 |
Bible-Discussion.com Private Bible Studies and Christian Fellowship Available - Ask Nobby |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Elijah22 Little Guppy
Joined: 13 May 2004
    Posts: 33
|
Posted: Sun May 16, 2004 9:38 pm Post subject: The Roman Catholic Church Inserted The Trinity , The Trinity |
|
|
The Roman Catholic Church Inserted The Trinity , The Trinity Never Existed .
The Father , Then You Have Humanity As His Children , And The Holy Ghost Are The AngelicBeings , You Are Useing 1John 5 ; 7 As If It Is Authentic When In Fact It Has Been Proven To Be A Distorted Scripture Nor Does It Exist In Any Of The Original Manuscripts I Don't Try To Discredit AnyThing Or AnyOne I Just State The Facts , And I Am Only Interested In The Facts . To Answer Your Question . When The Bible Was In Its Original Language Of Aramaic ( Hebrew ) Arabic And Galilean Arabic , The Verse 1John 5 ; 7 , That Has Become The Foundation For The 3 Beings In 1 Concept Called The Trinity DID NOT EXIST , It Also DID NOT EXIST IN GREEK , The Distortion With The Onset Of The Roman Catholic Church The Roman Catholic Inserted The Trinity Verse When They Translated The Bible From Greek To Latin I Purposely Said '' Inserted '' And Not '' Translated '' Because , As I've Already Said The Original Greek Did Not Have This Verse . HowEver , You Will Find Some Greek Translation Have Either The Whole Trinity Verse Or Only A Portion Of It , 1John 5; 7 Is Surround In Controversy Because There Are Two Versions Of This Verse Your Bibilical Scholars Say 1John 5; 7 . That Is Used In Most Bibles Today . Is Either Not The Origian Verse . Or They Say That Its Only Partially Genuine . There Have Been Many Arguments Between Scholars On This Subject When In Fact There Shouldn't Be Any Arguments Because The Original Aramaic And The Greek Manuscripts Don't Have This 1John 5 ; 7 , In It . The Problem Is They Really Don't Want To Admit That The Trinity Really Has No Basis In The Teaching Of Yashua , Making The Trinitarian Churches And Any Other Sect That Believe In This 3 In 1 Concept Obsolete , FurtherMore , In The Ancient Eastern Manusripts By George M Lamsa Which Is A Bible That Is Translated From The Original Aramaic And Syriac Language On Page 1222 , In 1John 5 ; 7 , You Will See That The Orginal Verse Says This ;...
Original Verse <> And The Spirit Testifies That That Very Spirit Is The Truth
Mistraslation <> This is he who came by water and blood , even Jesus Christ , not by water only , but water and blood , And theSpirit testifies that that very Spirt is the truth . And there are three to bear witness the Spirit and , the water and the blood ; and these three are one ,
Now , When You Read 1 John 5 ; 7 In Your Standard Bible , You Will Read This ,
1John 5 ; 7 <> For there are three that bear , Record in heaven , the father , the Word , and the holy ghost ; And these three are one . Do You See How The Verse Were Distorted ? They Are Both 1John 5 ; 7 , But They Don't Say The Same Thing ! That's Because In Your Standard Or Revised Edittion Bible , You Will Find The Original , Verse 5; 7 Has Been Actually Pushed Up To Merge With Verse 5; 6 . Now LQQk At 1John 5 ; 6 Below
'' This is he that came by water and , Blood , even Jesus Christ ; not by Water only , but by water and Blood And It Is The Spirit That Beareth Witness Because The Spirit Is Truth '' ;...The Underlined Segment Is Really The Original 1John 5 ; 7 By Combining The Original Verse 5 ;6 And 5 ; 7 Together , This Left Verse 5 ; 7 Made It Conviently Free To Insert The False '' Trinity '' Verse . Just In Case You Think I Made This Up . Clarke's Commentary Also States That In The Very Early Bibles , This Verse Didn't Exist Clarke's Commentary Says This About 1John 5 ; 7 ;... '' But It Is Likely This Verse Is Not Genuine . It Is Wanting ( Missing ) In Every M .S . ( Manuscript ) Og This Epistle Written Before The Invention Of Printing . One Expecyed . The Condex Montfortii , In '' Trinity College , Dublin ; The Others Which Omit , This Verse Amount To One Hundred And Twelve . It Is Wanting ( Missing ) In Both The Syriac . All The Arabic , Ethiopic , The Coptic , Sahidic .Armenian , Slavonian , In A Word , In All The Ancient Versions . But The Vulgate And Even Of This Version Many Of The Most Ancient And Correct , MSS . Have It Not .. It Is Wanting ( Missing ) Also In All Ancient Greek Father , And In Most Even Of The Latin So What About Those Who Say A Portion Of The Quote Is True , Then There Are Those Scholars Who That Only Part Of This Quote Is Genuine Once Again , Let's Go Back To 1John 5 ; 7 In Your Standard Bible . < '' For There Are Three That Bear Record In Heaven , The Father , The Word , And The Holy Ghost , And These Three Are One > The Underlined Part Of This Quote Is The Part That Your So - Called Scholars Say Is Genuine . Some Bibles Are Equipped With Notes And Small Commentaries To Help You OverStand The Verses You Are Reading . If You Have Such A Bible . It Will Most Likely Say The Same Thing . For Instance , On Page 1776 In The Ryrie Study Bible It Says ;
Verse7 For there are three that bear record in heaven , The father the word , and the Holy Ghost and these three are one .
