that man remains silent on the issue?
Back to top
Star
King of the Jungle



Joined: 05 Sep 2004

Posts: 1765

Location: Just moved to south Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 6:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ABSOLUTELY JP Thats why I will not judge another after what Paul or what the Lord had said. Whats written is written, no one needs justifies themselves to anyone (before men). To the Lord (the righteous judge) they give account of themselves. THAT was my point.

Did you see another?
Back to top
RevJP
Moderator



Joined: 18 Apr 2003

Posts: 6817

Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No. Did I indicate that I saw another? If so, I offer my apologies. I merely pointed out that often times we make those judgements and offer scripture to support our judgements, when in truth we should refrain from entering into that mode at all.
Back to top
christina
Cobra



Joined: 01 Nov 2004

Posts: 455


PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 6:33 am    Post subject: Re: reply Reply with quote

golfjack wrote:
Star, I also think preachers who do their work just for money are wrong, however if a preacher wants to preach in the USA, and overseas, wouldn't you think that money is necesary for travel, food, lodging, and quite necessary to spread the message of the Gospel?
May God bless, golfjack



It all comes down to the motive behind someones action.


Quote:
So if one wants to watch the "peddling of the word of God for profit" it surely shows the MANY that do such a thing. The corruptness was always shown standing at the pulpit. The rebuke was always for the religious leaders. Christ rocks!


you know what comes to mind, Wolves in Sheeps clothing!
We are all suppost to be brothers and sisters, we are all suppost to be spreading the word of God none of us are above thee other; if we place certain people over us are we obeying God?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Revelation and End of Times All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 

© 2001-2007