Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index Bible-Discussion.com
Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 

Eschatology discussion - Preterism/Dispensationalism


Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Revelation and End of Times
Author Message
Zathrus
King Kong



Joined: 28 Aug 2002
Posts: 2269

Location: WI USA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 6:19 am    Post subject: Eschatology discussion - Preterism/Dispensationalism Reply with quote

I'm opening this thread to continue a discussion started in the Debate Forum under another topic.
Robert wrote:
Good to hear from you. So you are a whole preterest, well one tenth would have been too much.
I get this a lot with dispensationalists. My eschatology and theirs (yours) is about as opposite as two theologies can get. From your responses to some of the other posts in this thread, I'm not sure you're interested in discussing these differences. I had looked forward to some very interesting discussions.

Robert wrote:
The only way you can come up your position is a wholesale twisting of Seriptures and denial of plain words.
How thoroughly have you studied scripture from a preterist perspective, Robert?

Robert wrote:
As an example, how do you see the one thousand years of Rev. 20, and what are you going to do with Acts 3:19-24 where Peter tells Israel that if they will repent that God will send Jesus back from heaven for the restoration of all things?
Ah, chilliasm. The foundation of the Christian faith, according to Jack Van Impe. How strange, I thought Jesus Christ was the foundation of our faith.

Anyway, where else in scripture is the reign of Christ said to last 1000 years? The only place I've ever found is that one passage in Rev 20. And Rev 20 is a very hard chapter to make sense of for any eschatological school of thought, certainly including dispensationalism. Daniel 2 and Daniel 7, which Rev 20 quotes and alludes heavily from, both describe Christ's reign as everlasting. I think the practice of building an entire doctrine on one passage of scripture, a difficult to understand passage of prophecy to boot, and reading Rev 20 without comparing it with other passages in the Bible that could shed more light on it is a pretty shaky practice, don't you?

Not only in Daniel, but in Isaiah, the minor prophets, and the new testament - everywhere else the kingdom of our Lord is mentioned, it is called an everlasting kingdom. Plain words, Robert. Why would dispensationalists deny plain words to build a doctrine based on one probably misinterpreted passage? The fact that everywhere else in the Bible, the reign of Christ is spoken of as everlasting certainly indicates to me that probably the 1000 years in Rev 20 has a deeper meaning that we need to understand. I do not ignore what the scripture says, not in Rev 20 nor elsewhere. If God owns the cattle on 1000 hills, does He not own the cattle on the 1001st?

Robert wrote:
And what about Rev. 1:7 where it says "every eye will see him"?
Why don't we quote the whole verse?
Quote:
7 Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.
In order to fulfill this, God would have to resurrect those who crucified the Lord BEFORE He returns in the clouds so they can see it. Does dispensationalism teach that the wicked are resurrected before Christ returns after the tribulation, or are they resurrected by Christ after He returns? I think God faithfully fulfilled this prophecy in the lifetime of those to whom it was made. The kindreds of the earth are the tribes of the land. And they did wail because of Him.
Consider this verse also:
Quote:
Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

The "ye" in the first quote above is the high priests. I think Jesus faithfully fulfilled this prophecy in their lifetime.
With the moderators' kind permission, here is a link to an article that deals with Rev 1:7 in far greater detail. http://www.preteristarchive.com/Preterism/preston-don_p_16.html
I encourage you to read it. It takes a look at Zechariah 12, which Rev 1:7 is quoted from, and investigates what is being discussed in Zech 12. If we can go back to the old testament sources that Revelation quotes from, we can gain a lot of understanding into the meaning of the Revelation. Zechariah 12 deals with Christ's redemptive work in the 1st century. That's the context we have to see Rev 1:7 in.

Since you've asked some hard questions to challenge me, may do likewise?

1.)Paul wrote:
Quote:
1 Thessalonians 4
17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
18 Wherefore comfort one another with these words.
1 Thessalonians 5
1 But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you.
2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night.
3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

This, according to Jack Van Impe, puts the day of the Lord that comes as a thief just before the 7 year tribulation, when the church will be taken away, and sudden destruction, (the tribulation) will come upon the world. So Paul is pre-trib.

Jesus said
Quote:
29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
This puts the event Paul described after the tribulation. So Jesus is post-trib.

Peter wrote:
Quote:
2 Peter 3:10
But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

So Peter puts the day of the Lord that comes as a thief at the end of the millenial reign when the earth is destroyed and the new earth created. A 1007 year difference from Paul's eschatology!