Commentary 5 ; 7 - 8 Should end with the word record The remander of Verse 7 And part of Verse 8 , Are Not In Any Ancient Greek Manuscript . Only In Later Latin Manuscripts .
Now , They Say Verse 7 And Verse 8 Is Only Partially Genuine . There Are Even Some Greek Translation That Also Supports This Version , But That's Because They Were Translated From English Back Into Greek 1John 5 ; 7 Was Just Another Way To Confuse And Add Another False Sect And Belief . It Is One Of Those Things That Are Kept Quiet Because That Would Be The End Of Some People's Faith And That Is Something That People Who Promote Religion For A Profit Can't Afford To Do . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
brendan Big Guppy
Joined: 04 Sep 2004
   Posts: 47
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 4:41 pm Post subject: amen to that |
|
|
| A near miss is as good as a mile.....YOU GOT A BULLSEYE!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
metothezero Tiger Cub
Joined: 13 Aug 2003
     Posts: 791 Location: east texas
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Very well, 1 John 5:7 is thrown out. It will not be used. Let us try Titus 2:13, is that still in the manuscripts? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tradcat Not So Newbie
Joined: 13 Aug 2005
   Posts: 9 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:13 pm Post subject: The catholic church inserted the trinity? |
|
|
That is absolutely absurd!
How do you know what was in the original manuscripts?
St Jerome was the one who translated the bible from the original manuscripts....i know who I would rather believe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tony Growing Guppy
Joined: 06 May 2005
   Posts: 40
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 5:04 am Post subject: Re: The catholic church inserted the trinity? |
|
|
| tradcat wrote: | That is absolutely absurd!
How do you know what was in the original manuscripts?
St Jerome was the one who translated the bible from the original manuscripts....i know who I would rather believe. |
In the footnotes of 1 John 5:6-7 of the Emphatic Diaglott it says:
"This text concerning the heavenly witness is not contained in any Greek manuscript which was written earlier than the fifteenth century. It is not cited by any of the ecclesiastical writers; not by any of early Latin fathers even when the subjects upon which they treated would naturally have lead them to appeal to it's authority. It is therefore evidently spurious; and was first cited (though not as it now reads) by Vigilius Tapsensis, a Latin writer of no credit, in the latter end of the fith century; but by whom forged, is of no great moment, as its design must be obvious to all"
Robertsons Word Pictures of the New Testament says
"1 John 5:7
For there are three who bear witness (oti treiv eisin oi marturountev).
At this point the Latin Vulgate gives the words in the Textus Receptus, found in no Greek MS. save two late cursives (162 in the Vatican Library of the fifteenth century, 34 of the sixteenth century in Trinity College, Dublin). Jerome did not have it. Cyprian applies the language of the Trinity and Priscillian has it. Erasmus did not have it in his first edition, but rashly offered to insert it if a single Greek MS. had it and 34 was produced with the insertion, as if made to order. The spurious addition is: en twi ouranwi o pathr, o logov kai to agion pneuma kai outoi oi treiv en eisin kai treiv eisin oi marturountev en thi ghi (in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth)...Some Latin scribe caught up Cyprian's exegesis and wrote it on the margin of his text, and so it got into the Vulgate and finally into the Textus Receptus by the stupidity of Erasmus."