Who's right? Or more charitably, how does dispensationalism reconcile these passages, besides splitting into pre-, mid-, and post-trib camps?

2. The apostles awaited the coming of God's kingdom on earth. According to dispensationalists, the millenial reign will be accompanied by the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem and the resuming of animal sacrifices. This raises a few questions:

    Why were the apostles so eagerly awaiting the rebuilding of the temple and the reinstatement of animal sacrifice when these things both still existed in their day?

    Why did they speak of the new covanent of grace as a new and better covanent when God intends to bring it to an end when His kingdom comes, and reinstate the animal sacrifices of the old covanent?


3.)With regard to the "catching up" in 1 Thess 4, Paul wrote of a man who was caught up to the third heaven, "whether in the body or out of the body" Paul didn't know. How did this man experience this "catching up" to heaven, if it's not even known if he left his body, much less the earth?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Coburn
Little Hamster



Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 75


PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 6:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zathrus,

Great points about the temple. God destroyed the temple and Old Covenant system and man wants to rebuild them.

I once read an article about an attempt to rebuild the temple in the 4 th century (I think) that was abandon because of gases seeping out of the ground and then exploding. Something like that anyway, I'm not sure if its a true account or not.

If the temple ever is rebuilt though, I'm converting to Islam Wink

Cheers,

Coburn
_________________
"There are very many who though not denying the Holy Scriptures, do not believe in endless torments." Saint Augustine
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zathrus
King Kong



Joined: 28 Aug 2002
Posts: 2269

Location: WI USA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Coburn, good to hear from you. There's been a lot of great discussion lately in your "Preterist Woes" thread.

I've heard of attempts in the last century to rebuild the temple, but obviously the Muslims who now control that piece of land are not permitting it. I think there's Biblical significance to that. It sort of reminds me of Galatians 4, and who are the spiritual children of Isaac, and who are the spiritual children of Ishmael. If the temple were successfully rebuilt, to me it would not in any way indicate a fulfillment of any prophecy. And I'd bet a paycheck that if it's ever rebuilt, there will be no cloud of glory filling it when it's finished.

And I think it'd be safe to bet that the dispensationalist expectation of Levites resuming animal sacrifices in it will never happen, because since the Babylonian captivity, and all the scattering and intermarriage that has gone on since, it's my understanding that it's no longer possible to tell who is descended from Levi! Over the years of Israel's being in captivity, the geneological records were lost!

I started this thread to continue a discussion with Robert, who is a dispensationalist who posted here for a while and posed some very challenging questions for me regarding preterism. I reponded to all of his questions, and then I asked if I could do likewise and pose a few questions for him to address. But he seems to have left us. I've seen no new posts from him in weeks now. Sad
I wish him well.
_________________
Establishing the law by receiving the righteousness which is by faith, without the deeds of the law!

2 Cor 3 "11For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious."

Certified Chalcedon Compliant
Officially approved in 451
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6360

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

was it ever really about a physical temple though?

God says he does not live in houses built by mens hands.

know ye not that YE are the temple.

Is God interested in building a physical structure or a building of believers?

something about looking at the outward appearance of things and not the spirit by which God searches things.

Eph:2:19: Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;
Eph:2:20: And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;
Eph:2:21: In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:
Eph:2:22: In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.

so the question remains: will the true temple ever be finished?
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Zathrus
King Kong



Joined: 28 Aug 2002
Posts: 2269

Location: WI USA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A very good point, lone traveller. The dispensationalist teaching that the earthly temple will be rebuilt denies the Bible's teaching that we are the temple of God.
A dispensationalist may counter that with "Yes, the Gentile believers are a spiritual temple, but Israel will have its rebuilt earthly temple!" But in the very passage from Ephesians that you quoted, Paul specifically says that this spiritual temple is comprised of both Jew and Gentile believers, so the dispensationalist teaching that Israel has a separate eschatological hope than the church is shown to be false.
_________________
Establishing the law by receiving the righteousness which is by faith, without the deeds of the law!

2 Cor 3 "11For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious."

Certified Chalcedon Compliant
Officially approved in 451
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Star
King of the Jungle



Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 1765

Location: Just moved to south Carolina

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mark 14:57 And there arose certain, and bare FALSE WITNESS AGAINST HIM, saying,

This is misconstruing Jesus words and the scriptures call them false witnesses Shocked

Mark 14:58 We heard him say, I will DESTROY THIS TEMPLE THAT IS MADE WITH HANDS, and within three days I WILL BUILD ANOTHER MADE WITHOUT HANDS.. Shocked sounds like many today.

Mark 14:59 But ((( neither so did their witness agree together.)))

Mat 26:60 But found none: yea, though many false witnesses came, [yet] found they none. AT THE LAST came TWO FALSE WITNESSES

Again, another false witness

Mat 26:61 And said, This [fellow] said, I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days.

TO ME??? This is a TYPE of falsewitness OF THE RESURRECTION (Paul spoke about being found a false witness of Christ and these above speak to the very thing that I see today as well.

Paul points two the two false witnesses in TYPE HERE...

2Titus 2:17 And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is ((( Hymenaeus and Philetus)))

2Titus 2:18 Who CONCERNING THE TRUTH (CHRIST) have ERRED, saying that THE RESURRECTION IS PAST ALREADY; and ((( overthrow the faith of some.)))

But THIS is what Jesus really said...

John 2:19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.

But this is how they "heard it"

John 2:20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?

John clarifies

John 2:21But he spake of the temple of his body.

Isaiah 6:2 After two days will he revive us: IN the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight.

Paul speaks of the lively hope and the knowing Him and the power of His resurection and the raising of the dead in the present. Although we know His works are finshed and he arose he still raises up in Him by His power. Thats how I see it. Not something in "the past" but something He has done yet I'm to lay hold of and apprehend in myself what He laid hold of me for, and this is shown by Paul.

Jesus Christ is the same yesterday To day and for ever Very Happy who was and who IS and who is to come.

Zath, I think I scared Robert off with my goblygook Laughing
_________________
God love ya In Him Starlaa
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6360

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sure it wasn't the mishmash? Wink
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
MoJo
Moderator



Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 3238

Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zathrus and Coburn, I'm curious how you would answer Lone's question. Will the temple ever be finished or do you see it as having already been finished at some point ????

Very Happy Very Happy
_________________
matt 6: 34 "Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
golfjack
Lion King



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 1127

Location: arizona

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 6:04 pm    Post subject: Charismatic's view of end times Reply with quote

Hi all, I am a born again, spirit-filled believer, who believes: THIS IS MY BIBLE, I BELIEVE WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS ABOUT ME, I BELIEVE WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS I CAN HAVE. I am a Word of faith kind of guy, who simply puts his trust in the Word of God.

I am a pre-millennialist. However there are several other thelogical positions concerning the return of Christ in relationship to His millenial reign. These schools of thought are the result of different approaches to interpreting Revelation 20 :1-6, the most significant passage on the millennium.

POSTMILLENIAL: The postmillinnial position says that Jesus will return at the end of the millinnium. Postmillinnialists contend that we are presently in the millinnium. The postmillinnial school focuses greatly on scripture verses in which metaphors are used. For example, Jesus said that the kingdom of God is like yeast (Matt. 13:33; Luke 13:20-21). A postmillennialist would immediately say that this means we are presently in the millinium and that the kingdom of God is going to take a thousand years to work itself into every area of society and eventually take over the world so that good conquers evil. Similar interpretations are made of the parable of the sower (Matt. 13:1-9;Mark 4:1-20; Luke 8:4-15), the parable of weeds amomg the wheat (Matt. 13:24-30, 37 -43) and the parable of the dragnet (Matt. 13:47-50). In the parable of the sower, the postmillennialist says that the seed is the kingdom, and ultimately it will take over the world. In reality the seed is the Word of God and works only in those who hear and obey (Matt. 13:23). In both the parable of the weeds and the parable of the dragnet, scriptures are interpreted by postmillennialists to say evil is overcome gradually by good. But Jesus was refering to a day of judgement when angels would be called upon to separate the children of God from the children of Satan. In order to preserve their point of view, liberal postmillenialists have to ignore statements from Jesus such as, The love of many shall wax cold (in the end times) (Matt. 24:12). A postmillennialist would believe that we are presently in the millennium or about to usher it in, and when we have finished Possessing the land, we will bring about the second coming of Christ. In other words, they believe that the Kingdom of God has arrived and we are presently ruling and reigning with Christ.

I believe that there are dangers of postmillennial eschatology. In evangelical reconstructionism as the belief that Christians have the mandate from God to reconstruct society by strictly instituting the civil code of the law of Moses over the governments of the world. The error in this thinking is the belief that man's efforts can create a perfect government which will usher the return of Christ. In reality Jesus said everything would get worse and the love of many wuld grow clod (Matt. 24:12).