A footnote in the NIV says
"FOOTNOTES:
F11:Late manuscripts of the Vulgate testify in heaven: the Father, the Word and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one. 8 And there are three that testify on earth: the (not found in any Greek manuscript before the sixteenth century) "
The Good News Translation simply says:
" 7There are three witnesses: 8the Spirit, the water, and the blood; and all three give the same testimony."
These are just a handful of quotes out of many I could refer you too but I think you get the point here, there is lttle doubt that there are spurious words added to verses 7 and 8.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thunder Lion King
Joined: 13 Sep 2003
    Posts: 1222
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 7:59 am Post subject: A lot of people ... |
|
|
A lot of people ... were raised on the trinity and need it to make the rest work.
Like tightrope walker needs a twig to help balance them self. Take it away and they immediately fall.
The difference is that the bible is completely intact with no mention of a hypothetical trinity.
thunder |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bridget Rattlesnake
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
     Posts: 443
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, unfortunately there were a lot of people who were raised on the trinity, but they do not need it to make the rest work.
Christianity was never based on the trinity, it is based on a man named Jesus Christ, who went through passion week receiving such cruel punishment, and then being nailed to a cross. Many people in that time frame were cruxified, none were raised from the dead. God raised Jesus from the dead Thunder, to show that we have everlasting life through Him. How does the trinity help you with that, for that is the whole basis for our faith. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RevJP Moderator
Joined: 18 Apr 2003
     Posts: 6825 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Let us try Titus 2:13, is that still in the manuscripts?
That is absolutely absurd!
How do you know what was in the original manuscripts? |
I'm wondering where 'original manuscripts' were mentioned? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nobby Board - Admin
Joined: 16 Sep 2002
     Posts: 5033 Location: Missouri
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thunder, who is our Savior?
Who is the Holy Ghost?
Who is God the Father? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thunder Lion King
Joined: 13 Sep 2003
    Posts: 1222
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:02 pm Post subject: Jehovah became a man ... |
|
|
Jehovah became a man ... in the life of Christ and made sure an angel told His earthly parents ( Joseph and Mary ) to call Him Jesus.
They obeyed and the rest is history.
Jehovah ( God for us ) renamed Himself Jesus ( God with us ).
" I have come in my father's name," and," has given Him a name that is abover every other name," and," I and my Father are one." John 10:30
who is our Savior? Jesus
Who is the Holy Ghost? Jesus
Who is God the Father? Jesus
thunder |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FFT Emperor of the Galaxy
Joined: 26 Mar 2005
   Posts: 5857 Location: Memphis
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bridget wrote: | | God raised Jesus from the dead Thunder, to show that we have everlasting life through Him. How does the trinity help you with that, for that is the whole basis for our faith. | He could have just, you know, told us. Would have been simpler. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
golfjack Lion King
Joined: 24 Aug 2005
   Posts: 1113 Location: arizona
|
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:57 pm Post subject: reply |
|
|
Thunder, you are out there in left field, which makes your other doctrine wrong.
May God bless, golfjack |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thunder Lion King
Joined: 13 Sep 2003
    Posts: 1222
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 2:03 am Post subject: Of course ... |
|
|
Of course ... I am wrong golf, that way you can be right.
Thats what you need, to be right, right?
thunder |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
christina Cobra
Joined: 01 Nov 2004
   Posts: 456
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| FFT wrote: | | Bridget wrote: | | God raised Jesus from the dead Thunder, to show that we have everlasting life through Him. How does the trinity help you with that, for that is the whole basis for our faith. | He could have just, you know, told us. Would have been simpler. |
Yeah but some people, you know just dont listen!
Besides he did tell us, but he did more then just talk, He showed us.
He established our faith by proving he was above all and knew all things,
"He said this will happen and it happend"
Jesus is our proof! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FFT Emperor of the Galaxy
Joined: 26 Mar 2005
   Posts: 5857 Location: Memphis
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd imagine it'd be quite difficult to ignore God simultaneously popping up in everyone's head going "yo, I'm here. Believe." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|