A STRONG WARNING FROM THE PAST: Finis Jennings Dake, one of the most outstanding thelogical thinkers of his day offers us a strong about postmillenial thelogy. Dake says the doctrine of the apostles until the third century when a thelogian named Origen SPIRITUALIZED THE wORD. fROM THAT TIME ON, MANY CEASED TO BELIEVE IN A LITERAL RETURN AND AN EARTHLY REIGN OF CHRIST. Dake says that not until the Reformation was the biblical concept of a literal millenium restored. He adds, the theory of postmillennialism is dangerous and unscriptural. It would have us substitute man and his works for the work of God. It would have us believe that man is going to usher in his own millennium and secure his own happiness by his own efferts. This was a widely held school of thought until 1900. Since the postmillennialist believes we are in the millennium, they interpret this to mean that Satan has been restricted in his activities. But those who maintain a high view of the inspiration of scripture see no need to interpret it in any other way but literally. Satan is clearly not bound or restricted in the present affairs of humanity.

CHARISMATIC THELOGY AGREES WITH SCRIPTURE: WE ARE MORE THAN CONQUERORS THROUGH CHRIST JESUS (Rom. 8:37).

In closing this post it is very important to note that all major charismatic prophesy teachers are premillennialists who believe in a literal millennial reign of Chrisat. These teachers agree with and quote mainline evengelical prophesy teachers.

I hope this post helps to explain my belief that there will be a rapture and also a second coming of Jesus Christ. (LORD OF LORDS, KING OF KINGS).

Have a great day in the Lord, golfjack
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Star
King of the Jungle



Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 1765

Location: Just moved to south Carolina

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Golfjack? huh? who are all these people your pointing to?

Dake says the doctrine of the apostles until the third century when a thelogian named Origen SPIRITUALIZED THE wORD. fROM THAT TIME ON, MANY CEASED TO BELIEVE IN A LITERAL RETURN AND AN EARTHLY REIGN OF CHRIST. Dake says that not until the Reformation was the biblical concept of a literal millenium restored. He adds, the theory of postmillennialism is dangerous and unscriptural.

Star replies,

Spiritualize the word? Laughing The Word IS Spirit, the SPIRIT IS TRUTH, The LORD SAITH THAT. Just because it is SPIRIT makes it no less LITERAL.


I havent a clue concerning the "doctrines of men" I can't even understand what you are talking about while bearing witness "of them". These terms and categories used by men? Not a clue, its chinese to me. Perhaps you have the gift of tongues.

What would the reign of Christ "look like" to you?

In Him
Stream
_________________
God love ya In Him Starlaa
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6360

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MoJo wrote:
Zathrus and Coburn, I'm curious how you would answer Lone's question. Will the temple ever be finished or do you see it as having already been finished at some point ????

Very Happy Very Happy


I think God keeps building it and man keeps tearing it down.

maybe one of these go arounds we'll get it right Mo...

Lone
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
golfjack
Lion King



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 1127

Location: arizona

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:24 pm    Post subject: reply Reply with quote

Hi there, If you are asking if I pray in tongues, yes I do. Can I interpret tongues,sometimes. Yes, I read certain books about Church History. Do I believe them? It's like asking me if I believe that George Washington was the president. Remember, When listening to a preacher, we can have discernment. History is history, and the Bible is Bible. Of course, the Word is Jesus Christ. At Pentacost, the Holy Spirit was sent to the apostles and others in the room. They were all empowered by the Holy Spirit.

Right now, I don't rule anyone, but during the one thousand years, the redeemed will rule and reign with Christ. Postmillennialism is the idea that We are ruling right now. My Bible tells me that Satan is the ruler of the world now, but we as believers don't don't have to live in his world. We have been transformed out of darkness into the light of our Lord Jesus Christ. Then the question is, who are we to rule? We rule over the ones that survived the great Tribulation and their children. Yes, there is much symbols used in the book of revelation. Therefore to believe that we are ruling and ruling and reigning with Christ right now, is not only unbiblical, but nonsense.

May God bless, golfjack
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lone-traveler
Emperor of the Universe



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 6360

Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

what is it we are going to rule and when?

Lk:12:42: And the Lord said, Who then is that faithful and wise steward, whom his lord shall make ruler over his household, to give them their portion of meat in due season?
Lk:12:43: Blessed is that servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing.
Lk:12:44: Of a truth I say unto you, that he will make him ruler over all that he hath.

2Cor:10:13: But we will not boast of things without our measure, but according to the measure of the rule which God hath distributed to us, a measure to reach even unto you.
2Cor:10:14: For we stretch not ourselves beyond our measure, as though we reached not unto you: for we are come as far as to you also in preaching the gospel of Christ:
2Cor:10:15: Not boasting of things without our measure, that is, of other men's labours; but having hope, when your faith is increased, that we shall be enlarged by you according to our rule abundantly,
2Cor:10:16: To preach the gospel in the regions beyond you, and not to boast in another man's line of things made ready to our hand.

1Tm:5:17: Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine.

Heb:13:7: Remember them which have the rule over you, who have spoken unto you the word of God: whose faith follow, considering the end of their conversation.

Rv:20:4: And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

Rv:20:6: Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.

need to do a study on thrones...

Rv:4:4: And round about the throne were four and twenty seats: and upon the seats I saw four and twenty elders sitting, clothed in white raiment; and they had on their heads crowns of gold

Rv:14:3: And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth.

Rv:5:9: And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation;
Rv:5:10: And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth.

Rv:22:1: And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.
Rv:22:2: In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.
Rv:22:3: And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him:
Rv:22:4: And they shall see his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads.
Rv:22:5: And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever.
Rv:22:6: And he said unto me, These sayings are faithful and true: and the Lord God of the holy prophets sent his angel to shew unto his servants the things which must shortly be done.

So we have Kings, Priests, and judges. Interesting to check out the books of deut. and kings, leviticus... maybe they give us a preview of things to come.. Or maybe we can learn from past mistakes??

just some thoughts...

Lone
_________________
Joh 15:14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
Joh 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Coburn
Little Hamster



Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 75


PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 4:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Temple had to go

Heb 9:8 The Holy Ghost this signifying, that the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest, while as the first tabernacle was yet standing:

The destuction of the temple was the final act of Christs redemptive work that put away the sacrifical system and began His "once for all time" reconciliation. It was the manifestation of Him "fulfilling all that was written". The gospel was already being mingled with the Old system laws durring the transitional period of the Covenants, so without the destruction of the temple the old system would have been incorperated into the new.

In Heb 8:13 it says the Old Covenant is "ready to vanish away", which it did when the "Capital" of that system was destroyed; the temple :

Heb 8:13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.

Concerning the Temple :

Heb 9:9-11 Which was a figure for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience; Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation. But Christ being come a high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building;

Rebuilding the temple would be regressing back to the law, which Paul encouraged his followers not to do.

Is the New Temple complete ? I believe it was completed in 70 AD. Man was unable to reconcile himself to God through the law, he simply failed. Under Christ, all are reconciled to God by "not imputing their trespasses unto them", which leaves Paul to beg "be ye reconciled" :

2Co 5:19-21 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation. Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us; we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God. For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.

Cheers,

Coburn
_________________
"There are very many who though not denying the Holy Scriptures, do not believe in endless torments." Saint Augustine
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zathrus
King Kong



Joined: 28 Aug 2002
Posts: 2269

Location: WI USA

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 6:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MoJo wrote:
Zathrus and Coburn, I'm curious how you would answer Lone's question. Will the temple ever be finished or do you see it as having already been finished at some point ????

Very Happy Very Happy
I believe, like Coburn said, that it is finished. I believe the scripture in Revelation 21 that says "Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men and He shall dwell among them..." is fulfilled. We are His true temple. Revelation 21 also says that the Lord Almighty and the Lamb are the temple that John saw in the New Jerusalem, which he identifies as the bride of the Lamb. I believe that's been fulfilled too.

As Coburn pointed out from Heb 9:8, while the shadow of the true temple still stood, the true temple was not yet complete. The passing away of the earthly temple signaled the passing away of the last remaining elements of the old covenant, and with the shadows gone, what remained was the substance. As the writer of Hebrews said, "26Whose voice then shook the earth: but now he hath promised, saying, Yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also heaven.
27And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain."
_________________
Establishing the law by receiving the righteousness which is by faith, without the deeds of the law!

2 Cor 3 "11For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious."

Certified Chalcedon Compliant
Officially approved in 451
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bible-Discussion.com Forum Index -> Revelation and End of Times All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 1 of 10

 

© 2001-2007